Re: Re: on being true to oneself
a-h-h-h...a correction. so good. so good.
a sister on the path taking a moment to realign the information to a brother
on the same pilgrimage. of course what you correct is true monica. thank you.
the 90% recalibration correction is locked in, and done so with zero % negative
the correction re-teaches all, including as much to the point, the novice
just entered. thank you. more please. much more.
on reexamining my post, i have no doubt that some will offer that negative
greeting may be offered by a 3d entity to a 3d entity. i've even read in posts
here that a 2d dog may offer negative greeting to a 3d fool in 2d dogs way. but
see, here is the point. perhaps the 3d fool is truly in the dogs way offering
threat, perceived as a 2d negative greeting by dog (humor injected here). a
threat to a 2d dog is just a threat, no matter how many times the 3d fool licks
his wounds in higher thought of the negative greeting perceived by the 3d fool
(in conflicted perception to the 2d negative greeting by dog - more humor). the
3d fool still will not remove himself from a rather nonsensical situation which
has less to do with negative greeting than it does stupidity in spite of all of
all of his protests to the contrary.
my point once again is that this is all small thinking, circular nonsense, and
ultimately of no consequence or growth.
i am open to being corrected where 3d negative greeting appears in the ra
material. please do correct. but should this be so, the greater question still
stands as to what truly constitutes "true negative greeting ?" a backyard
scraping of one 3d to another is hardly to the same degree as is a "5d
powerhouse" knockin at the door, as in the case of the sessions and carla et
3d to 3d, well, these are just two equals in conflict without either having
the ability to depolarize the other, but very much able to stall, or worse,
depolarize themselves only. this is what 3d looks like here. more about the task
of just simply polarizing, than is the concern of being depolarized by another
3d'er. he hasn't gotten it together enough either to worry of this. its enough
to focus on self as a handful.
as i postulated in my previous post, 3d is inherently by definition more
about the business of making a definition for himself, as in carving out his
path first, sto vs sts, more so as opposed to the powerful self aware ability of
a 5d entity able to redefine/usurp/steal away another self's polarity. this is
negative greeting. this is power. watch out.
but i dare say, the devil doesn't come a knockin if your not worth the time.
he's a bit busy for the chickling twerping in the corner, given that he has
bigger roosters to fry. now, he may enlist lessor minions dispatched to keep the
fires burnin, but this is hardly negative greeting either. this is just the way
it (3d) shows up here. we need the fire. it doesn't mean we're in it, or on it.
fire is not negative greeting. "fire good ! "
just don't jump in.
is it not more to the point mentioned, as cited in the ra sessions, that
negative greeting is the attempt to depolarize another, as in the sessions of
carla and elkins? can one 3d entity depolarize another 3d entity, in self
awareness, as opposed to a backyard scrape, in a bar, on the street, in a
bedroom, given that backyard scrapings are in fact a necessary challenge in 3d,
altogether necessarily expected in conflict as a means of defining self as
either sto or sts?
monica leal <lealdragon@...> wrote:
well said, drake! and i shall start here with a minor correction: the
requirement for sts harvest is 90%, not 51% as is the case with sto.
--- in firstname.lastname@example.org, "e. drake" <truelyndeeply@y...> wrote:
...51% sto or 51% sts,
astronomy gift astronomy magazine material science astronomy
telescope astronomy star name astronomy book
yahoo! groups links
visit your group "asc2k" on the web.
to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
your use of yahoo! groups is subject to the yahoo! terms of service.
yahoo! photos ? showcase holiday pictures in hardcover
photo books. you design it and we?ll bind it!
[non-text portions of this message have been removed]