global warning alarm sounded

[Bob Vanassen]

reading about a lot of the solar system and earth changes taking place in
both david's book and his website, i happened to come across this article by
drunvalo melchizedek who though not a scientist by trade, is pretty
respected (i believe) in the spiritual realm of things. wondering what david
or any of the left brainers think of this? hard to believe about the north
pole area- i went through a artic survival course up there years ago and
also have landed heavy c-130 airplanes (approximate weight 165,000 lbs) in
the north area and if i recall correctly the thickness of the ice i measured
at around 7 ft ( april time frame i believe).
http://www.spiritofmaat.com/announce/ann_dryice.htm
-peace bob







"

[Ed]

bob vanassen wrote:
>
> reading about a lot of the solar system and earth changes taking place in
> both david's book and his website, i happened to come across this article by
> drunvalo melchizedek who though not a scientist by trade, is pretty
> respected (i believe) in the spiritual realm of things. wondering what david
> or any of the left brainers think of this? hard to believe about the north
> pole area- i went through a artic survival course up there years ago and
> also have landed heavy c-130 airplanes (approximate weight 165,000 lbs) in
> the north area and if i recall correctly the thickness of the ice i measured
> at around 7 ft ( april time frame i believe).
> http://www.spiritofmaat.com/announce/ann_dryice.htm
> -peace bob
>

there are two very important concepts not mentioned in this
article.

1) albedo. that term refers to the reflectivity of a surface based on
its whiteness or lack of. anyone who lives where it snows knows that
the sun bounces off snow with little heat absorption compared to when
the sun shines on bare ground or any dark surface. the north pole
changes are accelerating because open water is darker than ice. this
is the immediate problem in the arctic region and there is little that
humans can do about it.

if this melting continues (which seems very likely) all the northern
waters become less salty and can then freeze more easily and could
very well form a solid ice sheet again easily at some point. whatever,
the other point is the key one:

2) david wilcock would agree that the sun is getting much more active
and everything in this solar system is warming up. here's a very, very
interesting brief article:

http://www.harvardmagazine.com/issue.../rightnow.html

the article shows that there are correlations between sunspot activity
(which slightly reduces the solar radiation to earth) and tree ring
growth, because sunspots affect solar magnetic fields which in turn
affect the composition of isotopes of a couple of elements in the tree
rings. from these correlations they could verify that there really
were a lot fewer sunspots than usual during the "little ice age" of
1640-1720. previously it had been thought that fewer sunspots were
observed then because the telescopes of the time were small, but they
realized you don't need large telescopes to see sunspots.

their point is that we are now in a long period of increased sunspot
cycles and the solar energy received here, which they call solar
forcing, accounts for 78% of the variation in the global temperature,
compared with 14% variation accounted for by greenhouse effect. in
other words, the wiggles in the graph of temperature track most
closely with the wiggles in solar forcing.

therefore imho while we have all sorts of compelling reasons to cut
the co2 and other pollution, the real driving force behind all climate
change is variation in the energy coming in from the sun. and that
probably relates to the change into the 4th density sector.

ed hamerstrom