Hyperdimensional Nebulae: More Proof of the "Matrix"

[Mozart]

WOW! WHOOOOO!


David, your latest blog entry about the Hyperdimensional physics is so totally spot-on! Beautifully written. It's funny how some "shoulda" stuff (the earlier red square nebulae) works eventually wind up to be perfectly included in future works, isn't it? Regarding the red square nebulae, how can we be sure that it ain't some Russians getting there first via their Sputnik? I smell a conspiracy here. :p


I am inspired with this latest confirmation of the value of intent, so that's what I'll move forward with right now, as it is a good time to figure out my intent and set it, given that the New Moon is approaching (Tues, April 17th, 1136hrs, UT). (Nice numbers there, the UT time for the new moon, eh?)


So may I suggest that anyone who reads David's brilliant latest blog entry to use it as a catalyst for whatever positive change/manifestation that one may wish to manifest in one's life in this coming New Moon cycle?


I do feel that the more people who create whatever positive/peaceful scenarios in our individual lives, the more possible that powerful peaceful outcomes can happen in the world at large.


I also figured that a thread might as well be started with regards any commentary/questions that people may have on David's latest Hyperdimensional blog entry for ease of discussion of this blog entry without creating too many separate threads.


Again, David, thank you so much for manifesting the Truth that is within each of us! Whoooowhooo!


~Seth

[David Wilcock]

You'd better go back and read it again if you've seen it prior to 3PM PST / 6PM EST.

I decided to put in some of my MOST POWERFUL information on 2012... helping build the case I reveal in The Science of Peace and in the upcoming 2012 book.

I've worried for years about people plagiarizing this as soon as it gets out, but heck... it was just TIME.

Plus, I really have to focus in on larger writing projects now, so we'll let this article 'hang out' for a while... there is a lot to absorb and follow up with.

- David

[alchemikey]

yeah that codefun part was a nice added touch...wow...what else you got hiding :)

[David Wilcock]

Lots of stuff... but several KEY missing pieces are in the Science of Peace MP3 series. The problem with releasing all of this is that no matter how nicely we ask, it invariably gets plagiarized, without credit to the original source.

Not only is this illegal, and will have to be pursued if someone tries to profit off of it, there is also the problem of their readers being denied access to the source that put it all together in the first place.

Remember... this is still just a PORTION of the 2012 case! I'm "leaking" more of it over time as people need to know. That's why I'm not reserving all of it for things that are strictly on a payment-only basis, like the Science of Peace series.

I have done additional updates, added two YouTube videos, tweaked it and read the whole thing start to finish as of 5:55 pm PST, 8:55 pm EST... and this is going to have to 'do' for now, as I have to get back to the OTHER projects...

That was just about 12 hours straight I put in on this puppy... not too bad for a day's work, eh? ;)

- David

[LightEye]

Dear Friends,

I received this reply to DW's article.

Be Well, Be Love.

David

Hey! This article looks as if written on a fools-day. I begun
reading without the pictures and all sounded very interesting
so have used the link given there to see those images. And lo! These
are not real images of stars or nebulae - the inperfect telescope optics
produces these regular distortions of brighter objects!!!

Cheers,
Kaz

--
K.Borkowski, Centre for Astronomy, N.Copernicus University, Torun, Poland
www.astro.uni.torun.pl/~kb/index.htm

[David Wilcock]

Unfortunately, this is an all-too-common response:

1. Insult the article and / or its author;

2. Attack one small piece of the data while ignoring the larger case;

3. Provide a 'scientific explanation' for the attack on the one piece of data, no matter how small it is.

If you go back to the original articles about this, they come straight out of NASA and are hardly an April Fool. Granted, you get SOME change from the optics of the scope, as you can see in the six-pointed pattern from the surrounding stars, but this is NOT enough to cause a cubical nebula to appear.

Remember... just read the articles. The top NASA astronomers are taking this to be real!

I should also point out that I do NOT write for scientists anymore... I write for the average people. I certainly COULD write in a formal scientific style, and have done it before, but then you end up leaving out the far greater number of people who would be interested.

Anyone can see that in this article I do not provide evidence to back up all my various points of geometric data... but if you actually go follow the links, back to "The Matrix is a Reality," to the interplanetary climate change paper I did with Hoagland, et cetera, you'll see that it's all there.

I really didn't know how someone would 'fight' such an intermeshing case as this. It's part of the reason why I've never seen a substantial attempt to attack any of the Convergence volumes, particularly the third, which is the most scientific of the three.

- David

[LightEye]

Well...

I only posted this as as you mention the person isn't seeing the "bigger" picture ;-)

Be Well, Be Love.

David

[Ceara]

Links for the YouTube videos?

Tried searching under your name and had zero search results.

Thank you.

[pyramidnj]

What is interesting is that the patterns reminiscent of the hyperdimensional nebulae and the "matrix" is also evident in some of the work Dr. Emoto has done with water influenced by thoughts of Love and Gratitude if my recollection is on target. Might be worth checking out. If I find the photos I saw recently, I will add a link here or try to copy.....Jo Anne

[alchemikey]

here is another video on cymatics, this is from vibrating rice (the sounds get really high pitched so you might want to keep your speakers on low volume)

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Zkox6niJ1Wc

i also thought it was worth noting how similar the cube nebulae appears to this square bubble :)

http://zometool.com/images/bubblebox.jpg

david, i wanted to thank you again for that link to codefun for it has lead me to a link where i finally understand how to build the double helix of dna out of zome

http://www.curtisdna.com/dna/img71.gif
http://www.curtisdna.com/dna/img65.gif

i was also curious how the dna nebulae near the center of the galaxy fits in with your model?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11841243/

peace,
mikey

[music=geometry]

Ah the beauty of numbers. Awakening to see what you had not seen is like being reborn again. The geometry in everything you see, to shapes in colors you begin to realize that you are a part of something so grand and amazing. To find others who see past the illusion is like conversing in a dream. I hope that you all have a wonderful day and thanks DW for the insight, words of comfort, and above all for your wisdom. (If you ever get a chance to read up on house DW I would suggest it. {Seek deep house on you tube} and check out some of the documentaries of this movement, it's positive, uplifting, and reiterates man's desire to let go of his burdens and meditate with the oldest form of expression; dance)

Cheers and Regards,
m=g

[Art]

Mikey - wow! :eek: Thanks! I would be VERY interested in learning how this was done. If there was ever a way to describe principles of harmonics, vibration, geometry, (and on and on) this is it! So, if any of you know something about this particular "experiment", please forward!!!

As a side note - what we are seeing is "planar" in nature. I would be VERY interested to learn whether these were actually "3-D's" projected onto a 2-D surface, or if there was another way to do this 3-D...

WOW! Thanks again! Hopefully one day I'll be able to do this demonstration for my students. I "walk the line" very carefully when trying to incorporate "this" material. As a side note, I always use "special numbers" on the tests I give them. ;) I'm going to push to "start" a geometry elective at my local community college, or at the very least, put together an informative lecture series - and something like this will blow people away. :cool:

:D