Gandhi model

[Neil Haddon]

happy new year to all!

with all the recent discussion re role models and particularly about gandhi,
the main strategy he employed - as was copied by martin luther king jr. -
was passive resistance. this is, i suggest, something we wil all need to
remember in the not too distant future.

doom and gloom predictions are rightly proscribed on this forum, but there
is no doubt that as the time spiral tightens and we begin to hurtle toward
the 'great moment', those of, and manipulated by, the negative path will
become even more desperate either with the short sighted view of retaining
their worldly power, or with the more elevated desire to achieve enslavement
of more 3d souls to their sts path. like it or not, we must face the
possibility and make our choice.

what defence will we have - in love - when they extend control over our
children at school - for their security of course; when we all must provide
bio-metric data for travel, banking, credit, even visiting the library - in
the interest of security and to combat the war on terra ( nice pun that, or
our classically educated members, isn't it?); when more and more of our
brothers and sisters are encouraged to inform on our every 'indescretion';
and when they insist on implanting each one of us - with or without our
knowledge - with rfid chips to control our movements, our actions, even our
ability to respond, and choose?

all are one, and we must try to become comfortble in our own minds and
hearts that the sts cohorts are also serving the creator in their way;
however, i'm not sure they respect the sanctity of free will as we might try
to do. so how do we react to their desperation?

i suggest the most effective method will again be passive resistance. those
who are not prepared to submit to this control and subjugation must stand
firm, speak out, and advocate a 'downing of tools' : no matter where you
work, government office, travel, medical care, production, public service,
the media - refuse to work. no resistance, no violence, no inflammatory
criticism: just steadfast, passive refusal to co-operate.

it will not be easy, and i pray it is never required - my fervent hope is
still for the special votex referred to by ra:
"
we may note at this point while you ponder the possibility/probability
vortices that although you have many, many items which cause distress and
thus offer seeking and service opportunities, there is always one container
in that store of peace, love, light, and joy. **this vortex may be very
small, but to turn one's back upon it is to forget the infinite
possibilities of the present moment. could your planet polarize towards
harmony in one fine, strong, moment of inspiration? yes, my friends. it is
not probable; but it is ever possible.**


however, if pushed into plan b, i believe passive resistance is the answer.

love throughout 2007.
neil


[non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[bluephoenix010]

--- in asc2k@yahoogroups.com, "neil haddon" <wayshower@...> wrote:
> i suggest the most effective method will again be passive resistance.
those
> who are not prepared to submit to this control and subjugation must
stand
> firm, speak out, and advocate a 'downing of tools' : no matter where
you
> work, government office, travel, medical care, production, public
service,
> the media - refuse to work. no resistance, no violence, no
inflammatory
> criticism: just steadfast, passive refusal to co-operate.


i believe passive resistance is a good tool as well. but something
struck me recently is that the negative forces are a bit worse now.
because of all the guns and negative army mentality i think pushed
forward slightly by the media, (everyone has a sick imagination and
more have an awareness of torture now.) ever seen farenheit 9/11 where
the army guys talked about getting in tanks and listened to heavy metal
kill them all type of music, and killing iraqi civilians. they showed
very little guilt, the beginnings of which would be not talking about
it so enthusiastically and shamelessly to someone making a documentary.

one of the things the indians once did against the british (the word
against used sparingly) was to move forward on the mines, and get their
heads cracked open. if people in a similar circumstance practiced
passive resistance now i think that the soldiers would pick a 15 year
old girl from somewhere and rape her in front of everyone. who would be
left practicing that form of passive resistance then? no one, it would
go into bloody violence in the time it takes to fire a bullet.

i think the answer is passive resistance but perhaps with the addition
of other tools. i think knowledge and awareness of metaphysics by
everyone will go a long way also. ever read michael talbots book the
holographic universe. where many, many people, the french convulsaries
or something. were able to get smashed with sledgehammers and didn't
even bruise? what if we could all do something similar?

[Pi]

> --- in asc2k@yahoogroups.com, "neil haddon" <wayshower@> wrote:
> > i suggest the most effective method will again be passive
resistance. those who are not prepared to submit to this control &
subjugation must stand firm, speak out, and advocate a 'downing of
tools': no matter where you work, government office, travel, medical
care, production, public service, the media - refuse to work. no
resistance, no violence, no inflammatory criticism: just steadfast,
passive refusal to co-operate.

pi: these tactics require tremendous personal courage & fortitude to
uphold. yet i absolutely agree & thank you for making this point.

--- in asc2k@yahoogroups.com, "bluephoenix010" <1129@...> wrote:
> i believe passive resistance is a good tool as well. but something
> struck me recently is that the negative forces are a bit worse now.

pi: i don't buy the premise that things are worse now than ever. past
escalation of self-serving conflicts has resulted in nuclear & laser
energy warfare on this planet, evidenced by the grand canyon & by
loss of collective memory of pyramid ruins found on every continent.

> > one of the things the indians once did against the british (the
word against used sparingly) was to move forward on the mines, and
get their heads cracked open. if people in a similar circumstance
practiced passive resistance now i think that the soldiers would pick
a 15 year old girl from somewhere and rape her in front of everyone.
who would be left practicing that form of passive resistance then? no
one, it would go into bloody violence in the time it takes to fire a
bullet.

pi: maybe so, maybe no. the reaction would depend on the openness of
one's heart to love in the face of violence & death in the environs.
it would be more likely imho that establishment media wouldn't report
such rape & would use disinformation & ridicule discredit the truth.

> > i think the answer is passive resistance but perhaps with the
addition of other tools. i think knowledge and awareness of
metaphysics by everyone will go a long way also. ever read michael
talbots book the holographic universe. where many, many people, the
french convulsaries or something. were able to get smashed with
sledgehammers and didn't even bruise? what if we could all do
something similar?

pi: haven't read that book, but for the last several years, have had
a vision showing me that energy of love & collective prayer buoyed by
faith could bring peace & protection from bullets & bombs of any kind.

ec often reiterated the capacity of 10 believers to save a city from
destruction today, just as is written in the bible old testament. the
issues we face today are imo that of egoism (think self-preservation
or opposite of altruism) & egotism (self-importance & separateness)
of many spiritualists who could "lead" small groups to engage in the
collective love & prayer that i am envisioning.

peace & love, pi

[bluephoenix010]

--- in asc2k@yahoogroups.com, "pi" <johnnypi@...> wrote:
> ec often reiterated the capacity of 10 believers to save a city from
> destruction today, just as is written in the bible old testament. the
> issues we face today are imo that of egoism (think self-preservation
> or opposite of altruism) & egotism (self-importance & separateness)
> of many spiritualists who could "lead" small groups to engage in the
> collective love & prayer that i am envisioning.

i agree completely that one person is immensely powerful, and has a
profound effect on everything around them. i didn't think that so much
about a month ago. but now i definitely do.