Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26

Thread: Tesla, and his failed mission

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by freedomr View Post
    There's an article on another alternate web site which has a confession of the man who says he killed Tesla:



    This contains very specific references to the HW B administration.

    freedomr
    It would probably be good to read Tesla's autobiography. When I say autobiography, I mean he wrote it about himself. He himself mentioned HW B's father as his assistant/benefactor at times and said the assistant's son was always snooping around his lab. Years later that same son headed the CIA, which depends on Tesla's technology to do what it does... Tom Bearden's Energy from the Vacuum site has the best info about Tesla and others like him that I've found so far. The videos and books for sale there are worth their weight in gold.

    Tesla stated that he had visions since he was a kid and that all his inventions came from those visions. He was an electrical and mechanical engineer I believe, but he never took credit for his inventions. He believed they were given to him by a higher source. I believe Einstein said the same. Tesla actually proved some of Einstein's theories wrong based on the understanding he got of reality through his experiments. Walter Russell claimed to received the secrets of the universe from God directly while in meditation and Tesla confirmed that what Russell was told was the same as what he was proving in the lab. Viktor Schauberger and Wilhelm Reich were onto the same thing. All these guys were alive about the same time and most were harassed by financial interests manipulating our gov't. I bet these geniuses were all friends before being incarnated on this dump of a planet. Alexander Putney has interesting pdfs for free on his humanresonance.org site. If you're into Tesla, you should read what's on there. No matter how strange some of it might seem, read it anyway! If you're on this site regularly, it probably won't seem strange though.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Firewalker View Post
    a very, very interesting query.

    i thought this was very relevant when i read it. reading 'between the lines' what ra seems to be saying is that because tesla was unable to see past his fears and social troubles with his fellow man, he lost service to others power.

    perhaps then, if the energies between him and other scientists was not so 'guarded' as such, then they would have helped him to release his information, and then tesla's mission would have been 'completed,' thereby we would have free energy.

    and things would be different.
    I think Tesla's biggest downfall was trusting government officials and depending on people who lived to make money to fund his work. The very people that funded him are the ones that stole his patents and suppressed his work until they found ways to charge us to use it if it was released to us at all. Had he been able to keep his work to himself and released it on a massive scale before it was suppressed, this world would be totally different. Patents for his electric dynamos must have run out a long time ago. Why don't we have power generators in our own houses instead of paying the power company? I believe the FCC is another entity created to heavily regulate Tesla technology to keep us paying. We should just get rid of money altogether and share like the native americans and other ancients did. The world was so much better then and there was way less monopolizing of resources.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Idaho, US
    Posts
    250

    Default

    Walter Russells work also talked about the unification of science and religion. This was a big no no for war mongers. And more than likely part of the reason his theroies were not funded or reasearched more fully.

    Einstein was exaulted the greatest genieous of his time. Why? Because he gave the military the most powerful wepon they had ever known.

    Had Tesla shown that his ideas could be used for mass distruction he may have earned a place on the shelves of history.

    Same goes for Russell, but it's kinda hard to talk about distruction and seperation within a unified cosmos.
    Gnothi Seauton (know thyself)

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tiredofthebull View Post
    Viktor Schauberger and Wilhelm Reich were onto the same thing. All these guys were alive about the same time and most were harassed by financial interests manipulating our gov't. I bet these geniuses were all friends before being incarnated on this dump of a planet.
    The real tragedy of Schauberger is that he thought he was being brought over to the US so he could continue to
    develop his Implosion Technology machines. Schauberger very much claimed that this Implosion technology is very
    Healing to the Planetary ecosystem, and extremely beneficial for all humanity. However when he finally figured
    out the intent of using the machines for Military purposes Schauberger deliberately changed the "plumbing" of the machines such that they would never function. Apparently his revisions to this plumbing were so thorough that the
    other scientists were unable to reconstruct nor make the machine operational.

    True to the personalities of the Financial interests, Schauberger was cut off, and transitioned a "broken man" in the later 1950's.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Virginia Beach, VA
    Posts
    207

    Default

    From freedomr: The real tragedy of Schauberger is that he thought he was being brought over to the US so he could continue to
    develop his Implosion Technology machines.
    This thread has been moved to General Discussions because the comments are not in relation to any Law of One thread topics, where the thread was started. Also, comments are welcome, but if your opinion is listed, please back up what you say with a reference, such as the comment above, say something like, "as written in Schauberger's biography by so-and-so". Individual opinions are fine, but in keeping with DW's insistence of backing up what we say with other validated information rather than starting rumor mills. I am not saying, freedomr, that you do this Just indicating that we need to back our statements up. I have long followed DW because this is what he takes time to do. This is part of the process and experience that makes each individual validate their own truths instead of being simple repeaters of what others say Thanks all of you for participating in this forum with patience, insight, and a genuine love for the other members, Chris
    Last edited by Chris Hamilton; 06-08-2012 at 06:57 AM.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Hi Chris,

    Apologies for not providing further documentation. My own introduction to Schauberger is from a chapter in a book from 1995 authored by a member of the Tesla Society, Dan Davidson. There is a video of David Wilcock where David makes a positive reference to Dan Davidson by name. Dan Davidson's 1995 book is titled "Shape Power"

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Apophis View Post
    Walter Russells work also talked about the unification of science and religion. This was a big no no for war mongers. And more than likely part of the reason his theroies were not funded or reasearched more fully.

    Einstein was exaulted the greatest genieous of his time. Why? Because he gave the military the most powerful wepon they had ever known.

    Had Tesla shown that his ideas could be used for mass distruction he may have earned a place on the shelves of history.

    Same goes for Russell, but it's kinda hard to talk about distruction and seperation within a unified cosmos.
    Indeed, Apophis, we should be glad Tesla "failed" because if he had built that device for the military, the world would be a different place.

    It sounds to me like he succeeded. Thanks, Nikola!

    Littleenki

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    22

    Default

    That technology was the basis for the "Star Wars" program proposed in the 80's by the Reagan (really Bush) administration. It is currently implemented in H.A.A.R.P. and G.W.E.N technologies. It's just that other people take credit for them. Walter Russell gives the principles for weather modification, IE earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, volcanoes, using electronics and Tesla actually designed the devices that could do it. He built a mechanical oscillator that caused earthquakes, but H.A.A.R.P works off of very high and likely very low frequency electrical oscillations. Some may recall Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez claiming that the US caused the earthquake that leveled Haiti...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=Q9QtZkT8OBQ

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    19

    Default

    Yes, TOTB, haarp may be the sneaky stepchild the of Tesla's black box, and it seems they arent admitting to it being a weapon so much as how it is beneficial to us.Yeah right!LOL!

    Ive heard how it deflects enemy ICBM's and how it can heat the ionosphere to divert storms away, and have to wonder...was it active during the last two less than serious hurricane seasons?

    It appeared to me the storms were just sent out to sea, but then we get the T.S. Beryl early this season, and it barreled straight into Jacksonville, albeit with some beneficial rains.

    If you recall the Norwegian spiral, it was supposedly a demonstration of the Swedish Haarp, and was used to destroy a Russian missile as it was launched over Kamchatka.
    What was the best part of that was the resulting spiral from the torsion field which was developed with the Haarp. very cool, and very dangerous all at once.

    If Haarp uses any ELF, I wonder how they get the waves to propogate through the aether, and how they can actually aim it, or does it just run wild over a large area?

    Haiti found out what can happen when an infrastructure is weak and unable to withstand an earthquake of even a low magnitude. Yet, did our fine science establishment make a faux pas of the ultimate kind with a misguided Haarp shot?

    Apophis set me upon Mr Russell's works, and when I get a dull few hours, I have downloaded some of his work to read in quiet time. Youre the second person here on DC to point his work out, and I have read numerous works by many science based authors, but none of Walter's.

    It seems he must have made an impression on you and many others.

    Have a great night...well...day now, as it's 1:30 here in FLA!
    Littleenki

  10. #20
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Littleenki View Post
    Yes, TOTB, haarp may be the sneaky stepchild the of Tesla's black box, and it seems they arent admitting to it being a weapon so much as how it is beneficial to us.Yeah right!LOL!

    Ive heard how it deflects enemy ICBM's and how it can heat the ionosphere to divert storms away, and have to wonder...was it active during the last two less than serious hurricane seasons?

    It appeared to me the storms were just sent out to sea, but then we get the T.S. Beryl early this season, and it barreled straight into Jacksonville, albeit with some beneficial rains.

    If you recall the Norwegian spiral, it was supposedly a demonstration of the Swedish Haarp, and was used to destroy a Russian missile as it was launched over Kamchatka.
    What was the best part of that was the resulting spiral from the torsion field which was developed with the Haarp. very cool, and very dangerous all at once.

    If Haarp uses any ELF, I wonder how they get the waves to propogate through the aether, and how they can actually aim it, or does it just run wild over a large area?

    Haiti found out what can happen when an infrastructure is weak and unable to withstand an earthquake of even a low magnitude. Yet, did our fine science establishment make a faux pas of the ultimate kind with a misguided Haarp shot?

    Apophis set me upon Mr Russell's works, and when I get a dull few hours, I have downloaded some of his work to read in quiet time. Youre the second person here on DC to point his work out, and I have read numerous works by many science based authors, but none of Walter's.

    It seems he must have made an impression on you and many others.

    Have a great night...well...day now, as it's 1:30 here in FLA!
    Littleenki
    There's probably some useful info on Alex Putney's human resonance site in pdf format. Russell explains what happens on the earth's surface as far as the exchange between electricity and magnetism (i believe it also explains yin/yang and the energetic function of pyramids), but it doesn't explain how energy can be bounced off the ionosphere and directed to other parts of the planet. Keep in mind that Walter Russell defines Magnetism differently than the way it's explained in electromagnetic theory. Magnetism for him is more like the ether, vacuum, source field, orgone to others. He seperates electricity into two things that would equat to electron flow in one direction and magnetic field in the opposite direction. HAARP has to do with resonant frequencies and harmonics so I'm sure it will be multiples and/or fractions of the schuman resonance, whatever that has increased to these days. I believe satellites are used to steer storms though. There are documentaries about it on youtube, but I'd start with Tesla's autobiography and patents. Maybe Tom Bearden's website. If it's not on there, they'd probably have links to places that do give a good explanation of how HAARP works technically. If you attempt to read Walter Russell you have to understand that he's explaining spirituality and science at the same time. In the end you'll see that they're really one in the same and he's bringing them together in the reader's mind. It's similar to alchemy. Some view it in the material sense of changing one element to another while other people view it in a spiritual sense. What Russell says is that it's true in both senses and the process is the same if you know what to look for. At any rate, if you're into Russell for science purposes, I'd recommend "The Universal One". "The Secret of Light" gives the same info, but it's written in the context of spirituality so you'd have to do more interpreting to get the scientific info from it. If you happened to get any of Russell's works in the form of a word document with no pictures, I recommend you buy the actual book from www.philosophy.org. His drawings are very helpful in understanding what he's talking about. If you've read any of Kosorev's work on TIME, most of Russell's stuff is in tune with that. I think there were small differences, but it may have been a matter of symantics, IE using different terms for the same thing. Even the guy that built Coral Castle knew this stuff. Like Tesla said, there's power in 3's, 6's, and 9's. I still haven't quite grasped their importance, but I'm sure it's in Russell's stuff. Lol I think Dr. Len Horowitz understands that secret from reading his Healing Codes book a few years back.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •