reikistar
07-15-2007, 02:54 PM
there i was....getting reaquainted with the world of art bell and coast to coast am and the work of richard c. hoagland when i read the bees needs by richard and some guy named david wilcock. at first i was like "oh jeez, another ascension wingnut". but my own angels kept pestering and pointing, flapping there wings, bla bla. (you'd think after 20 something years of eating feathers, i'd learn) then i saw this guy was going to be a guest on coast so i gave a listen. about halfway through the interview i thought ok my bad, this guy thinks like i do.
what struck me most, though was how down to earth he was. here was this guy (yes i immediately started reading his website) who was as human as the rest of us and made no bones about it. no doctrin, no dogma, just plain "this is who i am" or to coin a phrase from the millenium tv show "this is who we are"
another thing that struck me and this is why i had the thought "he thinks like i do" was the marriage of science and ascension. just a little bit about me. i'm a reiki "master". i put "master" in quotes because i detest the title master. it comes with too much baggage, ego etc. anyway, i've been on this ride for 20+ years and all the new age babble was always annoying and i was convinced that science and the language of the new age could be harmonized somehow so there wouldn't be what appeared to be a natural rift between the two. i studied sacred geometry and the like and that was getting closer, but still wasn't it. then i "found" rch's work about hyperdimesional physics. another step closer, but still something was lacking. mind you i'm still digesting david's work, but i don't think it's a stretch for me to stand and yell bingo!!!!!!
anyway, i've blathered on quite enough for now. i look forward to reading and writing on this forum.
peace, love and light
what struck me most, though was how down to earth he was. here was this guy (yes i immediately started reading his website) who was as human as the rest of us and made no bones about it. no doctrin, no dogma, just plain "this is who i am" or to coin a phrase from the millenium tv show "this is who we are"
another thing that struck me and this is why i had the thought "he thinks like i do" was the marriage of science and ascension. just a little bit about me. i'm a reiki "master". i put "master" in quotes because i detest the title master. it comes with too much baggage, ego etc. anyway, i've been on this ride for 20+ years and all the new age babble was always annoying and i was convinced that science and the language of the new age could be harmonized somehow so there wouldn't be what appeared to be a natural rift between the two. i studied sacred geometry and the like and that was getting closer, but still wasn't it. then i "found" rch's work about hyperdimesional physics. another step closer, but still something was lacking. mind you i'm still digesting david's work, but i don't think it's a stretch for me to stand and yell bingo!!!!!!
anyway, i've blathered on quite enough for now. i look forward to reading and writing on this forum.
peace, love and light