Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Homeopathy vs James Randi

  1. #1
    Mawk Guest

    Default Homeopathy vs James Randi


    hi group,

    below is the link to a very interesting transcript from last thursdays
    catalyst program on the abc (australia). catalyst is a science program that
    looks at cutting edge research specifically in australia but also around the
    world. this story dealing with the "memory of water", the essence of
    homeopathy, has far reaching consequences for main stream science. of course
    for many on this list it is just further verification for what we already
    know.

    http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s805448.htm

    cheers,

    mawk


  2. #2
    Mawk Guest

    Default RE: Re: Homeopathy vs James Randi


    hi paul,

    you have provided some very astute observations, in my humble opinion, that
    i completely concur with. i look forward to seeing the transcript of part
    two of the program. this should be available next friday.

    my guess is that the second part will show that there is something too
    homeopathy, but not to a degree of certainty that randi will have to cough
    up the cash. this of course will highlight the fact that the scientific
    process can never provide "certainty", only a hypothesis that best explains
    the facts. actually in this case it is the facts that are in question which
    takes the scientific process to its foundations. the interest for me will be
    how this bias will be presented.

    cheers,

    mawk


  3. #3
    Paul Kandrah Guest

    Default Re: Homeopathy vs James Randi


    > this story dealing with the "memory of water", the essence of
    > homeopathy, has far reaching consequences for main stream science.
    >
    > http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s805448.htm

    > mawk

    "james randi: scientists don't always think rationally and in a
    direct fashion. they're human beings like anyone else. they can fool
    themselves."

    or they can be fooled... is what i think he means to say.

    interesting transcript. basically they allowed a magician into the
    lab whose entire career is based on debunking, where the success of
    his adversary would mean a loss of a million dollars and also his
    rather large following. he is certainly not an impartial observer.

    in the second trial randi and maddox go into a sealed room, where
    they do odd things like taping the code to the ceiling. there is
    apparently lots of opportunity for randi to do some slight of hand
    magic with maddox. he already has done some magic out in the open
    while they were experimenting, which would generally cause mystified
    perceptions so that randi could do just about anything. (general
    magicians tactics)

    i've run into the followers of this fellow before. they are not
    just passive skeptics. they use lots of subversion tactics to
    manipulate perception. they say they are rational, but they often
    use flawed logic. they are human beings... behind a specially
    constructed wall of the mind of course.

    why don't people see through this? ... they want to believe. they
    have their champions (randi, bush) using any and all tactics to keep
    the status quo happy.

    it is a shame that so many people will turn on their own community
    (scientists) and instead put their faith in the traveling snake
    charmer that comes into town.

    paul


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •