Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Metal stuff

  1. #1
    Tarzan Guest

    Default Metal stuff


    paul, et. al.

    thank you for joining, sharing your pov (points of view) and
    for following good dead-text protocol. i appreciate your
    input and share jeremy's questions about the wtc. your
    information regarding the stresses of the metals is very
    useful--thank you.

    here's a url for the latest shuttle development that
    indicates that nasa is backing off the debris-did-the-damage
    theory:

    http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/sto...ttle_investiga
    tion?site=wimil&section=home

    regarding the wtc, here's some urls:

    http://serendipity.magnet.ch/wtc.html

    http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2002/12/1547247.php

    http://www.911pi.com/

    i had a conversation with an engineer who inisted that i
    never reveal his name--understandably, of course--and he
    said that there was no way that the planes, nor the fires
    could possibly have caused the collapse of the two tall
    thingys. he mentioned that, prior to the collapse of the
    two tall thingys, there was never any recorded collapse of
    any tall steel structure due to fire anywhere in the world.
    and consider that the collapses are two separate events (two
    separate buildings) that happened within one hour of each
    other--events that never were recorded before in the history
    of steel skyscrapers. then we have two of them happening
    within an hour on the same day. what are the probabilities
    of that happening outside of planned 'dmlition'?

    in a report, there were recorded radio transcripts from
    firemen who had made it to the 78th floor of the north tall
    thingy (i'm looking for the url) and they were able to
    approach and stand right in the areas of impact (that were
    supposedly burning with such intense heat to cause metal
    failure) and were able to work up a cohesive plan of
    rescue/recovery before their radio connections were somehow
    cut off after the collapse of the south tall thingy, which
    was the second one hit, yet the south was the first to
    collapse, not the north tall thingy.

    the meridian fire in la had heat that was far hotter than
    the tall thingy fires and the meridian building survived
    just fine. also, after the clean-up of the debris (which
    was done extremely fast without following well-established
    protocols of examining the debris, just like what was done
    with the okc collapse), there were pools of molten metal
    found in the basements of both towers. we're talking about
    metal walls that were 4 inches thick and they melted. where
    did that massive heat come from?

    also there's the smoking gun: seismic reports. a nearby
    university (i'm look'n for that url, too--gotta organize my
    huge 911 file) reported seismic events that registered 2.1
    on the scale just ten seconds before the end of the collapse
    of the south tall thingy and again another seismic recording
    of 2.0 prior to the north tall thingy collapse. such
    seismic recordings did not even pick up the impact of the
    thingys hitting the ground. this alone very strongly
    suggests placed 'xplsives' in the tall thingys, which would
    easily explain the pools of molten metal deep under the
    thingys. 'xplsive' experts suggest that only micro-'newkys'
    could have done that.

    i am always ready to discard anything that is not the truth
    or at least very close to the truth about any event--i just
    wish to have truthful, accurate information about any event.

    btw everyone, i wish to know if any of you are seeing any
    chemtrails in the skies as of late? today is the sixth
    straight day of my area being chemtrail-free! it's the
    first time in a full year and a half that we have had
    perfectly clear skies! wow. and the cessation of the
    chemtrails in my area started on the day of the columbia
    disaster. hmmm. i can see clearly for 200 miles west,
    north and south and have yet to see a single chemtrail
    anywhere in the skies for six straight days. i'm hoping
    that this'll continue.

    ~seth


    [non-text portions of this message have been removed]


  2. #2
    Rod Johnson Guest

    Default Re: Metal stuff


    >seth,

    i have a full collection of internet material on the
    analysis of the wtc event on a 2x cd. can i mail
    it to you?


    as to your comment below. from my perch on this ridge
    in the cascades i often observe the chemtrails up and
    down the i-5 in the mount shasta area. i just returned from
    a 6 day trip up and down the i-5 and hwy. 101. not a
    chemtrail in sight. perhaps the winter rains do the job
    better than the chemicals.

    rod

    >btw everyone, i wish to know if any of you are seeing any
    >chemtrails in the skies as of late? today is the sixth
    >straight day of my area being chemtrail-free! it's the
    >first time in a full year and a half that we have had
    >perfectly clear skies! wow. and the cessation of the
    >chemtrails in my area started on the day of the columbia
    >disaster. hmmm. i can see clearly for 200 miles west,
    >north and south and have yet to see a single chemtrail
    >anywhere in the skies for six straight days. i'm hoping
    >that this'll continue.
    >
    >~seth


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •