HRM - SunGazing Seminar.

[David Valdez]

i'm glad to see the interest in this new technology about getting nourishment
directly from the sun.
www.solarhealing.com

i'll summarize the lecture, and also state he has been studied by western
universities, has been contacted by the a.r.e group and also quoted edgar cayce.
(that was pretty cool).

basically hrm speaks of sungazing at "safe times" 1hour prior to sunset or 1
hour before sunrise. this is when the uv rays are at their lowest emissions.
begin gazing for only 10 seconds, barefoot on mother earth. -(not grass). you
can get more detailed info from the site.

benefits
after 3 months, you'll improve memory and negative thoughts will be almost non
existent.
after 9 months as a result the hunger pains will be non-existent.
he did state that this was not the purpose of sungazing but ended up as a result
of it.

he's had cat scans and mri's that have shown an increase neurotransmitters, most
old age ailments can be attributed to the decrease in our brain's
neurotransmitters. so in a sense he's reversed the aging process.

on saturday when i met hrm, he actually looks younger in person than the
pictures on the website.

pretty amazing.

peace, love and sun.

dave.


[non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[David Wilcock]

from: asc2k@yahoogroups.com [mailto:asc2k@yahoogroups.com] on behalf of
david valdez

i'll summarize the lecture, and also state he has been studied by
western universities, has been contacted by the a.r.e group and also
quoted edgar cayce. (that was pretty cool).

dw: whoa! pursue retinal damage at your own risk, my friends - i have
not personally suggested looking directly at the sun, though being out
in direct sunlight (looking at other things) is recommended. we do not
suggest or endorse looking directly at the sun.

peace be with you -

- david

[michael grogan]

unless a person has special sensitivity to sunlight (drugs, genetics,
herbs, or other things), sungazing within 1 hours of sunset (in other
words, when the uv index is less than 2) is compeltely safe. i've been
doing noontime sungazing in the tropics and also in the southern us for
18 months now and have experienced wonderful benefits to my health and
happiness from it. too much sungazing can make me a little nauseous
sometimes, and i get a little crazy if i overdo several days in a raw,
but as long as it is in moderation, sungazing can be beneficial. its
negatives are all temporary. you cannot go blind from sungazing. the
worst that can happen si that you get a small, temporary burnt spot on
your retina, but that will not impair your vision as long as you have
normal, healthy eyes. sungazing has been practiced in many cultures
for thousands of years, including in india, tibet and china. i studied
a closed-door, family system of tibetan healing and martial arts for
several years, and my teacher (a fine martial artist and healer)
definitely believed in sungazing.

sungazing makes your eyes take on a soft glow or radiance. it's wa
wnderful thing to see this happen after a week or two of regular sunset
or sunrise sungazing. sungazing in moderation has become very
enjoyable and helpful for me. that's just my experience. there is a
yahoo group on sungazing too, started by vinny pinto.



--- in asc2k@yahoogroups.com, "david wilcock" <djw333@i...> wrote:
> from: asc2k@yahoogroups.com [mailto:asc2k@yahoogroups.com] on behalf
of
> david valdez
>
> i'll summarize the lecture, and also state he has been studied by
> western universities, has been contacted by the a.r.e group and also
> quoted edgar cayce. (that was pretty cool).
>
> dw: whoa! pursue retinal damage at your own risk, my friends - i have
> not personally suggested looking directly at the sun, though being out
> in direct sunlight (looking at other things) is recommended. we do not
> suggest or endorse looking directly at the sun.
>
> peace be with you -
>
> - david

[Julia Shulga]

> dw: whoa! pursue retinal damage at your own risk, my
> friends - i have
> not personally suggested looking directly at the
> sun...

hi, group,
it's perfectly understandable that david can't
"officially" give advice to look at the sun directly.
nevertheless i know from another source (it was long
before internet era - from my russian ex-husband)
about sun gazing at dawn and dusk, and it was safe, as
he told me until sun was red color.
it's probably also depends on the latitude of a place
and the day of the year.
so this subject needs more investigation or... just
using common sense?
yulia



__________________________________________________
do you yahoo!?
tired of spam? yahoo! mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[Tanoyo Tanoko]

t: i think we need to use common sense because
everyone has a different response to this kind of
stimulus, sungazing is not for everyone. i personally
had explored this sun meditation for a while. for me,
it did bring the clearing of negativities. my ritual
was to use a mala while chanting and
meditating/staring at the sun, i did this almost
everyday two summers ago for approx. 3 months (after
work between 6.30pm - 7.30pm when the light was less
intense).
slowly i began to visualize myself as residing in the
sun, then slowly i pictured the sun as in me, becoming
one. in other words, i didn't just stare at the sun
for half to one hour, if i did i might have damaged my
eyes, i used discretion. basically, i attempted to
form a link with the consciousness of the sun (as old
hindu scriptures mention people of the past), a few
times i did have "funny" detached compassionate
feelings, as if things are as they should be in this
world regardless of the craziness around.

i had stopped this practice because i found
visualization is less risky and more fruitful for me,
occasionally i look up and stare for a few minutes,
but that's it ...
please consult your inner self before doing this,
folks.

namaste,
tan


--- julia shulga <kentavr021@...> wrote:
> > dw: whoa! pursue retinal damage at your own risk,
> my
> > friends - i have
> > not personally suggested looking directly at the
> > sun...
>
> hi, group,
> it's perfectly understandable that david can't
> so this subject needs more investigation or... just
> using common sense?
> yulia


__________________________________________________
do you yahoo!?
tired of spam? yahoo! mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[lealdragon]

david, i think it is wise to not endorse sungazing, as it is still
quite controversial. however, for those who are interested in this
topic and take responsibility for themselves, i have a few points i
would like to mention, fyi:

1. most proponents of sungazing are very adamant that it be done only
at the 'safe' times of 1 hour after sunrise or 1 hour b4 sunset. they
also advise safety protocols of starting slowly, with only a few
seconds, then gradually adjusting as the eyes acclimate. those stories
of people going blind while on acid were usually cases of staring at
the midday sun for several minutes, when they obviously were not used
to it.

2. marilyn vos savant supposedly has one of the highest iq's in the
world, is very mainstream; not alternative, esorteric, or even
wholistic at all, judging by her very conventional scientific
responses in her newspaper column. right around the time i was getting
interested in sungazing, lo and behold someone asks her if looking at
the sun was dangerous. her response? not dangerous during the 1 hour
after sunrise & 1 hour b4 sunset. you can probably search her database
if you want verification on this; it was a few months ago.

3. it is true that some sungazers sungaze during midday sun. every
movement has its 'fringe'. these people claim that no damage was done
and in fact they got benefits. i submit that this is just like any
other new idea: each person must cross-reference the available info
for themselves and take responsibility for themselves. i personally
have decided to play it safe and only sungaze at 'safe' times.

4. according to many live foods proponents such as victoras
kulvinskas, many of the so-called 'facts' we take for granted, such
as 'the sun causes skin cancer' are actually myths perpetuated by the
medical establishment to keep people in a state of fear, to keep them
from reaching higher vibrations of being. according to victoras' book,
the sun does not cause skin cancer - the toxins in the body cause skin
cancer; the sun merely draws those toxins to the surface. by this same
logic, is it not possible that gazing at the sun might be dangerous
for some people who might have certain toxic bodily conditions, but
could be actually safe or even healing for others?

5. many ancient cultures/religions consider the sun the source of our
being, or even a god. from the loo books we know that it is a sub-
logos. archetypically and astrologically, the sun has represented the
center of our being, or even our higher self. it would make sense to
me then, that communing with the sun could be symbolically effective
as well as physically effective. since how we perceive things can have
a direct effect on how it affects us, it makes sense that someone who
feels guided to sungaze would get benefits, whereas someone not so
guided might get harmful effects, just as different diets work for
different people. it all goes back to trusting your own guidance.

6. as we evolve towards 4d, could it not be possible that our bodies
are acclimating to the higher frequencies of the sun? i do not wear
sunglasses for this reason. in other words, what might have been
harmful to the majority of the people at one time might be safe now,
or even necessary to adjust to the higher frequenices the earth is
experiencing.

i am not an expert on sungazing or a scientist: just sharing some
ideas to consider.


> dw: whoa! pursue retinal damage at your own risk, my friends - i have
> not personally suggested looking directly at the sun, though being
out
> in direct sunlight (looking at other things) is recommended. we do
not
> suggest or endorse looking directly at the sun.

[lealdragon]

i just want to clarify that i did not mean 'on the fringe' to be
derogatory in any way. all of us on this group are 'on the fringe'! it
just means that we are pioneers, and forging the way. being on the
fringe of any radical idea can be dangerous, but it can also be
enlightening and exhilerating! all great thinkers & leaders started
out 'on the fringe'!

so it could be entirely possible that the midday sungazers are quite
right and they are just the pioneers in their field. i just don't know
so that's why i am starting gradually during 'safe' times. who knows,
as we get closer to 2012 maybe it will be quite natural to sungaze
during midday sun! and we will have those midday sungazer pioneers to
thank for forging the way for us in this area.

> 3. it is true that some sungazers sungaze during midday sun. every
> movement has its 'fringe'.