questioner: i may be wrong, but it seems to me that it would be the free will of, say the orion group, to interfere. how is this balanced with the information which you just gave?
" i am ra. the balancing is from dimension to dimension. the attempts of the so-called crusaders to interfere with free will are acceptable upon the dimension of their understanding. however, the mind/body/spirit complexes of this dimension you call third form a dimension of free will which is not able to, shall we say, recognize in full, the distortions towards manipulation.
thus, in order to balance the dimensional variances in vibration, a quarantine, this being a balancing situation whereby the free will of the orion group is not stopped but given a challenge. meanwhile, the third group is not hindered from free choice."
ra goes on to say that if the orion group invaded and forced compliance, they would lose polarity, but if the 3d entities chose to submit, the crusaders would gain polarity. thus, it is a matter of free choice.
consider that the spiraling energy from intelligent infinity forces change, which in turn, forces choices.for a 3d mind/body/spirit complex, every moment requires trillions of choices, most of which are initiated by the individual cells, organs, etcetera and overseen by the subconscious.
the first distortion is "freedom of will of awareness" and most of us tend to equate awareness with conscious thought.many of one's choices may be handled by automated patterns of behavior, yet they are free choices in that one has freely chosen to allow the automated patterns to make the choices. however one chooses to react, it is a free choice even if not consciously considered.
thus, if an sts persona chooses to attempt control or domination, that's a free choice. it is, by it's nature, a violation of the other's free will and the other persona may then freely choose how she/he will react.one is free to resist or submit, and whatever the choice, it is a free one.in other words, initiating an action intended to limit or control another's choices is a violation of that individual's free will, and a post hoc reaction is not an automatic violation of free will.
the intent to manage or control others violates free will, and choosing not to comply as illustrated by gandhi's philosophy of passive resistance does not violate free will. however, if an sto individual actively seeks to control others, that would be a violation of free will.
as ra notes, in 3d, interacting with others is a subtle and complex process requiring discernment. thus, the less one relies on automatic patterns, the less likely one is to knowingly violate the free will of others.
i have concluded that self observation is the best tool for detecting automatic patterns, and until observed, such patterns cannot be altered. unless one is consciously paying attention, it is amazingly easy to unintentionally violate the free will of others.
If you are alive, you cannot avoid making choices. If you say, "I refuse to choose," you just made a choice. -- DFS --
To assign blame is to give away one's power as a co-creator. - DFS -
Freedom of will of awareness means there are no true accidents, disasters or injustices. There are no victims, only volunteers. - DFS -