Astrology and 2012

[LightEye]

dear friends,

http://www.metahistory.org/aquarianwaves.php

if you haven't read the other articles here they are linked in the article.

be well, be love.

david

aquarian waves

more zodiacal reflections on the 2012 endtime

during the considerable part of my life that i have devoted to sky lore in its astrological, astronomical, and mythological aspects, i often found it difficult to make sense of the material, and tended to get bogged down in a morass of images and associations. much of what i learned over the years eventually became manageable and coherent due to what i found in the dendera zodiac. among other things, the dz showed me how to situate our moment in history in relation to the dawning of the aquarian age.

[LightEye]

dear friends,

http://www.metahistory.org/sophiaunveiled.php

be well, be love.

david

sophia unveiled

the resurgence of the mysteries in the endtime

the previous essay in this series offered an overview of the complete pattern of zodiacal ages measured by precession—quite an exercise! to calculate the ages is simple, but the material generated by doing so is anything but. readers who had the patience to plow through that article may wonder how the road ahead is looking.

it may come as a relief to that i will not be eliciting any more dense mythographic material dated to presumed events in 16,000 bce! as i suggested, to do so is an exercise in narrative invention intended to engage participation in our species' evolution over the long-term—an exercise better left to specialists in the party of xolotl. thankfully, there are other and easier ways to engender participation.this essay will take a different direction, toward the resurgence of the sophianic vision around 2012, as treated in my book, not in his image, but i will continue to use zodiacal imagery to illustrate our unique moment in precessional time. for example:

[soup]

something that seems askew is that most of the stars of the constellation aquarius reside at longitudes of pisces. this seems a major shortcoming to the popular calendar and astrological coordinate system. the field of astrology may benefit from some scientific to clean this up, because as time goes on this schism will grow.

http://users.winshop.com.au/annew/cons0.htm


do you feel the influences of the constellations better follow the months of the year or better follow the stars within the constellations?

[LightEye]

dear friends,

http://www.metahistory.org/gazegoatfish.php

be well, be love.

david

beneath the gaze of the goatfish

transpeciation, telepathy, and the terma pattern

well, up to now, i´ve been pretty restrained (!!??) expressing the imaginative power that keeps me alive, and put me on the glorious planet in the first place, but all that is about to change. on this site, i can only do so much, say, and dare so much. now, if it strikes your fancy, you are invited to the limit of what i can do, and care to do, in the cybernetic medium.

"plants don´t grow in cyberspace," says dale pendell, with psychoactive species on his mind. but what about myths? (definition: a myth is a psychoactive story that implants memes in the human mind, generating ritual behavior, non-ordinary insight, and opportunities for expanding our species--specific potential.) just maybe myths do grow in cyberspace, and just maybe they don´t. i can´t say for sure, but i have a strong hunch that some of those who read these essays, and reflect on them over time, will eventually come to definitive insight on that.

what myths are you going to grow in your minds, my fair-eyed friends, and let flower in your lives? it remains to be seen... for those who can see, who care to see... what myths lead to the planetary connection, or away from it. i´m just a country boy from maine, dancing through the last days of my mission.

my sense of humanity has gone down the drain,
behind every beautiful thing there is some kind of pain.
she wrote me a letter, and she wrote it so kind,
she put down in writing what was in her mind.
i just don´t see why i should even care.
it´s not dark yet, but it´s gettin´ there.
- dylan, "not dark yet," time out of mind

[Chris Hamilton]

astrological indications of a new era?

[litllady]

when reading things about the constellations and their meanings referring back to energies such as 'sophia' i receive great feelings of understanding. mabey the stories are not exactly as described, but the base of history in the stars about the time before humans seems right to me. just wanted to express that i feel great truth, understanding and knowledge lies in the stars. they speak to us if we are willing to listen. could sophia simply be the sol of the earth and a part of everylife form that is made of the earth.

this is my only problem with the idea that when the shift comes everyone good or bad will be displaced from earth. how can this be if we are 'of' earth. i can understand how the positive ones can leave earth for they will be merging with a higher realm of the soul, divine, love and light. but the negative ones, they will still be part of the earth because they havent transgressed past the matter of being of earth. it seems to me they would have to stay with earth to finish their time of progression towards positive. mabey, earth wont be considered earth if the sol of earth ascends to a higher realm as well. so then mabey since earth ascends in a way, the earth made humans that are negative will merge with another matter of another planet, hence they would then be a new creation in a way because they will have to be grounded to a new sol of a planet.

again, just as always, i like to express my thoughts to be rambles. not right or wrong. just things that come into my experiences of learning understanding.

peace to all,
lynette

[vithar]

this seems to be the kind of stuff i always run in to. after years trekking a certain concept wham, something comes along to seriously challenge the entire model.

this makes me reconsider what aw has been saying about the zodiac. the ptb know the real zodiac and plan accordingly. tho, i think he says that they actually devised it... to then pan out their plan according to it.

but does'nt this jibe with the kali yuga (devolution)?

now aw also says to beware of (getting back to) nature movements - as it's part of this one world religion attempt.
but this seems to makes sense to me. i'd rather do this and risk it. i've heartfully been into runes lore, norse and celtic deities...

but this actually indicates we're going in the opposite direction as to what most every other source says! this is "great".
but what about all this increased energy?

um, i did read that piece right did'nt i!?

i forgot what it was but there was a reason the tropical astrology has'nt "updated" their system (for precession). it was'nt due to laziness. it is odd tho. it may be due to the fact there are so many house systems, etc. the main dynamic observed is planetary aspects. venus is venus and a square is a square....

[vithar]

zodiacal signs. take aquarius. when they first looked up is this what they saw? did they have this kind of (established) archetype in mind to hang on that star pattern?
or, did some priest or whomever decide to give it such and such a label simply due to loose or subjective appearances?

if the latter, everything that came after is erroneous speculation.

[litllady]

hello to all,

to me, its not the literal signs (lion, scorpion, bull ect....) that i find importance. i do agree that humans ( and mabey some per-human beings) did use figures to relate their era of time to that area of stars. so the whole 'figure' of the constellations as literal i dont take into account. but, these figures (constellations) do tell us a time of different ages. to my understanding we are coming into the half way point. some think we are coming full circle and have gone all the way around the clock. i look at the age of the zodiac starting in the time of leo, and now were about half way around the clock from leo. could this be the marking point of not only the age of aquarius but also the time of the true golden age.
even if one doesnt take into the account that they have a certain 'birth' sign, the stars can still be a map of understanding the waves of cycles of of ones life. not using the signs directly for a purpose, but remembering what we are here to do. mabey even on a very personal level for some. we are a part of the earth as well as a part of the stars as well as a part of the unseen energy (love). connect with the stars in the same way we try to connect with earth. you will find the stars telling you things, just as the earth does.
i do think its possible that some of us have 'chosen' to come here in this time and mabey we chose to enter this realm at a certain time(during a certain constellation). so mabey our birth date is a symbol for us, from ourselves, before we entered this forgetful realm. mabey our higher self knew that being born of a certain date would trigger more memories for this particular soul for a specific time of need during this incarnation. mabey by entering at ones own will, the one sign that your higher self could leave with you in this realm would be a birth sign to remind you....who you are and what things do you need to work on in this life.
i dont read horoscopes. but i do think ones birth sign is still a way of the higher self leaving us with a sign of what we were before 'this'. i also think when trying to 'figure' the stars one must do this through 'their own' figuring. its like dreams. the best interpretor for our dreams is ourself. others can tell you what they think, but all in all, you yourself is the only one who can truly find the meaning. its like we all have different compasses inside us for the earth, stars, dreams ect...when you fine tune your understanding of your compass and how it works, you can read the stars and how they pertain to you, or read the earth and how she pertains to you, or read your dreams and how they pertain to you. this is not a negative side of service to self, its the side of service to self i believe that our creator gave us to use to 'know' ourselves.

as always, just my opinion, just rambles of thought.

peace to all,
lynette

[vithar]

[quote=litllady;28141]hello to all,

to me, its not the literal signs (lion, scorpion, bull ect....) that i find importance. i do agree that humans ( and mabey some per-human beings) did use figures to relate their era of time to that area of stars. so the whole 'figure' of the constellations as literal i dont take into account. but, these figures (constellations) do tell us a time of different ages. to my understanding we are coming into the half way point. some think we are coming full circle and have gone all the way around the clock. i look at the age of the zodiac starting in the time of leo, and now were about half way around the clock from leo. could this be the marking point of not only the age of aquarius but also the time of the true golden age.

>>>>> hiya. i've a book by [e-mail for author] who also says we are half way through. tho, on the cusp or leo and virgo... which is in the "zodiacal night" (of materialism. and perhaps being the western analog of the kali yuga). so according to this we've quite a ways to go.
one point about the signs; in many systems these are the cosmic building blocks. like in hermetic kabbalah; the 7 planets and 12 signs make up the hebrew alphabet (plus three mother letters). so if you toss these you are tossing the (supposed) ultimate archetypes.

it could be that these are the ultimate human archetypes. and that foisting them on "constellations" was a moot idea. it may simply have something to do with growth cycles.
but it does stick me as significant in using something that's an actual part of the spinning galaxy. i'd wager there's a better way to do this tho. not constellations as this is simply an earthside visual perspective.

and yadda, to.