About the Law of One

[onething]

i've come across testimony from military personnel more than once on videos that ufos are deactivating nuclear devices. this is great as far as i'm concerned. i can't see letting this solar system lose a 3rd planet! but i fail to see how this works with the law of free will.
anyone think about this?

[MarkM]

it may be that the collective wish and prayer of the majority of mankind is for nukes to go the way of the dinosaurs, not to mention the prayers of earth herself. perhaps our collective will in this regard necessarily invites a supportive boosting to our wishes for less than planet busting forms of settling differences, with the bulk of us not having been inveigled into wishing death to our enemies.

if it were otherwise and paramount with our collective free will, our need for learning might otherwise invite a repeat scenario of destruction. when i hear tales of ufos powering down nuke installations, i feel an answering to human striving for love, as this is what keeps us from the alternative. mark

[12thUranus]

i've come across testimony from military personnel more than once on videos that ufos are deactivating nuclear devices. this is great as far as i'm concerned. i can't see letting this solar system lose a 3rd planet! but i fail to see how this works with the law of free will.
anyone think about this?

these are very temporary "shutdowns" from the reports i hear. i hypothsize that it is more a matter of logistics than a deeper global conscience reasoning. the logistics being that nuclear facilities interupt et flight passages or space energy vortices that the planet is passing through would activate an online nuclear device.
besides, ufo pilots should be a part of free will as much as anybody. right?

[DFS]

i've come across testimony from military personnel more than once on videos that ufos are deactivating nuclear devices. this is great as far as i'm concerned. i can't see letting this solar system lose a 3rd planet! but i fail to see how this works with the law of free will.
anyone think about this?

i like mark's point about the collective consciousness and hope he is correct.

however, here's my take on the free will issue. i do not think that shutting down nukes is a violation of free will. those controlling the nukes are still free to order them launched even if the missiles refuse to respond.

if you climb into your car, turn the key and the car refuses to start, is that a violation of your free will? if it turns out that the car refuses to start because someone swiped the battery, i would consider that a catalyst for learn/teaching rather than a violation of free will. one might assume that it's appropriate for higher intelligences to act as catalysts for learn/teaching and that to do so, is not a violation of free will.

at least, that's how i would interpret the powering down of nukes. it's a catalyst for those folks who consider themselves so powerful that they can order the destruction of entire cities. <smile>

dfs

[billybobbutterball]

hi dfs

must agree with you on points you bring out concerning "free" will.
the intellectual problem is that everyone assumes that they have "it" but have difficulty
describing what "it" actually consists of beyond some overly simplistic "givens".

for those pondering such there is a thread on 'free will' -- located in the law of one --
that explores this slippery subject in some greater detail.

best, bbb

[DFS]

I offer some thoughts for consideration. A search of the LOO web site produced 88 question/responses containing "illusion", the majority being Ra's responses. For example:
2.3
Ra:
"...the structure of the illusion which is the physical body, as you would call it...."
4.20
Ra:
"... Thus, the intelligent infinity within this mind/body/spirit complex re-forms the
illusion of body, mind, or spirit to a form congruent with the Law of One."
7.15
Ra:
"... The laws, which are the primal distortions of the Law of One, then are placed into operation and the illusion of space/time is used as a medium for the development of the results of those choices freely made..."
10.14
Ra:
"... This is the most nearly centered and useable within your illusion complex. The moment contains love. That is the lesson/goal of this illusion or density..."

If space/time, this third density and the body, mind or spirit expressing in this third density are an illusion, what then might be considered actual or real?

4.20
" I am Ra. The Law of One, though beyond the limitations of name, as you call vibratory sound complexes, may be approximated by stating that all things are one, that there is no polarity, no right or wrong, no disharmony, but only identity. All is one, and that one is love/light, light/love, the Infinite Creator."

Thus, the only actuality or reality is the Infinite Creator. Infinity became aware, and that original moment of self awareness, that "I am that I am," is the creative essence of the Infinite Creator, which manifests all that is. In essence, all is thought.

1.0
Ra:...
"You are part of a thought. You are dancing in a ballroom in which there is no material. You are dancing thoughts. You move your body, your mind, and your spirit in somewhat eccentric patterns for you have not completely grasped the concept that you are part of the original thought."

A focused point of consciousness or separated self experiencing material manyness is actually an illusion manifested in order that the creator may know self; yet, each focused point of consciousness, each individuated being has been gifted freedom of will of awareness so that its focus/perspective and its experiences may be truly original and unique, thereby gifting the creator with self knowing in infinite variations.

Thus, I understand and accept that my true identity is the one Infinite Creator, which
raises another question. Are all my other identities, including my soul identity and higher self an illusion?

I welcome your thoughts.

DFS