The Moon

[Natho]

that is very interesting, and it does make one wonder as to how legitimate the moon landing actually was. with there being no visual disturbance on the ground from the thrusters also adds to curiousity. fair that the atmospere is extremely low in comparrison to that of earths therefore practically blowing the debree into space rather than have it land above the modules 'footing', its all very strange.

as for the pictures from hubble viewing the indentations which remained even after a crater was formed, could this be due to a form of magnetism in certain particles perhaps? i say this because it is evident with certain materials on earth, which will form directional patterns to coinside with our magnetic north and south poles, this is seen when mining minerals at depths, which i believe is also how scientists discovered that our polar nth and sth have moved over the course of earths history. even termites that build large bivverwacks in certain places will make them thin and will always point nth and sth.

[LightEye]

dear friends,

http://www.marsanomalyresearch.com/e...n-fakery-3.htm.

http://www.marsanomalyresearch.com/e...moon-skull.htm

be well, be love.

david

moon fakery-4
report #193
september 9, 2010
joseph p. skipper
j. p. skipper can be contacted at: jskipper@marsanomalyresearch.com

warning! you need to know up front that this is not an upbeat report and perhaps not for those with very tender dispositions. it deals with matters that can be considered visually gruesome as well as subjective opinions of mine that may be interpreted as dark and disturbing to some. so you may wish to avoid this report if you're sensitive and very easily disturbed. truth is not always a pleasant path but for most of you exercising objectivity, i suspect the added insight will be worth it despite the dark evidence. you'll of course be the judge.

as many of you will have noted, my last few reports have been about official moon evidence where someone is trying to and fairly well succeeding in obfuscating moon truth in the imaging. now normally i try to minimize my reporting on just obfuscation but i've been using some select evidence in the past few reports just to try and demonstrate the point that obfuscation exists in absolute terms with respect to official moon exploration and that it should be taken seriously by you.

why? it's because i've personally come to a conclusion via my own discoveries that someone with very advanced technology and active is on the moon and it is not us. the evidence reported on by me in year 2004 (reports 66–71 links further down) drawn from the since recently sanitized navy clementine mission official science data weighs heavily in my thinking on this and i've seen nothing in the years since that reporting to moderate or dispel this very personal conclusion. also, from what i've seen of the japan, china, india, and russia missions to the moon, obfuscation continues to be even more thorough and effective than in the older us data. that strongly suggests that there continues to be something on the moon hidden from you and i in the public that is active and ongoing rather than ancient and long gone.

[Natho]

id agree with the idea that the moon landings were more than likely a hoax, some people will do almost anything in order to 'win', and dubbing it a space race begs for competition, and as you'd say, 'insert steroids here'.
there seems to be more evidence on fakery than on the true landings themselves, this just adds to the bs that governments are capable of. as stated from the pictures, concrete mix is the first thing that comes to mind, the rock formations being of the 'stale' type.

nasa didnt plan that 'visual technology' would advance so quickly in the way that we can now determine man made illusions and spot the diff, thanks guys. lack of tread marks (also inconsistant with the wheel pattern), the astronaughts footprints being deeper than that of the rovers, i mean, c'mon now. the distant lines could also be viewed as 'interlaced backdrops' attempted to be blended with true scenery, this is something i do regularly with photoshopcs, now you see it, now you dont.

to get your hands on the origional photos and to use nowdays methods of scanning would show tampering if any.

the skull was strange indeed, and yes, the right shadow is false, any1 working at a print n press could tell you that. but why hide one side when the other is clearly visible? one could re-create the full image easily. and if it were suppose to act as the 'deaths head of warning' it is very hard to see, and therefore would have gone unnoticed. you would make it more obviouse, assuming there were beings still living there (under there i should say). you would give it borders, surround it with logically defined geometry of sorts in order to recognise, otherwise you would pretty careless in you attempts to show "causion, tresspassers will be shot!". thats my analogy of it anyway.

[LightEye]

dear friends,

http://viewzone.com/anomaluna1.html

be well, be love.

david

anomaluna!by juan von trillion

part 2: why we abandoned the moon

part 1: anomalous physics of luna

just look at it, the moon. it should not be there at all. level-headed people who have studied things say that the earth's moon is the biggest anomaly of the solar system, admitting they have no clue as to why it is there. for one, it is too big a moon for such a small planet like earth.

the duo of them is more of a bi-planetary system than a planet-plus-a-moon. a quick look at comparative planet and moon sizes in the solar system is all it takes. moon is way too big. it should not be larger than 40 miles or so, but it is over 2,000 miles in diameter. it is the size of the us, and not the size of maui.

the cassini probe's view from mars.
its camera was not intended for such a shot, hence it is not sharp. still, a great image.

luna moves on an almost perfectly circular orbit around earth, not an elliptical orbit. and much too close to earth. on top of this, it always shows its same side, with only very very slight variations. while the moon travels once around the earth, it rotates exactly once -- not more, not less. if it were not exactly once, we would eventually see the far side (not the cartoon), but we don't. this is, of course, how else could it be, coincidence.

[Glothr]

recently there was a post here about how the moon is shrinking in size. i have recently been reading a book on ancient sumerian myths by a well known author you all probably know (send me a private message for the name of the book/author if interested) and noticed something peculiar during the explanation of how marduk's collision with tiamat created earth and the banishment of kingu (the moon) to become earth's satellite rather than have its own "desitny" (orbit). the myth says that upon being stripped of its independent orbit kingu shrank in size and had its vital elements (atmosphere, waters, radioactive matter) stripped as well. kingu was then called a "mass of lifeless clay" and went from being known as king.gu ("great emissary") to dug.ga.e ("pot of lead").

could this "newly discovered" fact that the moon has been shrinking not be new at all? if it was recorded in ancient sumerian creation myths that the moon (kingu) was caused to shrink how can it be a new discovery? i guess now we have the scientific proof that what was said about kingu in this ancient creation myth may have been true all along.

not only do we have this mysterious shrinking of the moon but it also does not fit the profile of a typical satellite for a planet the size of our earth. as the last link in this thread states, it is simply too big of a moon in proportion to the size of earth. the big question now seems to be: how did it get here?

love, light, peace
-michael

[Natho]

after viewing the link from lighteye, i had a strange thought. what if certain moons, or planets, are basically gigantic geodes with hollow crystalized interiors? crystals or crystal like structures all come from deep underground and are created with heat and pressure, diamonds, rubies etc. cueva de los cristales, mexico was an amazing find when they built a mine shaft only to have stumbled upon this monster cave full of the largest amethyst's on earth, and they arent sure how deep it goes. crystals have many applications, not the jewelry kind either, such as healing (energy transfers and charging according to ra). it throws more ideals towards hollow earth theory and nassim's 'singularity core' concept.

lighteyes link explained that the moon, upon being struck by comets etc, resonates a frequency of sorts. this intrigues me.:d

[LightEye]

dear friends,

mighty interesting...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyrvpcslo8u

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bu9qwqa7apa

be well, be love.

david

note: this is much more clear on ipad, iphone or itouch than in this video!
i scott c. waring, author of ufo sightings of 2006-2009 have written about this in my book. this is actually an apple app for iphone, itouch & ipad. i used the app called "moonmappro." this app has genuine lunar orbiter images directly from nasa archives. the cool thing about these photos is that they were taken before photoshop so their techniques of covering up items had not yet been perfected. in these photos they actually appear to be raw and untouched by the nasa airbrushing room.
these are long black structures and often they curve into or around the craters and mold into the ground. this is definitive proof that they are real structures and they are really there on the moon. who made them and how they made them, we can only guess at.
the names of the craters and the degrees of longitude and latitude are included in the app which makes location of the structures much easier to determine.