View Full Version : Great Celestial Conjunction Crosses II
10-05-2007, 09:05 AM
my new article is the sequel to the great celestial conjunction crosses of 2012. in this new article i traced the origin of the great celestial conjunction crosses back to babylon where the sun god utu/shamash was represented by two four point crosses superimposed representing the zodiac cross and galactic cross.
in the old world the galactic cross was denoted by the four signs of the zodiac: taurus, aquarius, scorpio and leo, the four cherubim mentioned in the bible.
in this new article the following subjects are covered:
-sumerian and babylonian understanding of the eight pointed cross and great celestial conjunctions (galactic alignment)
-the egyptian understanding of these crosses and the meaning of isis-hathor with the cow horns and solar disk in the context of great celestial conjunctions
-the scarab beetle as the perfect symbol of precession
-the dendera zodiac containing the eight pointed cross and encoding two great celestial conjunctions
-interpretation of the leg of the bull, ankh and djed pillar, the eye of horus in the context of great celestial conjunctions
-the true meaning of church crosses including the eight pointed crosses of the vatican.
-the galactic alignment encoded at chartres cathedral (black madonna and chartres zodiac)
-the ark of the covenant, the knights templar and their understanding of the great celestial conjunctions (the eight pointed cross was their coat of arms)
-the cross of hendaye
read the article here:
or download as pdf:
10-07-2007, 07:18 AM
i think i read your first article on the internet somewhere, just not sure where. maybe through some of david's shared material.
as with the first article, i'm finding this second one loaded with gems--just going back to read some more, but first wanted to thank you. this is an amazing amount of research! the significance of the cross has intrigued me for a long time.
with great appreciation,
10-07-2007, 01:34 PM
thanks for your appreciation of my article!
the first was this article :
it's the result of a research i did together with sergey smelyakov, we both assumed that the cross symbols in both the old and new world were related to the great celestial conjunctions (galactic alignment 2012)
i've also discussed this issue at length with john major jenkins but he's still not conviced :-) but the evidence has now amounted to a point that it can no longer be denied.
thanks for your reply,
10-07-2007, 01:43 PM
jan, a wonderful, culminative article!
i find the ancients' understanding of the transcendant importance of the 'four corners' of the precessional cycle as being very illuminating and thought-provoking.
as evidenced throughout all of recorded history by the repeated references to the same set of zodiacal signs that seem to serve as markers to these great celestial conjunctions, and the primary importance placed on these events, it seems clear that mankind has been aware since before the dawn of recorded history of the great celestial clock and the harmonic interrelationship of its 'gears', and the inexorable and perfect timekeeping exhibited therein.
it somehow seems quite interesting that clocks throughout recent centuries are divided into twelve time divisions, and that traditionally, many will strike the quarter-hour, the half-hour, and the hour, mimicking precisely the four times the arms of the fixed galactic cross and the super-imposed earth-cross, which 'rotates' once each precessional cycle, meet to form a single four armed cross. i wonder if laurence gardner is familiar with your work!
i seek to understand more thoroughly how these great conjunctions facilitate such great energetic increase in the solar system.
i am not a proficient astrologer, and wonder how the relative positions of the earth/solar system and our neighbouring stars and the galactic plane combine to physically increase the amount of interstellar energetic mass encountered by our solar system.
i have gathered through david's work that as we orbit galactic center, we pass through bands, or striations of energy of varying intensity.
given the harmonic relationships between earth's precessional cycle, the sunspot cycles of the sun, and the rotational period of the galaxy (relationships expressed by the 'wilcock constant'), et al, does the orbiting solar system undulate in its motion, periodically rising above and below the galactic plane as with a graceful waltz, compelled by the tempo of the music?
and do the 'four corners' of the precessional cycle demark actual intersections of the solar system with the galactic plane, thus physically lining us up with a blast of energy from galactic center?
if this model were correct, the illustration of a complete cycle (rising, falling, rising, falling) would resemble the ancient 'caduceus' symbol of a snake entwined on a staff.
or is it more like (to use a metaphor) when the ancients would align a series of precisely aimed small mirrors, in order to direct sunlight through a series of temple corridors for the purpose of illuminating an inner chamber?
is it that there are moments of rare alignment or conjunction (or both) of multiple celestial bodies 'momentarily' directing an intense, focused beam of energy in the direction of earth?
i've seen various models put forth on the net, attempting to illustrate in various ways the positioning issues of the solar system circa 2012.
i shall soon have to re-read 'convergence iii' and perhaps gain more insight then.
10-08-2007, 12:30 PM
thanks for your reply and appreciation of my article.
if you like part ii you might consider reading part i as well:
in this article i explain how the maya and the aztecs understood the four and eight pointed crosses as well. i’ve provided abundant evidence that the maya must have understood that the earth cross (zodiac cross) rotates against the backdrop of the fixed galactic cross.
i’ve debated my findings with geoff stray and john major jenkins himself (author of the galactic alignment theory) but they don’t want to hear about it, although all the evidence is there. the hunab ku or galactic butterfly symbol is the perfect symbol that expresses their understanding of the eight pointed cross.
you are asking exactly the same questions that professor sergey smelyakov has been considering for some time. smelyakov has developed a solar zodiac model that explains how the galactic energies are filtered through the lens of the solar zodiac into the earth zodiac. in other worlds how the galactic energies are passed from the central sun (galactic centre) through the sun onto the earth sphere. smelyakov has developed a scientific model that also shows the eight pointed cross and great celestial conjunctions. this is how we got our idea to start studying cross symbols around the world in the first place.
this is his solar zodiac model:
http://www.astrotheos.com/page8.htm (you can download his word documents here).
but we wrote a consisted version of his work and published it on both our websites:
smelyakov’s intention is to study jose arguelles his work once more because he remembers that he’s read clues in arguelles his work in the past about these energetic effects coinciding with the great celestial conjunction that was mentioned by hunbatz men. so he’s preparing for a new study that might answer your question, a question shared by many in the 2012 field of what the energetic effects of 2012 might be and how the come about (if at all?).
i know david wilcock’s theory of the zone’s or striations of higher galactic densities and this certainly may be explaining the ‘global warming’ we’re experiencing in the solar system, but there may be other effects that we are not aware of yet.
well, i'm not a professional "reviewer", but if i had to choose between jenkins or you, you'd get my vote.
consequently, i am a fan of jenkins' work - i have his book galactic alignment and it is well-written and a good read. however, when i went to his website, he had a link to some email discussion between himself and carl johan calleman. upon reading the discussion, i was a little disturbed by jenkins' attitude. he seemed rude and "spoiled". regardless of how one personally feels about calleman, nobody should treat someone like that, at least no one claiming to understand the coming changes and how important it is to be positive... also, i don't think he is open to further interpretation of the work many are doing... so unfortunate... i don't think any particular "subject" is finished.
as we approach the technological singularity (another piece of the 2012 puzzle), pretty much all ideas, technological concepts, etc., will be refined and merged. so, i would much rather jenkins be open to working with others than so vehemently opposed to new ideas.
we're seeing it happen now - seemingly unrelated "subjects" are in fact connected, when studied under a left and right brained approach. if anyone would have asked me three years ago about quantum physics and dna, i'd say the two have nothing in common/relation. now, we know otherwise... in other words, when we integrate both "ways of thinking" we are able to make technological breakthroughs.
anyway, sorry to go off topic. i thoroughly enjoy reading your articles and am so glad you're part of this forum! keep up the good work! looking forward to reading whats next!
10-10-2007, 02:07 PM
like you i respect john major jenkins his work a lot. he’s a pioneer when it comes to understanding the galactic alignment.
what you describe has been my personal experience when i presented sergey smelyakov’s solar zodiac model on geoff stray’s forum. being warned in advance by sergey i was naïve and his theory was received with disdain by several leading 2012 authors (i won’t mention names). it was a shock to me to realize that people who are the front runners when it comes to proclaiming that in the 2012-era humanity has the chance to transcend the ego-self, were themselves not very much skilled in the teachings they preach.
apparently like in any other field of science, when it comes to 2012-researchers there’s a lot of competition, envy and defending of one’s own dogma’s as well.
to me it has been a live learning experience, but like you said it’s not something you would expect in a community that was meant to ‘change the world’.
the strangest part of it is, that i have been no tread to anyone’s existing pet theories; all i did was trying to expand the subject and lead the way to new horizons, uncharted territory.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.