The Law of One presents a super-advanced view of cosmology, physics and philosophy. Here's the original collection of 2012 quotes...
REVISITING A MAJOR SYNOPSIS FROM JUNE 9, 2006
This synopsis was originally written up on June 9th of last year in my discussion group -- though it doesn't seem that long ago. We were responding to a question from a reader about 2012.
Since we've been unveiling so much of this content lately, including the astonishing and controversial 'Henry Deacon' updates, which again indicate that a spontaneous event is coming, it seemed like the right time to show you the original letter -- so you can make up your own mind! (I did add headings and a few very minor edits to make it more readable.)
Later we will probably re-arrange this data in a new way, but here's how it first came through:
LAW OF ONE AND 2012: THE FACTS!
This is GREAT... I went back to the original Law of One source material and found a shocking correspondence between the Cayce Readings and the Law of One that I never saw before. It all centers on the year 1936, which BOTH sources actually target as THE year we directly hit the first wave of 4D energy.
We're going to need more research to see what was going on at this exact time, but the Cayce Readings give us unambiguous statements about what PHYSICALLY happened -- inside the Earth itself.
So today's the day for a new discovery! Here's how it all unfolded -- in the context of this post where I'm finally trying to lay the 2012 'gradualist' argument to rest once and for all, based on actual text analysis of the Law of One...
I haven't posted in a while, but I had a dream last night relating to ascension and 2012 and i thought i should share it.
DW: Please don't forget that ALL dreams must be considered as a projection of your own psychological issues, BEFORE ever mapping them as being representative of real events or prophecies. It is extremely rare to ever have a dream that is NOT strictly representative of your own issues -- simply because your dream landscape IS a projective matrix of the psyche.
>some background: there has/had been a polarization on this forum relating to the possible events of 2012.
DW: I don't think there's any polarization within the actual Law of One material itself. Only one answer is correct, and that correct answer MUST satisfy ALL the relevant quotes.
SHOULD YOU PURSUE PHYSICAL LONGEVITY?
Here's a quote from Session 14 about whether you should pursue "longevity" in your third-density body or not:
Ra: I am Ra. The harvest is now. There is not at this time any reason to include efforts along these distortions towards longevity, but rather to encourage distortions toward seeking the heart of self...
DW: So, I will show you, today, some of the proof that there IS NO responsible 'gradualist' argument that can be made from the Law of One series. This is the first major step towards building up a whole mini-book about this scholarly question. The time has come, because I'm getting tired of repeating myself, to be quite honest!
WILL OTHERS BE ABLE TO HEAR RA'S WORDS?
Don't forget, from the same session, that Ra said others would be able to hear their words besides the three members of L/L:
Questioner: I assume that as the cycle ends and inconveniences [Earth Changes] occur, there will be some entities who start seeking, or [will] be catalyzed into seeking, because of the trauma -- and will then hear your words telepathically or in written form, such as this book. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. You are correct -- except in understanding that the inconveniences have [already] begun.
DW: So, it is written into the Law of One series that others will be able to contact Ra in their own way. This was not an exclusive, one-time-only contact. It is for this same reason that I have been able to understand and extend many of the core points in the Law of One series, both scientifically and philosophically.
More interestingly, this quote makes it obvious that the "inconveniences," or earth changes, had already begun by 1981. The first 75 sessions of the Law of One series were all conducted in 1981. The next 25 were conducted in '82 and the last two in '83.
THE CAYCE READINGS WERE ACCURATE
So first of all, for reference, let's keep in mind that the Law of One series validated the Cayce readings as an accurate read of the Akashic Record:
Questioner: Who spoke through Edgar Cayce?
Ra: I am Ra. No entity spoke through Edgar Cayce.
Questioner: Where did the information come from that Edgar Cayce channeled?
Ra: I am Ra. We have explained before that the intelligent infinity is brought into intelligent energy from eighth density or the octave. The one vibratory sound complex called Edgar used this gateway to view the present -- which is not the continuum you experience but the potential social memory complex of this planetary sphere.
The term your peoples have used for this is the “Akashic Record” or the “Hall of Records.”
DW: So the Cayce Readings are authenticated as a valid source in the Law of One series. Here's a link to some Cayce passages regarding this shift -- some of which might be useful as you read on, if you're a stickler for detail:
Don Elkins was curious about these prophecies and wanted more detail. Ra's answer was that this was the MOST PROBABLE view at the time the readings were done -- but not the ONLY view... see Session 65 and then do a Find on "Cayce" for details.
Furthermore, I do NOT think it's a big deal one way or the other -- if you try to live by Law of One philosophy this really doesn't change anything in terms of how you live your life. That's the first point.
NEW EARTH IS ONE HUNDRED TIMES MORE HARMONIOUS
Whether something big happens in 2012 or you live out your life naturally, in the Law of One philosophy you still live by the same principles, and no matter what, it is very clear from what Ra said that things are going to get a lot easier and more harmonious in a very short time from now -- 100 times more harmonious, to be exact:
Ra: I am Ra. The mind/body/spirit complex of third density has perhaps one hundred times as intensive a program of catalytic action from which to distill distortions and learn/teachings than any other of the densities.
Thus the learn/teachings are most confusing to the mind/body/spirit complex which is, shall we say, inundated by the ocean of experience.
DW: So, remember -- as my other recent posts have pointed out, the Law of One CLEARLY states that ALL earth changes cease after 2012, that there is a 22-degree pole shift, and that the photon shifts to a new "true color green" core frequency. No one can dispute that.
THE BASIC ENERGY OF PHYSICAL REALITY MAKES A SHIFT
Before we go into the other stuff, if you can hang with me here, let's focus on this green-ray photon shift business, from Session 40. Here is where the correspondence between color and density was first asked:
Questioner: Thank you. I was also wondering if the first-density corresponded somehow to the color red, the second to the color orange, the third to the color yellow and so on... so that the basic vibration that forms the photon that forms the core of all atomic particles would have a relationship to that color in the density... Is this in any way correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is more correct than you have stated.
DW: Before we read the rest of this quote, check out the fact that Ra said it is not only correct, it is MORE correct than Don stated! What did Don say, in part? "THE PHOTON... FORMS THE CORE OF ALL ATOMIC PARTICLES." This statement is CORRECT.
So, if this core photon vibration INCREASES by an entire density level, then ALL atomic particles must make a density change as well- a TOTAL change in the physics of matter and energy. Elsewhere as this post goes on, you'll see that this core shift completes when? 2012.
A SHIFT AT THE MOST BASIC QUANTUM LEVEL
Let's continue with Ra's answer:
Ra: Firstly, you are correct in positing a quantum, if you will, as the nature of each density and further correct in assuming that these quanta may be seen to be of vibratory natures corresponding to color as you grasp this word.
DW: Don't miss this point. A quantum is simply a packet of energy at the sub-atomic level. So each density is built up from untold trillions of packets of energy with their own atomic / molecular core vibrations- and Ra says these vibrations DO correspond to color. Moving on:
Ra: However, it is also true, as you have suspected but not asked, that each density is of the metaphysical characteristic complex of its ray.
DW: The "metaphysical characteristic" of each color was previously explained, but Ra re-iterates some of this in the next passage:
Ra: Thus in first-density the red ray is the foundation for all that is to come. In second density the orange ray is that of movement and growth of the individual, this ray striving towards the yellow ray of self-conscious manifestations of a social nature as well as individual; third-density being the equivalent, and so forth,
DW: Before we finish this sentence, ask yourself if each density is ONLY comprised of its color, or whether there IS a bleed-through from the next highest level. When we pick up right where we left off, we get the answer:
Ra: ...each density being primarily its ray plus the attractions of the following ray pulling it forward in evolution and to some extent coloring or shading the chief color of that density.
EVOLUTION IS AN ENERGETICALLY-DRIVEN PROCESS
DW: Don then asks about 2D-3D change to take an existing example of evolution. Obviously first, second and third density all co-exist and are visible to us, since first, second and third-density lifeforms all can be seen -- 1D elements/minerals, 2D microbes/plants/insects/animals, and 3D human beings. Let's continue:
Questioner: Thank you. Taking as an example the transition between second and third-density, when this transition takes place, does the frequency of vibration which forms the photon (the core of all particles of the density), does this frequency increase from... the frequency we measure for the color orange, to the frequency we measure for the color yellow?
What I am getting at is, do all the vibrations that form the density, the basic vibrations of the photon, increase in a quantum fashion over a relatively short period of time?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. Then you see within each density the gradual up-grading of vibratory levels.
DW: Ra says it is CORRECT that the "basic vibrations of the photon increase in a quantum fashion over a relatively short period of time." Outside of these short, sudden shifts, there are also "gradual up-grading of vibratory levels" in between.
This raises the question -- is it ONLY physical matter that is affected by a density shift? Clearly not. It is LIFE that is most affected. You can have a first-density world and if you sent a probe there, it might just look like a pretty barren place with rocks, water, fire and storm activity.
The important part is that the VIBRATIONS are not present to take those raw materials and begin arranging them into DNA, to form single and multi-celled organisms, which is second-density life as Ra explains it.
WHAT IN THE WORLD IS A 'TRUE COLOR DENSITY?'
This becomes clearer as Ra goes on. The question you should now be asking yourself is, "what exactly do they mean by "true color?" I will skip ahead slightly, to where Ra further clarifies their point.
Here we also get into the difference between space-time and time-space when dealing with "true color densities". The important point to remember now is that physical matter is space-time only; it is only when you see LIFE that you have a joining of space-time and time-space. That's why life is the key:
Ra: ...The frequency that is the basis of each density is what may be called a true color. This term is impossible to define given your system of sensibilities and scientific measurements, for color has vibratory characteristics both in space/time and in time/space.
The true color is then overlaid and tinged by the rainbow of the various vibratory levels within that density and the attraction vibrations of the next true color density.
DW: So, this answer tells us that both space AND time are strongly affected by a density shift. Again, we're talking about a strongly DIS-continuous event in a density shift. Time as we know it is NOT going to just keep hummin' on along like nothing happened.
HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE TO MAKE THE EVOLUTIONARY TRANSITION?
Next Don will ask about the time it took for 2D to become 3D. Before we read that quote, let's keep in mind that he again re-iterates Ra's earlier statements, like he first did in Session 20. Here's his relevant quote from Session 20:
Questioner: Speaking of the rapid change that occurred in the physical vehicle for--the change from second to third density: this, you said, occurred in approximately a generation and a half. Body hair was lost and there were structural changes.
DW: STRUCTURAL CHANGES. This is not gentle or subtle. Ra agreed with him on this point. The brain suddenly became twice as large, much of the hair disappeared, and the body could walk fully upright.
A GENERATION OF 2D IS 900 YEARS
Questioner: How long was the time of transition on this planet between second and third-density? A generation and a half I believe. Is that correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct, the time measured in your years being approximately 1,350.
DW: Interesting. This means that a "generation" of second density is 900 years of our time.
TIME HAS SPED UP -- POSSIBLY 100 TIMES FASTER
Are you paying attention? This strongly implies that time as we know it has DRAMATICALLY sped up between second and third-density. We already know that in third-density the average animal's life is probably 9 years at best.
Ra secretly has slipped in the fact that time started going at least 100 times faster in 3D than it was in 2D!
This means that the actual RATE at which a creature lives out its life increased by 100 times. This is consistent with other reports I've seen of the variability of time.
Therefore, such a speeding-up should happen again when we go into 4D -- but if our time is going faster now than it was before, the time period should be a lot less than 1350 years.
HOW FAST WILL WE TRANSITION INTO FOURTH DENSITY?
If it were to happen ten times faster than before, that's a target window of 135 years. That's actually not a bad guess based on the real material in the text. Let's read Don's question and get the answer:
Questioner: Then what will be the time of transition on this planet from third to fourth-density?
Ra: I am Ra. This is difficult to estimate due to the uncharacteristic anomalies of this transition. There are at this space/time nexus beings incarnate which have begun fourth-density work. However, the third-density climate of planetary consciousness is retarding the process.
At this particular nexus the possibility/probability vortices indicate somewhere between 100 and 700 of your years as transition period. This cannot be accurate due to the volatility of your peoples at this space/time.
DW: Here is the one and ONLY 'gradualist' quote in the entire Law of One series. You just read the ONE quote that has created the WHOLE PROBLEM everyone's arguing about. Here we're taking it in its FULL context, NOT as a separate and isolated quote to be judged alone.
We will have to keep integrating what we learn as we go along. That's part of what makes the Law of One a difficult study. It's a lot to float in your brain, but let's keep going from where we were.
As we're about to see, this 100-700 year period does not start counting as of the time of the Law of One material... it begins in 1936. Trip out on this for a minute. We entered into a whole different structure of reality as we know it, beginning in 1936.
Ever since then, the "rules" have changed- we now create our own reality, where "thoughts become things"!
WHAT'S SO SPECIAL ABOUT 1936?
Ever since 1936, our 'core photons', making up all the atoms and molecules, have already started shifting in frequency, to a degree. This leads to more people getting cancer, as their negative thoughts manifest telekinetically in their bodies. It also leads to OTHER types of telekinesis, as well as the Earth Changes: people's disharmony starts translating into physical upheavals on the Earth's surface. Let's go on:
Questioner: Has the vibration of the basic, of the photon, of all our particles increased in frequency already?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. It is this influence which has begun to cause thoughts to become things. As an example you may observe the thoughts of anger becoming those cells of the physical bodily complex going out of control to become what you call the cancer.
Questioner: ...I am assuming that this vibratory increase began about between twenty and thirty years ago. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. The first harbingers of this were approximately forty-five of your years ago, [1981-45= 1936] the energies vibrating more intensely through the forty year period preceding the final movement of vibratory matter, shall we say, through the quantum leap, as you would call it.
DW: OK. Got that? Ra gives an EXACT time for when the 4D vibrations started having a DIRECT effect on the Earth, creating "harbingers." The exact year? 1936.
A 'FINAL QUANTUM LEAP' IN 2012
Now before we get into WHY this is so cool, you must ALSO consider that this last quote is all about the PAST. They also say that the energies begin "vibrating more intensely through the forty-year period PRECEDING THE FINAL... QUANTUM LEAP."
Elsewhere this "quantum leap" is clearly, unambiguously given as 2012, as further quotes below will establish.
What's 40 years before 2012? 1972.
This is not only Watergate, it is also when the gap between rich and poor suddenly accelerated dramatically -- as I learned in a sociology class in college. There was a gas shortage soon afterwards, and Earth Change activity stepped up.
This may also explain why it was advantageous for me to be born in 1973- a soul could take on a higher vibratory level at incarnation than was ever before possible.
Though I consider his channeled material to be of mixed quality, Drunvalo Melchizedek also "got" that something major shifted in 1972. Though I believe he got the WHY all wrong, he may well have gotten the WHAT correct -- a vibrational shift. That lends further support to the idea that Ra is talking about 2012.
1936 REVISITED: EDGAR CAYCE QUOTES
Now let's take a side tangent and examine this business about 1936 before we dive further into this Law of One quote. Something really cool and amazing must have happened in this year, right under everyone's noses.
We've already established that Carla is not a Cayce scholar and did not read Cayce books very much -- she didn't know Cayce had been Ra-Ta, for example, until my co-author Wynn Free discussed it with her. Therefore, it's even more unlikely that she would know any other Cayce prophecies that are even more obscure.
Check out what two different Cayce Readings say about 1936... that same EXACT year:
Q: What will be the type and extent of the upheaval in ’36?
A: The wars, the upheavals in the interior of the Earth, and the shifting of same by the differentiation in the axis as respecting the positions from the Polaris center. 5748-6 (7/1/32)
DW: Polaris is the North Star, so this means that the Earth's interior (there's a little mass in the center called the core) shifts off of its conventional north-south alignment it had up until then. What did the Cayce Readings say CAUSED this upheaval in the interior of the Earth? Simple... they were caused by (caps mine):
...the catastrophes of OUTSIDE FORCES to the Earth in '36, which will come from the shifting of the equilibrium of the Earth itself in space, with those of the consequential effects upon the various portions of the country -- or world--affected by same. 3976-10 (2/8/32)
DW: Got it? OUTSIDE FORCES come to the Earth and shift its EQUILIBRIUM IN SPACE. Cayce took a lot of heat (pun intended) for this prophecy, because nothing SEEMED to have happened in 1936.
AN UPHEAVAL IN THE INTERIOR OF THE EARTH
Nonetheless, this is an upheaval in the INTERIOR of the earth -- the core, which is like a separate piece in the center. Elsewhere in the Law of One they say that this 4D shift also is causing a "heating effect", i.e. global warming, which has certainly increased since then.
We know that our Earth's core IS now noticeably tilted at a different north-south angle than the outside of the Earth. I discussed the proof of this in the CONVERGENCE series, and the above article goes into it as well.
No one knows if it's always been like that or WHEN it got that way. Yet Cayce and the Law of One are in PERFECT alignment (pun intended) on when -- and how -- this happened! No wonder- the Law of One said Cayce was reading the Akashic accurately!
1998 CHANGES WERE THE MOST PROBABLE FUTURE IN CAYCE'S TIME
The Cayce Readings said elsewhere that this INTERNAL shift in 1936 would create EXTERNAL changes in 1958-1998. The negatively-inspired readings also implied that 1998 could be a massive pole shift AND the "second coming of Christ," which was another way of modeling the idea of Ascension. Each person who Ascends becomes part of the Christ Spirit in the Cayce model.
Again, if you go back to Session 65, Ra makes an analogy about how Cayce's 1998 vision of a pole shift was the MOST PROBABLE outcome at the time he did the reading, but not the ONLY one.
RA WARNED OF A 'CONTROLLED FASCISM' SPREADING TOWARDS THE END
Before we break into that Cayce quote, we also get a warning from Ra that there is a strong possibility of a sort of fascism spreading on Earth. This prophecy, to many people's reckoning, is well in progress right now:
Questioner: Would the coming changes as we progress into fourth-density such as changes in the physical third-density planet due to the heating effect and changes such as the ability of people to perform what we term paranormal activities act as catalyst to create a greater seeking?
Ra: I am Ra. This is partially correct. The paranormal events occurring are not designed to increase seeking but are manifestations of those whose vibratory configuration enables [them] to contact the gateway to intelligent infinity...
The correct portion of your statements is the greater opportunity for service due to the many changes which will offer many challenges, difficulties, and seeming distresses within your illusion to many who then will seek to understand, if we may use this misnomer, the reason for the malfunctioning of the physical rhythms of their planet.
DW: Get that? They said SEEMING DISTRESSES. In fact all is well. Nonetheless, the Earth Changes cause many to 'seek to understand' what is going on. Let's proceed right where we left off:
Ra: Moreover, there exists probability/possibility vortices which spiral towards your bellicose actions. Many of these vortices are not of the nuclear war but of the less annihilatory but more lengthy so-called “conventional” war. This situation, if formed in your illusion, would offer many opportunities for seeking and for service.
DW: Ra is VERY under-stated on things like this. So when they say "many of these vortices," they're basically saying "this is what's going to happen unless something wild comes along to change it." By all evidence, nothing has changed it. Let's move on to see what they tell us is most likely going to happen:
Questioner: How would conventional warfare offer the opportunities for seeking and service?
Ra: I am Ra. The possibility/probabilities exist for situations in which great portions of your continent and the globe in general might be involved in the type of warfare which you might liken to guerrilla warfare.
DW: Can you say "9/11"? This prophecy has already come true, except instead of "guerrilla warfare" you just have to use another word... 'trrzm.' Let's continue:
Ra: The ideal of freedom from the so-called invading force of either the controlled fascism or the equally controlled social common ownership of all things would stimulate great quantities of contemplation upon the great polarization implicit in the contrast between freedom and control.
DW: This is what's going on right now. All this government conspiracy talk, the idea of stealing elections, illegitimate wars, invading countries for their oil... the proof is right in front of your face. We're already benefiting from the "great quantities of contemplation upon... the contrast between freedom and control." Moving on:
Ra: In this scenario which is being considered at this time/space nexus the idea of obliterating valuable sites and personnel would not be considered an useful one. Other weapons would be used which do not destroy as your n-clear arms would.
DW: The airplanes of 9/11 didn't really destroy any valuable sites or personnel like nukx would have done. It was designed for maximum shock with little actual damage to the real infrastructure. Continuing:
Ra: In this on-going struggle the light of freedom would burn within the mind/body/spirit complexes capable of such polarization.
Lacking the opportunity for overt expression of the love of freedom, the seeking for inner knowledge would take root aided by those of the Brothers and Sisters of Sorrow which remember their calling upon this sphere.
DW: So, many Wanderers/ ET souls/ Brothers and Sisters of Sorrow are here at this time to teach people to love the greatest "freedom" of all... "the seeking for inner knowledge."
CAYCE SAW THE MOST PROBABLE FUTURE FOR HIS TIME
Let's go on as Don then asks a question, going as close to the wire as he can to try to get an answer about why Cayce would have predicted a pole shift in 1998. This is a physical Earth Change catalyst as opposed to the "warfare" catalyst Ra was just speaking of.
Don is seeing "dual catalysts operating" -- Ra's warfare and Cayce's possible pole shift- and wants to know "which one is going to act first":
Questioner: We would seem to have dual catalysts operating, and the question is which one is going to act first. The prophecies, I will call them, made by Edgar Cayce indicated many Earth changes and I am wondering about the mechanics describing the future...
What is the value of such a prophesy such as Cayce made with respect to Earth changes and all of these scenarios?
Ra: I am Ra. Consider the shopper entering the store to purchase food with which to furnish the table for the time period you call a week. Some stores have some items, others a variant set of offerings.
We speak of these possibility/probability vortices, when asked, with the understanding that such are as a can, jar, or portion of goods in your store.
DW: So again, the "probability vortexes" are possible events that may or may not happen in the future. Each of them, in Ra's analogy, would be like something you could pick up in a grocery store. Moving on:
Ra: It is unknown to us as we scan your time/space whether your peoples will shop hither or yon. We can only name some of the items available for the choosing. The, shall we say, record which the one you call Edgar read from is useful in that same manner.
There is less knowledge in this material of other possibility/probability vortices, and more attention paid to the strongest vortex. We see the same vortex but also see many others.
DW: OK... got that? The most probable vortex at the time Edgar read the Akashic was of a pole shift and Second Coming of Christ in 1998, let's say -- as many books described prior to 1998.
Less "attention" is paid to other vortexes by Cayce's source, but from Ra's level they seem to be able to see that the biggest vortex at the time (Cayce's 1930s) is not necessarily the RIGHT one. They apparently are more capable of seeing how other events CHANGE that outcome in the future.
Now let's read as they keep explaining this:
Ra: Edgar’s material could be likened unto one hundred boxes of your cold cereal, another vortex likened unto three, or six, or fifty of another product which is eaten by your peoples for breakfast. That you will breakfast is close to certain. The menu is your own choosing.
The value of prophecy must be realized to be only that of expressing possibilities.
Moreover, it must be, in our humble opinion, carefully taken into consideration that any time/space viewing, whether by one of your time/space or by one such as we who view the time/space from a dimension, shall we say, exterior to it will have a quite difficult time expressing time measurement values.Thus prophesy given in specific terms is more interesting for the content or type of possibility predicted than for the space/time nexus of its supposed occurrence.
DW: Here, the point they are making is that it is VERY hard to pin an exact date down on anything. The event itself is what really matters. This is also why they gave a window of 2011-2013 for the shifting of the photon to true-color-green level; it's hard to get it exact.
VERY EASY TO PREDICT COMING EARTH CHANGES
Anyway, let's go on a bit more with this passage from Session 65 before we get back on track with the previous one. Don is trying to sort out the "distinct possibility" of two different types of catalyst- one where the world is gripped with war and fascism, the other having to do with Earth Changes. Don wants to know how effective these Earth Changes really are in terms of inspiring personal growth, i.e. in providing "catalyst":
Questioner: So we have the distinct possibility of two different types of catalyst creating an atmosphere of seeking that is greater than that which we experience at present. There will be much confusion, especially in the scenario of Earth changes simply because there have been many predictions of these changes by many groups giving many and sundry reasons for the changes.
Can you comment on the effectiveness of this type of catalyst and the rather wide pre-knowledge of the coming changes but also the wide variation in explanation for these changes?
Ra: I am Ra. Given the amount of strength of the possibility/probability vortex which posits the expression by the planet itself of the difficult birthing of the planetary self into fourth-density, it would be greatly surprising were not many which have some access to space/time able to perceive this vortex.
The amount of this cold cereal in the grocery, to use our previous analogy, is disproportionately large. Each which prophesies does so from an unique level, position, or vibratory configuration. Thus biases and distortions will accompany much prophecy.
DW: So here Ra is saying that predicting Earth Changes is like hitting a big old softball pitch from the Universe. It's so obviously going to happen to some degree that everyone can see it if they start looking. Then it goes through their filters of personality and that's where it gets distorted. That's the end of our Session 65 excerpt.
REVIEW OF THE MOST IMPORTANT DATES AND TIMES
If you remember, before that we were comparing a Law of One quote about when the fourth density would hit. Let's rewind the tape and bring that moment back again:
Questioner: ...I am assuming that this vibratory increase began about between twenty and thirty years ago. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. The first harbingers of this were approximately forty-five of your years ago, [1981-45= 1936] the energies vibrating more intensely through the forty year period preceding the final movement of vibratory matter, shall we say, through the quantum leap, as you would call it.
DW: When we bring in Cayce's scan of the Akashic, we get a perfect correlation: we first hit the fourth-density "outside forces" in 1936, and it shifted the Earth's inner core to its new 4D location -- which Ra gives as being 22 degrees offset from our current rotational axis.
Again, this quote also says that 40 years before the "final movement of vibratory matter... through the quantum leap", the 4D energy would again get stronger. This appears to be 1972, and which fits with real-world data points -- Watergate and the economic changes.
Other quotes we have not yet cited clearly point to 2011-2013 as this moment of "quantum leap," as do a host of other data points -- leaked intel from secret projects [Burisch, Deacon, etc] as well as the research of Dr. Sergey Smelyakov, where time implodes into "singularity" at the end of 2012.
HOW FAR INTO 4D ARE WE NOW?
Let's move on to Don's questions as they continue in Session 40. Now he pushes it a bit and wants to find out exactly HOW FAR we are into the change. Heck, if it's 700 years off, as a gradualist might think, we might not be very far into it, right? Read:
Questioner: Starting then, forty-five years ago, and taking the entire increase in vibration that we will experience in this density change, approximately what percentage of the way through this increase of vibration are we right now?
Ra: I am Ra. The vibratory nature of your environment is [already] true-color-green.
This is at this time heavily over-woven with the orange ray of planetary consciousness.
DW: So we're already REALLY close, based on this quote. Also, notice that they said ORANGE, NOT YELLOW, is HEAVILY overlaying the Earth at this time. Orange is the ANIMAL level.
This means that many people on Earth are not even INDIVIDUATING, which is the basis of 3D evolution- they are still following leader figures in government and spirituality, and not making up their own minds about who they are and what they believe.
IS IT A GRADUAL OR 'DISCRETE' (SEPARATE AND DISTINCT) CHANGE?
So is this a gradual shift, or does something distinct happen at some point -- a discrete (i.e. separate) change -- the so-called "quantum leap"? Let's keep reading right along:
Ra: However, the nature of quanta is such that the movement over the boundary is that of discrete placement of vibratory level.
DW: DISCRETE PLACEMENT. Discrete means "separate and distinct." A quantum leap. They also say that there is a "boundary" that we move over. When is the boundary? 2011-2013.
DISCRETE MEANS 'SPONTANEOUS'
Guess what... even before all the other supporting quotes about 3D/4D electrical incompatibility, what you've just read about the photon shifting across a "discrete boundary" is proof positive, within the Law of One physics, that this is a spontaneous event.
In suppressed scientific experiments, like the Philadelphia Experiment, when you push the photons in a given object past the 'crossing point' of light speed, the object VANISHES. It has shifted into fourth-density, which WE CANNOT SEE in third density and is ELECTRICALLY INCOMPATIBLE with us.
I've spoken to many people, professionally and privately, about the 2012 stuff. A pattern became very visible early along. I feel that people who have not fully accepted the idea of physical death -- perhaps someone very close to them died and they never really dealt with it -- are far more likely to be "gradualist," whereas people who understand FULLY that no one is ever lost and regardless of where you are, there you are, have a much easier time with the spontaneous model.
EVERYONE GOES THROUGH THE VORTEX... REGARDLESS OF PROGRESS
Now let's bring in a bit more of Darryl's post that triggered this all-day writing project for me, where he is trying to sort out "gradualist" from the 2012/ "sudden dramatic event camp":
>Let's call one side the sudden dramatic event camp. This theory says that there will be a pole shift or some other catistrophic event where all of the non-ascendees perish and the ascendees do not.
DW: Whoa! That is NOT true. One of the quotes that really helped Mandelker and I figure out what the Law of One really said, within its OWN system, is "ALL are harvested REGARDLESS OF PROGRESS."
That's in Session 6:
That means that EVERYONE is an "Ascendee," as Darryl calls it. The question is WHERE YOU GO once you pop through the worldwide "quantum leap." Do you hang out in the astral planes for 100-150 years and holographically recreate what you already had, or do you start climbing the staircase of Ascension? At that point you have a choice.
So, you have to very clearly differentiate between what I am actually saying and what others might think, or what you have thought from reading something on the site. This proves how difficult it is to understand what is actually being said.
If Darryl thinks this is what I've been saying, then I'm sure other people have too -- hence I get stuck in endless re-iteration. So now I'm beginning a more official document I can use on-site to clear this mess up.
WHAT ABOUT MEGA-EARTH CHANGES?
The Cayce Readings said that the mega-Earth Changes were more of a metaphor of upheaval in people's lives -- NOT an event that people would literally go through. And my own readings, for what it's worth, have repeatedly said that (paraphrased):
"You are already experiencing the big earth changes that the ancient prophecies spoke about. If you're waiting for something even bigger to happen, you've missed the point."
GRADUALIST POSITION IS NOT SUPPORTABLE WITHIN LAW OF ONE TEXT
Darryl goes on:
>there are several variations that fit under this category. The other camp is the gradual transition camp whereby the non-ascendees are
>replaced with 4d folks over time and the whole transition is seemless and most are unaware that anything fundemental has really changed.
I have to say that I have been firmly in the gradual transition camp. The interesting thing about polarizations of ideas is that many times the truth is somewhere in the middle.
DW: If what you've just written is, in fact, a good articulation of the "gradualist" perspective, then there are hard, unequivocal Law of One quotes that negate this. We've already taken a heavy plunge into them.
Something happened inside the earth in 1936 when we hit the edge of fourth-density energy. Cayce spoke of it, and Law of One gave the same date; they are speaking about the same thing. I just realized that for the first time today. No one else ever has published about this, so it appears to be a new discovery.
This 1936 inner-earth event has real consequences on the outside of the Earth. We don't just gradually wash it away... big things are happening now as a result.
3D AND 4D ARE 'ELECTRICALLY INCOMPATIBLE'
Now let's really start going down the rabbit hole about this "discrete" "quantum leap" that is going to happen. The Law of One very clearly states that 3D beings and 4D beings CANNOT co-exist -- due to "electrical incompatibility:"
Ra:... The positively oriented harvested entities will remain in this planetary influence but not upon this plane. [i.e. third density]...
DW: This means after the "quantum leap," i.e. "harvest" or Ascension, you remain here on Earth, but not incarnate in the third density. There is no "overlap", no gradual shift. It's one or the other. Let's keep going...
Questioner: Now these entities incarnate into a third-density vibratory body. I am trying to understand how this transition takes place from third to fourth-density...
Ra:... If a third-density entity were, shall we say, electrically aware of fourth-density in full, the third-density electrical fields would fail due to incompatibility.
DW: That right there is the death-blow (pun intended) to the gradualists. Sorry... I'm just trying to teach what the Law of One really says, whether we feel warm and fuzzy about it or not.
YOUR 3D BODY IS TRANSMUTED
Ra even further drives the point home in the next sentence:
Ra: To answer your query about death, these entities will die according to third-density necessities...
DW: The transition of 3D to 4D is NOT gradualist. These quotes proves it. As I have since written, this form of "death" is a technicality -- a compromise Ra had to make in wording in describing transmutation.
In this case you go through a vortex, you disappear from 3D (as has happened in many cases, both in secret projects and eyewitness accounts of vanishings) and you CAN come back to 3D -- your body will re-materialize.
Does this mean you are "dead?" No... if the earth stayed 3D you could easily shift back to your 3D body after this happens. Your body is not damaged or disrupted... it just shifts out of 'third density' to a higher density.
Here's the problem: Since the earth ITSELF does not return to 3D, then technically NEITHER DO YOU.
So the people who are not ready to shift to 4D will hang out in the astral planes for a while... and that is what Mandelker and I concluded the 100-700 year 'clear-out period' is really about.
GRADUALIST PERSPECTIVE DOESN'T WORK...
Nonetheless, let's keep going with this excerpt. Don wanted to make VERY sure he heard what Ra just said, two different ways, so he re-iterates the statement as a question, seeking greater clarity...
Questioner: Now as this transition continues into fourth-density activation, in order to inhabit this fourth-density sphere it will be necessary for all third-density physical bodies to go through the process which we refer to as death. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.
DW: OK, so as you can see there is no 'gradualist' model to be had in these quotes. Two times in a row the word 'death' is clearly and unapologetically used. Just to further drive the point home, let's remember that Ra said the "true color green" core vibration of the photon would be fully activated as of 2011-2013.
We've already seen that this is associated with a 'quantum leap' and a 'discrete' event, which started in 1936 from instreaming 4D energy making "thoughts become things" and shifting the Earth's core on its own axis, as Cayce stated.
4D EARTH WILL BE 'SOLID AND INHABITABLE ON ITS OWN' AFTER 2012
Now read a bit farther down in this same session. I will selectively clip out certain sentences just so you really get this:
Questioner: Then at some time in the future the fourth-density sphere will be fully activated. What is the difference between full activation and partial activation for this sphere?
Ra: I am Ra. At this time the cosmic influxes are conducive to true color green core particles being formed and material of this nature thus being formed...
At full activation of the true color green density of love the planetary sphere will be solid and inhabitable upon its own...
DW: I must interrupt. 4D, which up until then was just a dream plane, becomes "SOLID AND INHABITABLE UPON ITS OWN" for the first time after the 'quantum leap' spoken of elsewhere.
ACTUAL LOCATION OF 4D IS A HIGHER ALTITUDE, WORLDWIDE, THAN WHERE WE ARE NOW
When you fly out of body, you realize that these other planes are HIGHER UP in the sky than where the Earth is. You have to fly a good distance up into space before you start seeing these planes, and I've punched through seven different levels on my own travels.
So the 4D sphere is now up in the sky -- it does not co-exist right over our own space. After this shift it finally will become a solid and inhabitable place. People who Ascend will "borne up to the heavens" (Revelation) and become a part of this new place.
A NEW TYPE OF BIRTHING, 'TRANSFORMED THROUGH THE PROCESS OF TIME'
Now let's continue with Ra right where we left off:
Ra: ...and the birthing that takes place will have been transformed through the process of time, shall we say, to the appropriate type of vehicle to appreciate in full the fourth-density planetary environment.
DW: No gradualism here. The 4D planet Earth will be SOLID and INHABITABLE ON ITS OWN. Your 3D body is "electrically incompatible" with 4D, and "the appropriate type of vehicle" [body] that you will use "to appreciate in full the fourth-density" is NOT your ordinary human body.
RAPID CHANGES BETWEEN 2D AND 3D VEHICLES
In the same way, a second-density body is not the same as a third-density body. Don Elkins summarized Ra's perspective on the difference between 2D and 3D 'vehicles' in Session 20:
Questioner: Speaking of the rapid change that occurred in the physical vehicle for the change from second to third density: this, you said, occurred in approximately a generation and a half. Body hair was lost and there were structural changes.
DW: STRUCTURAL CHANGES. We're talking about a rapid event -- and the 4D transition is even more drastic because it is a light-body activation. Plenty of masters have Ascended and they disappear after bursting into light. If they come back they are in a light-body form. This is very, very different than what we're living in now.
4D TIME-SPACE FLIPS INTO 4D SPACE-TIME
Keep reading where we stopped in Session 63...
Ra:... At this nexus [i.e. 1981] the green-ray environment exists to a far greater extent in time/space than in space/time.
DW: Here we see that we have NOT really seen much of what's going to happen when fourth-density becomes SPACE-TIME, i.e. the physical world, than just the dream plane, i.e. time-space. Don asks for clarity:
Questioner: Could you describe the difference that you are speaking of with respect to time/space and space/time?
Ra: I am Ra. For the sake of your understanding we will use the working definition of inner planes. There is a great deal of subtlety invested in this sound vibration complex, but it, by itself, will perhaps fulfill your present need.
DW: The inner planes are what you fly through when you're out of body -- those nested spheres I was just speaking of. You fly up a certain distance and suddenly a NEW earth appears under your feet.
REGARDLESS OF PROGRES...
Now for some additional context on all this, let's go back for a more detailed look at Session 6:
Ra: One major cycle is approximately 25,000 of your years. There are three cycles of this nature during which those who have progressed may be harvested at the end of three major cycles. That is, approximately between 75 and 76,000 of your years.
All are harvested regardless of their progress, for during that time the planet itself has moved through the useful part of that dimension and begins to cease being useful for the lower levels of vibration within that density.
'INCONVENIENCES' AS WE MOVE INTO FOURTH-DIMENSION VIBRATION
DW: Again, "all are harvested REGARDLESS OF PROGRESS" when the Earth moves out of 3D vibrations at the end of the cycle. A discontinuous event. Ra's answer is VERY IMPORTANT, because once we know WHEN the planet "has moved through the useful part" of the third "dimension", then we also know when "all are harvested regardless of progress" Keep reading Session 6 to find out how close we are to moving through the "useful part" of 3D:
Questioner: What is the position of this planet with respect to the progression of cycles at this time?
Ra: I am Ra. This sphere is at this time in fourth-dimension vibration. Its material is quite confused due to the society memory complexes embedded in its consciousness.
It has not made an easy transition to the vibrations which beckon. Therefore, it will be fetched with some inconvenience.
Questioner: Is this inconvenience imminent within a few years?
Ra: I am Ra. This inconvenience, or disharmonious vibratory complex, has begun several of your years in the past. It shall continue unabated for a period of approximately three oh -- thirty -- of your years. [1981+30= 2011]
Questioner: After this period of thirty years I am assuming that this will be a fourth-density planet. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is so.
Questioner: Is it possible to estimate what percent of the present population will inhabit the fourth-density planet?
Ra: The harvesting is not yet, thus, estimation is meaningless.
DW: BANG! I rest my case. Now everything fits together. You see? Right after this 2013 point, the "estimation" of how many people will REMAIN HERE is not given. This makes it very clear that the 'quantum leap,' i.e. the 'discrete' change to a FULLY ACTIVATED 4D sphere, with new light-bodies, et cetera, is in 2013.
As established way back in Session 1, when Ra says "inconveniences" they mean earth changes. Here we are told that these inconveniences will last until 2011-2013, at which time Earth becomes a fourth-density planet... and the earth changes STOP.
The earth BECOMES A FOURTH-DENSITY PLANET. Our VEHICLES (bodies) change. There is a QUANTUM LEAP.
ESTIMATION OF HOW MANY WILL 'MAKE IT' IS MEANINGLESS
Furthermore, as we read before, it is 'meaningless' to estimate what percentage of our current population will be ready to take on the 4D vehicles and stay here when 4D earth becomes SOLID and INHABITABLE ON ITS OWN. Session 20:
Questioner:... Am I correct in assuming that the basic vibration that makes up the physical world changes, thus creating a different set of parameters, shall I say, in this short period of time between density changes allowing for the new type of being? Am I correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.
DW: Again, Mandelker and I realized that the "gradualist" quote only means how long it may take for the 3Ders to clear out of the astral before this can happen.
YET ANOTHER '2012' QUOTE, FIXING THE TIMELINE
Still not convinced? Need one final puff of air to put you over the top so you understand what the Law of One REALLY said about 2012 and Ascension? Have a gander at Session 17, which is notoriously difficult to find because of two commas in '2,011,':
Questioner: Am I to understand that the harvest will occur in the year 2,011, or will it be spread?
Ra: I am Ra. This is an approximation. We have stated we have difficulty with your time/space. This is an appropriate probable/possible time/space nexus for harvest [Ascension].
Those who are not in incarnation at this time will be included in the harvest [Ascension].
DW: Whether you are in a physical body or in the astral, the "quantum leap" is in 2011-2013, and that's when you go through Ascension.
A BIT ABOUT 'ASCENSION'
Elsewhere I could go through a whole huge breakdown of what the "harvest" (Ascension) process really means, but that's already in the Study Guide.
Ascension is way more than just a gradual continuation of your life -- you essentially distill ALL your past lives into a core vibration of who you REALLY are and how far you've REALLY come after all this time.
OK? Is there anything left to even argue about? Not if we're actually considering the Law of One quotes.
So the real question becomes this... do you really trust what the Law of One series said, or does it just somehow feel more 'comfortable' to think that reality couldn’t make this sudden of a change at this time?
Does it seem "safer," more 'realistic' to believe that we'll have this gradual, sleepy walk through the next 150 years, so boring that few even realize what's happened until it's all finished?
PERSONAL EARTH CHANGES IN DREAMSPACE
Let's go on with Darryl's post of his dream, which he interpreted as an Earth Change prophecy:
>My dream started out with a voice ephatically proclaiming "There WILL be a physical event". Then I was shown storm that quickly built in the sky where I was located. The storm was like a hurricane with the exception that temperatures droped to below freezing during the storm.
A little fuzzy here, but I sensed that the core of the storm lasted about 3 days and then it continued to rain for another 30 or so.
This storm occured everywhere at once.
I got the distinct feeling that if you were not prepared then you could quite possibly die during the month, but many do survive somehow. As I was waking up from the dream, the idea popped into my head that this was analogous to the biblical great flood and marked a new beginning.
DW: In this case your dream of a "storm occurring everywhere at once" is almost certainly a description of an emotional storm that you have been through in your own life -- hence it 'marked a new beginning'. The Cayce Readings invariably associated storms and earth changes in dreams with major shifts in a person's subconscious.
Now that you've read my exhaustive summary of Law of One quotes, I think it's easy to see that the 4D shift is an energetic process... not a slow, labored trip through earth-change hell. The earth changes are the CATALYST that stimulates people to grow inside, but the 2012 window is a SPONTANEOUS shift... not something that you fight your way through a'la Mad Max.
NO FURTHER EARTH CHANGES, SOLID AND INHABITABLE 4D AFTER 2011-2013
More of Darryl:
>OK, so how does this relate to the polarized ascension theory talked about above? Well, I believe from my impression of the dream that both harvest candidates and non-harvest candidates survive the event, and the world doesn't suddenly become a 4D paradise, but in actuality a really difficult place to survive for a while.
DW: Not true. The fourth-density world becomes solid and inhabitable on its own as of 2011-2013, and there are no further earth changes. This is what all the quotes I've just shared with you actually say. It’s an entirely different world that is NOT damaged by previous Earth Changes.
The 3D world might well be a big mess for a while, but that's not where we're living anymore at that point. No one is. All are harvested regardless of progress. You may have a lot of lost souls in the astral, but no one on 3D space-time Earth anymore. They vanished with the vortex activation of true-color green photons in a "quantum leap."
NO 'HELL PHASE'
>Of course, the event changes everything and forcing people to completely re-order their lives. Some will see it as hell (armagedon realized) and some will be quite happy with the change....namely those who are physicall and spiritually prepared.
DW: Again, the Law of One does not support this idea that the earth moves through a "hell" phase. Sorry to use your post as cannon fodder, Darryl, but this just exposes how much people's opinions are based on pre-existing bias and not actually on what the Law of One really said.
>Much mutual coorperation to survive...read service to others.
DW: No, again the idea of "cooperate to survive" is a doom and gloom approach that has very little to do with what 4D arrival is really about. The real work is inside yourself... seeking the heart of the self, coming to love and appreciate yourself as a person. A bit more of Darryl:
>And this or course is not a completely gradual transition either. So, I see this as a third middle-ground possibility. Didn't explain everything, but I'm short on time. Will expand if there is interest....
WHEW... FINALLY SHARED WHAT I'VE KNOWN ALL THIS TIME...
DW: OK, so there you have it. I guess I've just taken a "quantum leap" (pun intended) into quote-citation for what the Law of One really says on this issue -- after all this time and all this bickering about it. If you just start reading the Law of one at Session One and get going, you'll see this 'harvest / Ascension' question is discussed in great detail. Now you have the context to UNDERSTAND what you're reading.
I realized a full decade ago that Ra was talking about a very distinct event with a very real timeline, and therefore there HAD to be a way to scientifically prove it -- if anything in the Law of One was actually the truth.
That's become my quest, and my findings in this area have enormously enhanced the credibility of the Law of One material, upgrading its level of comprehension for a whole new Internet generation.
I have always had all these quotes in my head (except the new bit on 1936) and therefore it's frustrating to see people misunderstand it. I hope I've done my part to help clear up the confusion... nine and a half hours after I started working on this letter <gulp>.
Peace be with you -
- Keep your comment relevant to this item and this item ONLY!
- Please be polite: Attacking, demeaning, disrespectful messages will not be posted.
- Please don't use comments to plug your website/product or your post will be deleted.
- David does not answer questions here.
- Comments over 1000 characters OR that request a response should be on our FORUM.
- To make links clickable, highlight them and click on the blue planet button icon.
- Please do not make posts that carry across multiple comments!
- No Huge Paragraphs: Please hit ENTER twice every 2-3 sentences to make it readable.
Have you tried our 'Search' function located at the top right hand side of this page?
It might help you find what you're looking for.
Also, if you place a word in the 'Title Filter' area, our system will show you only the articles that contain that word in the title.
Let's converge in Portland!More...