Laying down the mantle.

David Wilcock · 12-19-2000, 11:47 AM

<table bgcolor="#ffffff">
>hello again everyone! my latest diary entry for those who want to know the "man behind the curtain" of the asc2k website. this started as a response to "ascension (a different approach.)"
>
>actually these e-wars and book repostings have made a significant impact on my available time and i am now realistically pushing ahead the due date to the end of january as a result. (i am happy to have now made shift of the ages available to everyone and i think i am going to switch back to word 97 as my main content creator to avoid these problems in the future.) i've generated no new text since saturday, andknow that this will change today, thankfully. having shift of the ages fully functional was an important busy-work step that i needed to clear first before proceeding.
>
>my father has asked me to visit home on the 29th of this month, leaving the 31st, yet another delay. this didn't come without a struggle from me. the tickets for florida have already been bought andmy fatherknows it's a huge stress for me to have to accommodate. i'm trying to stay positive about it. i caught heck for not booking a longer trip - nobody is happy with my schedule demands these days.
>
>i'm also supposed to be in a play at the fellowship with a rehearsal tonight and a good chunk of saturday, performing christmas eve, plus a sounds of joy concertthiswednesday night. dr. izumoto is also stopping by on his way to florida sometime friday, probably for a day, and that means sushi trips, conversation, et cetera. so it's not getting any less crazy and my private space has all but evaporated! i've had insomnia because i can't shut my mind down to go to sleep when i get in this book-writing mode. last time i looked at the clock last night it was close to 4:00 a.m. and this is "morning" for me now. i'm going to get some msm and valerian tonight and use the monroe tapes to try to go to sleep at an earlier hour.
>
>but wait! there's more... the whining goes on! :^)
>
>my email box has been more active than at any time in my history. something from three days ago is almost hopelessly buried at this point - remember that there are many who do not want to subscribe to this list but nevertheless contact me. it's getting really, really, really intense. i may soon need to look into a staffing solution if the money can happen.
>
>i made free will decisions every step of the way and this is the outcome! other sources of funding have come in and made this deadline extension to late january less perilous of a choice - the lecture tour with dr. mandelker is a go! my career has just taken a quantum leap as a result.i now could go into march without needing to worry about any outside funding or responsibility - but i must realistically finish it as soon as i can so as to hopefully get it linked to cseti before the disclosure occurs. furthermore i have 21 people on the wait list for readings and two more requests came in today. i can only process a maximum of about ten a month without burning out - and that's when i'm not actively writing a book, which is channeling in its own right. 
>
>i did get a huge, long reading that came through the night before last and i don't remember a word of it. i plan on transcribing that today first. these tend to be the most interesting readings; i know it was almost 60 minutes long. it's the first one of that length that i have done in probably more than a month, maybe more. it was quite spontaneous, at 4:00 in the morning. (that night i actually did get to bed by midnight, which was because i had forced myself not to work on sunday.)
>
>i feel that we have reached a point where i can no longer participate in this sort of discussion. my time is catastrophically limited and i must conserve my actions for the greatest good. honestly i don't know why i have done as much as i have - most people who email me have to wait sometimes days for a response, if at all, and everyone should understand that this is by necessity, not because i am cruel and heartless.i may need to just back off from email, and clearly i must not let an emotional reaction from an email deter my focus. furthermore, i do not want others to be encouraged by thinking that if they argue with every point i make,they will be more apt to get a response from me. 
>
>but wait... still more...
>
>the study guide is not a final statement on ra's words. you cannot have an "argument" about what you haven't read! these books are a lifetime of study and i cannot do them justice by arguing about them, nor should anyone else on this list. that is not the way that ra teaches us to behave. if you don't want to study it then i'm not going to "sell" it to you. way back in early 1996 before i ever started doing my own readings, i would sit sometimes for 45 minutes and never even turn the page in the book, just meditating on what was being said until i could at least marginally understand. it is the ph.d. of channeled material and it certainly isn't for everyone. i will not "defend" my confidence in this series of teachings. if those of you reading this respect me and my opinion, that will have to suffice.
>
>the choices we make are by our own free will. irecognize now that i cannotbe of service in this given conversational impasse and therefore i withdraw. that was the point of the "to learn the meaning of life... click here" email in the first place. 
>
>the law of one series is a spiritual path.itis simply not possible to argueabout something this comprehensive and all-inclusive, and perhaps this means that discussing it in this forum is inappropriate. i don't know. i think if someone wants to hear about the ra opinion for a given spiritual situation or question because they seek assistance on their path, jeremy or clark or someone else could try to answer the question based on their understandings. it does serve as a wonderful guide for all paths of inquiry, and this is not to be argued, simply experienced. don't want the experience? don't get the books and don't argue about it. i'm laying down the mantle.
>
>iwill still post occasionally, and by all means everyone should be encouraged to proceed with communication - but i will not argue or defend my work or that of ra any longer. if someone wants to attack me i will have to let it stand in ugly silence for all of you to contemplate on your own, even if the monkey-mind part of me seeks to defend itself. what each person chooses through free will is right for them. this forum can exist without becoming a hindrance to my mission. i have really been suffering with all the responsibilities that i have chosen to do for others and something's gotta give. i'm under a terrific amount of stress.
>
>sorry that so many of my emails lately have been so heavy sounding. i'm actually trying to stay positive but this group cannot be considered a fire for my one-man bucket brigade when the whole rest of the city is burning. i've got even more pressure now that the "time of global harvest" workshop is a go - we want a full multimedia presentation to roll out by may. that's right. may. totally finished. think i'm not sweating? 
>
>i know that hoagland had a point where he just had to lay down his arms, back in 1996, and he since cut himself off totally from public email. his message board surges with discussion and he never reads a word of it, though they all think that he does and just ignores what they say, playing endless mindgames with each other. i will never cut myself off but i mustactively become more professional and not over-give.sorry guys.
>
>i'll put up that new reading once it's done - should be interesting.
>
>peace be with you -
>
>- david
<blockquote style="padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; border-left: #000000 2px solid; margin-right: 0px">
style="font: 10pt arial">----- original message -----
style="background: #e4e4e4; font: 10pt arial; font-color: black">from: korga@hotmail.com
style="font: 10pt arial">to: asc2k@egroups.com
style="font: 10pt arial">sent: tuesday, december 19, 2000 11:45 am
style="font: 10pt arial">subject: [asc2k] re: ascension (a different approach)
>
<tt>david wrote:
> seriously, i'm too busy to keep doing this - but this was another warm-up!

indeed you have been posting quite a bit lately david. i hope that doesn't mean we will have to wait any longer
for ciii. hehehehe. in that sense i don't want to keep engaging you on these points but (maybe someone else
will take up the reigns so you can get back to work....)

>
> dr. mandelker has a ph.d. in east-west psychology and spent many years living in ashrams, touring through the "hot spots" and seeking enlightenment. he is about as much of an expert on these systems of philosophy as was thomas merton before him, truly a rare breed. and in his estimation, the law of one series has fused all of these teachings together so clearly and cleanly that it is "the single most important source of written teaching [he] has ever encountered." as in - the best parts of all teachings that got these guys where they are can all be found in the law of one series.

this is not surprising but what does it mean? what are the 'best parts' of these teachings? and what about those
points which these teaching touch on which are not addressed by the law of one? are these the 'bad parts'? that
the law of one encompasses all of this, is that added merit to the law of one teaching or the teachings which it
encompases? these questions are fasisously (sp) serious.

>
> i know i must sound like a broken record, but really it's quite simple. ra gave us the blueprints for how each of these souls got where they got. it involves clearing the blockages at each chakra level, which also corresponds to that density and the karmic lessons for that density, until you get to a point where you have some degree of balanced flow between all of them. once this is open to at least a minimal degree, you have access to the violet-ray center which can allow you to perform ascended feats. i'm not there yet though i can tap into the akashics, heal people, effect electronics and get telekinetic effects on smaller scales, usually spontaneously. and the psychic function is certainly not lacking.

please don't take this as an attack but i find it interesting that ra can proclaim that which the majority of these
souls adamently proclaim words cannot express. what you say sounds good and logical and any other number of
words which can describe it, but i'd be willing to bet if this was explained to an ascended master as what they did
to ascend, they would partake in the heartiest of laughter.

after this point david, i'm not sure if you are speaking directly to me or to the forum as a whole.

>
> now you get into the finesse of how do you face yourself on every level of being: forgiveness of self, acceptance of self, direction of will, becoming the creator. it all comes back to self-acceptance and forgiveness, and "service to others becomes automatic at this point." best way to figure out where the hotspots are? dreamwork. if you're not taking notes on the messages from your higher self then you're not going to find out the problem anywhere near as quickly, if at all. that's why i took the time to give everyone that checklist. if you remember a dream and run it through the checklist, you will be able to decode it, at least partially, if you follow the formula. but don't email me and ask me to do it for you! this is your gig, and it don't mean a thing if it ain't got that swing! and you've gotta put the grr in swinger, baby!
>
> most clients of mine need to hear messages that go all the way back to very early in their life, and they have gone a lifetime without figuring it out. why do you think they've got their astrology, their parents, their trends in life? think that was all accidental or coincidental? not. i simply tie together their stuff with mom, dad, relationships, jobs, prosperity attitude, body esteem, diet and health and voila! suddenly it all fits together. my dream nails it, the reading comes in to explain it. most of the time it's so obvious i really don't even need to do the dream or reading. it's always the victim thing. whichever parent victimized you the most shows you which aspect of yourself feels more disconnected from god. and you'll discover that you're still making the same mistakes.
>
> talk to mom if she's still around. forgive, accept, direct, become. love yourself, nurture yourself. projection-wise, what comes out in this forum shows the issues black and white. (dr. perls: "look to what the person accuses you of saying, doing or being, and there you find the real subconscious issues with self that they haven't faced and are still upset about.") someone wasn't available enough.
>
> the reason why i'm here and doing what i'm doing is that at every stage of the battle, i have faced myself, accepted, integrated and gone up the ladder. lost 85 pounds, quit getting high, quit meat / sugar / fried food / dairy / white flour / et cetera, exercised, stopped hating myself, stopped worrying, meditated, studied, gained wisdom, directed creativity, practiced compassion and service to others, made a commitment to dedicate my life to healing this planet in the way i knew best. that's all that these other guys have done as well, and everybody reaches their own notch. there's a good reading early along in the archives on my site about jesus, saying that even though there was a plan, he had to make conscious choices every step of the way to become that person.
>
> there's no shortcut - no etherium gold powder under the tongue that will blast you into a higher level of being. get on your ****-wading boots and prepare to unclog the cesspool of the monkey mind. i'm serious. slow down your thoughts, get control of yourself, stop fluttering like a moth in front of a lightbulb, never giving yourself a breather from chatter-chatter-chatter in the head. how is this done? forgive, accept, direct, become. simple equation. knowledge is easy, application is freakin' hard.
>
> you don't walk the path of the master by making one choice, one day - you have to go back through your entire life, "defrag" every time where you didn't make the optimal choices for your own highest good, relive those times in the dream plane, "do the right thing," make the better choice, heal yourself, see how it works in your life now, integrate the information, put your knowledge into application, keep on working.
>
> it's not something easy - it is a constant process. the more you do this, the more your life will be filled with joy, synchronicity, blessings, love, wisdom, compassion, intelligence. i am so much smarter than i was before i went on this diet and self-transformation path; there's a significant gain in iq points, not to mention simple popularity because everybody wants to feel your light. yes, you make tons of sacrifices that the ego doesn't like. you give up all your addictions, habits, dietetic hangups, anger - "there is no such thing as an emotionally charged situation. there are only two choices - to be of service or to withdraw from the situation." i still blow that one sometimes.
>
> the tools for how to do all this are in every reading on the site! question is: are you ready to do the homework on self instead of looking for the magic panacea, the "one thing" that's suddenly going to make it all fit together?
>
> what feelings of limitation hold you back from being able to accept our immediate future transformation? did god abandon you somewhere along the line? is it "too fantastic" to be true? too "perfect?" do i need to beat you over the head with science to convince you that this is really going to happen? well, that's-a what i'm-a gonna do in the next book, if i haven't already done enough.
>
> if you're not studying the law of one or are not inclined to study it, (and the study guide works best in conjunction with the books themselves, it is not a stand-alone,) then you're not really going to understand why we keep wanting to divert the flow of conversation back that way. all of your questions are answered quite well therein.
>
> even the hard-nosed skeptic will have a very hard time denying the case that there is to be some form of energetic shift on our planet in the near future after reading c-iii. essentially, you cannot deny that it is happening now, because it fits so perfectly with the physics. all that you can do is to quibble about what it will actually "do" to each human being. and i feel that ra has given us the best answer.
>

okay lets talk metaphor's here because what you detail here is absoultely beautiful and really does get at the
heart of the topic of ascension, but it is all but only a metaphor. the same goes for all religious texts, all the ra
material, all the seth material, all surgeon general warnings, and generally speaking all things. that you can
share this metaphor with others in such an eloquent manner is beautiful. that it has done so much to improve
the lives of yourself and others is equally beautiful. but if you or anyone else regards it as more than a
metaphor, then for all the beauty that is entailed within it, it has limited your progress.

what is the purpose of these metaphors? the diamond sutra states (watch out i've started going to sources),
"all things are caused by me - that i may attain liberation nirvana" (paraphrased). let me explain this a bit
further. as said by the buddha 'caused by me' does not mean me as an individual nature but as entailing the
whole of everything, without ego or individual identity. as such the cause and the effect are the same. there is
no doer separate from what is done. you are the metaphor you create. as you refine that metaphor you refine
yourself. refining that metaphor is broadening it to encompass all causes/effects, or all things, which in turn
broadens you to encompass all things until the ego is removed and one rejoins all things, thereby attaining
liberation or ascending. at the same time the diamond sutra would be careful to express that this is not the way.
the way is unreal. this is merely called the way.

okay let me go one step further. ra is said to be a sixth density being. as such ra is still able to interact with
us here in the third density as individuals. but ra is not ra, ra is merely called ra. the sixth density is not the
sixth density it is merely called the sixth density. what is my point? where while you may say that ra and the
ra material capture the best parts of all the previous ascended souls, by no means has ra or the material ra
presents shown that ra has achieved any wisdom beyond them. taking the diamond sutra alone, that ra still
relates in an ego manner (no i am not saying ra is egotistical) shows his limits. he professes this as being only
a sixth density being which we think of as higher than us and thus the metaphor presented (like most other
metaphors of the kind) amaze us with what they entail. but fundamentally ra and the law of one are not ra or
the law of one they are merely called such. they are but the metaphors.

the primary danger (this is not a scare tactic) of metaphors is the human tendency to reify them. this is derrived
from our desires to know. we yearn in some sense (even the most humble of us) for some sense of certainty
and search the metaphor for truth, turning those things which please us about the metaphor into reality. what
reification does however is begin slowing the metaphor down until it becomes real. explained better, the truth is
fluid and ever changing. metaphors flow with the truth and as such we are able to learn from them. but if we reify
the metaphors, they potentially can become real, solid, still and thus no longer abide in the motion of truth.

i wrote:
> p.s. here's a question (okay 2): if there were no on-coming harvest would you honestly be prepared to cultivate
> mind, body and soul in preparation for ascension? was there ever a time when there wasn't an on-coming
> harvest to inspire human souls to pursue cultivation? refine your metaphor.

this is similar to a favorite question for me to pose to christians - could you follow the teachings of christ if there
were no jesus? and the follow-up - because the teachings of christ exist with or without jesus.

in the seven taoist masters (with regard to the second question), the queen of all things proclaims that she will
share the nectre of the sacred fruit on a specific day and that this fruit would not bloom again for ten thousand
years (again i am paraphrasing). tasting this fruit is the crowning of immortality, but in order to taste one must
have already ascended prior to the set date. is this not similar to the coming of a harvest in which one must walk
the ascension path to reap the benefits of the harvest? would not the coming of this event be as critical to a
taoist at the time as the on-coming harvest is to you?

okay i've said enough for now, but there is more. i'm about to go on vacation for a month so....

incarnations
korga

</tt>

<tt>to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>
</blockquote>

Thread: Laying down the mantle.

Thread Tools

Display

Threaded View

Laying down the mantle.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions