Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: For david about Divine Cosmos

  1. #1
    Lynda Guest

    Default For david about Divine Cosmos


    david i was reading the divine cosmos today and found that you had a
    number there that has stumped everyone, i would like to put my 2
    cents in if i may. here is what i am refering to.

    "there is a most profound and beautiful question associated with the
    observed coupling constant e ? the amplitude for a real electron to
    emit or absorb a real photon. it is a simple number that has been
    experimentally determined to be close to 0.08542455. my physicist
    friends won't recognize this number, because they like to remember it
    as the inverse of its square: about 137.03597 with an uncertainty of
    about two in the last decimal place. it has been a mystery ever since
    it was discovered more than fifty years ago, and all good theoretical
    physicists put this number up on their wall and worry about it."

    the number broken down in numerology is: 0.08542455 = 0.033,
    8+5+4+2+4+5+5=33 it is a very highly spiritual number. also if you
    take the 33 and turn it over on itself it will become a sign of
    infinity. in other words turning the one 3 around to face the other,
    also if you move the one onto the other they become one. there is a
    lot of intimancy in this number as you were saying in the divine
    cosmos.
    now about the storm, i have an antenna on my tv and this afternoon it
    was really stactic but has this evening did settle down some, i can
    always tell when a flare shoots of the sun, by the way my tv acts up,
    some times i just have to turn if off.

    --- in asc2k@yahoogroups.com, "david wilcock" <djw333@b...> wrote:
    > group,
    >
    > here's msnbc's take on what happened - they seem to be one of the
    more
    > forthcoming corporate media news sources.
    >
    > http://www.msnbc.com/news/750150.asp?0cv=cb10&cp1=1
    >
    > the article says outright that it is better not to tell people if
    > something like this is coming...
    >
    > the part that the article doesn't say is that we are not in the
    decline
    > of a solar cycle - that should have started happening over two years
    > ago. as battros has said, the sun's behavior is breaking all the
    > standard models and expectations as we speak. we can expect that
    this
    > will only continue intensifying as we get closer to the "water
    line" in
    > 2010-2013 (see divine cosmos supplemental.)
    >
    > http://ascension2000.com/divinecosmos
    >
    > peace be with you -
    >
    > - david


  2. #2
    Light Eye Guest

    Default Re: For david about Divine Cosmos


    dear friends,
    if anyone bothered to notice the cme came on 24/10/ 2003.
    2&#43;4&#43;1&#43;2&#43;3 = 12 or 3
    the number of wisdom, the holy trinity.
    did any of you meditate?
    wonderful things to see...
    nous somme du soleil.
    we are all of the sun.
    be well, be love.
    for that is what we are.
    david


    ny versjon av yahoo! messenger
    nye ikoner og bakgrunner, webkamera med superkvalitet og dobbelt sãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ã ƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâ ƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚⥠morsom

    [non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •