NASA Announces Solar Storm Warning

[Elmer]

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...ormwarning.htm


march 10, 2006: it's official: solar minimum has
arrived. sunspots have all but vanished. solar flares are
nonexistent. the sun is utterly quiet. like
the quiet before a storm.




this
week researchers announced that a storm is coming--the
most intense solar maximum in fifty years. the prediction
comes from a team led by mausumi dikpati of the national
center
for atmospheric research (ncar). "the next sunspot cycle
will be 30% to 50% stronger than the previous one," she
says. if correct, the years ahead could produce a burst of
solar activity second only to the historic solar max of
1958.







__________________________________________________ ______________________________\
____
tv dinner still cooling?
check out "tonight's picks" on yahoo! tv.
http://tv.yahoo.com/

[non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Chris]

ok elmer, did you notice it said 2006? lol chris

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...ormwarning.htm


march 10, 2006: it's official: solar minimum has
arrived. sunspots have all but vanished. solar flares are
nonexistent. the sun is utterly quiet. like
the quiet before a storm.




this
week researchers announced that a storm is coming--the
most intense solar maximum in fifty years. the prediction
comes from a team led by mausumi dikpati of the national
center
for atmospheric research (ncar). "the next sunspot cycle
will be 30% to 50% stronger than the previous one," she
says. if correct, the years ahead could produce a burst of
solar activity second only to the historic solar max of
1958.







__________________________________________________ ______________________________\
____
tv dinner still cooling?
check out "tonight's picks" on yahoo! tv.
http://tv.yahoo.com/

[non-text portions of this message have been removed]




yahoo! groups links

[M.W.]

--- in asc2k@yahoogroups.com, chris <chris.hamilton2@...> wrote:
>
> ok elmer, did you notice it said 2006? lol chris
>
> http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...ormwarning.htm

(:>) well, yes chris, 2006 ... but it may not be an out-of-date
remark.

we have had some major sunpot activity that match up with the time
zone given for the new active cycle start (late 2006 -07 )
here is the summary at the end of the article:

snip


when the belt is turning "fast," it means that lots of magnetic
fields are being swept up, and that a future sunspot cycle is going
to be intense. this is a basis for forecasting: "the belt was turning
fast in 1986-1996," says hathaway. "old magnetic fields swept up then
should re-appear as big sunspots in 2010-2011."

like most experts in the field, hathaway has confidence in the
conveyor belt model and agrees with dikpati that the next solar
maximum should be a doozy. but he disagrees with one point. dikpati's
forecast puts solar max at 2012. hathaway believes it will arrive
sooner, in 2010 or 2011.

"history shows that big sunspot cycles 'ramp up' faster than small
ones," he says. "i expect to see the first sunspots of the next cycle
appear in late 2006 or 2007?and solar max to be underway by 2010 or
2011."

who's right? time will tell. either way, a storm is coming.



>
>
> march 10, 2006: it's official: solar minimum
has
> arrived. sunspots have all but vanished. solar
flares are
> nonexistent. the sun is utterly quiet. like
> the quiet before a storm.
>
>
>
__________________________________________________ ____________________
______________
> tv dinner still cooling?
> check out "tonight's picks" on yahoo! tv.
> http://tv.yahoo.com/
>
> [non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> yahoo! groups links
>

[Darrell & Beverly]

dear asc2k friends,
i found that the information in this 3-10-06 article more or less confirmed what
q'uo said in the 11-2-07 meditation:

to sum up this third level, we would say that to the best of our knowledge-which
is not without error but is only opinion-the timetable of your planet is a set
one. the planet itself, minus the time lateral, will completely shift into
fourth density at the winter solstice of 2011.

healing love,
bev


when the belt is turning "fast," it means that lots of magnetic
fields are being swept up, and that a future sunspot cycle is going
to be intense. this is a basis for forecasting: "the belt was turning
fast in 1986-1996," says hathaway. "old magnetic fields swept up then
should re-appear as big sunspots in 2010-2011."

like most experts in the field, hathaway has confidence in the
conveyor belt model and agrees with dikpati that the next solar
maximum should be a doozy. but he disagrees with one point. dikpati's
forecast puts solar max at 2012. hathaway believes it will arrive
sooner, in 2010 or 2011.

"history shows that big sunspot cycles 'ramp up' faster than small
ones," he says. "i expect to see the first sunspots of the next cycle
appear in late 2006 or 2007-and solar max to be underway by 2010 or
2011."

who's right? time will tell. either way, a storm is coming.

>
>
> march 10, 2006: it's official: solar minimum
has
> arrived. sunspots have all but vanished. solar
flares are
> nonexistent. the sun is utterly quiet. like
> the quiet before a storm.
>
>
>
__________________________________________________ ________
______________
> tv dinner still cooling?
> check out "tonight's picks" on yahoo! tv.
> http://tv.yahoo.com/
>
> [non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> yahoo! groups links
>





[non-text portions of this message have been removed]