Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Who's Been Communicating with Gore?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    78

    Default Who's Been Communicating with Gore?

    brothers and sisters: i have become soured on politics for a while now with all of the dark shenanigans and simple greed and ego fest going on in that arena on both sides. i just read an excerpt from al gore's new book, and i sense that he has been in communication with our galactic friends, either consciously or subconsciously. he could turn out to be the surprise runaway candidate with 2008. once upon a time, i might have voted for barak obama, but am now concerned that he will be liquidated before he can breathe as a president, so why sign his death warrant? also, his inexperience in the "ethers of power" make the quality of his presidential work far too dependent on an exceptional ability to choose excellent "insiders" to advise him and increase his vulnerability in far too many other ways.

    check this gore book chapter out by reading primarily in-between the lines... gore may just be the candidate who could lead us through this mess to the other side. i am just thinkin' out-loud now, and not leading a surreptitious campaign! what if....??? still thinkin'.........jo anne
    ===================

    http://www.time.com/time/nation/arti...2015-3,00.html
    "fortunately, the internet has the potential to revitalize the role played by the people in our constitutional framework. it has extremely low entry barriers for individuals. it is the most interactive medium in history and the one with the greatest potential for connecting individuals to one another and to a universe of knowledge. it's a platform for pursuing the truth, and the decentralized creation and distribution of ideas, in the same way that markets are a decentralized mechanism for the creation and distribution of goods and services. it's a platform, in other words, for reason. but the internet must be developed and protected, in the same way we develop and protect markets—through the establishment of fair rules of engagement and the exercise of the rule of law. the same ferocity that our founders devoted to protect the freedom and independence of the press is now appropriate for our defense of the freedom of the internet. the stakes are the same: the survival of our republic. we must ensure that the internet remains open and accessible to all citizens without any limitation on the ability of individuals to choose the content they wish regardless of the internet service provider they use to connect to the web. we cannot take this future for granted. we must be prepared to fight for it, because of the threat of corporate consolidation and control over the internet marketplace of ideas."

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ft. Lauderdale, FL
    Posts
    53

    Default Dee Dee Dee X 2

    fuuny i communicated with the word gore in my apology and first thing this morning i heard about gore, (cnn) see your post first thing and last night i was reading about a horn, from psalms 75, about a horn which can gore, or i guess play music. no lol ~ but a great big da! is in order
    just thinking out loud?

    i won't ever make it a habit of logging every moment in sync on this forum, but it can truly be hell, seeing as i do. kinda like him after bush went outta his bird.

    starting day with, huge smile. chris i was so touched by your note to me.
    keep the light and the love coming.

    oh, lighten up!!!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    148

    Default You need to look at Ron Paul

    the only guy standing up to the neg-elites and the orion gang is ron paul. i strongly recommend looking at him, he is a light worker.

    peace nelson

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Oregon, Ohio
    Posts
    214

    Angry Re:Pending Presidential appointment

    hey jo anne, nelson, and group,

    now your talkin' an area that i can sink a tooth into- al gore is a joke, a liar, and a looser, and dr. ron paul needs to get off the free-trader's band wagon, before i throw-up.

    if this is the part where i'm supposed to throw out my choice for 2008, sorry- don't have one. and, the past two presidential elections should have proven that we no longer choose our leaders, as an ass won both times, without actually winning- our "leaders are appointed", by a very powerful grouping of materialisticaly endowed people, who don't necessarily have our best interests in mind.

    the government of rhe people, by the people, and for the people is in peril,floks. the only way we're ever gonna take this puppy back is by launching an evolution; and this evolution will not be televised....that's some of what we're all about here on this forum.

    bob

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    82

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by robert riedel View Post
    ...dr. ron paul needs to get off the free-trader's band wagon, before i throw-up.
    booo!

    what's wrong with free trade? isn't that about as first-distortion as you can get?

    note that paul is against nafta and the wto, which are institutions that "manage" trade in favor of elites at the expense of the third world. true free trade is a leveling, competitive force that the rich and powerful find far too unstable - yet it's that very instability that keeps power fluid and unconsolidated.

    i'm an anarchist, but i can't find a lot negative to say about ron paul. he's principled and he speaks the truth about war and corporate capitalism (or, as they used to call it, fascism). it's like one fair-trader once said: "the problem with free trade is that we've never really had it".
    - Jeremy (jeremy at 6th density period net)

    ...how strange it is to be anything at all...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    78

    Default Abandon the Right to Vote?

    bob, in the process of my personal evolution, i have, alas, become increasingly detached from the political process, especially after learning the extensive control the illuminati and its cabal wages over the way things are happening. but is it spiritually responsible for us to completely turn our backs on this right of ours, which at least enables us to "attempt" [thinking of the bush/gore elections] to make a statement.

    i am wondering if gore is the least of all other "evils" who have the potential of becoming elected or if it is better to stand back, not participate in the farce, and just allow things to evolve towards the inevitable ascension? if the elections are manipulated again, as there were during the b/g shenanigans, then what's the point? in that case, the point is that manipulation was so obvious that doubt and mistrust began to contribute to awakening more people in this country to the not-so-hidden dark agenda.

    the point now is that exercising a choice, even when knowing the underlying reality, is an opportunity to say to one's self, at the very least, if not to join with hopefully millions of other likeminded souls, we are committed to changing this world no matter how our votes may be manipulated. we are not sleeping. maybe the process of voting is just providing an opportunity for more souls to think, allow their frustration and disgust with the status quo to arise to the surface, take a stand by voting in honor of all that the right to vote means, and then allow the inevitable force of evolution and ascension to take its course....please take that into contemplation and see what you come up with. in the light and sound of all that is! jo anne

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    148

    Default To put it in a nutshell, since evryone is going nut's for truth

    cayce predicted that the so-called "battle of armageddon" described symbolically in the bible would begin in 1999. cayce foresaw that this "battle" will not be a war fought on earth. rather, it will be a spiritual struggle between the "higher forces of light" and "lower forces of darkness" for 1000 years of earth time.

    the reason for this struggle is to prevent souls from lower afterlife realms from reincarnating to earth. by preventing souls from the lower afterlife realms from reincarnating to earth, only enlightened souls will be permitted to reincarnate.

    (the above paragraph is where you get into the real battle being waged, it is not just here on earth)

    the paragraph below where you understand the assencion into positve 4-d, "the bad boys can't come back until their finished being in - time out"

    the result will be 1000 years of building a world of peace and enlightenment. after 1000 years, souls from lower afterlife realms will be permitted once again to reincarnate to earth. by this time, the so-called "kingdom of heaven" will have been established on earth.

    may your horse be with you,
    nelson

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Santa Cruz, California
    Posts
    706

    Default

    there may be some implication in the use of the term incarnation here that is specific to human lifeforms and lifetimes. from a perspective of transmigration of soul, it would seem that there is room to incarnate in other (plant and animal) lifeforms.

    the saying "do the best with what you have and you'll be given more" seems as a catalyst to me in this regard. what is the potential of a human lifeform? how does a person live in a way that brings out their best potential?

    pondering that, one may reconsider what cayce is saying. personally, i've seen labrador retrievers who seem to act more enlightened than how some people act, and i wonder about the incarnational hierarchy given the finite number of human lifeforms - is it related to behavior or harvestability?

    that is, i wonder if an animal who excelled well beyond its harvestable threshold in its animal lifetime is allowed to transmigrate to a human lifeform over say a human soul who fell short of its potential, way short of harvestability even in animal terms - as if there seems some sense of justice going on between re-incarnations that rewards life choices aligned with some divine intent...

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Under the sun.
    Posts
    169

    Default

    as far as presidents go i have a few good people i am in contact with who are active in these matters even though i do not do the thurough research, from all i have taken in ron paul seems so far the best all around person to get things started in a decent direction.

    i know that he wants to back up the constitution in many areas and can see that it has been walked on. he voted against the patriot act, he voted against regulating the internet and was against going to iraq.

    i also have heard that he never takes money from sources that shouldn't and isn't a scam artist. you can check all the details but what i have gathered from circulation as far as what is possible i think he will be our best bet.

    note* yes most of the government could be set up much better and there never be a great president in the stuff we go into because the collective conscious wouldn't manifest such things . so doing nothing and saying "nothing matters" i feel is somewhat concieted as well. be logical and weigh the balances. holes are always there just see what comes together best for you.

    you can see more of his stuff on youtube here:

    [note from moderator: spiral's url is subscription only and we can't get in to see it, so as soon as he can find another we can see, he will post that]

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Under the sun.
    Posts
    169

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •