Collective Consciousness

[Brad]

hi everyone,

i had some thoughts to share on this thread.

currently i'm travelling across canada on a national fringe theatre tour. i am
endlessly amazed at similarities in themes, bits of dialogue, sound cues,
movement, blocking, props and all sorts of things that i see in all the shows on
tour.

in one case i had the smallest china doll (the ones that fit inside each other)
that was a major prop in one show- i had been keeping it on my dresser all year
before the tour.

concepts of the law of one are creeping into a lot of the shows. amazing really
how many different ways it all can be said...

i am reminded of being in theatre school and playing word association, whenever
it is played within a minute the group is saying archetypal words including god,
life, love... incredible really...

the grid of consciousness, of life and love surrounding us truly is enfolding us
and we are slowly becoming more and more aware of it? i wonder how much of it we
can not see?



love and light,

we r 1



bradly

__________________________________________________
do you yahoo!?
tired of spam? yahoo! mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Z P C]

zee here:

donnell writes:
how did the ra entity achieve its current status of a collective
consciousness? what processes were involved in melding separate
units of intelligence, knowledge, will and all else that comprises
individual beings, into a single "data base" or mentanet (if you will)
of higher consciousness. was this great binding of many minds only a
natural consequence of their harvest from 3d to 4d? or was there also
a conscious agreement to evolve into the ra collective. will this
binding of minds also, naturally evolve in our species as we move up
the ladder to the next level? or do we also have to make a conscious
effort to mind meld.

could we achieve a somewhat similar network of consciousness here and
now (before december 2012) if we consciously tried? what would such an
experience be like?

zee here:
openness is the key.
nothing we have ever been or have ever done disqualifies us. it only qualifies
us, by showing us how things work. we forgive ourselves and one another, by
seeing that we have explored. we have learned the consequences of our thoughts,
of our imagining, of that to which we give our attention and of what we do. we
have also learned the consequences of our neglect: what we have failed to think,
have failed to imagine, have failed to provide due attention, or when and where
we have acted poorly. that history is like a foundation. it is what we had to
explore, in order to gain the values and the understanding we have gained. we
stand upon that experience.

there is no need for you to duplicate my mistakes. make new ones. tell me what
you discover. i'll tell you what i have discovered.

we must align what we say to others about why we do what we do, what we say to
ourselves about why we do what we do and why we really do what we do. they must
become the same thing. motives matter!

anything we believe either is true or tends to become true, as a result of
having believed it. we create our own experiences and our own reality. it may be
a small reality, but we have the power and the responsibility for those with
whom we coinhabit that reality. freedom requires open calibration with the
greater oneness. we dare not create in our own behalf, only, especially or even
preferably. we must be and become universal functionaries.

some close off. some attempt to create in their own behalf. some conditionally
exchange energy and pattern. some attempt to belong to themselves. there is so
much order we have been given, in hope, order which we must use, morally, in
behalf of all that is.

we need an edgeless self. i have atempted it before: there is that part of our
resources, in my bank account. i used to lecture, to very large gatherings. in
february of 1969, in the thousands. on friday nights, about 650. i used to ask
those who had something to share to deposit it in a basket, by the door. people
did. i also said, if you have needs, take what you need out of the basket.
pretty soon, after only a few weeks, there never was anything left in the
basket. that is when i realized we need to be skillful givers. we need to make
sure that what we give helps people change and doesn't shield them from the
consequences of poor choices they have made and intend to continue to make. they
have no feedback. i have attempted such common communities, several times. self
interest and desparate need has destroyed them, each time. now, it is just my
wife and i and you few with whom i exchange.

i am ready. are you?
with you,
zee


[non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Pi]

--- in asc2k@yahoogroups.com, "z p c" <anaclysm@...> wrote:
donnell had written: how did the ra entity achieve its current
status of a collective consciousness? what processes were involved
in melding separate units of intelligence, knowledge, will and all
else that comprises individual beings, into a single "data base" or
mentanet (if you will) of higher consciousness. was this great
binding of many minds only a natural consequence of their harvest
from 3d to 4d? or was there also a conscious agreement to evolve
into the ra collective. will this binding of minds also, naturally
evolve in our species as we move up the ladder to the next level? or
do we also have to make a conscious effort to mind meld.
could we achieve a somewhat similar network of consciousness here
and now (before december 2012) if we consciously tried? what would
such an experience be like?

zee wrote: openness is the key.

pi: yes, absolutely. a major difference in 4d is the use of
telepathy & mind reading by sto for communication. so why not begin
preparing for the inevitable? i ask self, if someone present knew
what i'm thinking right now, would i be embarrassed? if so, i
embrace the thought, ask what it's there for, call its opposite
forth and try to balance the two. then bid them adieu and refocus.
if the thought recurs, i try this again, looking more carefully at
why it did so. i always try to consider where a thought is taking
me. consciously looking at commonalities in my reaction to a
situation helps reveal patterns that are useful for learning /
teaching love. this seems a way to greatly accelerate one's
spiritual growth in 3d. i want to make a habit of what ra
calls "looking for love in every moment". as it becomes easier, i
face the challenge of how to consciously show acceptance for the
love i find.
showing acceptance isn't restricted to modes of empirical behavior.
at times it seems to suffice to merely think to self, "i accept this
situation; i am happy to offer love energy for the purpose of
enhancing the situation & for it to fulfill the will of god
(whatever that may be)."
openness usually isn't an appropriate choice for the path of sts,
since the goal of gaining power & control or self-aggrandizement
will meet less resistance if one conceals one's purpose. in 4d, sts
entities practice the art of deception by keeping motives / thoughts
hidden.

zee: nothing we have ever been or have ever done disqualifies us. it
only qualifies us, by showing us how things work. we forgive
ourselves and one another, by seeing that we have explored. we have
learned the consequences of our thoughts, of our imagining, of that
to which we give our attention and of what we do. we have also
learned the consequences of our neglect: what we have failed to
think, have failed to imagine, have failed to provide due attention,
or when and where we have acted poorly. that history is like a
foundation. it is what we had to explore, in order to gain the
values and the understanding we have gained. we stand upon that
experience.

there is no need for you to duplicate my mistakes. make new ones.
tell me what you discover. i'll tell you what i have discovered.

pi: i am not sure if the reference to mistakes is appropriate, since
mistakes are a way to discovery. i very much appreciate the
possibilities and prospect of openly sharing discoveries?

zee: we must align what we say to others about why we do what we do,
what we say to ourselves about why we do what we do and why we
really do what we do. they must become the same thing. motives
matter!

pi: ra makes this clear, too, but since i have no ra excerpt on
hand, i'll share one by latwii: "?we have often said that it is the
intention, the motivation for thought & action which is that of most
importance, for within your illusion there is not the ability to see
wisely & to act according to clear seeing. thus, the pure intention
is that which is of most importance for you within your illusion at
this time." 1988_0410.htm

zee: anything we believe either is true or tends to become true, as
a result of having believed it. we create our own experiences and
our own reality. it may be a small reality, but we have the power
and the responsibility for those with whom we coinhabit that
reality. freedom requires open calibration with the greater oneness.
we dare not create in our own behalf, only, especially or even
preferably. we must be and become universal functionaries.

pi: amen.

zee: some close off. some attempt to create in their own behalf.
some conditionally exchange energy and pattern. some attempt to
belong to themselves. there is so much order we have been given, in
hope, order which we must use, morally, in behalf of all that is.

pi: a little fuzzy about this.

zee: we need an edgeless self. i have attempted it before: there is
that part of our resources, in my bank account. i used to lecture,
to very large gatherings. in february of 1969, in the thousands. on
friday nights, about 650. i used to ask those who had something to
share to deposit it in a basket, by the door. people did. i also
said, if you have needs, take what you need out of the basket.
pretty soon, after only a few weeks, there never was anything left
in the basket. that is when i realized we need to be skillful
givers. we need to make sure that what we give helps people change
and doesn't shield them from the consequences of poor choices they
have made and intend to continue to make. they have no feedback. i
have attempted such common communities, several times. self interest
and desperate need has destroyed them, each time. now, it is just my
wife and i and you few with whom i exchange.

pi: kudos and haloes for sharing the account and your insight! early
in life, i chose to take a help-oriented view of the way i relate to
the universe in general & to others in particular. drawing a line on
which way and how far to go in offering to help is a central focus
of this effort; it's also a perpetual puzzle. i love the way you
frame the issue ?i.e., give in order help people change and avoid
shielding one from consequences of poor choices that (an other) one
has made and intends to continue to make. i debate with self
constantly on what/how it can be `known' that what i do is "helping
one change" vs. "shielding one from consequences of poor choices."
it's perplexing. one way of knowing may be through the ability to
predict. that way, however, is already commonly used by behavioral
research; & it's too often `proven' to be inaccurate and unreliable.
the reason for this also may be the reason i am perpetually puzzled
in determining which way & how far to go in offering to help: "poor
choices that one intends to continue to make." will i or will i not,
choose that way again? to be or not to be??

(given the priority and unpredictability of free will, i am learning
to turn inward and evaluate the forces that compel me to want to
help and the ways my help may be of service to the one. i currently
am aware of learning to set parameters and grow in patience.)

zee: i am ready. are you?

pi: yes, i am. would you agree, that the first and ever-essential
need is complete unity of purpose in prayer and meditation? here's
commentary that cayce gave while in trance (reading 281-37, 9-8-37).

1.(q) what is the meaning of one thousand years that satan is bound?
(a) is banished. that, as there are the activities of the forty and
four thousand - in the same manner that the prayer of ten just
should save a city, the deeds, the prayers of the faithful will
allow that period when the incarnation of those only that are in the
lord shall rule the earth, and the period is as a thousand years.
thus is satan bound, thus is satan banished from the earth. the
desire to do evil is only of him. and when there are - as the
symbols - those only whose desire and purpose of their heart is to
glorify the father, these will be those periods when this shall come
to pass.
be ye all determined within thy minds, thy hearts, thy purposes, to
be of that number!

2.(q) in rev. 21:1 what is the meaning of "a new heaven and a new
earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away;
and there was no more sea?"
(a) when the foundations of the earth are broken up by those very
disturbances. can the mind of man comprehend no desire to sin, no
purpose but that the glory of the son may be manifested in his life?
is this not a new heaven, a new earth? for the former things would
have passed away. for as the desires, the purposes, the aims are to
bring about the whole change physically, so does it create in the
experience of each soul a new vision, a new comprehension.
for as has been given, it hath not entered the heart of man to know
the glories that have been prepared, that are a part of the
experiences of those that love only the lord and his ways.

peace & love, pi