"The king is naked" messenger [Archive] - Divine Cosmos Discussions

Tarzan

10-20-2001, 09:08 AM

<table>
>lorna,
>
>i can understand completely your natural reaction to icke's site. i, too, have had many moments of anger of finding out the information about the elite cabal jerking humans around for centuries.
>
>but when i first found his information, what struck me were the solutions that he proposes and they always centered on peace/love vibrations. he really emphasizes peaceful solutions to these massive challenges that we humans have. the dark information is provided as a catalyst for people to wake the hell up and actually do something about it. most people are so deep in their well-worn ruts ofself-survival that it takes something of large magnitudes to motivate people to change. and, guess what, not even the 'double-ya tee cee' collapse was enough to change people and their perceptions--they fell into a lock-step support of the very president who not only knew about the comming event, but allowed it to proceed, then bald-faced lied to the people about his 'innocence' about the anger of people world-wide against the us that they know.
>
>icke is a very optimistic guy and always emphasizes the good in his messages, even if a lot of what he has to share is pretty dark stuff of what is really going on. the darkness is a catalyst for the light within to shine--that is the purpose of icke's sharing the dark info. somebody's got to point out that not only is the king naked, but also blatantly dishonest, armed and dangerous.
>
>seth

Lorna

10-25-2001, 09:53 AM

the darkness is a catalyst for the light within to shine--that is the
purpose of icke's sharing the dark info. somebody's got to point out
that not only is the king naked, but also blatantly dishonest, armed
and dangerous.
>
> seth

i absolutely agree with you on that point seth, in actual fact it was
icke being publicly ridiculed on live tv and the disturbing attitudes
of the media around that time that spurned me into paying more
attention to what he was saying. in many ways i have a lot to thank
icke for, in that much of what he said helped introduce ideas and
concepts to me that i am still trying to understand today.

i think what jarred with me was that his early stuff quite obviously
used the starting point of love/light and then built on that, and i
just haven't found that to be quite so obvious with some of his more
recent writing, website in particular. pedantic? quite probably,
the tone of a lot of it just doesn't sit with me well.

don't get me wrong, i have a great deal of admiration for the guy and
for what he's trying to achieve, and as a catalyst for making people
think he's doing a great job!
lorna