View Full Version : Who's Been Communicating with Gore?
05-22-2007, 05:09 PM
brothers and sisters: i have become soured on politics for a while now with all of the dark shenanigans and simple greed and ego fest going on in that arena on both sides. i just read an excerpt from al gore's new book, and i sense that he has been in communication with our galactic friends, either consciously or subconsciously. he could turn out to be the surprise runaway candidate with 2008. once upon a time, i might have voted for barak obama, but am now concerned that he will be liquidated before he can breathe as a president, so why sign his death warrant? also, his inexperience in the "ethers of power" make the quality of his presidential work far too dependent on an exceptional ability to choose excellent "insiders" to advise him and increase his vulnerability in far too many other ways.
check this gore book chapter out by reading primarily in-between the lines... gore may just be the candidate who could lead us through this mess to the other side. i am just thinkin' out-loud now, and not leading a surreptitious campaign! what if....??? still thinkin'.........jo anne
"fortunately, the internet has the potential to revitalize the role played by the people in our constitutional framework. it has extremely low entry barriers for individuals. it is the most interactive medium in history and the one with the greatest potential for connecting individuals to one another and to a universe of knowledge. it's a platform for pursuing the truth, and the decentralized creation and distribution of ideas, in the same way that markets are a decentralized mechanism for the creation and distribution of goods and services. it's a platform, in other words, for reason. but the internet must be developed and protected, in the same way we develop and protect markets—through the establishment of fair rules of engagement and the exercise of the rule of law. the same ferocity that our founders devoted to protect the freedom and independence of the press is now appropriate for our defense of the freedom of the internet. the stakes are the same: the survival of our republic. we must ensure that the internet remains open and accessible to all citizens without any limitation on the ability of individuals to choose the content they wish regardless of the internet service provider they use to connect to the web. we cannot take this future for granted. we must be prepared to fight for it, because of the threat of corporate consolidation and control over the internet marketplace of ideas."
05-23-2007, 03:48 AM
fuuny i communicated with the word gore in my apology and first thing this morning i heard about gore, (cnn) see your post first thing and last night i was reading about a horn, from psalms 75, about a horn which can gore, or i guess play music. no lol ~ but a great big da! is in order
just thinking out loud?
i won't ever make it a habit of logging every moment in sync on this forum, but it can truly be hell, seeing as i do. kinda like him after bush went outta his bird.
starting day with, huge smile. chris i was so touched by your note to me.
keep the light and the love coming.
oh, lighten up!!!
05-23-2007, 09:15 AM
the only guy standing up to the neg-elites and the orion gang is ron paul. i strongly recommend looking at him, he is a light worker.
05-25-2007, 02:23 AM
hey jo anne, nelson, and group,
now your talkin' an area that i can sink a tooth into- al gore is a joke, a liar, and a looser, and dr. ron paul needs to get off the free-trader's band wagon, before i throw-up.
if this is the part where i'm supposed to throw out my choice for 2008, sorry- don't have one. and, the past two presidential elections should have proven that we no longer choose our leaders, as an ass won both times, without actually winning- our "leaders are appointed", by a very powerful grouping of materialisticaly endowed people, who don't necessarily have our best interests in mind.
the government of rhe people, by the people, and for the people is in peril,floks. the only way we're ever gonna take this puppy back is by launching an evolution; and this evolution will not be televised....that's some of what we're all about here on this forum.
05-25-2007, 05:52 AM
bob, in the process of my personal evolution, i have, alas, become increasingly detached from the political process, especially after learning the extensive control the illuminati and its cabal wages over the way things are happening. but is it spiritually responsible for us to completely turn our backs on this right of ours, which at least enables us to "attempt" [thinking of the bush/gore elections] to make a statement.
i am wondering if gore is the least of all other "evils" who have the potential of becoming elected or if it is better to stand back, not participate in the farce, and just allow things to evolve towards the inevitable ascension? if the elections are manipulated again, as there were during the b/g shenanigans, then what's the point? in that case, the point is that manipulation was so obvious that doubt and mistrust began to contribute to awakening more people in this country to the not-so-hidden dark agenda.
the point now is that exercising a choice, even when knowing the underlying reality, is an opportunity to say to one's self, at the very least, if not to join with hopefully millions of other likeminded souls, we are committed to changing this world no matter how our votes may be manipulated. we are not sleeping. maybe the process of voting is just providing an opportunity for more souls to think, allow their frustration and disgust with the status quo to arise to the surface, take a stand by voting in honor of all that the right to vote means, and then allow the inevitable force of evolution and ascension to take its course....please take that into contemplation and see what you come up with. in the light and sound of all that is! jo anne
05-25-2007, 07:23 AM
cayce predicted that the so-called "battle of armageddon" described symbolically in the bible would begin in 1999. cayce foresaw that this "battle" will not be a war fought on earth. rather, it will be a spiritual struggle between the "higher forces of light" and "lower forces of darkness" for 1000 years of earth time.
the reason for this struggle is to prevent souls from lower afterlife realms from reincarnating to earth. by preventing souls from the lower afterlife realms from reincarnating to earth, only enlightened souls will be permitted to reincarnate.
(the above paragraph is where you get into the real battle being waged, it is not just here on earth)
the paragraph below where you understand the assencion into positve 4-d, "the bad boys can't come back until their finished being in - time out"
the result will be 1000 years of building a world of peace and enlightenment. after 1000 years, souls from lower afterlife realms will be permitted once again to reincarnate to earth. by this time, the so-called "kingdom of heaven" will have been established on earth.
may your horse be with you,
05-25-2007, 08:37 AM
...dr. ron paul needs to get off the free-trader's band wagon, before i throw-up.
what's wrong with free trade? isn't that about as first-distortion as you can get?
note that paul is against nafta and the wto, which are institutions that "manage" trade in favor of elites at the expense of the third world. true free trade is a leveling, competitive force that the rich and powerful find far too unstable - yet it's that very instability that keeps power fluid and unconsolidated.
i'm an anarchist, but i can't find a lot negative to say about ron paul. he's principled and he speaks the truth about war and corporate capitalism (or, as they used to call it, fascism). it's like one fair-trader once said: "the problem with free trade is that we've never really had it".
05-25-2007, 08:43 AM
dear jo anne,
what if there was an option on your ballot, that if you truely didn't like the choices offered, could vote "none of the above?" there are some who feel that nota would have been the big winner in several of our past elections. and if nota prevailed, what choice would they have, but to offer up a new batch of candidates? yeah, in a perfect world, but we're not there yet.
it is both spiritually, and morally a requirement, that we get involved- to do otherwise, is not an option. and, on some level, we all know that. david has said, that just by us being here we're making a differance, and that is so true, from an energy perspective, but i've always loved the wack 'em up side of the head with a two by four, analogy. in other words, direct, hands on involvement. do some vollunteer work- distribute liturature, run for office.
check-out g. edward griffon's site: http://www.freedomforceinternational.org for a wonderful anylisis of our current problems, and many viable solutions. by the way, i haven't not voted in an election since i was a kid, and my frustration with the current mess just boils over, sometimes. i actually love al gore- i think he 's got a great act, and should do the comedy circuit.
05-25-2007, 12:33 PM
the point now is that exercising a choice, even when knowing the underlying reality, is an opportunity to say to one's self, at the very least, if not to join with hopefully millions of other likeminded souls, we are committed to changing this world no matter how our votes may be manipulated. we are not sleeping. maybe the process of voting is just providing an opportunity for more souls to think, allow their frustration and disgust with the status quo to arise to the surface, take a stand by voting in honor of all that the right to vote means, and then allow the inevitable force of evolution and ascension to take its course....
i like the way you're thinking outside the box, jo anne. i like that you are connecting an observation of the vote to something deeper underlying it. while i do see an expression of consciousness within the vote itself, i see an even deeper meaning within the choice to not vote. so what does the right to vote mean, and what statement is made by exercising that choice or not?
when we look at recent elections we find that the majority of people do not vote, and for those who do, it matters not who they vote for. of the majority who don't vote there are some who want to vote, but have been shut out of the voting process. the rest, who are most likely the majority of non-voters, choose not to vote for a variety of reasons, but mostly, i suspect, because they realize that that person will not sincerely represent them.
for those who vote it matters not who they vote for because both candidates are hand-picked for their allegiance to something other than the will and best interest of the people. the idea of this being a two party system is naive and was conjured to implement a psychological "good cop - bad cop routine" and to split the voters' egos into competing factions for imaginary power and control over the other.
each side believes their side is the "good cop" and that the "bad cop" is attempting to beat them down. so you take to trusting the good cop more than you should because the bad cop is in the hallway just waiting for another opportunity to break you down. the good cop says "just give me something, anything, so i can keep the bad cop from coming in here and doing what he loves to do: beat the crap out of innocent suspects like you." so you confess to the good cop because he offers you safe-haven compared to the state of panic and brutality offered by the bad cop.
voting becomes your confession to the good cop. it allows you to feel good about yourself because you've temporarily staved off the fear of oppression from the bad cop (other party). you feel like you've done something positive because you've exercised your right to vote for the lesser of two evils - your right to confess to the cop of your choice. you've beat the bad cop by giving the glory of "getting the confession" to the good cop. the bad cop lost in his attempt to extract your confession.
the good cop won, but you still end up in prison. the prison is that of the ego believing it is/was right in overcoming the other ego that is/was wrong. the prison is not knowing that the two parties are contrived opposite ends of the same candle, and that no matter which end is lit the candle will eventually burn itself out because the wax (energy - conceptual framework) is limited (finite).
no matter which party gets in to the oval office they will carry out the same nwo plan. the only difference is in the choice of double-speak used. that's not to say that all elected officials are so disposed, but only all candidates for the executive branch having made it passed the primaries. do you wonder why the executive branch has increasingly gotten more power over the other branches? do you understand that this is a process intended to eliminate any checks and balances and create a worldwide monarchy? you will see which ones have been 'chosen' during the primaries by watching how the media supports or doesn't support certain candidates and the language that is used when referring to each.
so what does it tell me if people make a choice to vote for the good cop this time around instead of the bad cop? it tells me that those people still believe that an authority figure can do for them what they are unwilling to do for themselves. it tells be that those people are still willing to cast a vote for who they would prefer to get the glory of controlling and manipulating them, or worse, they are not even aware that they are being manipulated. but mostly, it tells me that those people are still willing to believe in good cops and bad cops.
thus, i take no satisfaction in seeing that people have voted one way or the other, or in seeing that the good cop has won. for i have no illusions that the good cop will save the day. what does the number of voters tell me? it gives me an indication of the number of people unwilling to see what is, and has been, sitting in front of their noses. what is hopeful to me is that the majority of people have come to the honest realization that to some degree, or some reason or other, this is a prison created for self-confessed inmates with no choice except to pick who will lock them up - or choose to not confess.
so, what i find hopeful is that fewer people are being duped into believing that one party or the other getting into the executive branch is going to assuage their fears or make things good, fair, or right. no, only the people can bring peace - by being at peace and living a peaceful life. only the people can bring compassion by treating themselves and otherselves with compassion. this won't happen by helping others perpetuate a lie, or by living their lie.
what would happen if only a few thousand people voted in the next election? would this not send more of a message to the negative elite and to the people than a few extra votes for the next 'good cop'? i will tell you that the ne enjoy seeing you vote in presidential elections (as opposed to voicing your opinion) because it tells them that they are still duping enough people to keep them in control. it tells them that the illusion of the system they have setup for people to voice their concerns within a controlled and limited boundary is accomplishing its' intended goal of domination.
my take on the next election is that the 'good cop' will win this time regardless of how you, or i, or anyone votes. why? because it is time for the good cop to work his magic of rescuing the masses from the persecution of the bad cop. because the masses are tired of, and angry with, the bad cop, and before they begin to scrutinize too closely and start to see the bigger picture a change must be made. this change will come as a relief to some. it will take the dogs off the scent. it will create an environment where a change, any change, will be considered a blessing, and where vigilance is pacified. yet behind the scenes, 'the plan' will be carried forward just as before.
when only a few thousand people are left voting in a system that excludes the rest. that is when the time will be ripe for real change. that is when the negative elite will know they have lost all control.
there may be some implication in the use of the term incarnation here that is specific to human lifeforms and lifetimes. from a perspective of transmigration of soul, it would seem that there is room to incarnate in other (plant and animal) lifeforms.
the saying "do the best with what you have and you'll be given more" seems as a catalyst to me in this regard. what is the potential of a human lifeform? how does a person live in a way that brings out their best potential?
pondering that, one may reconsider what cayce is saying. personally, i've seen labrador retrievers who seem to act more enlightened than how some people act, and i wonder about the incarnational hierarchy given the finite number of human lifeforms - is it related to behavior or harvestability?
that is, i wonder if an animal who excelled well beyond its harvestable threshold in its animal lifetime is allowed to transmigrate to a human lifeform over say a human soul who fell short of its potential, way short of harvestability even in animal terms - as if there seems some sense of justice going on between re-incarnations that rewards life choices aligned with some divine intent...
05-28-2007, 04:25 PM
as far as presidents go i have a few good people i am in contact with who are active in these matters even though i do not do the thurough research, from all i have taken in ron paul seems so far the best all around person to get things started in a decent direction.
i know that he wants to back up the constitution in many areas and can see that it has been walked on. he voted against the patriot act, he voted against regulating the internet and was against going to iraq.
i also have heard that he never takes money from sources that shouldn't and isn't a scam artist. you can check all the details but what i have gathered from circulation as far as what is possible i think he will be our best bet.
note* yes most of the government could be set up much better and there never be a great president in the stuff we go into because the collective conscious wouldn't manifest such things :rolleyes: . so doing nothing and saying "nothing matters" i feel is somewhat concieted as well. be logical and weigh the balances. holes are always there just see what comes together best for you.
you can see more of his stuff on youtube here:
[note from moderator: spiral's url is subscription only and we can't get in to see it, so as soon as he can find another we can see, he will post that]
05-30-2007, 04:37 PM
hopefully this one works.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.