Magnetism and rotation

Jeremy''s mail · 06-09-2001, 10:03 AM

<table bgcolor="#ffffff">
> something i am still unclear on while reading the book is the actual relationship between magnetism and aether flow.
>
> let me construct an example and see if you guys can help me out.
>
> i have a neodymium disc that is magnetized top to bottom and side to side. that means, one side of the disc is north, and if you flip it over to the other side, that side is magnetized south. in addition to this axial polarity, if you draw a line signifying the diameter of the disc, on one side of the line it would be north and the other south. so you have a disc that is magnetized axially and at two points on the circumference of the disc that are separated by the diameter of the disc. i can explain further, maybe draw a picture, if this is unclear. 
>
> ok, what would the affect on the aether flow into the earth and from the earth be if i spun this disc at, say, 20,000 rpm? what about 40,000 rpm? are there any other effects?
>
> thanks, look forward to y'all's input...
>
> jeremy

David Wilcock · 06-09-2001, 11:08 AM

<table bgcolor="#ffffff">
>let me handle that one quickly. if you look at the models, none of the circular magnetshave a top to bottom polarity as far as i know. it's in to out. take the depalma homopolar generator as an example. the magnet is like a super-sucker lollipop where you have a long, thin, flexible horizontal bar magnet that is coiled into a flat circle. this means that the center of the circle at the axis will have one pole and the rim of the circle will have the other pole. 
>
>if you want free energy you need to have a magnet that can also conduct electricity. the faster you spin it the higher the output, just like a lawn sprinkler continually pumping more water at higher velocities. magnetism is nothing but aether flow and the symmetrical arrangement of the molecules in the magnet forms an affect akin to a straw, where the aether flow is shielded in certain directions outside the poles and enhanced through them. 
>
>some of this might be explained in more detail later in the book in yet unpublished chapters. 
>
>there is a lot more information to fully understand the searl levity disc that i didn't go into for space reasons. there is a place online where the full technical papers were published and i have downloaded and read them, one jpg at a time... very, very laborious work to get off the net. they may already have disappeared now, such as is the case with "pirated" material. the writeup of the roschin / godin study goes into some greater detail about it as well. 
>
>the searl designis based on creating a "virtual" spherical torus field with concentric, nested layers of rings and rollers. but once again, the primary polarity flow is from the center out to the edges. 
>
you asked how this affects the earth. i have confirmation from a very good source that the reason why you don't see free energy machines coming out, especially in the us, is that when you start drawing the energy it affects the flux of the global grid. they can see this on specially built sensors on spy satellites. as soon as you get a working prototype, even if no one in the world knew what you were doing, if you get any real significant overunity effect they will know. what they do depends on the situation, but in some cases they will immediately seize it while you are away. that's why i put warnings in the book about this stuff.
>
>hope this helps.
>
>peace be with you -
>
>- david
>
<blockquote style="padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; border-left: #000000 2px solid; margin-right: 0px">
style="font: 10pt arial">----- original message -----
style="background: #e4e4e4; font: 10pt arial; font-color: black">from: jeremy's mail
style="font: 10pt arial">to: asc2k@yahoogroups.com
style="font: 10pt arial">sent: saturday, june 09, 2001 1:03 pm
style="font: 10pt arial">subject: [asc2k] magnetism and rotation
>

> something i am still unclear on while reading the book is the actual relationship between magnetism and aether flow.
>
> let me construct an example and see if you guys can help me out.
>
> i have a neodymium disc that is magnetized top to bottom and side to side. that means, one side of the disc is north, and if you flip it over to the other side, that side is magnetized south. in addition to this axial polarity, if you draw a line signifying the diameter of the disc, on one side of the line it would be north and the other south. so you have a disc that is magnetized axially and at two points on the circumference of the disc that are separated by the diameter of the disc. i can explain further, maybe draw a picture, if this is unclear. 
>
> ok, what would the affect on the aether flow into the earth and from the earth be if i spun this disc at, say, 20,000 rpm? what about 40,000 rpm? are there any other effects?
>
> thanks, look forward to y'all's input...
>
> jeremy

<tt>to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>

<tt>your use of yahoo! groups is subject to the yahoo! terms of service.</tt>
</blockquote>

Jeremy''s mail · 06-09-2001, 11:32 AM

<table bgcolor="#ffffff">
>so you're saying there would be no aether effect with the set-up i just described, right?
>
>would the effect change if the disc were radially magnetized (center = n, points on circumference = s, for example?)
>
>thanks,
>jeremy
>-----original message-----
from: david wilcock <djw333@exis.net>
to: asc2k@yahoogroups.com <asc2k@yahoogroups.com>
date: friday, june 08, 2001 6:35 pm
subject: re: [asc2k] magnetism and rotation


>let me handle that one quickly. if you look at the models, none of the circular magnetshave a top to bottom polarity as far as i know. it's in to out. take the depalma homopolar generator as an example. the magnet is like a super-sucker lollipop where you have a long, thin, flexible horizontal bar magnet that is coiled into a flat circle. this means that the center of the circle at the axis will have one pole and the rim of the circle will have the other pole. 
>
>if you want free energy you need to have a magnet that can also conduct electricity. the faster you spin it the higher the output, just like a lawn sprinkler continually pumping more water at higher velocities. magnetism is nothing but aether flow and the symmetrical arrangement of the molecules in the magnet forms an affect akin to a straw, where the aether flow is shielded in certain directions outside the poles and enhanced through them. 
>
>some of this might be explained in more detail later in the book in yet unpublished chapters. 
>
>there is a lot more information to fully understand the searl levity disc that i didn't go into for space reasons. there is a place online where the full technical papers were published and i have downloaded and read them, one jpg at a time... very, very laborious work to get off the net. they may already have disappeared now, such as is the case with "pirated" material. the writeup of the roschin / godin study goes into some greater detail about it as well. 
>
>the searl designis based on creating a "virtual" spherical torus field with concentric, nested layers of rings and rollers. but once again, the primary polarity flow is from the center out to the edges. 
>
you asked how this affects the earth. i have confirmation from a very good source that the reason why you don't see free energy machines coming out, especially in the us, is that when you start drawing the energy it affects the flux of the global grid. they can see this on specially built sensors on spy satellites. as soon as you get a working prototype, even if no one in the world knew what you were doing, if you get any real significant overunity effect they will know. what they do depends on the situation, but in some cases they will immediately seize it while you are away. that's why i put warnings in the book about this stuff.
>
>hope this helps.
>
>peace be with you -
>
>- david
>
<blockquote style="border-left: #000000 solid 2px; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 0px">
style="font: 10pt arial">----- original message -----
style="background: #e4e4e4; font: 10pt arial; font-color: black">from: jeremy's mail
style="font: 10pt arial">to: asc2k@yahoogroups.com
style="font: 10pt arial">sent: saturday, june 09, 2001 1:03 pm
style="font: 10pt arial">subject: [asc2k] magnetism and rotation
>

> something i am still unclear on while reading the book is the actual relationship between magnetism and aether flow.
>
> let me construct an example and see if you guys can help me out.
>
> i have a neodymium disc that is magnetized top to bottom and side to side. that means, one side of the disc is north, and if you flip it over to the other side, that side is magnetized south. in addition to this axial polarity, if you draw a line signifying the diameter of the disc, on one side of the line it would be north and the other south. so you have a disc that is magnetized axially and at two points on the circumference of the disc that are separated by the diameter of the disc. i can explain further, maybe draw a picture, if this is unclear. 
>
> ok, what would the affect on the aether flow into the earth and from the earth be if i spun this disc at, say, 20,000 rpm? what about 40,000 rpm? are there any other effects?
>
> thanks, look forward to y'all's input...
>
> jeremy

<tt>to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>

<tt>your use of yahoo! groups is subject to the yahoo! terms of service.</tt>
</blockquote>

<tt>to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>

<tt>your use of yahoo! groups is subject to the yahoo! terms of service.</tt>

David Wilcock · 06-09-2001, 11:43 AM

<table bgcolor="#ffffff">
>so you're saying there would be no aether effect with the set-up i just described, right?
>
>you have to remember that the homopolar generator effect is caused by centrifugal force acting on a fluidlike energetic medium. remember the work of dr. harold aspden in rotating magnetized discs, and they preserved momentum after being stopped so that it only took 1/10th of the original energy to return them to the same speed? this is a hydrodynamic effect, essentially, and that is why the polarity has to be from the center outwards. 
>
>would the effect change if the disc were radially magnetized (center = n, points on circumference = s, for example?
>
>now you're cookin' with gas.
>
>peace be with you -
>
>- david
>
>thanks,
<blockquote style="padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; border-left: #000000 2px solid; margin-right: 0px">
>jeremy
>-----original message-----
from: david wilcock <djw333@exis.net>
to: asc2k@yahoogroups.com <asc2k@yahoogroups.com>
date: friday, june 08, 2001 6:35 pm
subject: re: [asc2k] magnetism and rotation


>let me handle that one quickly. if you look at the models, none of the circular magnetshave a top to bottom polarity as far as i know. it's in to out. take the depalma homopolar generator as an example. the magnet is like a super-sucker lollipop where you have a long, thin, flexible horizontal bar magnet that is coiled into a flat circle. this means that the center of the circle at the axis will have one pole and the rim of the circle will have the other pole. 
>
>if you want free energy you need to have a magnet that can also conduct electricity. the faster you spin it the higher the output, just like a lawn sprinkler continually pumping more water at higher velocities. magnetism is nothing but aether flow and the symmetrical arrangement of the molecules in the magnet forms an affect akin to a straw, where the aether flow is shielded in certain directions outside the poles and enhanced through them. 
>
>some of this might be explained in more detail later in the book in yet unpublished chapters. 
>
>there is a lot more information to fully understand the searl levity disc that i didn't go into for space reasons. there is a place online where the full technical papers were published and i have downloaded and read them, one jpg at a time... very, very laborious work to get off the net. they may already have disappeared now, such as is the case with "pirated" material. the writeup of the roschin / godin study goes into some greater detail about it as well. 
>
>the searl designis based on creating a "virtual" spherical torus field with concentric, nested layers of rings and rollers. but once again, the primary polarity flow is from the center out to the edges. 
>
you asked how this affects the earth. i have confirmation from a very good source that the reason why you don't see free energy machines coming out, especially in the us, is that when you start drawing the energy it affects the flux of the global grid. they can see this on specially built sensors on spy satellites. as soon as you get a working prototype, even if no one in the world knew what you were doing, if you get any real significant overunity effect they will know. what they do depends on the situation, but in some cases they will immediately seize it while you are away. that's why i put warnings in the book about this stuff.
>
>hope this helps.
>
>peace be with you -
>
>- david
>
<blockquote style="padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; border-left: #000000 2px solid; margin-right: 0px">
style="font: 10pt arial">----- original message -----
style="background: #e4e4e4; font: 10pt arial; font-color: black">from: jeremy's mail
style="font: 10pt arial">to: asc2k@yahoogroups.com
style="font: 10pt arial">sent: saturday, june 09, 2001 1:03 pm
style="font: 10pt arial">subject: [asc2k] magnetism and rotation
>

> something i am still unclear on while reading the book is the actual relationship between magnetism and aether flow.
>
> let me construct an example and see if you guys can help me out.
>
> i have a neodymium disc that is magnetized top to bottom and side to side. that means, one side of the disc is north, and if you flip it over to the other side, that side is magnetized south. in addition to this axial polarity, if you draw a line signifying the diameter of the disc, on one side of the line it would be north and the other south. so you have a disc that is magnetized axially and at two points on the circumference of the disc that are separated by the diameter of the disc. i can explain further, maybe draw a picture, if this is unclear. 
>
> ok, what would the affect on the aether flow into the earth and from the earth be if i spun this disc at, say, 20,000 rpm? what about 40,000 rpm? are there any other effects?
>
> thanks, look forward to y'all's input...
>
> jeremy

<tt>to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>

<tt>your use of yahoo! groups is subject to the yahoo! terms of service.</tt>
</blockquote>

<tt>to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>

<tt>your use of yahoo! groups is subject to the yahoo! terms of service.</tt>

<tt>to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>

<tt>your use of yahoo! groups is subject to the yahoo! terms of service.</tt>
</blockquote>

Jeremy''s mail · 06-09-2001, 11:43 AM

<table bgcolor="#ffffff">
>i should be clearer:
>
>1. neodymium conducts electricity, right???
>
>2. does it have to be a bar magnet -> spiral design? doesn't a radially magnetized disc, as described below, accomplish the same thing?
>
>3. what are the effects of spinning such a disc (forget the top-bottom charge, and think about the side to side charge (half disc n, other half s, divided along the face of the disc)
>
> this is all purely hypothetical.
>
> thanks,
> jeremy
>
>-----original message-----
from: jeremy's mail <jweiland@nettalon.com>
to: asc2k@yahoogroups.com <asc2k@yahoogroups.com>
date: friday, june 08, 2001 6:59 pm
subject: re: [asc2k] magnetism and rotation


>so you're saying there would be no aether effect with the set-up i just described, right?
>
>would the effect change if the disc were radially magnetized (center = n, points on circumference = s, for example?)
>
>thanks,
>jeremy
>-----original message-----
from: david wilcock <djw333@exis.net>
to: asc2k@yahoogroups.com <asc2k@yahoogroups.com>
date: friday, june 08, 2001 6:35 pm
subject: re: [asc2k] magnetism and rotation


>let me handle that one quickly. if you look at the models, none of the circular magnetshave a top to bottom polarity as far as i know. it's in to out. take the depalma homopolar generator as an example. the magnet is like a super-sucker lollipop where you have a long, thin, flexible horizontal bar magnet that is coiled into a flat circle. this means that the center of the circle at the axis will have one pole and the rim of the circle will have the other pole. 
>
>if you want free energy you need to have a magnet that can also conduct electricity. the faster you spin it the higher the output, just like a lawn sprinkler continually pumping more water at higher velocities. magnetism is nothing but aether flow and the symmetrical arrangement of the molecules in the magnet forms an affect akin to a straw, where the aether flow is shielded in certain directions outside the poles and enhanced through them. 
>
>some of this might be explained in more detail later in the book in yet unpublished chapters. 
>
>there is a lot more information to fully understand the searl levity disc that i didn't go into for space reasons. there is a place online where the full technical papers were published and i have downloaded and read them, one jpg at a time... very, very laborious work to get off the net. they may already have disappeared now, such as is the case with "pirated" material. the writeup of the roschin / godin study goes into some greater detail about it as well. 
>
>the searl designis based on creating a "virtual" spherical torus field with concentric, nested layers of rings and rollers. but once again, the primary polarity flow is from the center out to the edges. 
>
you asked how this affects the earth. i have confirmation from a very good source that the reason why you don't see free energy machines coming out, especially in the us, is that when you start drawing the energy it affects the flux of the global grid. they can see this on specially built sensors on spy satellites. as soon as you get a working prototype, even if no one in the world knew what you were doing, if you get any real significant overunity effect they will know. what they do depends on the situation, but in some cases they will immediately seize it while you are away. that's why i put warnings in the book about this stuff.
>
>hope this helps.
>
>peace be with you -
>
>- david
>
<blockquote style="border-left: #000000 solid 2px; margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 0px">
style="font: 10pt arial">----- original message -----
style="background: #e4e4e4; font: 10pt arial; font-color: black">from: jeremy's mail
style="font: 10pt arial">to: asc2k@yahoogroups.com
style="font: 10pt arial">sent: saturday, june 09, 2001 1:03 pm
style="font: 10pt arial">subject: [asc2k] magnetism and rotation
>

> something i am still unclear on while reading the book is the actual relationship between magnetism and aether flow.
>
> let me construct an example and see if you guys can help me out.
>
> i have a neodymium disc that is magnetized top to bottom and side to side. that means, one side of the disc is north, and if you flip it over to the other side, that side is magnetized south. in addition to this axial polarity, if you draw a line signifying the diameter of the disc, on one side of the line it would be north and the other south. so you have a disc that is magnetized axially and at two points on the circumference of the disc that are separated by the diameter of the disc. i can explain further, maybe draw a picture, if this is unclear. 
>
> ok, what would the affect on the aether flow into the earth and from the earth be if i spun this disc at, say, 20,000 rpm? what about 40,000 rpm? are there any other effects?
>
> thanks, look forward to y'all's input...
>
> jeremy

<tt>to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>

<tt>your use of yahoo! groups is subject to the yahoo! terms of service.</tt>
</blockquote>

<tt>to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>

<tt>your use of yahoo! groups is subject to the yahoo! terms of service.</tt>

<tt>to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>

<tt>your use of yahoo! groups is subject to the yahoo! terms of service.</tt>

David Wilcock · 06-09-2001, 03:36 PM

<table bgcolor="#ffffff">
>maybe i should be clearer. centrifugal force needs to be aided by the aetheric shielding of the magnet. you couldn't support centrifugal force (force moving from the center outwards in all directions) by having a magnet that was circular shaped where half the division of the circle was north and half was south. the point of least motion (the central axis) has to be a point where the energy can be drawn in and the point of greatest motion (the outer edge) has to be the point where the energy is most fully radiated. 
>
>think of the north and south ends of the magnet as if they were ends of a straw. the setup that you are proposing wouldn't really benefit from being rotated at its axis, in terms of its overall output of flow.
>
>peace be with you -
>
>- david
>
<blockquote style="padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; border-left: #000000 2px solid; margin-right: 0px">
style="font: 10pt arial">----- original message -----
style="background: #e4e4e4; font: 10pt arial; font-color: black">from: jeremy's mail
style="font: 10pt arial">to: asc2k@yahoogroups.com
style="font: 10pt arial">sent: saturday, june 09, 2001 2:43 pm
style="font: 10pt arial">subject: re: [asc2k] magnetism and rotation
>

>i should be clearer:
>
>1. neodymium conducts electricity, right???
>
>2. does it have to be a bar magnet -> spiral design? doesn't a radially magnetized disc, as described below, accomplish the same thing?
>
>3. what are the effects of spinning such a disc (forget the top-bottom charge, and think about the side to side charge (half disc n, other half s, divided along the face of the disc)
>
> this is all purely hypothetical.
>
> thanks,
> jeremy
>
>-----original message-----
from: jeremy's mail <jweiland@nettalon.com>
to: asc2k@yahoogroups.com <asc2k@yahoogroups.com>
date: friday, june 08, 2001 6:59 pm
subject: re: [asc2k] magnetism and rotation


>so you're saying there would be no aether effect with the set-up i just described, right?
>
>would the effect change if the disc were radially magnetized (center = n, points on circumference = s, for example?)
>
>thanks,
>jeremy
>-----original message-----
from: david wilcock <djw333@exis.net>
to: asc2k@yahoogroups.com <asc2k@yahoogroups.com>
date: friday, june 08, 2001 6:35 pm
subject: re: [asc2k] magnetism and rotation


>let me handle that one quickly. if you look at the models, none of the circular magnetshave a top to bottom polarity as far as i know. it's in to out. take the depalma homopolar generator as an example. the magnet is like a super-sucker lollipop where you have a long, thin, flexible horizontal bar magnet that is coiled into a flat circle. this means that the center of the circle at the axis will have one pole and the rim of the circle will have the other pole. 
>
>if you want free energy you need to have a magnet that can also conduct electricity. the faster you spin it the higher the output, just like a lawn sprinkler continually pumping more water at higher velocities. magnetism is nothing but aether flow and the symmetrical arrangement of the molecules in the magnet forms an affect akin to a straw, where the aether flow is shielded in certain directions outside the poles and enhanced through them. 
>
>some of this might be explained in more detail later in the book in yet unpublished chapters. 
>
>there is a lot more information to fully understand the searl levity disc that i didn't go into for space reasons. there is a place online where the full technical papers were published and i have downloaded and read them, one jpg at a time... very, very laborious work to get off the net. they may already have disappeared now, such as is the case with "pirated" material. the writeup of the roschin / godin study goes into some greater detail about it as well. 
>
>the searl designis based on creating a "virtual" spherical torus field with concentric, nested layers of rings and rollers. but once again, the primary polarity flow is from the center out to the edges. 
>
you asked how this affects the earth. i have confirmation from a very good source that the reason why you don't see free energy machines coming out, especially in the us, is that when you start drawing the energy it affects the flux of the global grid. they can see this on specially built sensors on spy satellites. as soon as you get a working prototype, even if no one in the world knew what you were doing, if you get any real significant overunity effect they will know. what they do depends on the situation, but in some cases they will immediately seize it while you are away. that's why i put warnings in the book about this stuff.
>
>hope this helps.
>
>peace be with you -
>
>- david
>
<blockquote style="padding-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; margin-left: 5px; border-left: #000000 2px solid; margin-right: 0px">
style="font: 10pt arial">----- original message -----
style="background: #e4e4e4; font: 10pt arial; font-color: black">from: jeremy's mail
style="font: 10pt arial">to: asc2k@yahoogroups.com
style="font: 10pt arial">sent: saturday, june 09, 2001 1:03 pm
style="font: 10pt arial">subject: [asc2k] magnetism and rotation
>

> something i am still unclear on while reading the book is the actual relationship between magnetism and aether flow.
>
> let me construct an example and see if you guys can help me out.
>
> i have a neodymium disc that is magnetized top to bottom and side to side. that means, one side of the disc is north, and if you flip it over to the other side, that side is magnetized south. in addition to this axial polarity, if you draw a line signifying the diameter of the disc, on one side of the line it would be north and the other south. so you have a disc that is magnetized axially and at two points on the circumference of the disc that are separated by the diameter of the disc. i can explain further, maybe draw a picture, if this is unclear. 
>
> ok, what would the affect on the aether flow into the earth and from the earth be if i spun this disc at, say, 20,000 rpm? what about 40,000 rpm? are there any other effects?
>
> thanks, look forward to y'all's input...
>
> jeremy

<tt>to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>

<tt>your use of yahoo! groups is subject to the yahoo! terms of service.</tt>
</blockquote>

<tt>to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>

<tt>your use of yahoo! groups is subject to the yahoo! terms of service.</tt>

<tt>to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>

<tt>your use of yahoo! groups is subject to the yahoo! terms of service.</tt>

<tt>to unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com

</tt>

<tt>your use of yahoo! groups is subject to the yahoo! terms of service.</tt>
</blockquote>

Thread: Magnetism and rotation

Thread Tools

Display

Magnetism and rotation

Re: Magnetism and rotation

Re: Magnetism and rotation

Re: Magnetism and rotation

Re: Magnetism and rotation

Re: Magnetism and rotation

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions