2012 + 11:11

[Light Eye]

dear friends,

just a re-minder of things to come...

the end of the mayan calendar is dec. 21st 2012 and do you know at what time?

why of course - it's 11:11! just scroll down a bit...
http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/earthseasons.html
here's another site in which juli writes...
"it has always been my belief that the 11:11 phenomenon was related to the 'end
times' but i did not know how or why."
http://members.aol.com/seeingbelieving/chapter13.html
re-member this...
there are no coincidences, no accidents.
everything happens just as it should.


be well, be love.

david




[non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Kay Dayss]

i was just thinking about this. i think if we have an "event" it will be on
11:11:11 on 11/11/11. 8-)

exciting!
kay

----- original message -----
from: "light eye" <universal_heartbeat2012@...>

the end of the mayan calendar is dec. 21st 2012 and do you know at what
time?

why of course - it's 11:11!

[Graeme]

i have never taken this 11.11 thing very seriously, but that is
really quite a coincidence, a twenty-four-times-sixty to one
coincidence, and just happens to be the 2012 solstice! now i am
impressed!

actually, i have been noticing 11s turning up all over the place in
the last few weeks, but just thought i was being insidiously
brainwashed by all you 11:11 guys on this group!

love and light,

graeme

--- in asc2k@yahoogroups.com, light eye
<universal_heartbeat2012@y...> wrote:
> the end of the mayan calendar is dec. 21st 2012 and do you know at
what time?
>
> why of course - it's 11:11! just scroll down a bit...

[aaaxxxisss]

11:11....
"whats the buzz, tell me whats a happenin..."


i remain perplexed as to dates, times, months,and
minutes, may be missing the boat in its entirety here,
admit that i am only vaugely familiar with all this
11:11 principle as a whole, but please, if anyone out
there has even the slightest referance with respect to
the ra material, i would appreciate the referances. if
there is no ra referance, then perhaps a quick link on
a referral point on the subject as to how this, "in
your opinions", tie in in any manner what so ever with
the ra material.

am i being too much of a ra purist here?

puritanically (ra) yours :-)

axis


--- graeme <kimonokraken@...> wrote:

>
>
> i have never taken this 11.11 thing very seriously,
> but that is
> really quite a coincidence, a
> twenty-four-times-sixty to one
> coincidence, and just happens to be the 2012
> solstice! now i am
> impressed!
>
> actually, i have been noticing 11s turning up all
> over the place in
> the last few weeks, but just thought i was being
> insidiously
> brainwashed by all you 11:11 guys on this group!
>
> love and light,
>
> graeme
>
> --- in asc2k@yahoogroups.com, light eye
> <universal_heartbeat2012@y...> wrote:
> > the end of the mayan calendar is dec. 21st 2012
> and do you know at
> what time?
> >
> > why of course - it's 11:11! just scroll down a
> bit...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>




__________________________________
do you yahoo!?
y! messenger - communicate in real time. download now.
http://messenger.yahoo.com

[Chris Hamilton]

you are perfectly ok to question this line of conversation axis truth is,
david has often discussed the number/time/date synchronicity thingy at his
site, so that is why it is allowed here thank you for your diligence in
helping to protect the integrity of asc2k, i really appreciate it, as i am
sure others do. chris

> 11:11....
> "whats the buzz, tell me whats a happenin...">
but please, if anyone out there has even the slightest referance with
respect to the ra material, i would appreciate the referances. am i being
too much of a ra purist here? puritanically (ra) yours :-) axis

[aaaxxxisss]

thanks chris for referencing david and 11:11. does the
ra material in any passages/readings reference 11:11
as well to your knowledge?


--- chris hamilton <chris.hamilton2@...>
wrote:

> you are perfectly ok to question this line of
> conversation axis truth is,
> david has often discussed the number/time/date
> synchronicity thingy at his
> site, so that is why it is allowed here thank you
> for your diligence in
> helping to protect the integrity of asc2k, i really
> appreciate it, as i am
> sure others do. chris
>
> > 11:11....
> > "whats the buzz, tell me whats a happenin...">
> but please, if anyone out there has even the
> slightest referance with
> respect to the ra material, i would appreciate the
> referances. am i being
> too much of a ra purist here? puritanically (ra)
> yours :-) axis
>
>




__________________________________
do you yahoo!?
read only the mail you want - yahoo! mail spamguard.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

[Chris Hamilton]

from: "aaaxxxisss" <qquantumm@...>
thanks chris for referencing david and 11:11. does the
> ra material in any passages/readings reference 11:11
> as well to your knowledge?

only obliquely, i would say, in that the individual, being the catalyst in
many ways for his/her own learn/teaching, would create these synchronicities
in order to teach/learn itself certain things. here is a ra quote which
explains that:

questioner: i was wondering if there is a programming of experiences that
causes an individual to get certain catalysts in his daily life. for
instance, as we go through our daily life there are many things which we can
experience. we can look at these experiences as occurring by pure chance or
by a conscious design of our own such as making appointments or going
places. i was wondering if there was a behind-the-scenes, as you might call
it, programming of catalyst to create the necessary experiences for more
rapid growth in the case of some entities. does this happen?

ra: i am ra. we believe we grasp the heart of your query. please request
further information if we are not correct.

the incarnating entity which has become conscious of the incarnative process
and thus programs its own experience may choose the amount of catalyst or,
to phrase this differently, the number of lessons which it will undertake to
experience and to learn from in one incarnation. this does not mean that all
is predestined, but rather that there are invisible guidelines shaping
events which will function according to this programming. thus if one
opportunity is missed another will appear until the, shall we say, student
of the life experience grasps that a lesson is being offered and undertakes
to learn it.

questioner: then these lessons would be reprogrammed, you might say, as the
life experience continues. let's say that an entity develops the bias that
he actually didn't choose to develop prior to incarnation. it is then
possible to program experiences so that he will have an opportunity to
alleviate this bias through balancing. is this correct?

ra: i am ra. this is precisely correct.

questioner: thank you. from this i would extrapolate to the conjecture that
the orientation in mind of the entity is the only thing that is of any
consequence at all. the physical catalyst that he experiences, regardless of
what is happening about him, will be a function strictly of his orientation
in mind. i will use as an example (example deleted) this being a statement
of the orientation in mind governing the catalyst. is this correct?

ra: i am ra. ..... it is completely true to the best of our knowledge that
the orientation or polarization of the mind/body/spirit complex is the cause
of the perceptions generated by each entity. thus a scene may be observed in
your grocery store. the entity ahead of self may be without sufficient
funds. one entity may then take this opportunity to steal. another may take
this opportunity to feel itself a failure. another may unconcernedly remove
the least necessary items, pay for what it can, and go about its business.
the one behind the self, observing, may feel compassion, may feel an insult
because of standing next to a poverty-stricken person, may feel generosity,
may feel indifference.

chris here: this is why each person will learn something different from
their personal synchronicities. we just need to figure out what we are
saying to ourself love

[Bernard Gehring]

> chris here: this is why each person will learn something different
from
> their personal synchronicities. we just need to figure out what we
are
> saying to ourself love

hello chris and all:
i hope this gets through. if it doesn't. that's ok.
i have been seeing synchronicities for quite a while now and like
everyone who sees them i do not know what they mean. i would usually
see 11:11 or 1:11. however i recently read, on this forum or
another, about making a wish whenever one saw a synchronicity. so
that's what i have been doing. every time i see11:11 or any number
ending in :11 i would stop for a minute and wish the world "peace
love, understanding and compassion" or something similar. since i
started doing this i very seldom see 11:11 but i do see 12:12.
10:10, 12:34 and especially 4:44. i still don't know what this means
but perhaps we all meant to stop our busy lives and wish something
good for someone else. sto perhaps?

anyone else have these experiences or any thoughts.

peace ,love and ever brightening light to all:

b.j gehring

[Lesley Schultz]

hi bj:

--- bernard gehring <bjge@...> wrote:

>snip>>>>since i started doing this i very seldom see
11:11 but i do see 12:12. 10:10, 12:34 and especially
4:44. i still don't know what this means but perhaps
we all meant to stop our busy lives and wish something
good for someone else. sto perhaps?
>
> anyone else have these experiences or any thoughts.
>
ls: i see those numbers all the time too. i'm so glad
i'm not the only one! i really don't know what they
mean, especially 12:34. i think i read somewhere that
the 4's are for 4th density, for love and compassion.
the 12's i take to be perfection or perfecting. 10's,
i have not even a guess. i admit to not finding those
numbers too terribly important, but i believe this is
a failing on my part. many people are able to gather
messages from their environment, and i think this is
an excellent thing. i've even had periods of time
where it seemed like i was getting little hints-- and
understanding their meaning. unhappily, those periods
are rare for me.

i really think that the reason why i don't get the
messages [remembering that the messages are supposed
to be from me, and i should be able to decode them] is
that i don't look for them. part of me has a serious
attitude problem about little 'messages', ostensibly
from higher dimensions, trying to tell me things. as
you know, this kind of behavior is considered a
symptom of mental illness [i.e. schizophrenia.] having
had a nervous breakdown before, i try to guard my
sanity very carefully.

now, as we all know, and i even believe, people with
diagnosed schizophrenia can well be people with
special perceptual gifts. one person's mental illness
is another person's mental gift. i've had
manic/depressive people tell me that they don't like
to take their lithium because they feel like they will
lose something precious if they do.

those of ra have said that the green-ray energies that
are ever-increasing on our sphere can drive some 3rd
density minds insane, trying to cope with the new
energies. i think it's probably no exaggeration to
say that the green ray energies are a little bit
discombobolating to those of us working through our
issues of transformation from 3rd density into 4th. i
have some periods where i can read the thoughts of
those around me very strongly and can't tune them out.
this is very disturbing for me, but it's also a part
of the transformation process. i know that we will be
much more psychic in the next density than we are now,
so i need to get used to it, but perhaps the part that
is missing for me is being able to read their hearts
also. maybe this is coming. i hope so. thoughts
without context are not a true picture.

boy, how did i get off topic so quick? ;-) back to
the numbers. b.j. i think your plan to wish the
universe love, peace, compassion and joy is a good one
when you see the numbers. maybe when you see 12:34
you could summon up your most beautiful vision of what
4d will be like and concentrate on it for a few
moments. i do think we're creating its form right
now, and we need all the most beautiful visions of it
that we can get. i don't think they will clash, but
perhaps they need some integration and maybe that's
when the 10:10 is all about.

i'll try this plan if you will!

good journey,
~lesley





_______________________________
do you yahoo!?
declare yourself - register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com