this has indeed been an interesting thread. for what they may be worth, i will add my thoughts on polarity. please feel free to ignore anything that does not resonate for you.
"the intelligent infinity discerned a concept. this concept was discerned to be freedom of will of awareness. this concept was finity. this was the first and primal paradox or distortion of the law of one. thus the one intelligent infinity invested itself in an exploration of many-ness. due to the infinite possibilities of intelligent infinity there is no ending to many-ness. the exploration, thus, is free to continue infinitely in an eternal present."
therefore, this 3d illusion is finite, which means that limits or duality are a given. as finite 3d beings, we think in terms of dualities such as beginning-end, first-last, before-after, true-false, correct-incorrect and positive-negative. we constantly compare, contrast and evaluate seeking to parse and discern, and if you doubt this, take note of how you are considering and evaluating what you are reading.
much of our thinking is metaphorical in nature; like this, similar to that, and i believe this to be true for ra's use of polarity. ra is employing the concept of building up a consistent positive or negative charge as a metaphor rather than a literal process. establishing one's own consistent polarity may be similar to charging a battery, but they are not identical.
" i am ra. the galaxy and all other things of material of which you are aware are products of individualized portions of intelligent infinity. as each exploration began, it, in turn, found its focus and became co-creator."
consider if you will that the purpose of actualizing ra's metaphor of establishing a consistent polarity is actually about establishing one's own viability as a co-creator. as individualized portions of intelligent infinity, we employ the step-by-step building of polarity in order to find focus as a co-creator.
every choice one makes has a potential positive, neutral or negative charge, and choice by choice, one may create a consistent focus of intent, a firm foundation of biases and attitudes that in turn, guide one's future choices.
in keeping with the duality of finity, there are two distinct paths or means of focusing one's intent as a co-creator. one, sts, strives to manifest separation, individuation and control. the other, sto, endeavors to achieve unity through forgiveness and acceptance.
one may consider the assigning of a negative or positive polarity to sts and sto as merely a sort of metaphorical shorthand because, regardless of their polarity, all are aspects of intelligent infinity. in the end, both paths lead to unity with the creator.
polarity is not about separating self and others as positive or negative, nor is it about us versus them. although the concept of polarity may be more metaphorical than literal, the intent is clear. through the process of incarnations into 3d, each of us must eventually arrive at a focused intent or identity as a co-creator. otherwise, we cannot shift our learning process to a higher density. at least, this is how my own understanding of polarity has evolved.
If you are alive, you cannot avoid making choices. If you say, "I refuse to choose," you just made a choice. -- DFS --
To assign blame is to give away one's power as a co-creator. - DFS -
Freedom of will of awareness means there are no true accidents, disasters or injustices. There are no victims, only volunteers. - DFS -