The History Channel documentary “I Know What I Saw” is another sign that we are being formally prepared for Disclosure. Watch the full video here and see for yourself!

By David Wilcock


Everybody knows, deep down inside, that UFOs are real. If even one sighting is indeed an authentic extraterrestrial vehicle, then we are not alone — and given the incredible variety of UFOs that have been witnessed, it is just as likely that we are being visited by a wide variety of different civilizations.

Last year we heard testimony from Benjamin Fulford that David Rockefeller personally approached the Japanese emperor for a very substantial cash loan — and this included 500 trillion yen, or roughly 5 trillion US dollars, to fund a “major new expansion of the space program.”

David Rockefeller wanted 5 trillion US dollars to fund a “major new expansion of the space program.”

What could be a sufficient motivation to create such an expansion? How could the public become interested enough in ‘outer space’ again that they would openly sanction such a vast amount of money being spent?

This could be easily explained if it were a result of the disclosure of extraterrestrial civilizations — and particularly that their own ruins can be found on the Moon, Mars and / or other satellites. All that being said, the time of the recent LCROSS mission to ‘bomb the Moon’ with a space probe is certainly interesting — it got everyone looking up at the Moon and expecting to see a big show.

I was encouraged to see the latest October 21st, 2009 article from Michael Salla regarding a formal disclosure, as it took the existing data gathered from my own contacts, and those of Project Camelot, and enhanced it with new information I was not aware of before.


Most notably, it seems that in February 2008, the United Nations decided to put the public on an accelerated timeline for disclosure — one year of releasing hardcore proof that UFOs are real, without the usual skepticism and debunking. Then, if the public did not destabilize or have inappropriate reactions, it would be time to move into full gear and actually bring the truth out:

An official announcement by the Obama administration disclosing the reality of extraterrestrial life is imminent. For several months, senior administration officials have been quietly deliberating behind closed doors how much to disclose to the world about extraterrestrial life. Dissatisfaction among powerful institutions such as the U.S. Navy over the decades-long secrecy policy has given a boost to efforts to disclose the reality of extraterrestrial life and technology.

The impending disclosure announcement follows upon the secret implementation of a year long openness policy on UFOs and extraterrestrial life. Over the period February 12-14, 2008, the United Nations held closed doors discussions where approximately 30 nations secretly agreed on a new openness policy on UFOs and extraterrestrial life in 2009.

The openness policy was implemented but never publicly announced due to threats against UN diplomats not to disclose details of the secret agreement. The secret UN agreement was based on two conditions. First, UFOs would continue to appear around the world; and second, the openness policy would not lead to social unrest in liberal democracies. Both conditions have been satisfied making it possible for the next stage to begin – official disclosure of extraterrestrial life.

Obama’s September 24, 2009 chairing of the UN Security Council meeting on nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament, signaled his emerging leadership role in tackling major global issues such as nuclear weapons. The Nobel Peace Prize was an important step in giving global legitimacy to President Obama in making an extraterrestrial disclosure announcement.

Obama is therefore poised to play a prominent role in the increased global governance that will be necessary after an extraterrestrial disclosure announcement. The timing would most likely coincide sometime soon after his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech on December 10, 2009 in Oslo, Norway.

There have been various sources that have revealed deliberations are underway to make an announcement concerning the existence of extraterrestrial life by the end of 2009. These include Dr Pete Peterson, a whistleblower who has recently emerged revealing high level discussions have taken place concerning announcing the existence of extraterrestrial life. In a Project Camelot interview, Dr Peterson revealed that “Obama is planning to disclose the reality of ET contact by the end of the year; and that most, but not all, of the ET visitors are friendly.”

Another source is David Wilcock, a prominent researcher of emerging scientific paradigms. Wilcock has been told by additional independent sources that extraterrestrial disclosure will take place by the end of 2009. He furthermore claimed in a Coast to Coast AM radio interview that “a 2-hour international TV special has already been booked that will introduce [several different] alien species, similar to humans, to the world.”

In addition, popular NASA and space researcher, Richard Hoagland, has publicly come forward to reveal that the October 9, LCROSS ‘bombing’ mission of the moon, discovered an ancient base at the moon’s South Pole.

Reviewing the scientific data achieved by NASA’s LCROSS mission, Hoagland concluded, also on the popular late night Coast to Coast AM radio show, that “LCROSS is part of a carefully constructed campaign to prepare the populace for imminent disclosure. The President of the United States will soon announce that scientists have discovered ruins on the moon, he added. Nobody saw the LCROSS debris plume because the probes struck a building which swallowed the effects of the explosion.”

Finally, two independent and confidential sources have revealed to me that face to face meetings have recently occurred between U.S. military officials with one or more groups of extraterrestrial visitors. This has allegedly led to confidence being built for future cooperation with the extraterrestrials that will be formally announced to the world public either at the end of 2009, or early 2010.

[DW: I have heard a similar report from other sources, but did not mention this when I was on Coast. It only adds to the overall weight of the case.]

In conclusion, a diverse number of sources and events point to some form of extraterrestrial disclosure being made by the end of 2009, or early 2010. Official disclosure will most likely emerge in either of two scenarios. One is that President Obama will announce the existence of extraterrestrial visitors, and describe one or more of these to the world.

This scenario is supported by Peterson, Wilcock, and my own confidential sources. The second scenario is that an announcement will be made concerning the discovery of artificial structures at the moon’s South Pole, as revealed by the LCROSS mission. This scenario is supported by Hoagland.

[DW: As far as I know, this is Hoagland’s own conclusion, and does not have independent support from insider testimony.]

Which ever of the above scenarios is used for announcing the existence of extraterrestrial life or technology, President Obama will figure prominently. Behind the scenes, powerful institutions are ensuring that nothing derails the planned disclosure announcement. The disclosure will follow upon a year of greater government openness on UFOs in accord with a policy secretly developed at the United Nations.

If extraterrestrial disclosure does occur at the end of 2009 or early 2010, President Obama will lead an unprecedented effort to promote global governance through the United Nations. The Obama administration and its supporters are poised to take a bold step forward in helping our planet become an interplanetary culture that openly deals with the challenges posed by extraterrestrial life.

See also: Is Obama Nobel Peace Prize prelude to extraterrestrial disclosure?


Obama Chairs UN Security Council on Nuclear Disarmament



Remember — this is a war. Things could easily happen to throw off Obama’s current timeline that we’ve heard from these various witnesses. I have not received any specific intuitive data as to the actual timing of Disclosure, and therefore will not see this as a failure of my own intuition if the inital dates pass without any apparent action.

The insider sources have also said that anything and everything will be done to try to stop this disclosure… but thankfully the President’s security is tight enough that they won’t allow for another Kennedy-type event to occur. That still doesn’t mean it’s a sure thing — not at all.

Nonetheless, I completely agree with Dr. Salla that there are multiple contingency plans in place for disclosure to occur somewhere between now and the first quarter of 2010. If we haven’t seen anything by, say, April or May of next year at the very latest, then I would expect that there will be some very obvious reasons why by that point.

There are multiple contingency plans for disclosure to occur somewhere between now and the first quarter of 2010.

Either way, my intuitive data IS saying that we’re going to see a spectacular defeat of the negative elite and a major shift for the positive in the world economic and political climate. It also seems, from what I’ve heard, that this will either lead the way for, or occur alongside of, a disclosure. That I definitely am willing to put out there boldly and bluntly.

It may be that the insiders are supporting this disclosure simply because they have run out of time to prop up the economy with hot-air paper money, and need something new to inspire the public and stop a full-scale financial meltdown.

I’m being very serious here. If you are ready for a trip ‘down the rabbit hole’ and don’t mind some distorted audio (the volume on this clip is too high), then check out this 60 Minutes documentary from the fall of 2008 — after the previous round:



The news about this recent wave of foreclosures already hit just a couple weeks ago — strongly enough to make a huge full-page headline on Huffington Post. We just found out that the last three months have had more home foreclosures than ever before in American history:

“Worst Three Months of All Time” for Home Foreclosures

NEW YORK ( — Despite concerted government-led and lender-supported efforts to prevent foreclosures, the number of filings hit a record high in the third quarter, according to a report issued Thursday.

“They were the worst three months of all time,” said Rick Sharga, spokesman for RealtyTrac, an online marketer of foreclosed homes.

During that time, 937,840 homes received a foreclosure letter — whether a default notice, auction notice or bank repossession, the RealtyTrac report said. That means one in every 136 U.S. homes were in foreclosure, which is a 5% increase from the second quarter and a 23% jump over the third quarter of 2008…

No end in sight

The foreclosure crisis may not diminish anytime soon. “The fastest growing area is in the 180 days late-plus category, the most seriously delinquent borrowers,” Sharga said. “It’s going to be a lingering problem.”

Plus, the RealtyTrac statistics may understate the depth of the foreclosure mess because lender and government actions have delayed many filings. As a result, some delinquencies have not been counted on the foreclosure tallies. That means the crisis may not end quickly.

And because there are so many delinquent borrowers, Sharga predicts the banks will be slow to take back their properties and put the repossessed homes back on the market.

“It’s hard to envision [the banks] putting millions on properties up for sale and cratering prices,” he said. “Recovery will be slow and gradual. I don’t see home prices getting much better until 2013.”


The mainstream media is also coming out with blatant attacks against the soft white underbelly of the financial industry. This recent article revealed some unseemly facts — the financial industry accounts for 41 percent of all business profits made in the US, and a whopping 8 percent of our entire Gross Domestic Product: 

Financial Sector Takes 41% of All Profits and 8% GDP

Over the last several decades, the financial sector has grown relentlessly. It has doubled in size over the last 14 years. During the period 1973 to 1985 the financial sector never earned more than 16% of domestic profits. This decade, it has averaged 41% of all the profits earned by businesses in the U.S.

In 1947 the financial sector represented only 2.5% of our gross domestic product. In 2006 it had risen to 8%. In other words, of every 12.5 dollars earned in the United States, one goes to the financial sector, much of which, let us recall, produces nothing.

That growth has not been among community or regional banks — or credit unions. I’m talking about Wall Street.

Wall Street’s growth is one big reason that most of America’s economic growth during the last decade has flowed into the hands of investment bankers, stock traders and partners in firms like Goldman Sachs.

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities reports that fully two-thirds of all income gains during the last economic expansion (2002 to 2007) flowed to the top 1% of the population. And that, in turn, is one of the chief reasons why the median income for ordinary Americans actually dropped by $2,197 per year since 2000.



The video we’d previously posted in the original version of this article only featured Barney Frank talking about regulating the derivatives market. This regulation is equally as important as going after the Fed, and is in addition to the Audit Bill we’ve been discussing.

It is true that Ron Paul originated this bill, but it has grown well beyond that point by now. The conspiracy media is so saturated with anti-Obama propaganda at this point that they seem to act as if Ron Paul is the only guy on their side — but that is absolutely not the case. Here’s the proof that Barney Frank is directly involved in this effort, and it is indeed moving forward:

August 28, 2009: House Will Pass Legislation Mandating Complete Audit of Federal Reserve

Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, told a Massachusetts audience at a recent town hall that the House will pass legislation this fall mandating a “complete audit” of the Federal Reserve.

The bill to audit the Fed, H.R. 1207, was introduced by libertarian Fed critic Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) and is backed by well over a majority of the House. Frank’s comment suggests it won’t just be left to languish in committee.

“I want to restrict the power of the Fed in a number of ways,” said Frank in response to a question about the bill.

“They have had since 1932… the right to intervene in the economy almost whenever they” wanted to, Frank said, noting that the Fed relied on its extraordinary lending power to forward billions to financial institutions last fall. He intends to curtail that lending power, he said.

“Finally we will subject them to a complete audit,” he said. “I have been working with Ron Paul, the main sponsor of that bill. He agrees that we don’t want to have the audit appear as if it is influencing monetary policy, because that would be inflationary and Ron and I agree on that.”

Defenders of an independent monetary policy, including much of the political elite of both parties, argue that politicizing monetary policy would destabilize the financial system, devalue the dollar and lead to higher interest rates.


About a week later, another key article came out that further established the point about the House of Representatives directly going after the Fed:

House Pushes for Sweeping Audit of the Fed


The Fed’s response to all of this has been rather ominous — literally saying that if the truth were revealed, there could be “significant harms” to the world economy. Bear in mind that they may very well attempt to CREATE these ‘harms’ if the bill passes:

Fed Warns Truth Will Destroy Economy

NEW YORK, Aug 27 (Reuters) – The U.S. Federal Reserve asked a federal judge not to enforce her order that it reveal the names of the banks that have participated in its emergency lending programs and the sums they received, saying such disclosure would threaten the companies and the economy.
The central bank filed its request on Wednesday, two days after Chief Judge Loretta Preska of the U.S. District Court in Manhattan ruled in favor of Bloomberg News, which had sought information under the federal Freedom of Information Act.
Preska said the Fed failed to show that revealing the names would stigmatize the banks and result in “imminent competitive harm.” The Fed asked the judge not to require disclosure while it readies an appeal.
“Immediate release of these documents will cause irreparable harm to these institutions and to the board’s ability to effectively manage the current, and any future, financial crisis,” the central bank argued.
It added that the public interest favors a delay, citing a potential for “significant harms that could befall not only private companies, but the economy as a whole” if the information were disclosed.


Lastly, as proof that Obama’s team is not in the pocket of the Fed, Geithner’s request to have the Fed’s governance and structure studied was flatly denied:

Fed Rejects Geithner’s Request for Study of Governance and Structure

Sept. 21 (Bloomberg) — The Federal Reserve Board has rejected a request by U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner for a public review of the central bank’s structure and governance, three people familiar with the matter said.

The Obama administration proposed on June 17 a financial- regulatory overhaul including a “comprehensive review” of the Fed’s “ability to accomplish its existing and proposed functions” and the role of its regional banks. The Fed was to lead the study and enlist the Treasury and “a wide range of external experts.”

Some top central bank officials, after agreeing to the review, saw a potential threat to Fed independence after the Treasury released the proposal, two of the people said. The Obama plan said the Treasury would consider recommendations from the review and “propose any changes to the Fed’s governance and structure.”

“It is not obvious at all why that is a Treasury responsibility or even appropriate why the Treasury would undertake that kind of study,” said Robert Eisenbeis, chief monetary economist at Cumberland Advisors Inc. in Vineland, New Jersey, and a former Atlanta Fed research director. “The Fed was created by Congress and it is not part of the executive branch.”

U.S. lawmakers have also called for a review of the Fed’s power and structure, saying Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke overstepped his authority as he bailed out creditors of Bear Stearns Cos. and American International Group Inc. while battling a crisis that led to $1.62 trillion in writedowns and losses at financial firms.



Despite the threats, the initiative to audit the Fed is moving forward, as you can read here:

Fed Audit Bill Reaches 290 Cosponsors

In response, the Fed is having to change its tune to survive, showing preliminary signs of acquiescence:

Fed Being Forced to Change Tune to Survive

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke surprised members of both parties Thursday when he told a House panel that he believed transparency alone was not enough and that some financial products should be banned outright.

He acknowledged that the position represented a shift in philosophy for the Fed.

Bernanke’s answer during the financial services committee hearing came in response to questioning from Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), who seemed alarmed by the Fed chairman’s reversal and asked for an example of a product that ought to be banned.

Bernanke didn’t miss a beat. “No-doc loans,” he said, referring to loans given to borrowers with no documentation of their income or ability to repay.

Banning no-doc loans might sound like a common-sense approach but it slices to the core of free-market ideology, under which lending should be free from government interference.


This article has a rare bit of truth about the fact that the economy could indeed get a whole lot worse without sweeping changes:

Second Great Depression Still Possible

The future is fundamentally uncertain, which always makes prediction a rash enterprise. That said there is a good chance the new consensus is wrong. Instead, there are solid grounds for believing the US economy will experience a second dip followed by extended stagnation that will qualify as the second Great Depression. Some indications to this effect are already rolling in with unexpectedly large US job losses in September and the crash in US automobile sales following the end of the “cash-for-clunkers” programme…

There is a simple logic to why the economy will experience a second dip. That logic rests on the economics of deleveraging which inevitably produces a two-step correction. The first step has been worked through, and it triggered a financial crisis that caused the worst recession since the Great Depression. The second step has only just begun…

Yet, there has already been a financial crisis and the real economy is now infected by a multiplier process causing lower spending, massive job loss, and business failures. That plus deleveraging creates the possibility of a downward spiral, which would constitute a depression.



I’m frankly amazed that we haven’t already seen any stronger economic events at this point. And yet, my dreams have been very adamant — over and over again — that we will stare into what appears to be the ultimate catastrophe, but that for the common people, very little in the way of real damage will actually occur. In fact, this is paving the way for a much better system.

If you need some visual proof to confirm this notion, check out this recent interview with Barney Frank, who is heading up the resistance team to the Federal Reserve and its current method of doing business. Bear in mind it has now been openly announced that this stunning new bill, chaperoned by the Obama administration and the remarkable shift in politics that it created, now has 290 cosponsors:



This article supports what you just watched above:

Barney Frank Vows to Sharpen Derivatives Bill

Citing amendments to be adopted today, Frank said that the bill would be altered in the following ways:

–Derivative trading would be done on an exchange: “Everything they do in the derivative area will be forced onto an exchange,”

–Greater disclosure: Frank insisted that coming amendments would eliminate “hidden over-the-counter deals,” and while exchange exemptions would be granted to “genuine end-users” who use derivatives to diffuse volatility, they too would have to conduct business out in the open.

–Trades must be backed: Frank told Ratigan that “trades are going to be fully backed by capital so you won’t have a situation like you have with AIG where they overextended themselves and collapsed.”


This is pretty amazing stuff by any reckoning. Cynics will continue to hate, hate, hate anyone who suggests that something like this could happen, and come up with all different reasons for attack, but if you can’t see the signs of what’s coming by now, then you’re not paying attention.

These sources we’re in contact with are very real. And this is not some game they’re playing to discredit guys like me on the Internet — in fact the way we got this information was by covert means, which endangered the people who told us but who nonetheless wanted us to know.


With all that being said, History Channel recently put out a video that was similar to Dr. Steven Greer’s Disclosure Project in 2001 — including many of the same witnesses again speaking at the National Press Club — except this was in 2007, and it was made into a full-length television documentary.

In one radio show with acclaimed television producer Margaret Wendt, she openly revealed that the network heads insisted on having skeptics appear in any and all UFO documentaries if they are to air on television. They would say this was required in order to have it be a ‘balanced’ program.

Pilot sightings, ground sightings and radar tracings. That’s about as bonafide as you can get…

The notable thing about this documentary is that there are no skeptics coming in and bashing the various arguments that are made. You are shown two different cases where there are clear correlations — pilot sightings, ground sightings and radar tracings. That’s about as bonafide as you can get, and it’s all here in this documentary.

Interestingly, Google seems to be very slow on loading the third segment of this video. I tried it on a very fast, perfectly good connection, and every time I tried to load the video it stalled out. I have heard from several different people that Google is known for making certain videos load slowly in order to discourage people from watching them, and this seemed as clear an example as I ever saw.

This all works according to a playlist, where you have to click on the link at the end of each video to get to the next one. Unfortunately, the editor did not insert any pauses between videos, so you do miss a little at the end of each section, as if you wait until the last second, the link goes away and you can’t easily click over.

I have set it up so you can watch the first two sections in the top window, the third section in the next window if the top one doesn’t work (which is of a lower resolution, as is always the case with re-uploaded videos since Google compresses them for each upload), and then continue on from the fourth section in the third window, as follows:






The frequent mention of 1952 is very interesting — this was the year, as you can see in Part Three of the above video, where ETs attempted a formal landing and government officials had to issue bold, public statements discrediting the phenomenon. I recently went back into Peter Lemesurier’s “Great Pyramid Decoded” and recalibrated the King’s Chamber Timeline to fit the “one inch equals one year” format, as it now seems the designers originally intended.

Of course, this means that what Lemesurier refers to as the “first Messianic arrival” occurs in 2012 — but it also means that a major harbinger of the ‘Messianic event’ occurs in 1952, not in 1999 as in Lemesurier’s altered version. I was absolutely blown away when I made this calculation, as the Pyramid states that in 1952, we had the beginning of “a separate and unique form of society based totally on allegiance to the spiritual.”

Channelings began emerging in 1952 that clearly spelled out how we would experience interplanetary climate change, DNA transformation and a species evolution surrounding the coming of the Aquarian Age.

When you come to my talks you see exactly how far that prophecy goes — a variety of wonderful new channelings began emerging in 1952 that clearly spelled out how we would experience interplanetary climate change, DNA transformation and a species evolution surrounding the coming of the Aquarian Age. It is very, very exciting to see all of these threads finally coming together!

I would also like to thank SaLuSa, through Mike Quinsey, and Matthew, through Suzanne Ward, for favorably covering our work and supporting this timeline for Disclosure. We have had many, many emails about both of their supportive prophecies, and are glad to hear that their words are inspiring so many, and they stand with us in support of this bold prophecy.

I also want to thank Blossom Goodchild for writing me personally to support this prophecy. Her own guidance was unclear about last year’s October 14th prophecy, and as I have always said, channeling is extremely difficult. One failed ‘hit’ does not discredit the entire source. Authentic channeling is almost always a dance between the channel’s conscious mind and the Source, and it’s easy for distortions to go in.

As I always say for my own work as well as all others, if you find it inspiring and uplifting, then use it — and if not, then feel free to set it aside and look for something that you find more to your liking. That is how the Law of Free Will works, and how we are able to be blessed with inspirational messages that can get through to us without breaking ‘the rules,’ so to speak.

Again, thank you for your support of this work by your orders and conference attendance. I’m in London right now, getting ready for our first night, and we have a nice crowd here. I’d better go, as we have to do a rehearsal for the Wanderer Awakening songs we’ll be playing tonight, with yours truly as the lead singer — fun stuff!