Disclosure Endgame E-Book 12/25/2009

[Happystrings]

first: a great post by david. extraordinary research and detective work to pull all of that together.

second: what a lot of informaiton...in the end i felt drained and caught between fury at all the misery the power players have caused and concern that it 'would never end' and hope that all dw's interpretation of quantum physics and the next few years is correct...

i am soooo ready for a change for the positive.

[Loungin]

i have 2 concerns about the article.

since dr. beter is a new source of information, i am concerned that he may not be a creditable source. david is a brilliant researcher but we are all prone to grab pieces of the puzzle that others provide because they fit our story. with the wealth of information coming as fast as it is, i hope that david took the time to check this source out before diving in full steam ahead.

second, is the 'voice of the white house' source on tbrnews.org. some of his work has really rubbed me the wrong way as he frequently calls those who research ufo, "nutcases" or other choice words. the crawley files drew my attention over a year ago and i do find very interesting although i didn't research the credibility of this either.

bottom line is that i trust david's ability to research and often take him at his word. although now i feel compelled to research this further on my own, perhaps because i never thought i would see the day when i would learn the true history behind the wars.

i'll end with a thank you to david and his team as this article was mind blowing. i can't thank you you enough for dedicating your life to this cause.

[eagleye]

david,

i would have posted in the comments section of the book but i figured you would have a better chance of catching my comment here since there are less posts to go through.

i just want you to know that your work is appreciated. this book has some of the most outstanding information i have ever seen. i learned more in just a few hours than i did in years of researching this stuff on my own.

there are many of us who recognize the sacrifices you make and we know that you have poured your heart and soul into an exhaustive amount of work to share this important information with us. and you gave it to us as a gift absolutely free. not to mention the mentally draining attacks and utter hatred you have to deal with on a daily basis. never doubt that what you are doing is having a huge impact on the consciousness of humanity. you truly are fulfilling what you came to do in this life. i feel honored to be one of those working along side you in raising the vibrations. :d

loungin,

dr. beter is by no means a new source. he has been around probably longer than all of them and had been openly exposing the illuminati since at least the 70’s. that is why david posted the wikipedia article about him, so that you could see how long his information has been around. david wilcock has recently discovered dr. beter for himself but he has always been there. we know that he is probably the most credible out of them all of them because we can go back to see what he said before the fact. he had been consistently accurate for many decades. i don’t see how you can get any better than that.

also, just because the voice of the whitehouse is a jerk does not mean that he does not tell the truth about most things that he knows. if you have been reading his posts long enough then you know that he has a very high opinion of his own intellect and a very low opinion about many others. haughtiness does not make a liar.

we can go back many years with this source and see that he is extremely credible. many the things he said were later revealed to be true with amazing accuracy. we don’t have to like his personality in order to use the information he puts out. credibility for most people can only come with a track record and both of these sources have proven to be accurate over many, many years.

another thing i will say about the voice of the whitehouse is that david does not use him as a ufo source and neither should we. he may know about a lot of what is going on in the government but that does not mean he knows everything about everything. it is evident that he is to low in the pyramid structure to know about this. his own ignorance about ufo’s does not mean he is not a credible source in the things he talks about.

like any other source you have to take it with a grain of salt and use discernment. no one person has all the answers because the power structure is compartmentalized into “a need to know” basis. they can only give you their perspective as they see it in their limited place in the pyramid structure, they can never see up, only down, so you have to take that into consideration. the only way to get the full picture is to put all the credible sources together; this will give you the full picture. after reading this book there can be no doubt that we now have all the pieces we need to see what is really going on.

i don’t think that david leaves any room for us to just take his word for anything. he always provides more than enough credible information so that if we want we can verify everything he is saying. that is why the book was so complicated. most of it was giving us the information we needed to research everything on our own. it would have been a much easier read without the additional information to back up what he was saying. however as you know these are big claims to make. no one will accept it without the references. you almost could not read a sentence without coming across some kind of reference to back up what he was saying.

i give it two thumbs up!

[Nancy]

finally i understand the connections of the illuminati factions and governments.
i appreciate the research and time you've put into this and look forward to the next sections.
nancy in oregon

[Rebecca]

: it seems david has gone from an attitude of "disclosure is imminent and going to happen any minute now" to "disclosure is imminent, but may or may not happen w/in obama's first term in office".

wow...i'm feeling so impatient!
with ants in my pants,
jellyfish

hey, jellyfish,
ive got ants, too. maybe i can help chill yours out. here's a direct quote of david from part 4 a bit above the video with corbin:

"we will have much more to say about the possibility of disclosure actually happening well within obama's first term, and the united nations meetings that led to all this,in the conclusion."

. . and a bit below the video: " in the conclusion, we will bring you fully up to date with all the evidence suggesting that disclosure is indeed imminent -- either from the obama administration directly or other groups that will do it for him if he refuses."

just one more quote: " . . the conclusion will show up some time after the first week of january, most likely."

didn't steven greer give obama one full year from his inaguration day (jan. 20) to bring forth a disclosure, or else another g7or 8 country would do so?

darn, i've still got ants. you too? reb










.

[Loungin]

loungin,

dr. beter is by no means a new source. he has been around probably longer than all of them and had been openly exposing the illuminati since at least the 70’s. that is why david posted the wikipedia article about him, so that you could see how long his information has been around. david wilcock has recently discovered dr. beter for himself but he has always been there. we know that he is probably the most credible out of them all of them because we can go back to see what he said before the fact. he had been consistently accurate for many decades. i don’t see how you can get any better than that.
.
.
.

well put eagleye. my skepticism on this "new" source stems from the shock that someone who has been researching this for as many years as david hasn't found this information previously. it truly appears to be a treasure trove of data. perhaps it was hiding until just the right time. none the less, i am glad it found it's way into david's hands as it confirms much of what he has been saying prior to finding it.

as for tvotwh, you make a good point that the compartmentalization of the shadow governments make it impossible for someone to speak accurately about the whole picture. tvotwh writes with such arrogance which in turn discredits him in a way. in one line he will say that we are in iraq for oil and that it is irrefutable and then the next line he will say that there is no secret ufo program and the loons are better off dieing to make room for the intellects. speaking in absolutes is usually not a wise practice and he enjoys doing it. i find this to be more damaging to his credentials rather than upsetting because he doesn't follow my view of the cosmos.

[Bill]

i had posted this as a comment on the e-book, but thought i would add the information here as well.

i did some pokin around on the internet, and found a contact at eiscat who has responsibility for the 'tequila sunrise' test they were running. i asked him if eiscat was responsible for the "norway spiral". here is his/her (?) reply:

no. the famous spiral was caused by a failed russian rocket, which took place about 10 minutes before my radar experiment.

the idea of my radar run was to examine how the geminids meteor shower changes the properties of the mesosphere. actually, i repeated the experiment every morning for two weeks and, as said, one of the experiments coincided roughly with the time of the spiral.

yes, i have received quite a lot of questions on this matter and responded to each and everyone so far.

thanks for your interest and happy 2010,

dr. antti kero
principle investigator of the tequila sunrise experiment

now, i don't know who this person is. i did a follow-up e-mail to get more details:

thank you for your response. i was surprised to get a response, but pleased.

according to some basic physics calculations, the rocket launch would have had to occur somewhere near your facility... if it were launched from the white sea, it should have been spotted over russia and several other countries, yet the only sighting was from norway...

you don't fire missiles from your facility, do you?

regards,

bill koerner

[email removed to protect bill from spammers]

[onething]

i found this article last night and read the whole thing in one sitting. finally, events of the world are making a little bit of sense to me, even though i have read about this sort of conspiracy thing for years.
it's not completely clear to me why certain faction(s) want disclosure...i guess it is to allow the new technologies to come forth which only the rockefeller faction wants suppressed?
if the new kremlin faction is good, what about putin? he has been pretty conservative and is an oil man, and russia has a lot of oil.

i can't help but think about how in the bible, probably in revelations, it says that in the last days there will be great signs and wonders in the sky which will have a lot of power to deceive. it seems to specifically warn about a false second coming, because it says that if someone says that christ is here or there, not to believe it, but that when the second coming happens, it will be seen everywhere and from east to west. it is also interesting how the bible emphasizes the importance of deception in these days, and how difficult it will be for people to withstand it.

i'd like to know who the four bolsheviks were that were brought here, were they public figures?

i'm going through the article to make comments, and i just clicked on the link about mainstream media and the bulova missile. it is very interesting that they are trashing the russian military capability in this article, with russian sources. i can't help but wonder if they are trying to make americans think the russians are bumbling idiots and that we can win against them. this news outlet could be controlled by a faction that hopes for war with the us and russia. (i have always thought that in a war with russia, america would lose.)


to be continued...

[Ewhaz]

this was an absolutely fascinating read. i really appreciated the info on the factions, it seemed quite a bit to delve into and disseminate so i never even considered going into it. david did as he always does, clears out the garbage and gets to the point without all the fluff and distractions that tend to make researching an issue like this an arduous task. admittedly it was only a gross overview of a few key historical events, it still helped clear up a lot of info on who what where and why things happen the way that they do.

i look forward to the conclusion!

[eagleye]

bill,

asking someone that works for the eiscat facility if they were responsible for the spiral is like asking david rockefeller if he wants to rule the world. don’t expect to get an answer that is even remotely close to the truth.