Jesus, RA

[JohnEAngel]

The Law of One was one of the most important finds of my lifetime and i especially have been living it and breathing it in these last days. there is something though that i hope someone can offer a method of a particular conceptualization with.

RA referred to a certain time in the life of Jesus where he accidentally killed a playmate. Later RA described Jesus as a 5th dimensional being but later corrected that and stated that he had been a 4th dimensional being. there are other references to Jesus by RA which seemed to indicate that Jesus was in fact a real entity who lived on Earth in the past. however there have been several books written that indicate a similar pattern of history by other avatars, higher beings, etc., that are similar to that of Jesus. one such being was Amenhotep. the god Amun impregnated the Queen, Amenhotep's mother and his birth was attended by Kings bearing gifts. this was written on the walls of the Temple at Luxor. if Jesus was a symbolic then why did RA refer to him otherwise? this has caused me great confusion. your thoughts please?

[GrumpyBear]

Interesting question!

I've always thought that Jesus was, in fact, a real person. I hadn't considered the possibility he didn't exist - thank you...should be some good reading this evening!

[billybobbutterball]

Questioning the work and person of Jesus is a good way to bring out the worst
in True Believers...For instance, you might end up impaled on a burning stake.

It is, however, a legitimate question. There are threads going back to the archives here on D.C. that engage it...

There are some books worth reading that try to get to the core of it...About 15 years ago I read a best selling work entitled, "The Greatest Story Ever Sold,"

( D. M. Murdock, better known by her pen name Acharya S, is an American author and proponent of the Christ myth theory, etc.)

She is/was a brilliant, All-American girl type scholar....and a "looker" to boot!
She followed the above mentioned work with a more scholarly magnum opus
entitled, "The Suns of God"

This is what happened to me....I had become some ten years before a rather obnoxious Christian. A hard nosed Nephew challenged me to read a book...It was titled, The Jesus Mystery. I was impressed. I began to doubt the special divinity of Jesus...the whole trinity thing.. A Christian friend was outraged and horrified by my reading the book...a couple of nights later I heard her
discussing my shaken faith with the "Bible Answer Man" on the radio. What really burned my butt was that they agreed that my furniture upstairs was a
real mess...Now I had planned on just coasting along and keeping my mouth shut....But now I changed plans -- I was going to start doing some serious reading....

Years before I had been a student of Edgar Cayce, and a member of ARE...so I was doomed...I mean destined to run into David Wilcock and the RA Material..
Of course I was looking for Jesus stuff...Seems that a group within the RA had been influencing and introducing religious systems down the line...As mentioned in a post above "Jesus" was from a high level of the 4th dimension...all love, not much good sense...So he came in loaded for martyrdom. From several sources he did kill a playmate...but brought him
back to life...He was a typical child...a handful..I understand that info was considered undesirable so was removed from scripture. What became of the Jesus figure? Seems at this time he is currently in the 5th dimension studying how to blend Wisdom with Love.

I fear that much of the holy scriptures were created to control the masses.

I could go on and on but there is no end... incidentally, from associated RA material, it seems that the Virgin Mary and the Satanic Devil are actually powerful thought form creations!!

I don't want to offend true believers.. I do hold Jesus in high regards and I'm infuriated by the current attacks leveled against Christianity.

Concerning the Ten Commandments...Judging from the RA that list should be
changed to the Ten Suggestions....(free will ya know...)

Love to all!!! bill g... AKA billybobbutterball

[EcyaC]

The Law of One was one of the most important finds of my lifetime and i especially have been living it and breathing it in these last days. there is something though that i hope someone can offer a method of a particular conceptualization with... if Jesus was a symbolic then why did RA refer to him otherwise? this has caused me great confusion. your thoughts please?

I think the simple answer is: Didn't Wilcock just tell us channelings are only like 10% accurate? Maybe Halaliel said the parts confusing you...or some other negative being posing as the RA?

[billybobbutterball]

I think the simple answer is: Didn't Wilcock just tell us channelings are only like 10% accurate? Maybe Halaliel said the parts confusing you...or some other negative being posing as the RA?

Well, to be fair...there are channelers and channelers....all of which have different scorecards.. Carla's Ra Material efforts rates high on the board, However, the following years of contact -- although of great interest and immense spiritual value -- may lack the same surgical precision -- possibly because the field of inquiry is more outreaching and delves into subject matters that are not easy to analyze, much less put into mere words...

Our In-House Princess, EcyaC (boisterous champion of the loyal opposition) Resurrects Halaliel for an example to make her point...Well, indeed, Halaliel was the misleading bane of Edgar Cayce --a real trouble maker extra-ordinary! But he/she/it was finally exposed.

Now about some negative posing as the RA? Well, there
was a guard in place, being that the RA identified itself by stating, "I am Ra" before answering a question...there are a couple examples where this safeguard nailed an intruder. (However, it wasn't caught until they transcribed the recording)

Now,...heck!..lost track of whatever just escaped my mind.....

Bbb

I saye... The higher self belonges to the combination of Group-Soules such as Ra Ta.

I Am Bill.

Dear Rosa. I believe the term Ra Ta is the name of the Egyptian guy that later ended ended up as Cayce...THE RA is the name of a 6-D group...being one of the major Sub-Logi of at least this part of the Cosmos... The concept of God is way beyond understanding..."It" is the "One Creator", "Prime Creator"...the "SOURCE"...NOT some anthropomorphic-like biblical Big Guy in the Sky.

Incidentally, we uns are little sub-logi ourselves!

I'm no channeller, but I think I'm about 12% right

(seriously, if any of the above doesn't fit, discard it bbb)

[Dtris]

My personal opinion is that Jesus was a real person. Given the strength of the Ra Material on scientific grounds I am inclined to give the information regarding historic figures like Jesus more weight. What we do know is that Christmas which has been promoted for a very long time as the birth of Jesus, was most likely not. He was most likely born in the late summer or early fall. So where did they get the Christmas day? Mithras. The old god born of a virgin. What about St. John the Baptist day? Oh that used to be Moloch's day. Easter? Well we all know that the christians adopted that one too. Back in the day the early church would go into a new area and start converting people. Then they would remove the idols from their temples and change the names of the already existing holy days to celebrate christian figures.

Another thing to keep in mind is that within 50 years of the death of Jesus there were dozens of versions of the Gospels going around. After a while people had to sit down and decide which version was going to be the official one.

The best evidence for Jesus being a living person comes from the histories of Flavius Josephus, wherein Jesus is mentioned. This history dates to 80 A.D. People may have surrounded the life of Jesus with all kinds of pre-existing symbology and myths but that does not preclude his being real. It does make it harder to gain historically accurate information though. I also believe that you should judge a messenger by the content of his message. We judge the Ra material by how much sense it makes, how accurately we can verify certain information, and overall resonance within ourselves. If we read the message of Jesus with the same idea in mind, then his message may be more accurate than previously thought. Or less depending on your persuasion.