this is an interesting circle.
here's what the measured dimensions of the circle was found to be:
"the pattern spans across 333ft of the field with the outer ring of the main circle measuring 33ft width. seven arcs, each approximately 5ft wide cut through the central body of the circle."
i betcha that our dw had done gone snuck over there and did this hissself with a string'n board.
i'll guess that this circle references the harmonic of the 8-octave dimensions of the universe as we know it; the "333" may refer to the trinity and resurrection, as well as a factor of 10 with the number 33, as represented by the width of the outer ring of the circle.
it's a nice circle.
cool pickies on the corn circles. doug & dave are starting early this year!
i've got a ton of pics that i took last july, depicting dozens of delightfully delerious dancing devas doing devizes and the surrounding wiltshire area.
ya think they're gearin' up for a "big" one this year? later on, we chunneled paris, and then had a return flight out of heathrow on 8-11, and got to experience a 9-1-wasn't. oh, them crazy brits, eh?
i have found some interesting articles from this russian scientist, very thought provoking and it all fits in with what is going on. donald
here is the orginal site i linked to that began my journey and let me to find the following. explore this site it makes many references to david and his work http://www.psychicchildren.co.uk/4-5...nment2012.html
here is link to original article below
russian biophysicist and molecular biologist pjotr garjajev and his colleagues have been carrying out cutting-edge research the more esoteric nature of dna. they simply did not believe that 90% of our dna is ‘junk dna’. from the german book vernetzte intelligenz by grazyna fosar and franz bludorf (summarised and translated by baerbel):
the latest research explains phenomena such as clairvoyance, intuition, spontaneous and remote acts of healing, self healing, affirmation techniques, unusual light-auras around people (namely spiritual masters), mind's influence on weather-patterns and much more. the russian scientists also found out that our dna can cause disturbing patterns in the vacuum, thus producing magnetized wormholes! wormholes are the microscopic equivalents of the so-called einstein-rosen bridges in the vicinity of black holes (left by burned-out stars). these are tunnel connections between entirely different areas in the universe through which information can be transmitted outside of space and time. the dna attracts these bits of information and passes them on to our consciousness.
what we are seeing here is ‘hyper-communication’, where information is passed inter dimensionally. it is as though the dna acts as a ‘stargate’ between this dimension and others. in the book there are several stories of how this information is downloaded via dna.
here is second article about how this links in with crop cirlces
the findings of the molecular biologists dr pjotr p. garjajev and dr. vladimir poponin of the russian academy of science concerning the ‘phantom-dna effect’ have a radical connection with the formation of crop circles in the united kingdom and throughout the world in recent times. according to these scientists the dna is emitting electromagnetic waves that continue to manifest even after the dna sample has been removed from the experiment. hence the name ‘phantom-dna effect’. the genetic procedures being adopted by these scientists have been commented on and explained by grazyna fosar and franz bludorf in their book vernetzte intelligenz (1), who have put forward the theory that self-radiating balls of light often seen in the sky and mistaken for extra-terrestrial visitors are in fact a group consciousness phenomenon brought about by hypercommunication within the dna. this theory by fosar and bludorf can also explain the formation of crop circles which are also commonly attributed to extra-terrestrial visitors. in addition it will be shown that the precise technology being adopted by the aforesaid scientists in moscow represents a new energy source, previously unknown to mankind, that is capable also of creating crop circles.
here is link to that site http://www.spiritualgenome.com/crop_..._explained.htm
good links/stories on that russian research, donald!
some here are aware of much of it, i'm sure...
but that is about one of the best outlays of the matter
inside/outside matters wormholing(etc.) to "re-connecting" us!
gonna be a very interesting year and/or 2 or 3...coming at us : )
hold on to your "intuitive" seats...it'll be the ride of a lifetime!
be well, be love.
four megalithic sundials: geometrical and astronomical analyses
the unexpected appearance of a novel "sundial" type of crop picture at oliver's castle on april 15, 2007 has stimulated much excitement and wonder around the world.
charles mallet and others have carefully investigated the flattening of fairly-thick plant stems there in oilseed rape; and have concluded that many of those plants were smoothly bent at a 90-degree angle to the ground, just above their roots (by unknown means), leaving them still alive yet growing horizontally.
another "sundial" type of crop picture appeared next to avebury ring four years ago, on the night of the summer solstice june 21, 2003. a large crowd of people were celebrating nearby, yet no one noticed any human activity in the field where that picture was later found. one month later on july 20, 2003, yet another "sundial" (resembling avebury) appeared at hackpen hill.
then two years later at avebury ring on july 27, 2005, a "solar-lunar" type of crop picture appeared, which showed 19 small mini-circles in its very centre, evidently meant to symbolize the 19-year metonic cycle of the moon.
could we be receiving messages today in wiltshire fields, from a group of unknown crop artists who are more technologically advanced than ourselves? or could all of these amazing crop pictures just be the work of clever human fakers?
in order to distinguish between those two hypotheses, i carried out careful geometrical analyses on all four solar-lunar crop pictures from 2003-2007. it seems that a deep astronomical code, based on megalithic astronomy from the ancient british isles, was embedded carefully within all of them. yet no one took any notice for the past four years, until a new picture at oliver's castle brought the subject more closely to our attention!
over ten years ago in the 1990's, astronomer gerald hawkins likewise found a "hidden geometrical code" in many early (and much simpler) crop pictures. it involved five geometrical theorems which were demonstrably true, but which ancient experts such as euclid had missed. hawkins provided good evidence from that work for a paranormal origin of certain crop pictures, but still a slim possibility for human fakery remained. now however, in light of this new work, the possibility for human fakery seems to have become almost negligible. those "hidden astronomical codes" (which no one could decipher for the past four years) are more powerful and complex than the earlier codes found by hawkins. they tell us the precise latitude north of the unknown artists who made such pictures, as well as (in one case) their approximate historical epoch.
be well, be love.
the next good question, which the movie didn't touch upon, is a follow-up to the evidence that man-made circles do possess weird characteristics which were not expected. if the man-made circles present characteristics which were not expected to be there, then let the skeptics please explain a process by which they may become. perhaps the geometry is responsible; perhaps the mass of dead/damaged crop is responsible; perhaps the thought and/or intention of the persons creating the formation is responsible; perhaps it's all horse-...stuff
again people are too quick to focus on the idea that either something is or it isn't. i like that the film noted how the men who create some formations are themselves somewhat spiritual, and admit having weird experiences while creating them. but where is the scientific research trying to explain why known man-made circles have properties totally unexpected and generally considered to be genuine? i guess i ask too much from scientists to leave their childish comforts behind and to bravely explore the controversial without doing a half-assed job then calling the case conclusively closed. perhaps i'm too hard on people but i consider myself a scientist and have a degree to show for it, yet am disgusted to be even indirectly associated with some of this rubbish which pervades the field.
i look at crop glyphs as an artform and as analogous to other forms of art, there can be the art as distinct from the artist. more importantly, for me is the issue - does the artistry speak to me in some way? in this way, first i enjoy the music without wondering how or who made the music - so maybe i'm just a casual observer in such regards.