I have asked Svali and other insiders if I inadvertently stumbled over a “ritual site” back in 1990, in Scotia, New York – and they said it probably was.
Let me say, up front, that I do not believe the vast majority of Masons have any knowledge of these activities, nor anything to do with them. I feel it would be grossly unfair to blame them for this.
We did reveal how Masonic oaths could be used to conceal damaging secrets. However, that doesn’t change the fact that most Masons are good, kind-hearted people who do not want to participate in anything nefarious.
Approximately one mile away from a Masonic lodge in my home town of Scotia, New York, just east of Collins Lake, Sunnyside Avenue became a bridge that crossed over railroad tracks.
In 1990, a friend of mine was riding his motorcycle under this bridge when he saw something truly terrifying. He rushed over to my house and told me I had to come see it right away.
He wouldn’t say more.
I went there with him and was shocked by what I saw. It was a gigantic, Egyptian Left Eye of Horus – the classic Illuminati symbol – painted in full colors — bright red, bright blue, bright yellow, jet-black and white — under the bridge.
The spots of dirt on the Eye are my footprints from the day before. The Eye is about 40 feet wide.
The paint was very fresh, colorful and crisp in 1990. There was no other graffiti in the area. Not a single thing other than this Eye. No other designs. No scribbles. Nothing. Just the Eye.
I was surprised at how little it had degraded, overall, when I went back to photograph it in 2004. There was a lot of new graffiti, but nothing else even came close to the Eye in the quality of its execution.
Admittedly I was terrified to go there and do this, but I did it anyway.
In this next image, I used simple Transform filters in Photoshop to get the Eye looking the way it did when it was originally drawn – before they drafted it all out as a mural, using the bricks as a grid.
What I found even more troubling was that when I returned there in summer 2004, I found extremely hateful, and in some cases satanic graffiti – particularly under the opposite side of the bridge.
Jews and African-Americans were specifically targeted. Swastikas were drawn, as well as other symbols I could not identify. Next you will see one of the (believe it or not) less-offensive but nonetheless all-inclusive examples.
I went back a third time in winter 2004 and captured video film of this and much more of what was under there. I drive directly from the Masonic Lodge, around the corner, down the street, park in the lot, walk to the bridge, go under the bridge and see this.
My friend and I both felt an oppressive sense of evil when we were there in 1990. We realized that people could do ceremonies under this bridge and be undetected. There was a huge parking area nearby.
Back at the time we had no idea that there would be a connection between Egyptian symbols and black magic rituals – but why else would someone paint this huge, utterly perfect Eye, and not one other thing?
It was also strange to go back in 2004 and see that someone had repainted the Eye any time other graffiti was placed over it — such as the “tags” of whomever called himself “M-Side.”
Paint seems to degrade very fast on concrete, particularly in cold climates. Graffiti I see on a regular walk I take has already faded almost to invisibility in less than a year. It would appear the Eye has enjoyed regular upkeep and maintenance since I first saw it.
I really didn’t understand what I saw, or how it all fit together, until I read Still’s book in December 1996 – and particularly after reading Svali, beginning in 2001.
As I read Svali, I also felt like I finally had an explanation for something my parents saw one night, when I was maybe seven years old, that utterly terrified them with supernatural dread.
The house across the street from us was owned by a successful local car dealer. At the far south end of our street lived a family that owned a local oil company, a local bank, and also won positions in local elections.
In the middle of the night, my parents watched at least three different couples walk down the street and enter the house across the way from us.
There were no lights on outside or inside the house. They did not knock – they just opened the door and walked in. They walked almost like a military march – no talking, no gesturing, just very stiff.
My father was completely terrified and told us never to say anything to anyone about this. Neither of my parents like it when I ask them to tell me the story – and it’s always the same after all these years.
At least one of the couples they saw was Masonic. Mr. W was an elderly member of the Masons. His wife was a member of Eastern Star, the female version of Masonry.
We had at least three elderly male Masons and their wives living on our street – the Ws, the Fs and the Ms – all within no more than four houses’ distance from the one across from us. These were probably the people my parents saw.
The Ms were an Italian family that owned a local shoe repair shop. I wondered if there was a mafia connection, as periodically they would host large parties where lots of cigars were smoked.
Down the north end of the street, we had a group of guys stand in formation, wear kilts and play bagpipes every year. This would happen for one or two days. They were rehearsing for a local parade.
Both of these things really happened to me as a kid. What my parents saw was very real. The eye under the bridge was very real. Later on, all this research helped me put the pieces together.
You may be having a very strongly negative reaction as the full scope of this investigation becomes clear. You may feel too sick to keep reading, but you still want to. I do understand that.
That Eye really freaked me out when I was a high school student. It was way too perfect to have been done for no reason.
When I read Svali’s materials in the summer of 2001, I felt like the world was closing in on me. I had trouble sleeping and I felt a continuing sense of dread and anxiety.
Unlike many people, I did not have reactions of denial, ridicule, sarcasm and hatred. I had too much of a background – too much education – to fall into that trap.
The only way I could read about all of this was to take it in small doses, which I would then balance out with reading positive, uplifting inspirational material.
It took months for me to work through the grief, fear and disgust that came up for me as I learned about all of this. I have since become vastly more confident in a positive outcome.
This is our planet. This is who we have living here. This is the situation. I do believe in positive, angelic forces guiding and protecting our planet – and I also believe they need our help.
One of the strongest inspirations I saw in Svali’s testimony was the fact that the vast majority of these people don’t like what is happening to them, and would get out and help the world if they could.
The same thing happened during the Anti-Masonic Revolt of 1826 to circa 1840.
When I read Svali, I had seven years of studying and integrating Finney’s book into my daily thoughts, and five years to take in the much bigger picture of the history and goals of the “Illuminati” revealed in Still’s book.
I was stunned by the degree to which Svali’s testimony validated these provable, historical facts. Furthermore, there was plenty of evidence in the present world that such a group did exist.
This included a wide variety of movies that I would have never shown any interest in watching – but once I knew what to look for, I considered this to be a necessary form of research.
I did not want to publish my findings about all of this on my own website, under my own name, at the time, though I have since lost that fear.
On July 27, 2003 I briefly took on the pseudonym “Art Aqua” and published a comprehensive investigation of Svali and various corollary materials on Joe Mason and Dee Finney’s website GreatDreams.com.
I wrote about the Eye, but I couldn’t remember where it was at the time – and didn’t have pictures. I retraced my footsteps on a trip to New York the following summer and found it.
Certain Hollywood films provide excellent proof to validate Svali’s testimony once you know what you are looking for. In many, many cases, the agendas of this group are being presented in these movies.
There have obviously been others since 2003 – but I largely abandoned this ‘research’ practice as it was emotionally disruptive. Each time I saw one I was vividly reminded of how real this all is.
Three films that actually exposed the group’s agenda – albeit in a very creepy and disturbing way – were David Lynch’s Mulholland Drive, Stanley Kubrick’s Eyes Wide Shut and The Skulls.
Two of the most popular film series of all time directly expose their agenda in thinly-veiled symbolism, thus helping to ensure their defeat: The Lord of the Rings series and the Star Wars series.
Additional expose’ films include Dr. Strangelove, The Parallax View, and both versions of The Manchurian Candidate.
Other than many obvious examples of horror films, the movies I saw that seemed to most directly promote this group’s agenda, as I discussed in detail, are:
The Lawnmower Man, Independence Day, Starship Troopers, Total Recall, Fight Club, The Cell, The Devil’s Advocate, The Game, Conspiracy Theory, A Beautiful Mind, Signs, X-Men I and II, The Matrix, The Matrix Reloaded, Face/Off, Tomb Raider, The Core, DareDevil, Hulk and Terminator III.
I apologize to M. Night Shyamalayan for having included “Signs” in this list, as I do not believe he is a member of this group – only that they liked his concept.
Since 2003, there have been other blatant examples. I was stunned when I watched Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, as the treatment of Gary Oldman’s character “Sirius Black” seemed to precisely mirror how Svali says this group sees Lucifer.
The power battles against “Dementors” in that movie were quite disturbing for a children’s movie as well. In the series finale, Harry has to let Voldemort kill him in order to “win” – another common theme.  
Batman Begins and The Dark Knight Rises are both loaded with obvious correlations once you’ve familiarized yourself with Svali’s material. The villains are used to reveal the group’s agenda.
A Series of Unfortunate Events is one of the most blatant examples of all time – almost like a love letter from the group to its own children. The All-Seeing Eye appears constantly in this movie.
The Golden Compass was a big-budget flop that is thoroughly loaded with symbolism and programming.
The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus, Heath Ledger’s last film before his drug overdose, is an extremely obvious example – and reveals that the group knows they are losing, and desperately need a pep talk.
Inception is so closely related to the “training” Svali discusses that it would seem its ultimate creators must have been fans of her website – and / or that she is telling us the truth.
I went back and watched Dark City upon recommendation, and this also had many correlations. ExistenZ is another older (1999) example that seems heavily influenced by the group. Be warned that both of these films are difficult and disturbing to watch, although ExistenZ is also corny and lacks believability.
Hundreds of thousands, if not millions of people are now investigating this subject and looking for examples. Certain music videos are quite blatant as well as certain video games.
You have probably seen at least a few of the movies I’ve just mentioned. Now that I’m finally giving you all the pieces I’ve been putting together, you may very well be feeling overwhelmed.
That’s exactly what they want.
Denial is their first line of defense – creating a sarcastic disbelief in which people boost their egos by convincing themselves this is all a joke, and then attacking and humiliating anyone discussing it.
Their next line of defense is fear. The people within this group do literally believe that if you fear them, you worship them. They see fear and worship as interchangeable.
There are many, many people who begin acquiring knowledge about this group, but then conclude it is completely hopeless for anyone to stand up to them.
I do not fear them. I published this all at once for my own protection. We had hundreds of letters asking me when this would be finished, but for my own safety it was important that it all come out at once.
I understand we have a very serious problem – and I have now had contact with a massive 122-nation alliance that has formed to solve it.
Particularly since 9/11, a majority of the active and retired United States military has become completely aware of this group, its agendas and ultimate intentions – and apparently intends to stop them.
Fulford’s Pentagon sources assert that we will soon see mass arrests. There may be a public unveiling of evidence like what I have presented. This “history lesson” may soon become common knowledge.
There is a historical precedent for what could be about to happen now.
180 years ago the Anti-Masonic Revolt was in full swing. A staggering 45,000 out of 50,000 Masons fled the group once they realized they could. Masonry was nearly destroyed in America as a result.
These people had taken their oaths. They were well aware of the secrecy, preferential treatment and loyalty they had sworn to uphold – upon pain of death.
Nonetheless, after this happened they became some of America’s strongest and bravest allies.
Using this written history as our guide, let’s again remember what Svali said:
3. Most of them are wounded, abused victims, who don’t realize that it is possible to leave the group.
There is a lot of discontent in the ranks, and there would be a mass exodus if the members believed it were really possible to get out (and live).
Many of the trainers I knew (I know, wicked, torturing pedophiles) were NOT happy with what they did.
They would whisper quietly, or give a look, to show that they disagreed with what they had to do.
There is an incredibly vast amount of material about the Illuminati on the Internet. Much of it is of very poor and unconvincing quality.
The overwhelming majority of these articles are loaded with anger, victimhood and the witch-burning mentality. I hardly ever see any acknowledgement of the humanity of the people stuck in these groups.
I believe this “projected” anger happens when we cannot face our own shadow side – the pain, humiliation and sense of inadequacy and defeat that goes back to early childhood, when we first heard the word “NO”.
This buried shame can lead to the use of alcohol and drugs to numb it out, as well as many other addictive and compulsive behaviors.
Unhealed pain creates a ‘victim’ mentality, in which we are constantly searching for an external enemy to blast with our repressed rage. We project this rage onto a convenient, easy target.
If we can blame someone for why we feel bad, then for a short time we feel better.
If we haven’t forgiven and accepted ourselves, and those who hurt us, and stepped into a true knowing of our own value, we will keep seeking revenge over and over again.
This is nothing short of an epidemic in our society. Just look at the comments on any YouTube video as an obvious example.
The “Internet Conspiracy Theorists” channel this repressed rage and self-loathing into a mythical scenario that is extremely destructive to individuals, groups and nations.
Many of them seem utterly incapable of healing, or even realizing what they’re doing.
In this scenario, it becomes black and white. God Versus Satan. People versus Things. Good Guys versus Bad Guys. Us Versus Them.
Look at what happens when you think like this. Everyone in the government is the enemy. Everyone in the military is the enemy. Everyone in a corporation is the enemy. Everyone in the media is the enemy.
Our warriors have pledged their lives to protect us. That is a truly valiant sacrifice. Our own fathers and brothers paid the ultimate price for our freedom — with their blood.
I will not dishonor the brave men and women of our armed forces by suggesting, for even one minute, that “they are all in on it.”
Some of them are. Absolutely. But most of them are not. They have chosen to risk torture and potentially sacrifice their lives to protect the will, the freedom, the safety and the lives of the people.
They have not chosen to increase the comforts of a small group of wealthy bankers.
Anyone who works inside or outside the system, and chooses to stand and fight, has become a soldier for Truth — protecting the people who are still half-“asleep” and cowering in fear. 
We have a word for those who stand and fight to protect and defend others. They are called heroes.
One of the most heroic exposures of Truth, paving the way for much more that will follow, aired on CNN in January, 2010. Videos of this stunning expose are still available.
I have transcribed this clip in case it should ever be taken offline, as the information is too important to ignore. It features an interview between Anderson Cooper and Republican senator Charles Grassley.
This expose’ could not have come about without the coordinated, heroic efforts of military, media and governmental officials. I first wrote about it here, in 2010.
ANDERSON COOPER: Keeping them honest tonight. Potentially hundreds of military employees and contractors who may have bought child pornography online, and haven’t been prosecuted or in some cases even investigated.
That’s right, you heard me. Child pornography. As many as 1700 names, according to a US Senator, on a list of 5200 from an Internet sting operation – overlooked the first time around, four years ago.
Only now are they supposedly getting a second look, and only after pressure from investigative reporters and the US Senator you are about to hear from – Republican Charles Grassley.
The Pentagon porn story began in 2006. An immigration and customs enforcement child pornography sting operation called Project Flicker produced payment records of about 5200 people – many of whom provided Army or fleet zip codes, or military email addresses.
Subsequently, the Pentagon’s investigative branch, DCIS, began going through the ice list to identify who actually was a DOD employee or a contractor.
The investigation, however, only ran for eight months – and only cross-checked some 3500 names for Pentagon ties, according to the senator.
According to DCIS documents, revealed in a Freedom of Information Act request, out of that 3500, investigators uncovered 264 employees or contractors – including staffers for the Secretary of Defense and contractors at the NSA.
Nine people had top security clearances. But only about 20 percent of those 264 people were completely investigated. Fewer still were prosecuted, and after about eight months, the entire probe was halted.
It left about 1700 names totally unchecked. 1700 alleged kiddie porn customers – an unknown number of whom may still work in some capacity for the Defense Department.
Late last summer, after investigations by the Boston Globe and Yahoo News revealed the figures, a Pentagon spokesman promised to re-open the investigation, conceding that DCIS had stopped due to lack of resources.
DCIS says it is now revisiting all 5200 names, telling Senator Grassley’s staff they have now identified 302 employees or staffers. The Pentagon’s IG telling us, quote,
“Any suggestion that the D.O.D. Office of Inspector General or its criminal investigative arm, the DCIS, is not taking Operation Flicker and the issue of child pornography seriously is in error.”
Senator Grassley says he is still not getting the cooperation he needs from the Pentagon. I spoke to him earlier…. [snip]
AC: One of your staffers told us that getting information from the Defense Department on this has been like pulling teeth. Is that how you’d describe it?
SG: I’ve been involved in oversight of the Defense Department for almost all the years I’ve been in the United States senate.
It is very difficult to get answers from a lot of bureaucracies, but it’s quite more difficult in the Defense Department.
AC: Senator Grassley, I appreciate your time. We will continue to follow this. Thank you.
What you are seeing here is the result of two warring factions in the Pentagon. The minority “Illuminati” loyal faction still enjoys an institutionalized cover-up that protects certain members from being prosecuted.
Based on firsthand witnesses leaking intel to former Forbes bureau chief Benjamin Fulford, we have every reason to believe that the majority of the Pentagon, and the military, are fully aware of this problem.
They have listened to the will of the people – particularly since 9/11 – and they intend to do their job to protect the people… and save our planet from a plan that very few people really want.
If the rumors Fulford is hearing are correct, such an operation would have required an extraordinary degree of international cooperation and secrecy – and stunningly deep espionage.
Pentagon sources have said the trillion-dollar lawsuit I have reported on, and will cover again here, is one of several key strategies to make us aware of the urgent need for these mass arrests.
The group must be tackled by strictly legal means, so there is no possibility of confusion. Then, in the ensuing investigation, many other suppressed truths will emerge.
David DeGraw covered many of the under-reported news stories behind this takedown on September 3, 2011, in an article entitled Full-Blown Civil War Erupts on Wall Street. These stories are still extremely current.
Cell phone and Internet service will nearly grind to a halt if / when something like this happens. Twitter and Facebook will overload and crash. It will be much bigger than 9/11 in scope.
Undoubtedly, many people will believe this is a worldwide military coup, and be terrified by it.
Nonetheless, I feel confident that the Pentagon and their international allies wouldn’t do this unless they had information that will leave little doubt of the need for action – and for why it had to be done.
I am not in denial. Neither should you be. Facts are facts. This group exists. The media can’t talk about it without being killed. A coalition of the willing is increasingly rising up to defeat Financial Tyranny.
By writing this and setting it free to the Internet, I have done my part. I have never seen any other presentation of this data all in one place, with the full sensitivity to the history involved.
I have no involvement in this possible military operation other than to have written this investigation — to help pave the way for the major changes and the complete honesty and truth-telling that is required.
I do not believe we will be ‘rescued’ by UFOs, ETs, angels or otherwise. While I do admittedly believe in such things, I also feel that this is our problem – and we are the ones who have to solve it.
In this sense, the military would merely become the instrument for the will of the people. We have said what we want, on a massive level. You can help by understanding what is coming, in advance — and helping to educate your friends and family, to reduce propaganda and panic, once it actually occurs. I very much believe it will.
We may never be able to predict how this change will occur, but I do believe events are now reaching a critical mass. Powerful alliances and opposing factions are closing in on this group from all sides.
I will now cover some additional, critical evidence before we head into a discussion of the lawsuit itself, and present the back-story and supporting material that I have only recently been made aware of.
This will be the last of the material that is upsetting to read. It is important to understand that the Penn State trial is only a brief glimmer into the world of organized pedophilia – and it must be stopped.
If you go to NAMBLA.org, you will find the official website of the North American Man-Boy Love Association. Seriously.
Just the name sounds like the punch line of a joke – and Season Four, Episode Six of South Park, “Cartman Joins NAMBLA,” was devoted to it.
I feel this episode is crude and insensitive, as are almost all of them – yet humor was used to expose a very real problem.
Most of the people watching this episode had no idea that NAMBLA is a real organization – and are disturbed if and when they find out the truth.
The NAMBLA logo features an offset, capital M and a lower-case B. Any image or video file will have a certain number of “megabytes” on a computer.
Megabytes are also delineated as Mb – the “Man-Boy” within the NAMBLA logo.
Therefore, the NAMBLA logo implies that by becoming a member of this group, you will have access to the same “Man-Boy” materials Anderson Cooper and Senator Grassley said were being downloaded by various members of the Department of Defense.
Since NAMBLA receives hardly any media coverage whatsoever, I have found that even very open-minded, clear-thinking people have a hard time believing me when I tell them about it.
Yet, you can go to their website yourself and see how extensive it is. This excerpt says it all:
WELCOME!  The North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) was formed in 1978….
NAMBLA is strongly opposed to age-of-consent laws and all other restrictions which deny men and boys the full enjoyment of their bodies and control over their own lives….
We call for fundamental reform of the laws regarding relations between youths and adults….
We provide factual information and help educate society about the positive and beneficial nature of man/boy love. 
Other parts of the NAMBLA website feature graphic fantasy descriptions of erotic encounters between men and boys, clearly intended to help pedophiles get “in the mood.”
Again: just as Svali said, this is right out in the open – but no one seems to be paying attention.
The “good guys” in the FBI created a long-term sting operation against NAMBLA – thanks to the work of Bob Hamer, a 30-year veteran operative who spent three years infiltrating the organization.
A 1995 FBI investigation revealed NAMBLA had 1,100 registered members. The article featuring this information appears to be blocked – I had to leave it up on my browser for hours before it loaded.
Agent Bob Hamer ultimately wrote The Last Undercover – The True Story of an FBI Agent’s Dangerous Dance with Evil, a groundbreaking book about his investigation.
This book is currently available for free download here. Please donate or buy the hardcover version to support Hamer’s work.
As this next video shows, Hamer discovered that this group was primarily focused on coordinating efforts to find and have sex with boys – not as the legal lobbying group it claimed to be.
Unfortunately, Hamer’s investigation did not go very far up the ladder – but the Franklin Cover-Up revealed much more, thanks in part to the testimony of Paul Bonacci, a child NAMBLA victim.
The original book investigating these issues, The Franklin Cover-Up, features graphic descriptions of ritual abuse and murder similar to what you find in some of Svali’s materials – which I did not publish here.
The author, a 16-year senator from Nebraska, tells his story in the documentary A Conspiracy of Silence, which got pulled from Discovery Channel before airing in 1994 – but is now widely available on YouTube.
More recently, Nick Bryant wrote The Frankin Scandal – and substantially added to the scope and the amount of provable data in this investigation.
Bryant’s book is also written with much greater sensitivity to the reader – and does not provide the graphic depictions of abuse that make The Franklin Cover-Up so difficult to read.
This Amazon review of Bryant’s book by “Puzzlenomics” reveals the scope of what it contains.
I applaud Nick Bryant for bravely and selflessly investigating the inner workings of local, state, and federal officials to conceal the sexual terrorism, murder, and blackmail of many Nebraskan underage children by some of America’s most affluent, successful, and revered men in government, law enforcement, education, and clergy….
In this utterly disturbing work, Bryant deftly elucidates the confluence of the “real” powers within our taxpayer-funded government to craftily coordinate assets within key judicial, media, and law enforcement agencies to effect its will to suppress worldwide exposure of a possibly CIA-sponsored (blackmail) operation — pandering minors to some of the country’s most influential, affluent, and powerful men in business, media, and government.
This network of judges, policemen, lawyers, FBI agents, and media figures is so extensive, so deep, that the “powers” seemingly have an inexhaustible supply of “assets” ready to carry out their assigned tasks at a moment’s notice.
Paul Bonacci was directly involved in the Franklin cover-up, and is featured in the book. You can see part of Bonacci’s testimony about NAMBLA to FBI agent Ted Gunderson in this video.
In The Franklin Cover-Up, Bonacci claims that NAMBLA was used to coordinate child auctions.
229: The North American Man-Boy Love Association, or NAMBLA, figured prominently in what else Bonacci could recall.
The motto of NAMBLA is “Sex before eight, or it’s too late.” Bonacci reports… that he witnessed NAMBLA-organized auctions of children.
300: Paul Bonacci reports… trips on behalf of the North American Man-Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), the pedophile group now given semi-official status by the United Nations.
Paul cites travel to the Netherlands and Germany carrying child pornography for subsequent “import” to the U.S.A. to avoid prosecution.
In Amsterdam, he names “Charles Hester,” and the British “Tommie Carter,” who had on computer a global list of child pornography users. NAMBLA is also cited for organizing auctions of children.

It is a misnomer to think that most of these children are being snatched off the street. If parents have their children take normal precautions outdoors, they should be fine.
The evidence does not support paranoid assertions that most missing children were dragged into pedophile rings that may be organized by groups like NAMBLA.
The reality is that many of these kids were sexually abused by their parents first, and the parents were offered freedom in exchange for allowing their children to participate in “medical experiments.”
Many, if not most of the kids involved in this are from within the group itself, or “sister groups” that work with the Illuminati. Some kids are specifically trained to specialize in this kind of work.
I am not at all trying to cover for this group. Nor does this in any way undermine the seriousness of what is going on, or of the need for it to be stopped immediately.
I just do not want loving parents to be living in constant fear when the odds are extremely small that anything like this would happen to their children.
Regardless of what you may think about FOX, they have very bravely carried this and other shocking and important stories — and for that they deserve credit.
In December 2011, three new witnesses joined the team of former child actors claiming they were repeatedly sexually abused in the film and television industry – going back to the 1950s.
If a spate of recent allegations proves true, Hollywood may have a hideous epidemic on its hands. The past two weeks have brought three separate reports of alleged child sexual abuse in the entertainment industry….
Revelations of this sort come as no surprise to former child star Corey Feldman
Feldman, 40, himself a survivor of childhood sexual abuse, unflinchingly warned of the world of pedophiles who are drawn to the entertainment industry last August.
“I can tell you that the No. 1 problem in Hollywood was and is and always will be pedophilia,” Feldman told ABC’s Nightline. “That’s the biggest problem for children in this industry… It’s the big secret.”
Another child star from an earlier era agrees that Hollywood has long had a problem with pedophilia.
“When I watched that interview, a whole series of names and faces from my history went zooming through my head,” Paul Peterson, 66, star of The Donna Reed Show, a sitcom popular in the 1950s and 60s, and president of A Minor Consideration, tells FOXNews.com.
“Some of these people, who I know very well, are still in the game.”
“This has been going on for a very long time,” concurs former “Little House on the Prairie” star Alison Arngrim. “It was the gossip back in the ‘80s. People said, ‘Oh yeah, the Coreys, everyone’s had them.’ People talked about it like it was not a big deal.”
Arngrim, 49, was referring to Feldman and his co-star in “The Lost Boys,” Corey Haim, who died in March 2010 after years of drug abuse.
“I literally heard that they were ‘passed around,’” Arngrim  said. “The word was that they were given drugs and being used for sex.
It was awful – these were kids, they weren’t 18 yet. There were all sorts of stories about everyone from their, quote, ‘set guardians’ on down that these two had been sexually abused and were totally being corrupted in every possible way.”…
Even though Feldman spoke candidly about the abuse, he hasn’t named the predator. “People don’t want to talk about this because they’re afraid for their careers,” says Peterson.
“From my perspective, what Corey did was pretty brave.
It would be really wonderful if his allegations reached through all of the protective layers and identified the real people who are a part of a worldwide child pornography ring, because it’s huge and it respects no borders, just as it does not respect the age of the children involved.”
Once the secrecy around this issue is broken – and I do believe that it will be – there will be a vast, unprecedented need for psychologists, counselors and social workers to provide effective treatment.
Whether you are a victim of abuse or you find yourself in a position to help survivors, there are resources available that will greatly assist you.
Another very useful classic that focuses in more specifically on the sexual abuse aspect is The Courage to Heal, by Ellen Bass and Laura Davis.
Svali’s own writings provide detailed information about how the “programming” is done, making it much easier to anticipate what could happen — and recognize it when it does.
This comment appears on the Franklin Cover-Up Amazon page, and was written by Jed Schlackman on August 5, 2003.
It’s interesting that former CIA director Bill Colby ambiguously acknowledged to the author that the scenario described is real, and not long thereafter Colby turned up dead under suspicious circumstances.
This comment by John Doe “JD” (NJ), on February 8, 2011, also spells out a typical reaction from someone who reads the book.
This makes Rosemary’s Baby and An Invitation to Hell look like bake sales. The scope of the crimes, people involved and lack of justice is overwhelming….
Chief of Police, District Judge, Senior Editor, Senator, President, Foster Care worker, FBI, is anyone in power not a raving lunatic?
Drugs, child pornography, prostitution, murder, embezzlement, satanism, all with the help of very powerful friends in Omaha and D.C.

This quote inidicates that former Rep. DeCamp welcomes anyone to sue him if they can disprove what he has written.
Comment by Emi (MD, USA) – December 25, 2007
Mr. Decamp so much as said that if anyone believes that he is lying, or being untruthful about ANYTHING he’s written in his book, then that person should just ‘go ahead and sue him’.
He wrote that, he in fact, “welcomes” any suits that anyone would like to bring against him challenging his honesty in what he’s written in this book….
Ultimately, Mr. Decamp concludes that the reason why this huge cover-up has gone on for so long, is because there are very prominent people who like where they are in the social hierarchy.
If this scandal were to reach the mainstream, then the whole “system” itself would collapse entirely, thus threatening the security of their position.
Knowing the penalty of lying in such a sensitive, controversial case, Rep. John DeCamp revealed the content of his conversations with former CIA director William Colby in the beginning of his book.
The “Larry King” being mentioned is not the former television news anchor, just to be clear.
Colby and his wife, Sally Shelton Colby, a United States ambassador under President Jimmy Carter, were at that very moment warning me to get away from the Franklin child abuse investigation, Larry King, and anybody else linked with Franklin, as quickly as possible for the sake of my own life and safety.
Sally and Bill had never talked to me like this before. They sat me down, made it clear that this was not one of our routine discussions about life and health and happiness, and emphasized to me the serious nature of what and whom I was dealing with.
“What you have to understand, John, is that sometimes there are forces and events too big, too powerful, with so much at stake for other people or institutions, that you cannot do anything about them, no matter how evil or wrong they are and no matter how dedicated or sincere you are or how much evidence you have.
That is simply one of the hard facts of life you have to face. You have done your part. You have tried to expose the evil and wrongdoing. It has hurt you terribly. But it has not killed you up to this point.
I am telling you, get out of this before it does.
Sometimes things are just too big for us to deal with, and we have to step aside and let history take its course. For you, John, this is one of those times,” Bill warned, with Sally nodding her head in affirmation….
“But Bill,” I argued, “somebody has to do something. The problem here is that our institutions of government have been corrupted.
If there is a cover-up — and I now absolutely believe there is, even though originally I thought this whole Franklin story had to be a fantasy — then that cover-up can only take place with the cooperation and even the active assistance of some of our key institutions of government, from the courts to the cops, from the highest politicians, to the media representatives, to the wealthiest business leaders of our community and country.
“I can’t believe what you are telling me, Bill. Are you saying I should just lay it down, and walk away from this, when I know kids are being abused and killed; when I know our most respected citizens and business leaders are up to their eyebrows in drug dealing and official corruption; when every bone in my body tells me that evil is triumphing and everybody who is anybody is scared beanless to do something about it, for fear of one thing or another?
How can any honest or intelligent person do this? If I, or someone like me, do not keep pursuing this, then who will? And if we quit now, then when, if ever, will the truth come out and something be done about this evil and this corruption?”….
“So, what’s the message?” I asked. “What are you trying to tell me?”
“Sometimes,” Bill said, “There are forces too powerful for us to whip them individually, in the time frame that we would like.
We have to keep working at our goal. But we have to be sensible enough, not to risk everything and get ourselves destroyed or killed in the process. That victory we seek may take much longer than we wanted, and come in ways we never anticipated.”
I believe that victory that Colby spoke of – and may have been killed for – is upon us now.
I also want to be clear in saying that not everyone in these insider groups is a pedophile. The problem is that some of them are – and the group as a whole is concealing their crimes.
Now we will turn our discussion back to subjects that are a lot easier to talk about – with a greater focus on the solutions that are now emerging.
This stunning Federal Reserve bailout figure of 26 trillion dollars, and other evidence like it, has directed the people’s wrath towards the financial industry… rather than the elected government.
Nothing like this has ever happened before.  
Millions of people have taken to the streets in the “Occupy Wall Street” movement. It has pulled back due to cold weather, fatigue and threats of arrest, but is certainly far from over.
By October 10, 2011, the movement had spread to fully 900 different cities:
Occupy Wall Street, a movement that began as a small band of protesters in Zuccotti Park, gained endorsements from major unions and progressive leaders as well as prominent politicians.
Within a few short weeks, it has come to resemble a movement with more than 900 meetups in 900 cities across the country.
It has even gone international with Occupy sites in Australia and London and other cities saddled with long unemployment lines, gross income disparities, and hapless politicians.
I do believe the “1 percent” are scared out of their wits of a mass, public uprising. I believe there is clear evidence to prove it.
We’ve already seen Occupy Wall Street protestors gathering directly in front of the homes of key figures in financial and media corporations:
NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Occupy Wall Street is on the move … uptown.
Why uptown? Because that’s where the rich folks live!
Organizers are planning a march on Tuesday that will visit the homes of JP Morgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500) CEO Jamie Dimon, billionaire David Koch, hedge fund honcho John Paulson, Howard Milstein, and News Corp (NWSA, Fortune 500) CEO Rupert Murdoch.
The millionaires and billionaires are being targeted for what event organizers called a “willingness to hoard wealth at the expense of the 99%.”
In desperation, the United States Congress passed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).
If you don’t know what this is, you should. It is a declaration of war against the people of the United States by the insiders running their government:
Top experts – including the sponsors of the bill – say that the newly-passed National Defense Authorization Act authorizes indefinite detention of Americans living within the United States.
Top legal experts point out that the government claims the right to assassinate American citizens on U.S. soil without any charges, trial or other constitutional protection.
I noted last month that Congress was considering repealing prohibitions against torture. (I wrote to attorneys at the ACLU, but haven’t received word yet on whether such a provision has been enacted).
Here are two other articles that came out shortly after Obama actually signed the bill — but only by adding a “signing statement” to it that attempted to de-fang it of its power.
Obama Signs NDAA Into Law – But Won’t Detain Americans
Revised Bill Still Gives Obama Right to Lock Up Citizens

The members of Congress may be all under death threats, forcing them to sign the NDAA bill — despite it being political suicide to do so, as it gives permission for the US to lock up its own citizens, without a trial, and throw away the key — forever.
However, it was very clear that Obama did not want to sign it at all. He put in a “signing statement” that clearly contravened the underlying intent of the bill.
Obama Signs NDAA Bill Despite “Serious Reservations”
“I have signed this bill despite having serious reservations with certain provisions that regulate the detention, interrogation, and prosecution of suspected terrorists,” Obama said in the signing statement.
Presidents issue such statements when they feel a law conflicts with the executive’s constitutional powers. Obama criticized them during the Bush administration, but has found the practice useful on a handful of occasions.
In this case, Obama argued that the changes Congress made to the bill affirm only authorities that the Bush and Obama administrations have already claimed in fighting terrorism.
But he noted that the codification of those powers in law was unnecessary and perhaps harmful. And he insisted he would not use the powers to detain citizens without trial.
“I want to clarify that my administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens,” Obama wrote.
“Indeed, I believe that doing so would break with our most important traditions and values as a Nation.
“My administration will interpret section 1021 [of the bill] in a manner that ensures that any detention it authorizes complies with the Constitution, the laws of war, and all other applicable law.”
Civil liberties advocates like Romero pointed out that once the provisions are law, however, they will be available to a President Newt Gingrich or Mitt Romney or any future president, who could choose to use the powers granted more aggressively.
“We are incredibly disappointed that President Obama signed this new law even though his administration had already claimed overly broad detention authority in court,” said Romero. “Any hope that the Obama administration would roll back the constitutional excesses of George Bush in the war on terror was extinguished today.”

This article from Politics USA attempted to diminish the hysteria around this NDAA bill by explaining what this “signing statement” really means.
Others disagree with this, as we see — but the important point is that Obama did not blindly sign it. We can clearly see that there is an epic power struggle going on, right now, at the highest levels.
It is literally quite amazing that we are seeing such a blatant example of the war between the “insider” government and the elected government — playing out right in front of our eyes, for all to see.
The trick was that this same NDAA bill is required to make sure the military receives funding. By withholding that, the country would have been completely and utterly defenseless — and that is an intolerable situation.
Obama’s Signing Statement Prevents NDAA From Applying to American Citizens
Those who believe that Obama should have vetoed the NDAA don’t seem to realize that what they are asking for is that the military go unfunded.
The NDAA is a yearly funding measure, and as such could be amended when a new, and hopefully saner Congress is sworn into session to remove the war on terror language that this Congress — foolishly, in a bit of near-election-year pandering — passed.
Too many Democrats went along with supporting the NDAA, and those members of Congress along with their detention and torture-loving GOP colleagues must be held accountable. I know that it is easier to blame the president for everything, because he is but one man, but the truth is that we need to clean out and disinfect this Congress.
Yes, Obama signed the NDAA. Even if he would have vetoed it, an override would have been likely. His veto would have been nothing more than an empty symbolic gesture that would have caused more problems than it solved.
The NDAA does a lot of things, but the one thing it does not do is authorize the detention of American citizens. As we head into to 2012, can we finally put this bogus piece of misinformation to bed?

Obama’s signing statement wasn’t enough to satisfy many people. There is a growing paranoia online about the depth and severity of threat presented by this bill.
Look. It’s obvious. The Federal Reserve elites are trying to scare you out of protesting, or even reading about this stuff. They want to make you afraid that you will be hauled off and thrown away. The Constitution is completely toast.
Even if Obama tried to avoid endorsing NDAA, the underlying threat it represents is so severe that no one is happy about it at all.
NDAA Outrage Continues to Grow Online – January 5, 2012
This is day three of living in post-NDAA America.
In case you’ve been living under a particularly large and comfy rock, the NDAA is a radical and dangerous bill — which Barack Hussein Obama quietly signed into law on New Year’s Eve, while almost every American was preoccupied with New Year’s binge drinking.
(His administration had previously vowed to veto the NDAA, before strangely reversing course and signing it into law. He issued a signing statement saying his administration would not use the controversial indefinite detention provisions.
This promise, however, is not legally binding — and it also does not prevent future Presidents from detaining and torturing American citizens without the right to a trial or attorney, and without bringing formal charges against them.
The signing statement is the legal equivalent of a Post-it note affixed to a manuscript.)
How bad is this law, really? Here are some experts:
Presidential candidate Ron Paul on NDAA: “…bold and dangerous attempt to establish martial law in America.”
Rep. Justin Amash: NDAA was “carefully crafted to mislead the public.”
Amnesty International: “Provisions that were snuck into the bill with little notice from mainstream media could spell indefinite detention without a hearing, keep Guantanamo open, and hinder fair trials.”
And Americans, despite some pro-Obama spin to the contrary, are definitely targeted by NDAA’s indefinite detention provisions. As Salon columnist and constitutional lawyer Glenn Greenwald explained:
“Myth #3: U.S. citizens are exempted from this new bill: This is simply false, at least when expressed so definitively and without caveats. The bill is purposely muddled on this issue which is what is enabling the falsehood.”
The American broadcast media has been eerily silent on NDAA’s passage into law, despite the fact that foreign newspapers and broadcast networks have been covering this as one of their top international stories.
Yesterday, however, FOX News began to let NDAA mentions seep into their news coverage….
Jonathan Turley in The Guardian (UK): “President Barack Obama rang in the New Year by signing the NDAA law with its provision allowing him to indefinitely detain citizens.
It was a symbolic moment, to say the least. With Americans distracted with drinking and celebrating, Obama signed one of the greatest rollbacks of civil liberties in the history of our country … and citizens partied in unwitting bliss into the New Year.
Ironically, in addition to breaking his promise not to sign the law, Obama broke his promise on signing statements and attached a statement that he really does not want to detain citizens indefinitely.”
Petitions and online protests like this one, which call for the impeachment of Obama and recall of Senators who voted in favor of NDAA, are also beginning to appear.
This should be an interesting year. If you don’t see any future articles or tweets from me, you’ll know I’ve been relocated to the Guantanamo Beach Club.

In the midst of all these other things going on, I chuckled when I read this.
Still, after all these years, certain members of the British press are insinuating that the United States is an illegal country, and should still rightfully be a colony of Great Britain.
This may be another sign that we are truly reaching what some insiders have been calling a “Reset Point” — in which geopolitical events could cause rapid, almost unprecedented changes.
Is the US Declaration of Independence Illegal?
In another sign of imminent trouble, breakdown and chaos at the highest levels, the head of the New York Times resigned very suddenly and out of nowhere in December.
Everyone knows newspapers are losing money. Profit losses do not explain her panicked, spontaneous and total withdrawal, as if some major disaster is about to happen and she didn’t want to get caught in the middle of it.
NY Times CEO Exiting, Without Explanation

Robinson, who steered the company through one of the harshest business environments it has ever faced, underscored the struggle her company faces during a presentation at the recent UBS investor conference in New York.
The Times Co gave no explanation for Robinson’s sudden departure, which caught analysts as well as company insiders by surprise.

Speculation among industry observers and the analyst community centered on the company’s faltering stock price, which has declined more than 80 percent since Robinson was appointed CEO in December 2004. This year alone, shares are down nearly 25 percent….
“It is very unusual to have a long-time CEO suddenly announce her leaving within two weeks with no replacement,” said Evercore Partners analyst Douglas Arthur….
Within the New York Times’ newsroom, word of the shakeup began to spread about 20 minutes before the announcement.
“No one had an inkling this was coming,” said a source at the paper, who declined to be named. “As recently as last week she was taking meetings with people and mapping out business plans for well into next year.”…

The Huffington Post has been quietly absorbing journalists who have broken away from The New York Times and other Mockingbird-dominated sources. It definitely appears that “HuffPo” is much less controlled than other, more traditional media outlets.
Mass “Defection” of NYT Reporters to HP
Times lawyers fired off a cease-and-desist letter to Arianna Huffington on Monday, claiming that The Huffington Post’s new blog, Parentlode, is a rip-off of the Times blog Motherlode and she better change the name or else.
Longtime Times writer and Motherlode founder Lisa Belkin decamped to The Huffington Post earlier this month and began writing for the new blog on Monday in a post titled, “Welcome to Parentlode.”…
In the last year, Times writers and editors like [Lisa] Belkin, Tim O’Brien, Peter Goodman and Tom Zeller have all jumped to The Huffington Post. In the spring, then executive editor Bill Keller dedicated part of a Times Magazine column to trashing HuffPo’s aggregating ways and its merger with AOL.

In addition to passing the NDAA bill, it appears that the Federal Reserve insiders’ cabal created the “Tom Clancy’s Rainbow 6: Patriots” game as a form of propaganda.
In this game, the people who marched in the Occupy Wall Street movement are framed as if they are domestic terrorists — and should be hauled away into “detention camps” as the NDAA bill recommended.
An upcoming game in the Tom Clancy franchise is ruffling some feathers for depicting a domestic terrorist attack staged by individuals who sound sympathetic to the 99 Percent movement.
“Tom Clancy’s Rainbow 6: Patriots,” due out in 2013 for Xbox 360, PlayStation 3 and PC, was teased in a recent trailer released by French publisher Ubisoft, which produced a clip wherein a collection of American mercenaries raid a corporate boardroom and murder the CEO.
“This all started when you became bigger than the governments,” a narrator’s voice explains. “And governments became bigger than the people. That’s how the land of the free became the kingdom of the few — a few like you, Mr. Walsh.

It’s time for a new balance of power. You may not answer to the government, but you will answer to us.”
And like a scene from a Wall Street CEO’s worst nightmare, the captive is strapped with explosives and hurled from the skyscraper office down to the street below, where the bombs detonate seconds before he hits the pavement.
Conservative blogs have been rather appreciating how these fictional terrorists mirror the message of the 99 Percent movement, although it’s not yet clear what the characters’ true motivations are.

Even with the 26 to 29 Trillion dollars in bailouts we described earlier in this investigation, there is still such a great insolvency in the Western institutions that Obama was forced to ask for yet another bailout on December 27th.
It was an additional 1.2 Trillion — added to the “debt ceiling” of the United States.
Obama Asks for 1.2 Trillion-Dollar Bailout (Tuesday 12/27)

The approval is expected to go through without a challenge, given that Congress is in recess until later in January and the request is in line with an agreement to keep the U.S. government funded into 2013.
The debt is projected to fall within $100 billion of the current cap by December 30, when the United States has $82 billion in interest on its debt and payments such as Social Security coming due.
President Barack Obama is expected to ask for authority to increase the borrowing limit by $1.2 trillion, part of the spending authority that was negotiated between Congress and the White House this summer.
Under the agreement struck in August during the showdown over the government’s debt limit, the cap is automatically raised unless Congress votes to block the debt-ceiling extension.
Lawmakers have 15 days within receiving the request to vote, which is largely symbolic because the president can veto it and Congress would be unlikely to muster the two-thirds majority to override it. Moreover, the U.S. House of Representatives also is in recess until January 17.
The deal called for raising the debt ceiling by $2.1 trillion to serve the nation’s borrowing needs into 2013 and also included mandatory cuts to the federal budget deficit. Since then, the extension has been increased twice by a total of $900 billion.
The debt limit currently stands at $15.194 trillion and would increase to $16.394 trillion with the request.

China has a key role in the 122-nation alliance that has banded together to take down the Powers that Were.
Such an event seems imminent enough now that on December 31st, there was a mainstream media article that seemed to be getting people ready for it.
The ‘spin’ here is that it would be a terrible thing if this were to happen — akin to an invasion while America is at its weakest moment.
2012 Voters Feel Dispirited
Republicans or Democrats, liberal or conservative, young or old, they lack confidence – in the country’s potential to be great again, in their elected leaders’ ability to do the right thing, in the economy and in themselves.
It’s not that they feel incapable of doing what needs to be done, as much as they are uncertain about what that right thing is and whether anything they can do will have any real impact….
In Lima, Ohio, where people have seen America’s industrial might falter: “I’m just waiting for China or somebody to take us over. That’s the way it seems,” says Becky Jamison, 36, who has watched her 18-year-old son look unsuccessfully for work for months. “Because we’re just falling apart.”

By now, the public is realizing that war is big business. It’s all about money, power and control. 9/11 was immediately turned into an excuse to invade Iraq. As soon as US forces got there, it was all about the oil.
All Wars are Fought Over Natural Resources
Wars for Oil
Skipping over a long history of U.S. imperialist aggression against other countries, we may note that the U.S. did not go to war in the Persian Gulf in 1991 to liberate Kuwait from Iraqi aggression (to which its ambassador to Iraq, April Glaspie, had given a green light) but rather to move military forces into the area and to establish military bases so as to exercise greater control over the area’s oil.
Talk of removing “that evil dictator Saddam Hussein” is simple obfuscation.
Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld are lying to the American people when they pretend to be outraged at the actions of the Iraqi dictator (whom the U.S. supported right up until 1991, including Saddam’s use of chemical weapons against the Kurds).
In fact it is control of Middle Eastern oil which is the primary motivation for U.S. military plans for that area.
The Federal Reserve has been lending money to foreign banks for a lot longer than you might think.
You may also be surprised who they were lending to — but then again, after all you’ve read, maybe you’re starting to get the point. This is another excerpt from Still’s book, New World Order: The Ancient Plan of Secret Societies.
150: Less than four years after its passage in 1913, with World War I in progress, the Federal Reserve loaned American dollars to the Soviet Communists immediately following the Russian revolution. As we will see, a similar injunction of American cash occurred less than thirty years later during the next World War.
On June 15, 1933, Congressman McFadden explained to Congress what the Federal Reserve, along with the Rockefellers’ Chase Bank (soon to merge with the Warburg’s Manhattan Bank to form Chase-Manhattan Bank), had done on behalf of the fledgling Communist government.
The Soviet Government has been given United States Treasury funds by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank acting through the Chase Bank… you will be staggered to see how much American money has been taken from the United States Treasury for the benefit of Russia. [23]
[23. Daniel Plemmons, The Illuminati, (self-published tract, 1979), p. 28-29.]
Another extremely vital “leak” of information that came to my attention during this investigation is from Susan Lindauer, who worked for the CIA in the lead-up to 9/11.
Lindauer wasn’t just any CIA employee. She was the chief liaison between Iraq and the Bush Administration.
What she reveals in this videotaped testimony is astonishing. The Iraqis wanted peace, and were willing to do anything, trade anything, give up anything to get it. They were flatly refused.
Furthermore, she reveals that she was warned not to go to New York in the weeks leading up to 9/11. She was told that miniature nuclear devices were going to be used and there would be radioactive fallout.
By blowing the whistle and revealing that there was prior knowledge of 9/11 at the highest levels, she suffered a prolonged imprisonment — but was ultimately freed.
She also asserts that the pilot who shot down Flight 93 over Shanskville, Pennsylvania is still incarcerated, and is being drugged into a “chemical straight jacket.”
CIA Asset Susan Lindauer Blows the Whistle 10 Years Post-911
As we head into the next section, we will tie all these pieces together by revealing the Occult Economy — and how this trillion-dollar lawsuit could break open the whole thing, and free us from Financial Tyranny.