The Law of One: As it was...and what it makes

[The8Fool]

Hello everyone,

"The Law of One":

Davids writings and understandings are not his own. Although with the general understanding of comprehension, we could entitle him.
The writings in the law of one material contain a very universal message, in fact many messages!

Starting with comprehension:

The words i am using contain definitions and depending on the organization share a different message. These words are not the totality of understanding but merely the totality of the understood. The understood is not the totality of what could be understood, but a piece of understanding.
(A Great Example): in a movie "The Secret" there is a point when the dreamer(Main Character) wakes up next to a shaman. Looking out into the ocean he sees the sails of ships coming. He taps the dreamer so she can see what he sees.
(Another Great Example): Age(1000 years)s ago our ancestors observed that the earth has a heliocentric experience. That the Heliocentric experience is apart of a galacticentric. I would also imagine they generally theorized a universalcentric experience. Simply the non-biased observation of the movement of orbits.
(Yet Another Great Example): for one reason or another we switched to the geocentric view.

A point of these examples is to show the power of observation and the technologies and thoughts that ripple forward because of them.
(Note: that these *Ripples* are the actions within the timeline of the "Now" that create the hereafter.)

So back to David Wilcock and the source field investigations: This compendium of perspective is as trivial as a family sitting down with a puzzle on a table.
(Please continue to bare with me)
The puzzle comes with a picture on the box. (This picture is a belief) The family believes that all the pieces contained in the box will make the picture.
The family has vantage over the situation, a belief in a result. With enough time spent fitting the pieces togethor and referring to the picture given to them. They will in time create that same image.

So back to all of use, in this Age and time. We exist in a timeline and David has begun to look back across recorded experience. The Law of One... is in my opinion the law of many! The perspective experience you yield to enables the picture, the variable pieces of puzzle, reveal a unique picture.
With us now existing in 2012ad and recorded history going back, beyond 13,000bc. We have an entire puzzle to experience, the perspective we view. Is a culmination and synthesis of all time before us.
Note Example: Sorta like a product placement in a movie or commercial apart of the programming <-- apart of propaganda. associative values create measured responses.
*Translation* i feel thirsty...i crave a pop. Reason sugar? subconscious relationship to the programming?

The "Hindu's" have known this experience as "The Way". We know history as a "Timeline". We use many words and comprehensions to express the very same thing.
Confounded we are when we think we know! The entire history is behind us.. Variable...Variable...the future ahead of us Variable...variable.

Philosophical prowess....David Wilcock, Philosopher, Historian, Visionary you have the power as all those who came before you, to shift the time ahead that has yet to pass. The small deeds of a person magnified across 7billion. Is a fraction of fractal empowerment.

-ADF

[Enkidu]

I agree with your statements on several points, but I must ask. Is there something to be gained or questioned? Or simply your interpretation of what is?

I agree that the Law of One is an amazing piece of work. And I agree that the Law of One is the law of many (as all are one then all are many).

I have had the great advantage of working with Carla Rueckert for a few years, and through discussions and their (Her and Jim)'s on gleaning's of the information, the personal integration/undrstaning of the specs provided are as unique and as individual as the entity enveloping them.

I can say this, that concept of "a family sitting down with a puzzle" is not at all inaccurate. However, due to our inadequacies of accurately recording our history as a species, and the times leading up to them, we do not "have all the pieces".

So much of what we turn and toss is speculation based on an amalgam of great minds and thinkers, who have compiled and erected specific patterns of said puzzle into interesting and plausible shapes. David has gone the extra mile and looked at the amalgam and erected their puzzle pieces into a greater section of the center of the entirety.

However, some of those pieces may not be from the same puzzle, some may not fit the actuality of light/love love/light and the truth behind the intelligent infinity. We stand now at a pulpit braced and watching as a possibility/probability unfolds before us "making wagers" as it were towards the outcome. David has been VERY wise in his movement in regards to never jumping onto a ship lest his heart is fueling the sails, and thus, he has maintained credibility. His garned praise from the LL Research Foundation only adds to that.

I am afraid you didn't really posit a question, simply a statement, and thus, I responded in kind.

As an aside, the best way to share a truth or understanding is a simply as possible.... And we do not yet have the ability to do so:

The "special introduction" to the 1989 edition of the Feynman Lectures on Physics contains the following paragraph:

Feynman was once asked by a Caltech faculty member to explain why spin 1/2 particles obey Fermi-Dirac statistics. He gauged his audience perfectly and said, "I'll prepare a freshman lecture on it."

But a few days later he returned and said, "You know, I couldn't do it. I couldn't reduce it to the freshman level. That means we really don't understand it."

The complexity and depth of your musings show an incredible insight into the probabilities/possibilities of what may be/is actually. However, that same complexity will repulse all who do not have a similar grasp on the concepts at hand...

For example, I will condense my post into one sentence:

"So much of what we seek is complex, and we find ourselves trying to find the underlying; However, as other portions piece together their part of the puzzle, we can begin to approach a greater understanding of the final picture as our own pieces fall into place."