The Source Field Investigations Book has taken thirty years to develop!

[Jeia Ra Manuk]

our physical brain is like a radio. our time/space energetic brain is the power to the radio. one can't pick up anything with out the other. the source field is pretty much the "space" (for whatever that term is worth, lol) which contains both time/space and space/time. think about a computer file... where does it go when it is fully deleted? as in after you delete it from the computer and recycle the computer itself. no more physical location. but it must be somewhere. the only way we know something exists is to watch it come out of existence. but how do we know that it actually does? we can only judge from our position in space/time. thus it is coming out of existence from space/time, but that does not mean it came out of existence, because for something to come into existence, it must come from somewhere or somewhen.

love,
ra ma

[Jeia Ra Manuk]

probably. although the materials might be different the concept does seem similar! thanks for bringing this up, it is a good point. i'll give it some thinking and i'll get back at you!
love,
ra ma

i'm on page 146, talking about pyramids - thinking about making one of my own

i'm wondering about teepees--american indian teepees. they contain no metal, you use 4 long sticks and wrap skins or fabric around them--would this kind of "container" create the same influence on matter as a more traditional pyramid?

[Jeia Ra Manuk]

from what we already know, and don't really need to look up.
the native americans, just as ancient egyptians did, make a big emphasis on hat wear.
we know that in both cases, this is done to underline the opening of the crown chakra.
although if we go by the ancient astronaut theory, this would have a double meaning;
just as we find prolonged sculls in egypt and an obvious hat adjustment for these sculls so do we find the same clues (crystal sculls as an example) in the north/south americas.
the thing about teepees (tipis) is that these are not the only homes we find in native american cultures but they are the ones which are portable, thus easy to carry.
there relations to the pyramids are not obvious but there are some.
we sure don't see any teepee tombs, but then again it's hard to say that the giza pyramids were on burial ground. although many pyramids seem to have attributes of a tomb like nature, we can't say for sure, unless we find bones... right? and then again, who are we to say that these bones were originally there.
the tribes that used teepees as the main living place were travelling/migrating tribes. some of them stayed in places longer, some of the shorter. one of the things they did practice when it comes to dead relatives was the moving of the bones along with the moving of the tribe. they would take out all the bones, clean them and take them along to the new location.
okay, well this is as far as my brain can go right now!
have a good one,

love and light,
ra ma

[Tommy777]

i just picked up david's book on friday and absolutely love it!! i've only read the first 5 chapters so far but i honestly can say that i can't put it down. it's amazing how many "pieces" of information are out there that just seemed like information and when david put them together they make so much sense. i'm looking forward to reading each page!

[derek]

thank you for that clarification jeia. what i am trying to figure out is if that time/space brain is just an exact energetic duplicate of our brain (ie just energetic neurons communicating with each other), ithan it too must be some sort of antenna, as our brain is made to be able to actually create thought, so our time/space duplicate brain could not either. unless it was something else entirely.

[Jeia Ra Manuk]

yaya! welcome to the forum! what are you finding the most interesting in the book? we would all love to discuss it if you'd like! or if you have any questions, throw them out here!

i just picked up david's book on friday and absolutely love it!! i've only read the first 5 chapters so far but i honestly can say that i can't put it down. it's amazing how many "pieces" of information are out there that just seemed like information and when david put them together they make so much sense. i'm looking forward to reading each page!

and dear derek,
yes, it is an exact energetic duplicate. it cannot be an antenna without the organic brain and vise versa. the two together create the antenna. organic brain is our hardware, the energetic brain is what powers the hardware. the neurons (circuits in our brain) are still a physical part of our organic brain. it is the elasticity that is being passed on through those neurons that is the energetic brain. and from what we learn in physics forces such as electricity and gravity(source field that is) can move freely through dimensions.

love and light,
ra ma

[Jeia Ra Manuk]

by the way derek,
scott and i are having a rather similar discussion at another thread, i think it can be beneficial to you as well, to read what i've wrote there! here's the link:
http://divinecosmos.com/forums/showt...1187#post61187
love,
ra ma

[ZMonkey]

i was wrong about the geometric pictograms. do deca to me is 2 x 10 = 20. the illustration is correct.

getting into the middle of the book now. time travel concepts are interesting, in fact i experience them
when in deep concentration when working. the space/time alternate dimensions and their interaction
was explained very well. these fringe events caused by slipping into the time dimension either partially
or fully is probably something that is more common than we know. there is no telling how it will manifest,
and what the reaction of the person will be. these concepts i learned through the "alchemical manual for
this millennium". the book is written by telepathic link to "starfriends". they explain that the most basic
particles of physical stuff are space time corpuscles. they are continuously cycling between space and time,
and each cycle is a creation, and an annihilation, so in every cycle it is created and destroyed, which
continues infinitely. this is why they are always pristine, in perfect condition. each particle can be biased
toward space or time changing the nuances of the material. they combine geometrically, and get combined
to form all matter. the way the particles are biased changes the way the structures they make perform, such
as a proton, or a photon, or an electron. this book rewrites the rules of energy and magnetism.

i am hoping that the source field investigations continues in to those areas. i'm on page 321 so far and
pretty much everything seems to jive with my heart center. also i am long learned in atomic and quantum
physics, and those things jive with my brain center. it is truly an unparalleled effort to identify the creation
of all that is. tsfi also parallels hermetic philosophy well, which is important because i consider hermetic
law to be equivalent to cosmic law, which is also a good parallel to tsfi.

howdy y'all,

i got the book in my hands about an hour ago. i have been glued to it since. been hopping around scanning, prereading.
from what i have looked at so far it is superlative. i can't wait to have some time to dig into it. i did, however, find a little
oopsy, page 329, the geometric pictograms, two are mislabeled, the icosahedron and the dodecahedron. i'm not usually one
to pick nits, but this really stood out...

sorry, i'm sure the rest of the book is perfect...

[electrum]

i have been reading dw's book on the source field and am a little over halfway thru it. page 349 to be precise. and it is on this page and the following where i have gotten very puzzled. hopefully some of you all can help me?

dw writes, "...it was not until 1996 that we found out the core is rotating slightly faster than the rest of the earth--and takes about 400 years to complete one cycle". (this information is referenced by a note #21 "core spins faster than earth lamont scientists find"). what "cycle" is dw and these scientists referring to?

on the following page we read this, "dr. song and dr. richards calculated that over a year, the inner core rotates about one longitudinal degree more than the earth's mantle and crust. the inner core makes a complete revolution inside the earth in about 400 years".

i am getting confused by the use of the term "revolution". the term rotation makes perfect sense in that it takes the earth 24 hours to rotate once upon its axis. if the core rotates "slightly faster than the rest of the earth" then it would require less than 24 hours to complete one rotation on its axis. but what does this have to do with a "complete revolution inside of the earth in about 400 years"?!

how can the earth's core revolve inside of the earth? it can rotate but revolve?? sorry but this loses me.

[wayshower]

frustrating to be sitting here in the uk reading all this positive comment about david's sfi - yet across the pond we are still waiting!!!
in response to my enquiry of amazon uk re my order placed back in june, i was told; "we are currently awaiting a revised estimate from our supplier, and will email you as soon as we receive this information. . i realise that this is the fourth time that this has happened to you and we are taking steps to ensure it does not happen again.unfortunately, as the shipping date has changed four times at this stage i must inform you that we can no longer guarantee a date of dispatch."
they -generously - went on to say: " if you still require the item it would be worthwhile seeing if it is available from a third party seller on amazon.co.uk marketplace."
'if i still require the item...' indeed!
so i checked the amazon marketplace, hopped along to the book depository who were advertising sfi 'new', emailed them to confirm they did indeed have it in stock for immediate delivery, and placed my order with them. it will cost me £1 more than amazon - worth it at twice the price :d.
net result: order placed 15th sept; order despatched 16th sept; wife advised i will be busy from today or monday - do not disturb.