
math proofs
curious,
this is very illuminating to say the least..
but, why are the tetrahedrons back to back, when esoterically they would be
interconnected in a star tetrahedron.
and would it not be more...logical to imprint the star tetrahedron into a
sphere, why are we still using cubes as a reference for building are math
models..?
why not rebuild with harmonics for understanding each
level/density/dimension, so , the ratio would be enscribing each geometry,
as did kepler in his platonic model of eather. then figure this according to
phi in a dynamic sense(multid), or as bearden said in scalar geometry..
so we have a resonance field factor for each ratio, not just two
tetrahedrons within a cube, which really only seems to describe one ratio..?
this number /constant could also be conclusive , as the nineveh const was
for celestial time keeping.
therefore we could have a common 'key' that is applicable to each level that
would work for each level to computate any given subset of a overtone, or
time frame..
a master 'key', if you will..?
mind you , this is like a freestyle that david talked about in a club one
rare night, that i am just going off my own sense/channel of my small
understanding..
looking for fellow seekers of a cosmic code of understanding uniformity to
unity..
humbly,
clark
__________________________________________________ _______________________
get your private, free email from msn hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

RE: math proofs
clark,
i do not follow you in most of this. in terms of sequential physics,
tetrahedrons are part of a matrix construct. that means they are a part of a
greater whole bound within a specific geometry. within that whole are
fundamental and primary relationships between octahedrons and tetrahedrons.
to realize their significant aspects you must become familiar with the
natural space matrix as a geometry. the esoteric sacred geometry is not a
very revealing model of matrix concepts. face to face tetrahedral structures
model a vector field as a volume that represents a photon quantum space. the
6.66 relationship is ratio of that photon space volume to an energy
measurement in cartesian coordinate terms. blackbody radiation is quantified
in a cubic framereference. plank inadvertently discovered that the energy
relationship is always 2/3 of the measurements.
rod deebokonon
original message
from: clark stewart [mailto:fudoshin09@...]
sent: friday, june 15, 2001 10:59 pm
to: asc2k@yahoogroups.com
subject: [asc2k] math proofs
curious,
this is very illuminating to say the least..
but, why are the tetrahedrons back to back, when esoterically they would be
interconnected in a star tetrahedron.
and would it not be more...logical to imprint the star tetrahedron into a
sphere, why are we still using cubes as a reference for building are math
models..?
why not rebuild with harmonics for understanding each
level/density/dimension, so , the ratio would be enscribing each geometry,
as did kepler in his platonic model of eather. then figure this according to
phi in a dynamic sense(multid), or as bearden said in scalar geometry..
so we have a resonance field factor for each ratio, not just two
tetrahedrons within a cube, which really only seems to describe one ratio..?
this number /constant could also be conclusive , as the nineveh const was
for celestial time keeping.
therefore we could have a common 'key' that is applicable to each level that
would work for each level to computate any given subset of a overtone, or
time frame..
a master 'key', if you will..?
mind you , this is like a freestyle that david talked about in a club one
rare night, that i am just going off my own sense/channel of my small
understanding..
looking for fellow seekers of a cosmic code of understanding uniformity to
unity..
humbly,
clark
__________________________________________________ _______________________
get your private, free email from msn hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2kunsubscribe@egroups.com
your use of yahoo! groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Posting Permissions
 You may not post new threads
 You may not post replies
 You may not post attachments
 You may not edit your posts

Forum Rules
Bookmarks