mudpuppy
11-08-2001, 09:41 AM
<table bgColor="#ffffff">
>David, I think your opinion on the merits of other's work is respected and desired. If you have no problem having your opinion known, then an easy way to do so would be to placethese opinions once and for all, except for updates, in the files section of this yahoo group. A short note/link to the filessectioncould be placed in the description info for the group.
>
>mudpuppy
>
<blockquote style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: David Wilcock (djw333@exis.net)
style="FONT: 10pt arial">To: asc2k@yahoogroups.com
style="FONT: 10pt arial">Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 5:35 PM
style="FONT: 10pt arial">Subject: RE: [asc2k] cassiopaea
>
<tt>From: Tiffani Boswell [mailto:tiffani@2000wave.com]
i have been doing some research, more in depth, on the Ra Material and have
run into cassiopaea...
what is your comments on this? they have stated that the Ra Material was 63%
accurate (which was good with the free will distortions) and that it was a
precursor to the cassiopaea material....
any comments would be helpful...thank you
DW: No offense to you, Tiffani, but I really don't want to keep being placed
in the role of arbiter of others' work and may just stop answering questions
like this altogether. This is one of the ones that keeps coming up, and my
personal experience with it gives me no reason to pursue it.
Yes, the woman is undoubtedly in some form of a trance state. Yes, the man
has studied his physics and raises some interesting points. Several emailers
have gone so far as to suggest that it is service-to-self philosophy
carefully cloaked, and to "BE VERY CAREFUL." There is certainly evidence to
back up that idea, and Ra states that some measure of "compromise" is the
most common fate of channelers. That is one reason why I am forthcoming
about both my strengths and my distortions, so people can gauge for
themselves whether I pattern my life by what I teach.
Personally I have seen a number of cases where questions that are very
complex but easily answerable for any 5D entity or above are obfuscated,
dodged and avoided.
I am also aware that the people doing this work have issued statements to
their emailers telling them to avoid the "flawed" asc2000 work.
Peace be with you -
- David
</tt>
<tt>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com
</tt>
<tt>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service (http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/).</tt>
</blockquote>
>David, I think your opinion on the merits of other's work is respected and desired. If you have no problem having your opinion known, then an easy way to do so would be to placethese opinions once and for all, except for updates, in the files section of this yahoo group. A short note/link to the filessectioncould be placed in the description info for the group.
>
>mudpuppy
>
<blockquote style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black">From: David Wilcock (djw333@exis.net)
style="FONT: 10pt arial">To: asc2k@yahoogroups.com
style="FONT: 10pt arial">Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 5:35 PM
style="FONT: 10pt arial">Subject: RE: [asc2k] cassiopaea
>
<tt>From: Tiffani Boswell [mailto:tiffani@2000wave.com]
i have been doing some research, more in depth, on the Ra Material and have
run into cassiopaea...
what is your comments on this? they have stated that the Ra Material was 63%
accurate (which was good with the free will distortions) and that it was a
precursor to the cassiopaea material....
any comments would be helpful...thank you
DW: No offense to you, Tiffani, but I really don't want to keep being placed
in the role of arbiter of others' work and may just stop answering questions
like this altogether. This is one of the ones that keeps coming up, and my
personal experience with it gives me no reason to pursue it.
Yes, the woman is undoubtedly in some form of a trance state. Yes, the man
has studied his physics and raises some interesting points. Several emailers
have gone so far as to suggest that it is service-to-self philosophy
carefully cloaked, and to "BE VERY CAREFUL." There is certainly evidence to
back up that idea, and Ra states that some measure of "compromise" is the
most common fate of channelers. That is one reason why I am forthcoming
about both my strengths and my distortions, so people can gauge for
themselves whether I pattern my life by what I teach.
Personally I have seen a number of cases where questions that are very
complex but easily answerable for any 5D entity or above are obfuscated,
dodged and avoided.
I am also aware that the people doing this work have issued statements to
their emailers telling them to avoid the "flawed" asc2000 work.
Peace be with you -
- David
</tt>
<tt>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
asc2k-unsubscribe@egroups.com
</tt>
<tt>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service (http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/).</tt>
</blockquote>