soup
06-15-2007, 11:47 PM
from the questions thread:
so along this line of thought wandering occurs the possibility of one breaching one's own freewill, a sort of self enslavement so to speak. i wonder if this is a paradoxical crux that eventually toggles, say a 5th density negative, upon a path to serving others - a sort of reasoning that one can act as one's own worst enemy in a way that catalyzes a more fulfilling direction. here a question could be, is there such a thing as "too much love" so much love that it seems to immobilize or inhibit another, or else so much love that it infringes freewill?
this reminds me of the study of sociology, from which comes the idea that the very rich find security in wealth though often find themselves isolated from others by fear of losing wealth - in contrast to the very poor who find themselves immersed with many others though without any monatary security.
by nature of polarities, the extent of isolation or immersion may directly relate to a person's ability to "share love". in this case the circumstances of the person may act as some natural regulator by which "too much love" is just never an issue.
personally, i feel that if more people had a taste of what the high states of love have to offer, it would shift their value systems in a way which would act as a healing influence upon the planet, i.e. instead of furiously working for the means to make love (which they have little energy for when the opportunity arrives), they would simply furiously make love instead which would pose less stress upon the planet in terms of trade and commerce.
then again, maybe trade and commerce is acting as some sort of birth control which keeps the population moderated.
so along this line of thought wandering occurs the possibility of one breaching one's own freewill, a sort of self enslavement so to speak. i wonder if this is a paradoxical crux that eventually toggles, say a 5th density negative, upon a path to serving others - a sort of reasoning that one can act as one's own worst enemy in a way that catalyzes a more fulfilling direction. here a question could be, is there such a thing as "too much love" so much love that it seems to immobilize or inhibit another, or else so much love that it infringes freewill?
this reminds me of the study of sociology, from which comes the idea that the very rich find security in wealth though often find themselves isolated from others by fear of losing wealth - in contrast to the very poor who find themselves immersed with many others though without any monatary security.
by nature of polarities, the extent of isolation or immersion may directly relate to a person's ability to "share love". in this case the circumstances of the person may act as some natural regulator by which "too much love" is just never an issue.
personally, i feel that if more people had a taste of what the high states of love have to offer, it would shift their value systems in a way which would act as a healing influence upon the planet, i.e. instead of furiously working for the means to make love (which they have little energy for when the opportunity arrives), they would simply furiously make love instead which would pose less stress upon the planet in terms of trade and commerce.
then again, maybe trade and commerce is acting as some sort of birth control which keeps the population moderated.