Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: math proofs

  1. #1
    Clark stewart Guest

    Default math proofs


    curious,
    this is very illuminating to say the least..
    but, why are the tetrahedrons back to back, when esoterically they would be
    interconnected in a star tetrahedron.
    and would it not be more...logical to imprint the star tetrahedron into a
    sphere, why are we still using cubes as a reference for building are math
    models..?

    why not rebuild with harmonics for understanding each
    level/density/dimension, so , the ratio would be enscribing each geometry,
    as did kepler in his platonic model of eather. then figure this according to
    phi in a dynamic sense(multi-d), or as bearden said in scalar geometry..
    so we have a resonance field factor for each ratio, not just two
    tetrahedrons within a cube, which really only seems to describe one ratio..?
    this number /constant could also be conclusive , as the nineveh const was
    for celestial time keeping.
    therefore we could have a common 'key' that is applicable to each level that
    would work for each level to computate any given sub-set of a over-tone, or
    time frame..
    a master 'key', if you will..?

    mind you , this is like a freestyle that david talked about in a club one
    rare night, that i am just going off my own sense/channel of my small
    understanding..
    looking for fellow seekers of a cosmic code of understanding uniformity to
    unity..

    humbly,
    clark
    __________________________________________________ _______________________
    get your private, free e-mail from msn hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.


  2. #2
    Rod Johnson Guest

    Default RE: math proofs


    clark,
    i do not follow you in most of this. in terms of sequential physics,
    tetrahedrons are part of a matrix construct. that means they are a part of a
    greater whole bound within a specific geometry. within that whole are
    fundamental and primary relationships between octahedrons and tetrahedrons.
    to realize their significant aspects you must become familiar with the
    natural space matrix as a geometry. the esoteric sacred geometry is not a
    very revealing model of matrix concepts. face to face tetrahedral structures
    model a vector field as a volume that represents a photon quantum space. the
    6.66 relationship is ratio of that photon space volume to an energy
    measurement in cartesian coordinate terms. blackbody radiation is quantified
    in a cubic frame-reference. plank inadvertently discovered that the energy
    relationship is always 2/3 of the measurements.

    rod deebokonon

    -----original message-----
    from: clark stewart [mailto:fudoshin09@...]
    sent: friday, june 15, 2001 10:59 pm
    to: asc2k@yahoogroups.com
    subject: [asc2k] math proofs

    curious,
    this is very illuminating to say the least..
    but, why are the tetrahedrons back to back, when esoterically they would be
    interconnected in a star tetrahedron.
    and would it not be more...logical to imprint the star tetrahedron into a
    sphere, why are we still using cubes as a reference for building are math
    models..?

    why not rebuild with harmonics for understanding each
    level/density/dimension, so , the ratio would be enscribing each geometry,
    as did kepler in his platonic model of eather. then figure this according to
    phi in a dynamic sense(multi-d), or as bearden said in scalar geometry..
    so we have a resonance field factor for each ratio, not just two
    tetrahedrons within a cube, which really only seems to describe one ratio..?
    this number /constant could also be conclusive , as the nineveh const was
    for celestial time keeping.
    therefore we could have a common 'key' that is applicable to each level that
    would work for each level to computate any given sub-set of a over-tone, or
    time frame..
    a master 'key', if you will..?

    mind you , this is like a freestyle that david talked about in a club one
    rare night, that i am just going off my own sense/channel of my small
    understanding..
    looking for fellow seekers of a cosmic code of understanding uniformity to
    unity..

    humbly,
    clark
    __________________________________________________ _______________________
    get your private, free e-mail from msn hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.


    to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com



    your use of yahoo! groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •