The Earth

[weboy78]

the magnetic structure of earth is regenerating

[LightEye]

dear friends,

http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/39469

and this article;

the earth's magnetic field remains a charged mystery
http://www.physorg.com/news164253692.html

be well, be love.

david

earth’s magnetic field perturbed by 'electric oceans', claims researcher

in a radical rethink of accepted geophysics, new research in the us links variations in the earth’s magnetic field with the ebb and flow of the world’s oceans. given the practical importance of these field variations in navigation and atmospheric modeling, the implications of this new research extend far beyond academia. however, the idea has already faced strong criticism from some researchers in the geophysics community.

i consider this paper extremely important, although i expect violent opposition from the experts

alex kostinski, michigan technological universitythe origin and mechanism of the earth’s magnetic field are amongst the biggest unsolved questions in the earth sciences. most geophysicists agree however that the main component of the field — which defines the magnetic poles — is a dipole generated by the convection of molten iron deep within the earth’s interior. we know, from studying the way magnetic minerals align in volcanic rocks, that this dipole has flipped its orientation every million years or so throughout earth history.

[avmc]

hi there.

i am kind of new here, although i've been lurking for some months.
i was not sure where to post this, but since i intend it to be discussed, i post it here!

i've been following closely dc for about some 10 months now, and reading and listening to the material provided here, as well as other related material and law of one alike stuff, my view of what people call reality changed dramatically. (well, dw's material does do that in of itself )

anyway the main subject of this thread:

a while ago, i was hearing a radio show with graham hancock (2003) talking about the ruins underwater near cuba and about how most if not all ancient cultures share myths about a huge flood and changes in the water levels, along with some hints about an ice age maybe some 10,000 years ago.
all of a sudden i remembered some information that richard c. hoagland provided in a conference or radio show about how a physical pole shift could occur (he made a comparision with atoms and electrons shifting rotations) and it popped up into my head:

"there was no ice age, what there was, was a pole shift. there were regions under ice because those where the rotational poles of the earth at that time".

i looked at the time and it was 12:44, so i read that as synchronicity (i had no clue of what time it was) and immediatly i thought of writing it here!!!!

i did perform a quick search but i could not find immediatly find any threads about pole-shifts and ice-ages...

anyway, later on with the hancock show, i thought to myself "hmm that kind of shift would change water levels? not sure, but some massive earth changes would have to happen in very little time, such as large landmasses changing place, earth crust disruption causing huge volcanic activity, and that in turn would cause massive tsumanis to race across the earth surface and possibly causing huge floods".
immediatly after that, i hear hancock saying something like "i believe there were huge earth changes occuring for some reason, large terrain portions, country or continent-sized being altered, entire populations of fauna and flora being devastated... and all of this might have happened over night"... <-- as if it was a confirmation of my previous thoughts.

my main question is:
what articles or research is there about this hypothesis?
that what we call ice ages were in fact consequences of physical pole shifts?
pole shifts caused by the natural re-orientation of the planet's rotational axis to properly cope with the hyperdimensional energy that is being passed onto it, as hoagland presents?
is this hypothesys even logic?

thank you, and knowlegde and peace to you all (in other words: light and love!)

[moderator reminder - specific book recommendations are not permitted on the forum - exceptions, david's recommended reading list. references and links to articles are ok. please pm any book refs]

[LightEye]

dear friends,

huh?

http://www.impactlab.com/2009/08/11/...ove-the-earth/

be well, be love.

david

nasa wants to move the earth

move the planet… now i heard everything

scientists have found an unusual way to prevent our planet overheating: move it to a cooler spot.

all you have to do is hurtle a few comets at earth, and its orbit will be altered. our world will then be sent spinning into a safer, colder part of the solar system.

this startling idea of improving our interplanetary neighbourhood is the brainchild of a group of nasa engineers and american astronomers who say their plan could add another six billion years to the useful lifetime of our planet – effectively doubling its working life.

[weboy78]

http://geology.com/press-release/worldwide-fault-zones/
large earthquakes trigger global activity


u.s. seismologists have found evidence that the massive 2004 earthquake that triggered killer tsunamis throughout the indian ocean weakened at least a portion of california's famed san andreas fault. the results, which appeared in the journal nature, suggest that the earth's largest earthquakes can weaken fault zones worldwide and may trigger periods of increased global seismic activity.

"an unusually high number of magnitude 8 earthquakes occurred worldwide in 2005 and 2006," said study co-author fenglin niu, associate professor of earth science at rice university. "there has been speculation that these were somehow triggered by the sumatran-andaman earthquake that occurred on dec. 26, 2004, but this is the first direct evidence that the quake could change fault strength of a fault remotely."

earthquakes are caused when a fault fails, either because of the buildup of stress or because of the weakening of the fault. the latter is more difficult to measure. ..

[LightEye]

dear friends,

http://www.newscientist.com/article/...html?full=true

be well, be love.

david

phantom storms: how our weather leaks into space
06 october 2009 by jon cartwright

whether it's showering spacecraft with lethal radiation, filling the sky with ghostly light, or causing electrical surges that black-out entire cities, space weather is a force to be reckoned with.

thankfully, all is calm in space on the day that i speak to bill murtagh at the us national oceanic and atmospheric administration in boulder, colorado. "last week we saw a moderate storm, and that was about the most interesting event in months," he reassures me. "it's pretty quiet today."

and murtagh should know - his job is to forecast space weather, which comprises any disturbance in near-earth space, including the upper reaches of the earth's atmosphere where satellites roam. many of the serious events involve disturbances in the charged portion of the atmosphere, known as the ionosphere, which stretches from 80 to 1000 kilometres above sea level. the finger of blame has always been pointed at the sun, which bombards the earth with a stream of charged particles in the form of the solar wind. during the last three years, though, the sun's cycle of activity has hit a trough, and as murtagh observes, space weather is temporarily calm.

yet if the sun really is the only cause, things haven't been quite as quiet as we might have expected. despite the solar lull, activity in the ionosphere still hots up occasionally - with ghostly tides of charged particles that throw gps systems out of whack and block radio communication. it seems that as much as one-fifth of this space weather cannot be blamed on the sun after all. if the cause of these charged-particle surges is not above the atmosphere, it must be somewhere below. but where?

[evolving]

i would think that most everyone here know that earths resonant frequency has increased from 7.9 hz to ???

the reason i ask is because the frequency increase is part of the argument for the understanding of the change in density which will occur, and when this is used as a point to demonstrate this part of the puzzle to people, some ask for proof. though there are many online generalities about this, i have as of yet to find any hard scientific documentation.

would anyone have any links to actual nasa or other scientific evidence of this? and current numbers?

[Berry Chastain]

evolving,
david has written a number of excellent research manuscripts/e-books discussing a-z all of the changes which support the shift which is happening, including the earth's resonant frequency known as the schumann resonance. the current frequency btw is around 13hz but this is an average as the frequency varies from time to time depending on geological and astronomical influences.

you can find his books and articles in the "start here" tab at the top of the web-page.

i would think that most everyone here know that earths resonant frequency has increased from 7.9 hz to ???

the reason i ask is because the frequency increase is part of the argument for the understanding of the change in density which will occur, and when this is used as a point to demonstrate this part of the puzzle to people, some ask for proof. though there are many online generalities about this, i have as of yet to find any hard scientific documentation.

would anyone have any links to actual nasa or other scientific evidence of this? and current numbers?

[LightEye]

dear friends,

http://www.newkerala.com/news/fullnews-18585.html

be well, be love.

david

earth's north magnetic pole racing towards russia due to core flux

washington, december 25 : a new research has determined that earth's north magnetic pole is racing toward russia at almost 40 miles (64 kilometers) a year due to magnetic changes in the planet's core.

the core is too deep for scientists to directly detect its magnetic field. but researchers can infer the field's movements by tracking how earth's magnetic field has been changing at the surface and in space.

now, according to a report in national geographic news, newly analyzed data suggest that there's a region of rapidly changing magnetism on the core's surface, possibly being created by a mysterious 'plume' of magnetism arising from deeper in the core.

[ogfreeman]

earth's north magnetic pole is racing toward russia at almost 40 miles (64 kilometers) a year due to magnetic changes in the planet's core, new research says.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...arth-core.html