Benjamin Fulford

[MarkM]

i recall a conversation i was involved in once that revolved around the issue of peaceful resolution of conflict. i was defending the position of violence not needing to ever be a means of resolution.

i was asked a series of hypothetical questions about what i would do if attacked, if a loved one was being attacked, etc.

in pondering how to respond to these questions, i felt a troubling cloud of low vibrationed energy come over me as i imagined these events occurring. it occurred to me that to just consider how i would react to such physical attacks was lowering my own vibration.

i noted that other than bullying in grade-school, i have never been in such a situation where i have had to defend against violence with violence. (come to think of it, i never defended myself physically in grade-school.)

as my questioner pressed for answers, i realized that it was, in some way, folly for me to even consider these questions, one of which was how i would choose if faced with a choice between which of various loved ones would die, if forced to make such a choice.

by the grace of whatever relation i have with my own higher guiding principles and entities, i am left peacefully alone in this life to transmit life and light into the world. such questions of intrigue have not had to be faced by me; and if such a regretful necessity arises, i'll cross that bridge when i come to it.

and so i declined to address the questions, feeling that to do so would only lessen my own conductivity of positive energy. there are those in this world who, for whatever reasons on whatever level, are faced with the need to choose how to act in the face of a lethal threat from others. if they find themselves on that particular stage, well, what can i say, it's unfortunate.

so, when i read about the chinese secret society's alleged plans to strike at the 'eye', i find i can neither support this plan 'b' as it is called, or condemn it. in fact, i can't even address the conundrum at all, for to do so fills me with an inner conflict, as it has many of you.

from a purely spiritual perspective, for those of us who have the mission of channeling the energy of light/love out into the world at large (and considering that many wanderers will read of benjamin fulford), merely the consideration of this conundrum, i believe, is antithetical to our mission, and perhaps is a ploy to lessen the pure, unadulterated quality of love from the heart of oneness, by making us think we should choose, here, regarding plan 'b', if it comes to that.

not to be ensnared by 'human' intrigue, i remain,

mark

[SuperManny]

just to fill in some small gaps.. it is my understanding that ra expresses the fact that some do have a double ie. 3d/4d body, the latter not fully being activated yet.

ra also expresses that because of the 4d body activation, the earth will not be inhabited by 3d entities because the 4d entity has not yet understood the ways in which to cloak itself from 3d.

i've been fascinated too by concept of this dual body. they asked ra if these dual-body people would have to die at harvest time. ra said they would have to die according to the laws of third density. this got me wondering, because he didn't exactly say that the 4d body would die. could it be possible, in a dual-body person, for the 3d body to die and the rest of the mind/body/spirit complex move on to fully actualize in a 4d earth? what else would be a reason to have a dual body?

obviously the 4d earth will be populated, but how will the first 4d people appear? maybe this could be a possible scenario, where these dual-body people kind of 'shed' the 3d body and keep the 4d body.

seems like i remember ra saying that when earth went from 2d to 3d a strain of the chimp/monkey/baboon became hairless and developed into the human body over one or two generations.

sorry mods, i know this thread is running a little off the topic, but i just wanted to respond to this...

[donald@newdirectionscs.com]

i found this today on rense.com 8/23/07 donald, i pray that this will come true.

http://benjaminfulford.com/secretgoverment.html

secret government promises big changes
by benjamin fulford

the secret government of the us and eu has promised a major overhaul in the wake of the warning it got from the chinese secret society, according to a senior japanese public security police officer and freemason who has been acting as an intermediary with the chinese secret society. �gexpect big changes this autumn,�h he said in comments confirmed by a member of the japanese royal family. �gwhat you will be seeing is the unwinding of george bush senior�fs 50-year campaign to turn the u.s. into a fascist regime,�h the secret police agent says. �ggeorge bush senior is now a broken man showing signs of senile dementia,�h he adds.

if the sources are to be believed, u.s. president george bush�fs government will resign, before his term expires, and will be replaced by an interim regime headed by al gore.

[Verm]

hello, i am newbie to these forums but have been reading them quite some time. so greetings to you all! i have been following the fulford event quite a bit and there are some amazing things happening within if this indeed is all true. just to make it short but quick, what fulford has been saying in his last story, about the changes to come seem to be happening. now, could be coincidence, but who believes in that . but in the past month 3 high ranking members have resigned and the newest of that the attorney general. just something you guys i am sure are completely aware of, but would be interesting to keep this post going the direction of what changes are happening that have been "promised" from fulford's article.

[Divine Cosmopolitan]

an interum reign headed by al gore???
thats not even possible is it?

[SuperManny]

an interum reign headed by al gore???
thats not even possible is it?

absolutely! anything is possible!:d
i thought this was kinda strange at first, but when you think about it, it all makes sense in a weird way. if the bush regime is exposed as predicted, it may very well come to light that the last election was actually skewed in gws favor. so we may find out that al gore did indeed win the election, so why not let him do what he was 'elected' to do?

[Verm]

absolutely! anything is possible!:d
i thought this was kinda strange at first, but when you think about it, it all makes sense in a weird way. if the bush regime is exposed as predicted, it may very well come to light that the last election was actually skewed in gws favor. so we may find out that al gore did indeed win the election, so why not let him do what he was 'elected' to do?

wasn't he going against john kerry? not that it matters, but just saying. or are you talking about the first term election?

[billybobbutterball]

absolutely! anything is possible!:d
i thought this was kinda strange at first, but when you think about it, it all makes sense in a weird way. if the bush regime is exposed as predicted, it may very well come to light that the last election was actually skewed in gws favor. so we may find out that al gore did indeed win the election, so why not let him do what he was 'elected' to do?

whoops! unless i'm a victim of a time-line blipburp the last presidential election was between bush and some other bones guy named kerry.

billybushwacked

[SuperManny]

wasn't he going against john kerry? not that it matters, but just saying. or are you talking about the first term election?

well i guess this opens up a whole new 'can of worms' and sure if you could prove that kerry won..... i don't know if you could, but i think it could much more easily proven that gore won. who knows, a lot of people say both of the last two elections were a farce. i don't know, just trying to make sense of this mad, mad world.

[Mozart]

well i guess this opens up a whole new 'can of worms' and sure if you could prove that kerry won..... i don't know if you could, but i think it could much more easily proven that gore won.

it can be proven in any court beyond any reasonable doubt that both gore and kerry were winners in both of their respective elections, as both elections were provably stolen by the thief executive, the shrub. there are a lot of solid, factual and irrefutable proofs that both elections were stolen.


and the idea of gore leading a transitional, post-shrub team--that is entirely within the realm of possibility because the "government" as a whole that we understand it to be is already an extra-constitutional entity, meaning that it has been functioning wholly outside of the organic constitution for a very, very long time--ever since 1861. in other words we have not had an effective republic acting under the organic constitution as designed by our founding fathers ever since 1861. not kidding. as for gore leading...i think that ron paul is a far-better choice for heading this transitional team, as there was a recent poll... http://usaelectionpolls.com/ ... that shows ron paul taking a full 61% of the votes out a field of 19 candidates (both dems/repubs). wow.


this whole country has, somehow, continued to function as a whole nation, endowed with a unique self-identity without the effective use of an active organic constitution, as lawfully amended ever since 1861.


to further muddy the waters of "law", the organic constitution as we know it was fatally flawed in many ways and had no true authority that was really derived from the people, yet, somehow, america continued to function as a somewhat cohesive whole nation and continues to do so, though in a very much negatively-altered state as compared to what it was in the past.


after many years of extensive law/legal research, i had started to create a whole new way of how the people can govern themselves that starts with a three-step process of expatriating out of the current system of slave-based governance into a new way of governance that would be guided by a compact in a "new union" that would take the best of the organic constitution, embody the essential spirit of the declaration of independence, be built upon the golden rule and be interconnected by a common, interest/usury-free currency that would be handled by locally-based co-op banks owned/operated by the people themselves; the dimensions of the new currency would have reflected the golden mean and other sacred geometric principles. i think that it would have really worked, but the reality of the sheer dominance of the illoonynaughties and their abilities to infiltrate/destroy any oppositional groups shadowed over my whole project, plus the emergence of the reality of 2012 event horizon hit, so i thought..."what's the point of doing this new union compact if 2012 is just around the corner?". so i did not follow through with this and have pretty much abandoned my whole law/legal career that i had been building. oh well. <sigh>


~seth