Polarizing measurements

[Jeremy Weiland]

> regarding the measurement of s.t.s. and
> s.t.o. orientation, i think that the reason
> that we are attempting to measure them is
> ra's standard of being oriented to s.t.o. of
> 51% or more, hence we're getting wrapped up
> in trying to determine if we're reaching that
> minimum standard.

right: ra did not give us any measurable criteria to
evaluate our orientation by (at least from a 3d
perspective, since i think ra does talk about how it
has something to do with your vibratory level).

jeremy

__________________________________________________
do you yahoo!?
yahoo! geocities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month.
http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1

[Brian V. Cox]

would the act of quantizing and analyzing your percent
of relative sto be a sts act itself? by thinking "how
can i increase my sto to better help my chances of
positive polarity?"...vs just thinking "how can i help
others along their paths and be of service?" and being
of service without keeping "score" of how each act
is polarizing you either way.

just a thought...

-brian


> regarding the measurement of s.t.s. and
> s.t.o. orientation, i think that the reason
> that we are attempting to measure them is
> ra's standard of being oriented to s.t.o. of
> 51% or more, hence we're getting wrapped up
> in trying to determine if we're reaching that
> minimum standard.
>
> i agree with rob: just relax and fly.

--------------
**in lak'ech, brian cox - brian@...
**magpu: electric-progressive-trance-improv-fusion: http://www.magpu.com
**campaign for the new time (13:20) http://www.tortuga.com/new/index.html
**harmonize. resonate. communicate. evolve.
--------------

[theodorepong]

--- in asc2k@y..., "brian v. cox" <lerxst@m...> wrote:
>
> would the act of quantizing and analyzing your percent
> of relative sto be a sts act itself? by thinking "how
> can i increase my sto to better help my chances of
> positive polarity?"...vs just thinking "how can i help
> others along their paths and be of service?" and being
> of service without keeping "score" of how each act
> is polarizing you either way.
>
> just a thought...
>
> -brian
>
>
> > regarding the measurement of s.t.s. and
> > s.t.o. orientation, i think that the reason
> > that we are attempting to measure them is
> > ra's standard of being oriented to s.t.o. of
> > 51% or more, hence we're getting wrapped up
> > in trying to determine if we're reaching that
> > minimum standard.
> >
> > i agree with rob: just relax and fly.

me too, for what it is worth.

it is a natural process. no measurement of is needed.
to attempt to alter your normal actions in anticipation of a reward of
ascension is defeating the purpose of sto behavior.

no need to keep a score card.
>
> --------------

[Tarzan]

<table>
><font color="#0000ff" face="arial" size="2"><span class="620353807-23112001">regarding the measurement ofs.t.s. and s.t.o. orientation, i think that the reason that we are attempting to measure them is ra's standard of being oriented to s.t.o. of 51% or more, hence we're getting wrapped up in trying to determine if we're reaching that minimum standard.</span></font>
><font color="#0000ff" face="arial" size="2"><span class="620353807-23112001"></span></font>
><font color="#0000ff" face="arial" size="2"><span class="620353807-23112001">i agree with rob: just relax and fly.</span></font>
><font color="#0000ff" face="arial" size="2"><span class="620353807-23112001"></span></font>
><font color="#0000ff" face="arial" size="2"><span class="620353807-23112001">flying,</span></font>
><font color="#0000ff" face="arial" size="2"><span class="620353807-23112001"></span></font>
><font color="#0000ff" face="arial" size="2"><span class="620353807-23112001">seth</span></font>