Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: The DIY Thread - Building Source Field Detectors with available technology

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Out of this world!
    Posts
    97

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Apophis View Post
    Okay if the "Casimir efect" can be used what would we be mesuring? pressure? light defraction?

    An idea came to me. I was thinking about a way to incorporate water and this is one that came to me. If you were to create a stable water vortex you could measure the movement of the vortex as it spun. This may be just as plausible as watching a candle flame or the smoke from an incense? I suppose you could watch a stabilized gyroscope as well.

    That sparked another idea... If you had a gyroscope contained within an electromagnetic field, could you keep the gyroscope spinning using the field as well as shield it from outside interference? Then tracking the movements of the gyroscope could prove useful.
    Let's file that thought for a moment until I get my lathe. But keep hashing that one out. I personally prefer the random number generator because it's A.) Easy, B.) Doable in an evening or a weekend, and C.) CHEAP. The keyword is CHEAP.

    Did I mention that CHEAP is important? Cause I want to build a bunch to act as test beds and controls. It's also why Kozyrev's experiments are kinda outta the league of your typical garage engineer/scientist.

    With the RNG, I can build a crap ton for about 8 bucks worth of parts. Not including the microcontroller.

    So this question is mainly technical. Anyone know of a weldable plastic (using plastic welding) that's NOT PVC and comes in cylindrical shapes, preferably black in color that is also water impermeable? I'm building one RNG as my control, one with a CDS (photoresistor) encased inside a plastic "black box" chamber, and one that's encased in a bb chamber with a metal mesh that's grounded as a Faraday shield. So far as I can tell, Lowe's and Home Depot mainly has PVC pipe. And from what I remember from the SFI, PVC blocks/channels SF's. Unless I'm mistaken with that one. I'd use glass, but glass blowing services ain't cheap. Course I can always build one with PVC for comparison. Like I said, I like this project cause it's CHEAP. :P

    I'm probably gonna have to build an embedded linux box with wifi to connect and transmit the rng stations. Time to dumpster dive for old TP-Link MR3220 and Linksys WRT-54GL routers...

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    29

    Default

    I came across this vid on youtube a while back.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQ4a_Gu49SA

    This guy uses a camera that he's developed to look at the fields emmited from organic items. Looks cool.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    22

    Default

    Honestly I don't believe the source field can be detected with any kind of device that uses an oscillator. The oscillator will only take samples of the true source field that from my understanding exists outside of vibratory existance aka "reality". I believe that's what Pete Peterson was getting at in his Project Camelot interview where he said his problem was making something without a frequency generator. Understanding this stuff is understanding the true meaning of the phrase "Peace be still" with emphasis on the word "still." Frankly any device in the material world will oscillate since everything in reality exists because of varying vibrations. Tom Bearden and John Bedini's Scalar detectors might be a better option... There are probably free plans for the basic unit on the energy from the vacuum website. I could be wrong as I'm still not sure if there's a difference between scalar and gravitational waves and what the difference is between those and electricity, magnetism, and time, if they're all different. I'm sure everything I need is in the works of Walter Russell, Koserev, Nikola Tesla, Gabriel Krohn, and maybe a little Moray and Howard Johnson added in here and there. My biggest issue is these guys use different terms to describe the same phenomenon so it's hard to know exactly how many different variables there should be altogether. There are documents about building caduceus/smith coils by someone named Wilbert Smith that might have some useful info also.

    I believe the source field is easier to observe through higher states of consciousness as explained in the book "The secret life of nature" than it is to measure it quantitatively. That book is hard to find and it's not cheap, but it might still exist on the net in pdf format, maybe in a torrent file, possibly with "the secret life of plants" and "the secret life of soil". I believe Jesus was able to perform his "miracles" because he was able to reach higher states of consciousness and maintain them while doing his daily activities, kind of like Goku learning to maintain super saiyan power levels without powering up in DBZ, thus allowing him the ability to manipulate reality through visualization instantly. Yogis call that some type of samadhi. There are different levels depending on whether you are conscious or not while in that state. I believe the extremely low and extremely high frequency voltages being experimented with to manipulate reality and make things like food replicators work, can exist within the human body and mind... This is all in theory to me though. I have no personal experience with any of it.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    22

    Default

    Just remembered Wilhelm Reich was probably familiar with the source field, but called it Orgone. Maybe he designed stuff to measure it too. A lot of his work was banned and burned, but a thorough search might turn up something. I think Jagdish Chandra Bose worked with electronics as well as George Washington Carver in measuring life energy. They might have patents with diagrams to reproduce the devices they used. Carver's patents are likely all American, Bose's would be in India and probably England. Reich would be in the US and maybe Austria/Germany. Just a thought.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Amherst Co. Virginia
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Daven, hope your getting somewhere! haven't posted lately...I saw on the news the other night, a company i think " vortech" built a tornado simulator to study tornados from a weather perspective...I wonder what kind of experiments could be run in a "manmade" tornado? a way to measure changes in dna or materialization (consistancy) or densities...i clearly don't know what im talking about.. im not that kind of scientist... but seeing a fullsized tornado in a controlled setting did raise some quesions in my mind...don't give up, and keep us in the know. thanks

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Out of this world!
    Posts
    97

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dkom68 View Post
    Daven, hope your getting somewhere! haven't posted lately...I saw on the news the other night, a company i think " vortech" built a tornado simulator to study tornados from a weather perspective...I wonder what kind of experiments could be run in a "manmade" tornado? a way to measure changes in dna or materialization (consistancy) or densities...i clearly don't know what im talking about.. im not that kind of scientist... but seeing a fullsized tornado in a controlled setting did raise some quesions in my mind...don't give up, and keep us in the know. thanks
    Well,

    I got the RNG working. Currently working on how to express the random ness as numbers, as its output currently is in a chaotic waveform. I also developed a highly sensitive analog sensor, which I can deploy for any kind of sensor test.

    The problem of course is we're dealing with a phenomena that can't really be detected by metal/electrical means. It has to be either mechanical or biological. We can't do direct measurements (yet), it has to be through 2ndary effects. Hence the reason I developed the really sensitive sensor.

    Next step now is to get the RNG to express itself as digital numbers, so I'm currently figuring that out. Once I get that, I should have a decent field sensor, then the next step is programming a embedded linux system to read in the numbers and compare for decreases in random ness. Once I figure that out, then it's on to testing out Pyramids and other Euclidean shapes. I got a $hit load of pvc pipe left over, so might as well put that to good use.

    All Da Best!
    Da Asian Brutha
    "You think you can just escape? Walk out of this world like it’s some bad movie? It’s too easy to make like a bird. To flap your wings as you chicken out after causing all these problems. The tough part’s walking. Taking what comes along and walking right through it. That’s what real people do."- Eikichi Onizuka, GTO

    --------------------------

    Now writing in the geo-political/world financial crisis column for the DNA Newsletter.
    http://davesnewadventure.com

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    768

    Default

    I wonder if some kind of freguency modulation imput of electrical or aural toning might precipitate a wave coherence effect so that you have a single amalgamated wave front from which you can graph the precipitation, without dampening the random diversity of signal. I've heard that some researchers have had success with harmonic chording. Mark

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Daven, I like the idea of Open Source as the way to go with this. This is the ultimate Open Source. The more legal safeguards that can be put into place to prevent anyone from trying to "own" the technology, the better. It must be a widespread, volunteer/donation based project, because I believe the technology will actually refuse to emerge until people stop trying to own it. It resists ownership, because ownership is in contradiction to its nature. The way it has habitually been squelched is, someone usually works through a large corporation or the government or a university, thinking they need many millions to manufacture the required machines, and/or feel they should be compensated. These are false assumption. The Source belongs to everyone and there has to be an accessible way to do this. We no longer need to seek compensation. Occupy Source Field!! (i.e, live there). It will be its own compensation. There must be a way to beam healthy, coherent resonance into a sick person, thus healing them, without the necessity of lasers or any other expensive equipment. That's the only way it will bypass the ... whatever it's called - that rusty, crumbling thing that tries Rockefeller everyone. The only entities that can bypass it are those that are never owned.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Idaho, US
    Posts
    250

    Default

    Okay maybe I can pump some new ideas into this thread.

    Here's my thoughts;

    There is a way to turn a speaker into a microphone, right? They work on the same principals. I've heard a rumor about it once but didn't know enough to test it. Its a sound theory, ha ha pun...

    Anyhoo, have you researched the Roden Coil? This guy, Marco Roden discovered that wraping an electrical coil on a twelve point matrix rather than a single loop greatly increaces the magnatism generated.

    Furthermore he postulates a new mathmatical system, which was picked up by a guy named Randy Powell, tenitivly named Vortex Mathmatics. You can find a TedTalk by Mr Powell on the subject if you look. Along with multiple videos of Roden Coils in action.

    But to get to the point.....

    I believe these Roden Coils are generating standing Source Field Waves, and it may be posable to record a SFW using the same equipment that generates them.

    Just a thought....
    Gnothi Seauton (know thyself)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •