New Universe

[Jan Wicherink]

dear david,

since we have been talking about geniuses a lot lately, did you ever
hear about ananda m. bosman?

he's on the same spiritual-scientific path you're exploring.
supposedly ananda ran into an accident way back when and after his
recovery discovered to his amazement that he had gained access to a
higher consciousness. he's ever since been using it to shape a new
physics based on sacred geometry that he has coined vortexijah, the
physics of vortexes within vortexes.

in his `timegate' series he's using terrence mckenna's timewave zero
function to determine the novelty progression of our present time.

he's written an extensive report on the `new universe- the
astrophysical transformation'. from what i've seen of it, it bears a
strong resemblance to your own enterprise mission report
called `interplanetary "day after tomorrow".

http://phoenix.akasha.de/~aton/

new universe report : http://phoenix.akasha.de/~aton/nu.html

ananda seems to have access to an inexhaustible source of knowledge
about physics, ancient esoteric teachings and mysticism. did you ever
hear about this person?

with love,
jan

[David Wilcock]

from: asc2k@yahoogroups.com [mailto:asc2k@yahoogroups.com] on behalf of jan
wicherink

>since we have been talking about geniuses a lot lately, did you ever
hear about ananda m. bosman?

dw: not until now. "boss man," hm?

>he's written an extensive report on the `new universe- the
astrophysical transformation'. from what i've seen of it, it bears a
strong resemblance to your own enterprise mission report
called `interplanetary "day after tomorrow".

new universe report : http://phoenix.akasha.de/~aton/nu.html

ananda seems to have access to an inexhaustible source of knowledge
about physics, ancient esoteric teachings and mysticism.

dw: yes... that inexhaustible source of knowledge is called plagiarism.
about 95% of his interplanetary climate change data is plagiarized word for
word out of the article i wrote for (ok, with, he did make a few minor
sentence-structure changes to it and wrote a new intro) richard.
unfortunately the boss man synthesized all of this in a way that i find
quite unreadable - just a mess, with all the different fonts, colors, and
over-extended underlined links. there's perhaps 5 or 6 data points he
uncovered that i could actually use and much the rest is all word-for-word
what i already distilled and wrote up from 6 months' worth of daily
research.

he does thank "richard hoagland of enterprisemission" at the end but never
mentions my name, though i am a co-author of the paper. (if i had better
boundaries i would have insisted that my name go first, or solo, but that's
another codependency recovery story. suffice it to say that anything else i
do on this subject will probably appear with my name alone, on my site.)
what's worse is that he attached a copyright to the paper! bad boy.

it is pretty shameless to bluntly plagiarize another's research and use it
to make your own look better, giving almost no credit whatsoever. trust me,
there's going to be a whole new wave of such activity once "the case"
section appears on the new site, but remember where you saw it first...


i guess plagiarism is the sincerest form of flattery. he does get bonus
points for actually reading through it and understanding it enough to steal
it to support his own channeling.

i was told by my own readings that this would happen and that it is all part
of the process of helping humanity awaken. the film is what's really going
to put the stamp on this and make it clear who did the work.

some say, at times scornfully, "why do you even care, david?", and the only
reason why i care is that it denies the readers the opportunity to consult
the ascension2000 / divine cosmos website, to come in contact with more work
that was written by the true author of the words. at least he didn't try to
put it into a book he would make money off of.

peace be with you -

- david

[Jan Wicherink]

david wrote :

about 95% of his interplanetary climate change data is plagiarized
word for word out of the article i wrote for (ok, with, he did make a
few minor sentence-structure changes to it and wrote a new intro)
richard. unfortunately the boss man synthesized all of this in a way
that i find quite unreadable


dear david,

woh, sorry about that david, i really didn't realize he could be a
fraud and copied the information from your article. i genuinely
believed the man was sincere and contributed to a greater awareness of
the integration of physics and spirituality like you do.

come to mention it, he's using a lot of information from daniel
winter, however in this case he mentions it. on the other hand his
diamond light body is exactly drunvalo melchizedek's merkaba lightbody
without explicitly mentioning it.

so i guess you may be right about this man. i'm really baffled about
the fact that there are people out there who really do things like
that. i wrote a book myself and put it on the internet but explicitly
mentioned that none of the issues discussed in the book are my own
discoveries! i cannot image that there are people out there who claim
to be on the spiritual path but in reality are only boosting their own
ego using a cheap form of plagiarism. how foolish to deceive oneself!


with love,
jan

[Jake Almond]

"i cannot image that there are people out there who claim
to be on the spiritual path but in reality are only boosting their own
ego using a cheap form of plagiarism."

indeed. and also what makes it more damaging is that someone could
read
the material, then find out the person plagiarising, and dismiss
*everything* as fraudulent.
so all the new and useful information is missed out on just because
that person now doesn't trust the 'author'.

jake

[David Wilcock]

from: asc2k@yahoogroups.com [mailto:asc2k@yahoogroups.com] on behalf of jake
almond

>"i cannot image that there are people out there who claim
to be on the spiritual path but in reality are only boosting their own
ego using a cheap form of plagiarism."

>indeed. and also what makes it more damaging is that someone could read the
material, then find out the person plagiarising, and dismiss *everything* as
fraudulent. so all the new and useful information is missed out on just
because that person now doesn't trust the 'author'.

dw: well, i wouldn't worry about the "boss man" in this case because i've
never heard of it before, and it was such a disorganized website that few
people would actually sit through it enough to read it. trust me - once the
site is redone and especially once the film comes out, there will be no
doubt as to where this material originated.

your point also reveals why the entire field of channeling is in such
disarray at this time. so many people try to "reinvent the wheel" with their
own new cosmology, cosmic drama, laws of the universe, historical events,
future events, et cetera, and they all invariably contradict one another.
none of them seem to refer back to the real bellwethers of channeling:
cayce, seth and now the law of one series as well. none of these are
"complete" sources of material. each builds upon the foundation that the
previous ones laid. many important questions were not asked by elkins and we
fill in the gaps now.

on the other hand there are several "cheap imitations" of the law of one
series where they steal certain words from it (like "service to others",
"service to self", "fourth density" and "distortion"). in every case, no
credit is given as to the inspiration of the source-- and then we've
actually had people sound surprised because the law of one sounds just like
*blank*.

there are at least four examples of popular material out there that has
plagiarized the law of one and contorted its message: zetatalk, cassiopeia,
operation terra and tfel. these sources invariably represent incomplete
scholarship of the material; it sounds similar but there are major
differences - and these differences often bring in the "negative greeting"
aspect that speaks of doom and of teachings that are self-serving in nature
once you really examine them.

they are rather politically null, however, as conference planners just don't
want to host these people for talks. the ego tends to be so inflated that
the audience walks away sorely disappointed. and again, the vast majority of
channelers have the "take my word for it" attitude and do little or nothing
to back up the things their channeling talks about with hard scientific
data. "boss man" looked better for this reason, at first, but in his case it
was just a disorganized amalgamation of material he plagiarized from others-
including myself- with little or no credit.

along similar lines, i have not heard back from the wingmakers webmaster and
real author when i directly challenged his idea that there was anything good
in blending apparent channeling with material that is completely fabricated.
he never tells his readers which is the fabricated parts, just alluding to
the fact that it all might be true. if people want to get taken in by this,
that is fine, but as i told him, i stake my spiritual honor upon the fact
that everything i say on my website is the truth as far as i understand it.
nothing has been fictionalized or distorted except the names of people who
do not want publicity. certain personal events in my own life have been
overlooked for the same reason, but that is omission, not creating fiction.

i am almost finished with the written content for a new section of the
website called "the case." this is going to firmly establish that there were
at least four different published books, widely available in bookstores,
between 1954 and 1963, that directly talked about interplanetary climate
change, the confederation, the ascension, et cetera, and gave scientific
proof of this interplanetary climate change in action.

i have been sitting on this data for at least a year now, but we've reached
a point where it's ready to come out. this will go a long way towards
establishing the continuity of the confederation's messages to humanity and
further strengthen the foundation that the law of one and my own work stands
upon. there actually is a continuity of information coming through, if you
know where to look.

well, quite frankly i have to go to the bathroom, so i'll sign off for
now...

peace be with you -

- david

[Petrus]

> along similar lines, i have not heard back from the wingmakers webmaster
and
> real author when i directly challenged his idea that there was anything
good
> in blending apparent channeling with material that is completely
fabricated.

david,
i got into the wingmakers stuff myself a little bit probably four or so
years ago. in terms of whether or not it's a good thing to blend fact and
fiction...i get the feeling that they were possibly going for something
allegorical or a parable type format, in order to try and get past the
credulity barrier that a lot of people would probably have with this kind of
material. my guess is that the author/s looked at the popularity of
fictional tv series such as the x files, and felt that working the channeled
material into a science fiction story as "morals" would make the whole thing
easier to accept. the parable format is a very old one and can work well;
but i agree with you in the sense that the author/s should have admitted
that it was allegorical up front, and not tried to cash in on the extra
publicity generated by a "blair witch project" (is it real or isn't it?)
type approach.

for the record, i didn't really get anything educational whatsoever out of
the wingmakers material. (although it's arguable that i wasn't really ready
to accept channelled material at the time.) i immediately recognised it as
entertainment, and appreciated it on that level. on that level, it works
well, and conveys an impression of having had rather more care devoted to it
than is usual for that sort of thing; the graphic artwork is interesting,
vivid, and rather unique; (voodoo/african/cave painting type stuff is
probably the closest to it that i've seen elsewhere. i think they were
going for an indigenous feel) the music is nice and often very high
definition; and the story, while not the most original i've read, is
enjoyable and makes some effective use of familiar science fiction/pop
cultural stereotypes. some of the blurb on the website comes across as a
bit fluffy and pretentious, yes...but if you've got a spare $20, there are
probably far worse ways to spend it than the first source cd. i probably
wouldn't bother with any of the other cds/materials myself, but that one was
the original cd he/they released, and as such has the original music, the
story, and the first set of cave paintings. the music alone is probably
worth the price of admission, and the story is good for a night or two's
idle vegetation in front of the computer. ;-)

so, yeah...i'd basically compare the wingmakers stuff to a multimedia bottle
of the original fruitopia. (the discontinued, not current ones) it tastes
nice, with a mildly populist new age vibe, which feels starry on the way
down. it probably won't hurt you, but there's not much genuine nutritional
content here either. ;-)

[Jake Almond]

dw: "certain personal events in my own life...."

on that note, i recently invested in two books you mentioned in your
stories about your life:

genesis revisited - zecharia sitchin
we, the arcturians - norma milanovich

they both look interesting. i've not started them yet though!
are they worth looking at or have you covered all the stuff in your
convergence series?

cheers

jake