Pyramids shapes mentioned in study guide

[Ewhaz]

Just to help clarify something I've looked into a bit.

D. THE DIMENSIONS

QUESTION: You mean the sum of the 4 base sides should be 1.16 of the height of the pyramid? (B3, 48-49)

RA: That is correct.

RA: The most appropriate size for use beneath the head is an overall height small enough to make placing it under the cushion of the head (pillow) a comfortable thing. (B3, 120)

RA: The Giza pyramid offers an excellent model. Be sure the pyramid is so small that there is no entity small enough to crawl inside it. (B3, 121)


A few things to mention here.

When they mention the aspect ratio between the bases and the hight, The sum of the four sides seemed to be erroneous. With that aspect ration between the 'sum' of the four sides, it would end up being a very tall thin pyramid.

Also the equations I did on this shape (just to clarify them in my own mind) I did between the base length and the length of the sides. I'll have to dig those equations up to show what I have done to work all this out.

The Ra material seemed pretty clear on how the ratio was supposed to be worked for the proper shape. At first I had a thought that it would be more difficult to work out a 3D object in that aspect ratio, however on reflection it makes sense that we are talking about higher beings and they may have thought it much simpler. I worked all this out on a 2D triangle assuming they had simplified it for us.

With my 2D model of one of the sides, what I ended up coming up with on the 1.16 ratio was an apex of 71 degrees and 54.5 degrees on the side. Just to warn you.

I think in order to get a 70 degree or less, the aspect ratio was closer to 1.36 between the base and sides (though with out my paper and my reference book, don't use that ratio unless you check it first.) That would be 70 degrees on the apex and 55 degrees on either side at the base.

If this has already been covered, I apologize, but after searching the net for information on making your own pyramid shapes and such I came up with very little usable information. This was something I had worked on and thought to contribute. If this is still useful I'll try to get my equations up here for every one to see what I'm talking about.

[Ewhaz]

http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/6928/trianglezo4.jpg

My desire here was to simply put this in an easy equation I could look up at any time to figure out the size of the triangles to make a proper one at any time. Again, this was the relationship between the length of the base and the sides, NOT the length of the base and the height of the triangle.

A = Apex Angle
B & C = Base angles (always the same)

a = Base length
b & c = Side Length (always the same)

Since the ratio is between the length of the sides and the base, we will assume that is our constant, lets say thats 2"

With a Ratio of 1.16 between the base and the length of the sides we get the following numbers.

a = 2.32"
b & c = 2"

A = 70.9 (degrees, almost 71 degrees)
B & C = 54.6 (degrees)

To get the apex under 70 deg the ratio is closer to 1.147 (I knew I had this wrong)

Assuming again that the length of the sides is constant at 2" we get the following numbers.

a = 2.294 "
b & c = 2"

A = 69.99 deg
B & C = 55.1 deg

Now these numbers are a pain in the butt unless you have exact measuring tools to make your shapes all perfect. It might be easier to just assume a good ratio that will get you close without being over the 70 degree mentioned in the Ra material.

If we assume a Ratio between the base and sides of 1.125 you'll always get a length (in inches at least) that's easy to measure and cut and the angle is still pretty close to 70 degrees at the apex.

So to figure out your lengths, just use this formula

2" (or any length for the side) X 1.125 = 2.25"

Or if you have a base in mind already.

2.25" (or any base length) / (divided by) 1.125 = 2"

and the numbers plug in like this.

A = 68.46
B & C = 55.77

You need not worry about the angles that much, since this was meant to make this easy, just worry about the length of the sides and the angles will always be the same as long as you don't change the ratio.

While this isn't at the heart of what the Ra material covered, it was something that caught my fancy and I figure some one out there may at least like to have this information as well.

Some one may want to figure out a good ratio for metric measurements to help those who aren't already familiar with American standard inches.

[Ewhaz]

I'm going to rework my equations a bit. The reason I did this as a ratio between the base and the sides was to build a frame that would make up the pyramid. I was thinking about it and that would be a hard way to build a solid shape. I'm going to work this out so that it can be done with a frame or the side(as a 2d flat shape) just for kicks I might put up the equations for the full pyramid if I can figure them out.

[Art]

Original post has been deleted due to inaccuracies, etc. - my apologies

[Ewhaz]

Original post has been deleted due to inaccuracies, etc. - my apologies

My post or some one else's post on the same subject?

I'm doing my best in order to keep the info as clear as I can. As I said before, the info in the study material seemed to not make sense to me after I did a few equations. Also I could find nothing on the net other than cutouts for paper pyramids, so I wanted to make an easy way to figure it out in any size aspect.

If there are any inaccuracies in my post, Please let me know so I can rectify them!

I'm still thinking of the 3d shape, There may be some discontinuity between the 2d flat shape and a 3d shape... I need to work that out, but it's not math I'm experienced with.

[Art]

Ewhaz -

No, it was my posts. My original post was inaccurate - I erred in relating the 1.16 ratio to the golden mean - a two decimal approximation of phi is 1.62 though.

I then went and researched llresearch.org for the info and also around elsewhere in cyberspace for the dimensions of the Giza pyramid.

After all editing was done, my post was incoherent and rambling, so I deleted it.

Keep up the good work - again, sorry for the confusion.

Art

[arcane son]

Hi Ewhaz,


First off just wanted to say that's awesome that your actually looking into this. Very cool!

So are you actually building a small physical pyramid to put under your pillow or just designing one on a comp program? I was just a little uncertain of your aims/goals here after reading your posts. So are you saying you think Ra gave the wrong aspect ratios to build this thing? If so, you say that because the shape and size is too steep and doesn't seem right?

Math isn't a strong suit of mine so I can't offer much to your equations but I am sure there has to be a few people reading this forum that can work with you on it.

Cheers!

[Ewhaz]

So are you actually building a small physical pyramid to put under your pillow or just designing one on a comp program? I was just a little uncertain of your aims/goals here after reading your posts. So are you saying you think Ra gave the wrong aspect ratios to build this thing? If so, you say that because the shape and size is too steep and doesn't seem right?


I haven't built one yet, well actually I did out of straws but it didn't stand up to much for very long :p. My goal was to have something that would allow me to build one at any time, at any size with a simple equation.

And yes, The equation that is in the study material may be distorted in some aspect. Weather it was from the interpretation of the Ra material in general, or a simple typo I don't know.

QUESTION: You mean the sum of the 4 base sides should be 1.16 of the height of the pyramid?

That was from the Ra study guide. If you think about it, it doesn't really make any sense. If it's the Sum of the four sides (the length of the base) in ratio to the Height of the pyramid, the bases would be roughly one quarter the length of the height on each side. It would look much more like a spear tip than a pyramid. I did some equations, the apex was something like 96 degrees at the top.

[Art]

When I visualized the aspect ratio of the height being 1.16 times the perimeter of the base, the pyramid looks more like the Russian pyramids used for torsion field experiments, NOT the Giza pyramids.

Is it possible that you have combined info "incorrectly"? I apologize if this comes off the wrong way, but I suspect these "mentions" of pyramids may be unrelated...

For some reason, I haven't been able to "leave" this topic, likely due to the confusion pondered by the aspect ratio offered - very interested in what you're trying to do here...

I'll give it some more thought and get back to ya.

Art

[Ewhaz]

I may need to erase this thread as well, As I see it the equations I've done will lead to just what I was trying to avoid, a pyramid with a greater than 70 Deg apex..


If you've built one off the instructions I've given you, I regret to inform you you may need to dispose of it and start over. I'm working on the full set of equations now to get this little mistake resolved.

[twva]

Ra stated several times that they had trouble transmitting numbers accurately. Perhaps the 1.16 is not entirely reliable?

[Note from moderator: I was stumped by this too and thought the same thing, but what does make sense is to change "height" in the equation to "side" (one only, don't add them together), then it seems to work-ex: if one side of the base is 2", then the sides would be ~ 1 3/4" long using the 1.16. Hey, I don't know if that's right, but it's worth a stab at it :)]

[Ewhaz]

Well, I'll put this up here just to let people know what exactly my mistake was.

I was trying to figure out a ratio for the sides of the pyramid that would work for making the 3d model from the sides.

That means the 2d side model might look just fine but as you begin to lay the sides together, the overall height decreases and the angle INCREASES at the apex.

At this point it's looking like any angle more than 60 at the apex for one of the sides will result in a pyramid with an apex more than 70 deg.

My ratio for the making one of the sides is backwards really, you want the base to be always shorter than the length of your sides. Doing that will keep the pyramid below 70 degrees at the apex.

[Ewhaz]

I have the finished equations, I just need a few days to put it in a presentation people can understand.

I had a few negative greetings trying to get this information corrected and worked out, so I'm pretty sure I'm on the right track.

I'll provide proofs of all my equations as well.

[Note to the Moderators: I see that I can't add a note to the first message to warn people of the mistake. If you can do so, please do, otherwise I'll have to have this topic deleted so I can present the proper numbers. Thank you!]

[twva]

[Note from moderator: I was stumped by this too and thought the same thing, but what does make sense is to change "height" in the equation to "side" (one only, don't add them together), then it seems to work-ex: if one side of the base is 2", then the sides would be ~ 1 3/4" long using the 1.16. Hey, I don't know if that's right, but it's worth a stab at it :)]

Hmmm, interesting.

The ratio side/height of an equilateral triangle is two divided by the square root of 3, which equals 1.1547

Edit: Change "height/side" to "side/height"

[Ewhaz]

Hmmm, interesting.

The ratio side/height of an equilateral triangle is two divided by the square root of 3, which equals 1.1547

Edit: Change "height/side" to "side/height"

It's funny that you mention that, my calculations are pointing to the fact that an equilateral triangle is darned close to making a perfect pyramid.

In an equilateral triangle, all the angles are 60 Degrees.

When figuring out the shape of the side of a perfect 70 deg pyramid, it ends up being 60.87 for the base sides and 58.26 for the apex.

The sides of the triangles (that is the sides of the 2d shape that makes up the side of the pyramid) still need to be slightly longer in order to prevent the pyramid from having an apex of more than 70 deg.

[jax]

Gang!
I made 2 small pyramids out of a foam-like material. one has a 6 inch square base and the other is 4 in. square base. Do you know of any easy experiments can be done with them? I just measured and drew 4 triangles on the base, folded the triangles up from the base square and then taped the triangle edges together with 1 in. masking tape. They're hollow. I'll try to draw a diagram in Paint and post it later.
L&L, jax

[heck]

I honestly haven't followed all of the math in this thread. I've done my own research on the Giza pyramid and I'll summarize what I've found:

http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/6928/trianglezo4.jpg

The angle between a and b in the picture (using a side profile of the pyramid, the angle between the side and the base) should be 51 degrees, 51 minutes, 51 seconds. This can be calculated using pi, or alternatively with phi.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pyramid_of_Giza

Using a new picture:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/32/Mathematical_Pyramid.svg/250px-Mathematical_Pyramid.svg.png

b = half of base length
h = height length
a = side length

Pi method (closest to the Great Pyramid dimensions)
pi = 3.1415926535897932384626433832795
4/pi = 0.78539816339744830961566084581988

The ratio of (h : b) should be (4 : pi)

Example:
h = 10 * 4 = 40
b = 10 * pi = 31.415926535897932384626433832795
a = sqrt(b^2 + h^2)
a = sqrt((10 * pi)^2 + (10 * 4)^2) = 50.862171012540703991245083142351

bh angle = 90 degrees
ab angle = ~ 51.85 degrees (or 51 degrees, 51 minutes, 51 seconds)
ah angle = ~ 38.15 degrees

Phi method
phi = (sqrt(5) + 1) / 2 = 1.6180339887498948482045868343656

The ratio of (b : h : a) should be (1 : sqrt(phi) : phi)

Example:
b = 10
h = 10 * sqrt(phi) = 12.720196495140689642524224617372
a = 10 * phi = 16.180339887498948482045868343656

bh angle = 90 degrees
ab angle = ~ 51.83 degrees
ah angle = ~ 38.17 degrees

Other notes

You can order very precise wood pyramids from this person:
http://www.precisionpyramids.com


-heck

[Ewhaz]

I suppose I should finish what I started :D

Really my goal here was to simply supply people with enough information to easily construct a pyramid that was within the constraints proposed in the law of one material.

That material requires that A, the Apex of the pyramid be not more than 70 degrees.

However, I realized quickly that trying to build one out of lengths of materials, or creating a shape to build one was difficult unless you knew how to crunch the numbers.

Thank you for posting this, it was part of the reason I started this discution, I cound't find any where where the math was presented on the pyramids as far as the relation to the angles.

However, now that you've done that, I can already see a problem.

If we take your angle ah, we can get the actual angle of the pyramid's apex by doubling it (adding the other side of the angle).

ah = ~ 38.15

38.15 x 2 = 76.3 degrees

This angle is specificaly warned against in the Ra material

C. MAKE APEX ANGLE NO GREATER THAN 70 DEGREES

QUESTION: The dangerous pyramid shape would be a 4-sided pyramid that was large enough to create the King's chamber effect. Is this correct?

RA: That is correct with the additional understanding that the 76 degree apex angle is characteristic of the powerful shape. (B3, 50)

QUESTION: What angle less than 76 degrees would not produce this dangerous effect?

RA: Any angle less than 70 degrees. (B3, 50)

I've already done much of the work on this problem, I just need to finish my presentation. Then I can post all the info here for a pyramid that agrees with the above statement.

[heck]

Sorry for getting off topic. I realize now that this thread was about the dimensions of the pyramid mentioned in the Ra material for healing. My post on the other hand was focused on the dimensions of the Great Pyramid in Giza.

I bought one of the Giza replica wood pyramids and it came in the mail yesterday. I took a 20 minute nap with it under my pillow, and the energy seemed palpable and tingly. I also felt a lot better after my nap. Later that evening I put it under my bed, positioned under my pillow, and I slept through the night with it there.

So I'd say so far it has been a positive experience. But there are no coincidences, and this morning I see your reminder warning of what Ra said about a dangerous apex angle. So I think I need to re-read the material and balance that with my experiences and decide what I should continue to experiment with.

Thank you Ewhaz.

-heck

[Ewhaz]

Actually, I don't really know if the information you posted is necessarily wrong per say.. One thing that I have noticed is that Ra states that the angle is for shapes that you would sit ABOVE, rather than IN or UNDER.. There may be a different requirement and many people attest to the power of sitting under pyramid shapes.

That in itself may still be under debate.
We learn as we go, else wise we learn nothing.

[Lorigga]

I've been wanting to chime in on here for some time as the Ra material confused me as well. Indeed, with the Ra specifications the apex would always turn out extremely steep.

That was around the time I started reading Davids Shift of the Ages book. Have you guys glanced at the chapter on pyramid shapes?

http://www.divinecosmos.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=57&Itemid=36

He basically states that a good pyramid will sit in a hemisphere, with the pyramid's vortexes resting on the shell. It seems this would dramatically simplify the math involved when analyzing the geometry.

I've been wanting to just write out the equations and make some diagrams, but haven't found the time.

I am also curious about the discussion surrounding the Ra quote. I would assume David's pyramid analysis comes from a merging of Ra material and pyramid studies. I have yet to get to the mentioned quote within the Ra material. It seems the Questioner is merely reiterating something Ra just said, does anyone know what that was? Maybe it can help clear some of the discrepancies in the math.

I've really enjoyed this thread, thanks guys!

-Lorenzo

[twva]

I am also curious about the discussion surrounding the Ra quote. I would assume David's pyramid analysis comes from a merging of Ra material and pyramid studies. I have yet to get to the mentioned quote within the Ra material. It seems the Questioner is merely reiterating something Ra just said, does anyone know what that was? Maybe it can help clear some of the discrepancies in the math.

Which quote?

[Ewhaz]

This is the entirity of the quote as shown in the study guide:

II. USING A SMALL PYRAMID SHAPE

A. THE PYRAMID SHAPE CATCHES PRANA

RA: The pyramid shape is a collector which draws that in-streaming energy from the bottom or base, and allows this energy to spiral upward in a line with the apex. The energy is not Earth energy, but is light energy which is omni-present. (B3, 55)

RA: The pyramid shape is an arrangement for the centralization of the spiraling upward light energy. The magnetic fields of an individual are affected by this spiraling energy. Certain shapes intensify the spiraling prana, the all-present, primal distortion of the One Infinite Creator. Vaulted and conical shapes (like your tepees) also intensify spiraling light. Your eaves, being rounded, are places of power due to this shaping. (B3, 39)

B. SIT ABOVE THE PYRAMID FOR NO MORE THAN 30 MINUTES PER DAY

RA: The small pyramid shape, placed beneath a portion of the body complex may energize the body complex.



This should be done for brief periods only, not to exceed 30 of your minutes*. (B3, 46)



QUESTION: Would the pyramid shape be placed beneath the bed? (B3, 48)

RA: That is correct.



It may be placed directly beneath the cushion (presumably the pillow) upon which the body complex rests. We again caution that the 3rd spiral of upward lining light, that which is emitted from the apex of this shape, is most deleterious to an entity in overdose and should not be used over-long. (B3, 48)



QUESTION: If I used a wire frame that was 4 pieces of wire joined at the apex running down to the base, and the pyramid were totally open, this could do the same thing to the spiraling light. Is this correct? (B3, 55)

RA: This is correct, but there are many metals not recommended. Expensive metals are best, or wood or plastic. (B3, 55)

C. MAKE APEX ANGLE NO GREATER THAN 70 DEGREES

QUESTION: The dangerous pyramid shape would be a 4-sided pyramid that was large enough to create the King's chamber effect. Is this correct?

RA: That is correct with the additional understanding that the 76 degree apex angle is characteristic of the powerful shape. (B3, 50)

QUESTION: What angle less than 76 degrees would not produce this dangerous effect?

RA: Any angle less than 70 degrees. (B3, 50)

D. THE DIMENSIONS

QUESTION: You mean the sum of the 4 base sides should be 1.16 of the height of the pyramid? (B3, 48-49)

RA: That is correct.

RA: The most appropriate size for use beneath the head is an overall height small enough to make placing it under the cushion of the head (pillow) a comfortable thing. (B3, 120)

RA: The Giza pyramid offers an excellent model. Be sure the pyramid is so small that there is no entity small enough to crawl inside it. (B3, 121)

E. THE PYRAMID AMPLIFIES THE 2ND SPIRAL OF LIGHT

QUESTION: There are many people who are now bending metal by mentally requesting that it happen. What's happening?

RA: As this 2nd spiral of light ends at the apex, the light there may be likened to a laser beam in the metaphysical sense and when intelligently directed may cause the bending (of iron) not only in the pyramid. This is possible through indigo contact with intelligent energy. (B3, 56)

F. WHAT ARE THE EFFECTS OF THIS RADIATION OF ENERGY?

RA: The vibration offered by the energizing spiral of the pyramid is such that each cell, both in space-time and time/space, is charged as if hooked to your electricity. The keenness of mind, the physical and sexual energy of the body, and the attunement of will of spirit are all touched by this energizing influence. It is possible to overcharge a battery and this is the cause of our cautioning any who use such pyramidal energies to remove the pyramid after a charge has been received. (B3, 120)



RA: There is no application for direct healing. In most cases it is most helpful in alleviating weariness and in the stimulation of physical or sexual activity. (B3, 122)



G. THE RADIATION PRODUCED IS MUCH LIKE THE SUN'S RAYS

QUESTION: Is this spiraling light energy somehow connected to the indigo energy center?

RA: This is incorrect. This energy moves within the field of the physical complex and irradiates each cell of the space/time body, and as this is done it also irradiates the time/space equivalent which is closely aligned with the space/time yellow ray body (i.e., the physical body).

This is not a function of the etheric body or of free will. This is a radiation much like your sun's rays (It acts on the physical body).



Thus it should be used with care. Any sudden feeling of weariness would be a sure sign that the entity had been over-radiated (B3, 121)

While it is very clear in some aspects, in others it is very unclear. Especially the part about the Ratio of the four base sides to the length of the sides. It is also woefully limited information, I would have preferred if it was a bit more in depth.

Its only because of the numerous cautions in this quote that I decided to be absolutely clear on how I build my shapes.

[mellisamouse]

I have nooo math skills whatsoever, but was wondering if someone could help.

I have a triangle on my left forearm that I was born with, so last summer when I decided to make a pyramid out of origone, I just copied it for the size of the 4 sides, and when I put them together it was basically a nice, not too flat, but very balanced pyramid, with a perfect square at the bottom. It was really cool and pretty, but it dissapeared within a few months, so I have to make a new one.

Oh, so the math part would be that it is perfectly, 45mm X 45mm X 45mm, so all 4 triangles put together were that exact size.......My question is, would that angle be good if I made another to replace the one that dissapeared?

Thank you in advance. :)

[CK1]

Hi all,
This is my first time on the boards, so hello to everyone. I've just been working on this same thing (again, actually, as I had made some pyramids about a year ago trying to do this). Here's the difference that I found: the Law of One material is definitely specific about which angles are for which pyramids. The one angel specifically mentioned had to do with it's undesirable properties when climbing INSIDE it. The under-the-chair-or pillow pyramids follow the 1.16 rule. So, yes, very tall and thin. I was just working on one that is about a foot high. When I get it done, I'll try to take a picture so you can have a visual reference. Hope this helps!


CK

[soup]

I live in an old house, in one of the top rooms that has an A-frame appearance. In some ways I feel as if I was spiritually guided to find this room and live in it. I found that sleeping on the ground is often calmer than sleeping upon an elevated bed - that maybe the bed is giving me an overcharged battery condition. I save the bed for special occasions when I feel the urge to experience something like astral travel. I also filled the room with crystals and plants and that may contribute to the weirdness of it all. I mention it because recently I connected the idea of the pyramid to the idea of an A-Frame as a low efficiency pyramid.


soup

[soup]

I recently moved to a cube shaped room, of lower magnitude, with a deafening silence.


soup

[soup]

Along the same subject there seems mention that such pyramid shapes seem outdated - that there seem people who carry the "kings chamber influence" which for whatever reason may be more effective.

I could probably count on two hands the number of people that I've met personaly who are like this as I have consciously seeked them out. (note, I've never personaly met DW.) My impression is that most people could not count on one hand the people in their lives who are like this.

My impression is that DW knows many many more than most, in a way where "birds of a feather flock together."


soup

[yossarian]

Questioner: You mentioned that an energizing spiral is emitted from the top of any pyramid and that you could benefit by placing this under the head for a period of thirty minutes or less. Can you tell me how this third spiral is helpful and what help it gives the entity who is receiving it?

Ra: I am Ra. There are substances which you may ingest which cause the physical vehicle to experience distortions towards an increase of energy. These substances are crude, working rather roughly upon the body complex increasing the flow of adrenaline.

The vibration offered by the energizing spiral of the pyramid is such that each cell, both in space/time and in time/space, is charged as if hooked to your electricity. The keenness of mind, the physical and sexual energy of body, and the attunement of will of spirit are all touched by this energizing influence. It may be used in any of these ways. It is possible to over-charge a battery, and this is the cause of our cautioning any who use such pyramidal energies to remove the pyramid after a charge has been received.

Questioner: Is there a best material or an optimal size for this small pyramid to go beneath the head?

Ra: I am Ra. Given that the proportions are such as to develop the spirals in the Giza pyramid, the most appropriate size for use beneath the head is an overall height small enough to make placing it under the cushion of the head a comfortable thing.

Questioner: There’s no… there’s no best material?

Ra: I am Ra. There are better materials which are, in your system of barter, quite dear. They are not that much better than substances which we have mentioned before. The only incorrect substances would be the baser metals.

Questioner: Now, you mentioned the problems with the action in the King’s Chamber of the Giza-type pyramid. I am assuming if we used the same geometrical configuration that is used at the pyramid at Giza this would be perfectly all right for the pyramid placed beneath the head since we wouldn’t be using the King’s Chamber radiations but only the third spiral from the top, and I’m also asking would it be better to use a 60° apex angle than the larger apex angle? Would it provide a better energy source?

Ra: I am Ra. For energy through the apex angle the Giza pyramid offers an excellent model. Simply be sure the pyramid is so small that there is no entity small enough to crawl inside it.

I'm thinking of giving this a try. Was wondering if anyone here has any experience or advice?

[transiten]

Hello yossarian!

What's life like in Nanaimo two days after the victory of Obama? I read this thread through for the first time this morning...do you think it will work on my dog Pajazzo too?

I'm no good at maths, and though I love geometry due to astrologyaspects and the "sacred geometry", I would not dare to buy or try to build a pyramid after reading what you wrote here...

How come Ra would even think of giving the wrong dimensions when it's possibly dangerous? And what is the correct info here? I would really want David Wilcock to answer this question and not let us speculate on our own in such an important matter. I would also really need som pyramidal energy right here, right now!

[moderstor: we have many capable members who are welcome to answer this:) Please keep in mind that this is LoO forum, so answers should reflect this]

Liliane the transit

[Raveninns]

^^ I'd like to hear of other's experiences as well!

I was absolutely just gobsmacked when I read this thread. It is crystally clear to me I shall have to do more research...

Since as long as I can remember, I have been fascinated by pyramids. I've always been drawn to stories and books that feature them, and have had dreams about being in them, however, they were not like the Giza ones, rather, more open and it would appear I lived in them....I don't know:rolleyes:

So, a life long collection of pyramids began, and people give them to me as gifts. I particularly like the crystal ones....

So, about fifteen years ago, I found the smallest crystal pyramid, about a quarter inch base, on a chain. I took the chain off, and found a silver hoop and have worn this pyramid in my left ear since then. I have taken it off once, when I had to go for surgery and was made to, against my ignored better judgement of the surgical staff. The second I woke up, well, maybe not that second, but for sure within a half hour, I was asking for my earring and put it back in. I'm just totally out of sorts without it.

Since reading this thread, I'm asking myself why I'm so neurotic about this earring that must be in my ear, at all times. Thinking I might change up the positioning so that the apex faces my neck rather than the way I wear it now and see what happens, lol, what a daredevil!

And another aspect that I find fascinating is the mention of teepees. I am Cree, and I have always found my visits to these structures very comforting, very cathedral-like in nature.

And another thing lately, (isn't synchronicity fascinating?), last week I took my mother to the dollar store so that she could purchase a witches hat for her senior's group Hallowe'en party. Anyway, it got me to thinking about dunces caps, and that they were a sign of derision in the olden days, and how I remember looking at illustrations in books when I was a young girl, and thinking that the cap was making them smarter!, and that the teachers who put them on the perceived dumb kids were dumber. Why I would ever think this is still beyond me. And now I think about it, why would witches wear conical hats if not to tap into a "magical" power?

I see I have a lot more to learn. Thank you, so very much, for this thread.

Cheers, Raven

[transiten]

My stepmothes funeral took place in the Silvervalleychapel outside Stockholm. The wall in the front was pyramideshaped and there was a suncross in stone; a rounfd sphere with four halfshperes cut out in each direction....

It was raining half of the day, but when leaving the sun went down behind the trees in the graveyard, almost as on fire...

Please tell me what dimensions a pyramide should have! I really need the energy instantly!

Liliane the transit

[Berry Chastain]

My stepmothes funeral took place in the Silvervalleychapel outside Stockholm. The wall in the front was pyramideshaped and there was a suncross in stone; a rounfd sphere with four halfshperes cut out in each direction....

It was raining half of the day, but when leaving the sun went down behind the trees in the graveyard, almost as on fire...

Please tell me what dimensions a pyramide should have! I really need the energy instantly!

Liliane the transit

Liliane,
If I remember properly the Giza Pyramid has the angles of 51.5 degrees (approximatly) at each of it four corners. Others had different angles. Here is something I found which seems doable if you want to build or have someone build one for you to use for meditation.

[emails removed at request of person who wrote the email]

Here are some interesting facts about the Giza Pyramid:

The base unit of measurement in the Pyramid's is 25.052 inches. The Pryamid's inch is 1.0025 of our regular inch. Each side of its base is 365.2422 cubits, which is the exact number of days in a solar year. Now 365.24 cubits occur five or six times somewhere within the pyramid that shows it was not a coincidence.

The Pyramid's perimeter, the distance around the four sides of the base, correlates with the circumference of the earth.

According to Professor Piazzi Smyth, multiplying the height of the Pyramid's 35th layer by 10 derives the distance of the earth from the sun.

The base unit of measurement used by the Pyramid designer is ten-millionth of the earth's polar radius, according Peter Lemeisuier. Simply put it is one ten millionth the distance from the North Pole to equator.

The number of days in a century (100 years) is 36,524 days and corresponds to the total inches valued in the Pyramid's perimeter.

The number Pi is the mathematical constant 3.1415, with the ratio of the diameter to the distance around the circle, called the circumference. In the pyramid it is the ratio of the height to twice the length of the base.

[transiten]

Thanks Berry!

Where would I be without this Forum?

Liliane

[Alixandra]

Hi All,

Interestingly, I was sent a red amber crystal in the shape of a pyramid several months ago as a gift.

About halfway up the pyramid you can see what looks like ancient honeycombs.

Because I was working on my base chakra, I put it under the chair here at my desk, I'd already put an ancient red coral and petrified red wood under the chair.

I mentioned it in passing to my spiritual Teacher (I always have one of these if for no other reason than to stay humble) and all great Masters have said we cannot Ascend without an Ascended Teacher, and he said he was sleeping under a crystal.

This crystal is small enough to put under my pillow, the bases is 1.25 on each side and the height is 1.5". I can't find my metric ruler or I'd add the metric measurements.

So, it would be interesting to see what happens if one sleeps on it. I'm not kinesthetic, although I'm very visual.

Anyway, interesting how much this is all coming up.

I don't have a scientific calculator at the moment, someone kindly want to let me know what my Apex angle is?

Thank you eversomuch.

Love and Light,

Alixandra

[NoBlindfold]

I've only read the Law of One Study Guide here on DC but what exactly does placing this pyramid underneath your pillow do? Thanks.

-Adam

[eagleye]

You can start here: http://divinecosmos.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=57&Itemid=36

And finally ending up here to get an understanding of how and why pyramids work: http://divinecosmos.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=103&Itemid=36

If you go back and read Ra’s statements again you will get the answer to your question. He clearly states what the small pyramid under your pillow will do.

The pyramid must be of the proper measurements and constructed of the right material in order to work. :)

[Klassh]

I have a quick question. Is it critical that the pyramid be hollow if your just sticking it under your pillow. Cause I was thinking of filling an 8 sided die down to a quaint little pyramid. If so, I could probably use a dremel tool and drill/sand it out into the frame, which I did read was acceptable (as long as no creatures crawl in). Though I'm curious to see what happens if a spider crawls in..

Thanks in advance for any advice.