this is why i prefer intelligent infinity to creator or creation. it is more descriptive and less parodoxical. if a creator is infinite and is "all that is" then it's not really a creator because nothing has been created. intelligent infinity is really an explorer of self by self as non-self. it is less confusing (to me) to say "the explorer and its' exploration" than to say "the creator and its' creation."
"It is also to be noted that an adept is one which has freed itself more and more from the constraints of the thoughts, opinions, and bonds of other-selves. Whether this is done for service to others or service to self, it is a necessary part of the awakening of the adept. This freedom is seen by those not free as what you would call evil or black. The magic is recognized; the nature is often not". - Ra, Session 80