Mozart
04-03-2007, 10:24 AM
Creators of Money, pt 1
That Eleusinian-based text on money was, indeed, very good in David's "Deeper Secret", pt III.
There is an additional light that I'd like to shed upon money in this post to underscore the source of the "evil" that is often attributed to money.
Firstly there is very little modern-day history of a widely-used printed currency--known as "money"--that comes without interest or usury; the only countries in the world that uses usury-free money are: Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Cuba and Libya. Do you notice something in common amongst those five countries? They all are declared "enemies" of the USA, INC and several are on the so-called "Axis of Evil" list.
In this two-part post, I wish to show that it is the interest/usury aspect that is attached to money that is the key source of the misery that is frequently associated with money. Ideally, printed money ought to be neutral, but the reality is that the vast majority of printed, modern-day money is anything BUT a neutral means of exchange. Printed money as we know it is not neutral--it never has been, with the exception of the aforementioned 5 countries. It's not to say that gold/silver, which is specie that has *intrinsic value*, has always been handled with wisdom and kindness, but, with the advent of printed money, the ease of the creation/distribution of wealth really *SHOULD* have been far, far easier with more and more people having wealth, rather than the widely-observed phenomenon of the wealthy few gaining more and more wealth for themselves at the expense of everyone else. This is a world-wide phenomenon, even in the few countries that have usury-free money.
Here's a couple of quotes:
...from "The Deeper Secret, pt III:
"Kindness is the foundation of all good; avarice the source of all evil." Chinese
...from history:
"Let me issue and control a nation's currency and I care not who creates the laws." N.M. Rothschild
A small bit of history of money and it's creation is in order here. Money had its start as "traveler's checks" by those who wished to travel without the risk of carrying gold/silver on hand, so the travelers deposited gold/silver with the Knights of Templar ("KT"--who were the precursors to the Jesuits, secret societies and banking societies), who released the gold/silver back to the travelers who had completed their travels--minus a fee, of course. The merchants who received the traveler's checks sent the checks to the KT and received the measured gold/silver in exchange, minus another fee, of course. Travelers who died while traveling presented windfalls of wealth for the KT, who naturally used the gold/silver specie to further their wealth by loaning it out with interest/usury; the KT soon found out that they could loan out many times the value of the stored gold/silver as long as they had the confidence of the public in their debt-based notes and this was the start of the fractional-reserve banking system that would play a key role in the development of the modern-day fiat/debt/interest/usury-based monetary systems. From the Middle-Ages on, there was quite a thriving banking industry in Europe with many players (mostly various kingdoms), but most of it dates back to the KT traveler's checks that were widely recognized and accepted.
Gold/silver was the most widely accepted specie for exchanges of goods and services. As the economies started to speed up and exchange more, people started to accept warehouse receipts in lieu of the physical gold/silver and this was the next step in the development of the fractional-reserve banking systems, as the warehouse receipt makers realized--like the KT discovered--that they could make more warehouse receipts than there were gold/silver deposits...as long as they had the confidence of the public; hence the deception of the public in the hiding the real truth behind money was of utmost importance.
Then the Rothschilds--who were known then as the "Bauers", who were decendents of the Khazar Jews--entered the stage through the hard work and industry of a one Nathan Meyer Rothschild (note the "N.M. Rothschild quote above), who was born poor and who used the catalyst of being poor to never be poor again. N. M. Rothschild was a genius in banking and he was able to work his way up the banking positions of power, yet he was just a player amongst powerful banking players playing the profitable game of interest/usury-bearing money (that was based on the KT traveler's checks model) that greatly enriched the bankers/kingdoms at the expense of the surrounding populations, most of whom were woefully under-educated and could not see the scam that the interest/usury-based money really was, much less read anything printed.
It was a moment of history of the defeat of Napoleon--a defeat that was unknown to the English world as of yet, but was known by N.M. Rothschild, thanks to his superior means of communication and information-sharing network--that Rothschild was able to influence the direction of the massive selling-off of British banking stock in such a way that the traders interpreted Rothschild's actions as to mean that Wellington had lost, rather than Napoleon, so there was a wave after wave of panic selling of English banking stock. Then near the end of the day, Rothschild quietly put out bids to buy up English banking stock for mere pennies on the pound to the point that he had full control of the English banking system...then the news came in the next day that it was Napoleon who lost at Waterloo, not Wellington, hence the English banking stock rose rapidly back up to previous levels and even exceeded those levels. N. M. Rothschild made over a BILLION pounds that one day. This is a billion in 1700's Pounds, dear reader. A lotta money. From then on the Rothschilds were the prime lords of the banking industry in the entirety of Europe...and they still are today here in our modern world that is full of wars, market crashes and avarice-based creations of wealth beyond measure for those who profit handsomely from the ignorance of the under-educated masses of people, most of whom have messed-up relations with money, materially and spiritually.
Most people think that today's money (I'll use the Federal Reserve Note, known as the "USD" as a central example) is a neutral measurement of goods/services that are exchanged today and that the money is created by the de jure (by law) government. Nothing can be further from the truth. Today's Federal Reserve Note is issued and controlled (note the Rothschild quote above) by a private corporation, the Federal Reserve, that is neither Federal, nor is it a Reserve; it is a corporation that is controlled by, guess who...the Rothschilds, no less. The Rothschilds are the wealthiest and most powerful financial family in the world today and has been so since 1815. They have brilliantly engineered a means of skimming wealth off from the backs of the people--like how the Mafia skims cash off casino winnings before taking the money to be deposited in banks, but it's much more than that--who naively believe that the money that they handle is a neutral measurement of value. Today's interest/usury-based money is anything BUT neutral; it has built-in avarice that benefits a super-wealthy few who are the creators ("primary creators") of the money at the expense of the majority of people ("secondary creators") who use the primary creators' money; the money created is in the Peoples' name, but the control of the money is completely out of the hands of the People and in the hands of the Rothschilds, the primary creators of the fiat-based money.
If modern-day money were to be created by, say, We the People, it would be totally devoid of usury/interest, which is the key source of the "avarice" mentioned in the above Chinese proverb. When the American Republic was born, there were a LOT of strong debates on how to manage the nation's money with Alexander Hamilton arguing for a strong, central bank (i.e. a privately-owned bank operated by the Rothschilds) as opposed to Thomas Jefferson, who would rather have had money be real gold/silver specie to be used as "units of account". Twice there was a central, private bank established in America and twice the charter was canceled by the Congress back then, with the first one being canceled in 1811.
Guess what happened in 1812--a war, the "War of 1812" and the real reason was the European-banker-financed armies had tried to do the war to re-establish the private banking interests in America, as well as other reasons, like the destruction of the original public records that were essential in the founding of the Republic, as well as the stopping of the Original 13th Amendment (Google " Original 13th Amendment ") so that the private, European bankers (back then the Rothschilds were mere players and not yet dominant) could deploy their Esquire agents in key positions at key times to gradually undermine the American Republic that was blissfully unaware of this infiltration.
[end of part 1; to be continued in part 2]
That Eleusinian-based text on money was, indeed, very good in David's "Deeper Secret", pt III.
There is an additional light that I'd like to shed upon money in this post to underscore the source of the "evil" that is often attributed to money.
Firstly there is very little modern-day history of a widely-used printed currency--known as "money"--that comes without interest or usury; the only countries in the world that uses usury-free money are: Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Cuba and Libya. Do you notice something in common amongst those five countries? They all are declared "enemies" of the USA, INC and several are on the so-called "Axis of Evil" list.
In this two-part post, I wish to show that it is the interest/usury aspect that is attached to money that is the key source of the misery that is frequently associated with money. Ideally, printed money ought to be neutral, but the reality is that the vast majority of printed, modern-day money is anything BUT a neutral means of exchange. Printed money as we know it is not neutral--it never has been, with the exception of the aforementioned 5 countries. It's not to say that gold/silver, which is specie that has *intrinsic value*, has always been handled with wisdom and kindness, but, with the advent of printed money, the ease of the creation/distribution of wealth really *SHOULD* have been far, far easier with more and more people having wealth, rather than the widely-observed phenomenon of the wealthy few gaining more and more wealth for themselves at the expense of everyone else. This is a world-wide phenomenon, even in the few countries that have usury-free money.
Here's a couple of quotes:
...from "The Deeper Secret, pt III:
"Kindness is the foundation of all good; avarice the source of all evil." Chinese
...from history:
"Let me issue and control a nation's currency and I care not who creates the laws." N.M. Rothschild
A small bit of history of money and it's creation is in order here. Money had its start as "traveler's checks" by those who wished to travel without the risk of carrying gold/silver on hand, so the travelers deposited gold/silver with the Knights of Templar ("KT"--who were the precursors to the Jesuits, secret societies and banking societies), who released the gold/silver back to the travelers who had completed their travels--minus a fee, of course. The merchants who received the traveler's checks sent the checks to the KT and received the measured gold/silver in exchange, minus another fee, of course. Travelers who died while traveling presented windfalls of wealth for the KT, who naturally used the gold/silver specie to further their wealth by loaning it out with interest/usury; the KT soon found out that they could loan out many times the value of the stored gold/silver as long as they had the confidence of the public in their debt-based notes and this was the start of the fractional-reserve banking system that would play a key role in the development of the modern-day fiat/debt/interest/usury-based monetary systems. From the Middle-Ages on, there was quite a thriving banking industry in Europe with many players (mostly various kingdoms), but most of it dates back to the KT traveler's checks that were widely recognized and accepted.
Gold/silver was the most widely accepted specie for exchanges of goods and services. As the economies started to speed up and exchange more, people started to accept warehouse receipts in lieu of the physical gold/silver and this was the next step in the development of the fractional-reserve banking systems, as the warehouse receipt makers realized--like the KT discovered--that they could make more warehouse receipts than there were gold/silver deposits...as long as they had the confidence of the public; hence the deception of the public in the hiding the real truth behind money was of utmost importance.
Then the Rothschilds--who were known then as the "Bauers", who were decendents of the Khazar Jews--entered the stage through the hard work and industry of a one Nathan Meyer Rothschild (note the "N.M. Rothschild quote above), who was born poor and who used the catalyst of being poor to never be poor again. N. M. Rothschild was a genius in banking and he was able to work his way up the banking positions of power, yet he was just a player amongst powerful banking players playing the profitable game of interest/usury-bearing money (that was based on the KT traveler's checks model) that greatly enriched the bankers/kingdoms at the expense of the surrounding populations, most of whom were woefully under-educated and could not see the scam that the interest/usury-based money really was, much less read anything printed.
It was a moment of history of the defeat of Napoleon--a defeat that was unknown to the English world as of yet, but was known by N.M. Rothschild, thanks to his superior means of communication and information-sharing network--that Rothschild was able to influence the direction of the massive selling-off of British banking stock in such a way that the traders interpreted Rothschild's actions as to mean that Wellington had lost, rather than Napoleon, so there was a wave after wave of panic selling of English banking stock. Then near the end of the day, Rothschild quietly put out bids to buy up English banking stock for mere pennies on the pound to the point that he had full control of the English banking system...then the news came in the next day that it was Napoleon who lost at Waterloo, not Wellington, hence the English banking stock rose rapidly back up to previous levels and even exceeded those levels. N. M. Rothschild made over a BILLION pounds that one day. This is a billion in 1700's Pounds, dear reader. A lotta money. From then on the Rothschilds were the prime lords of the banking industry in the entirety of Europe...and they still are today here in our modern world that is full of wars, market crashes and avarice-based creations of wealth beyond measure for those who profit handsomely from the ignorance of the under-educated masses of people, most of whom have messed-up relations with money, materially and spiritually.
Most people think that today's money (I'll use the Federal Reserve Note, known as the "USD" as a central example) is a neutral measurement of goods/services that are exchanged today and that the money is created by the de jure (by law) government. Nothing can be further from the truth. Today's Federal Reserve Note is issued and controlled (note the Rothschild quote above) by a private corporation, the Federal Reserve, that is neither Federal, nor is it a Reserve; it is a corporation that is controlled by, guess who...the Rothschilds, no less. The Rothschilds are the wealthiest and most powerful financial family in the world today and has been so since 1815. They have brilliantly engineered a means of skimming wealth off from the backs of the people--like how the Mafia skims cash off casino winnings before taking the money to be deposited in banks, but it's much more than that--who naively believe that the money that they handle is a neutral measurement of value. Today's interest/usury-based money is anything BUT neutral; it has built-in avarice that benefits a super-wealthy few who are the creators ("primary creators") of the money at the expense of the majority of people ("secondary creators") who use the primary creators' money; the money created is in the Peoples' name, but the control of the money is completely out of the hands of the People and in the hands of the Rothschilds, the primary creators of the fiat-based money.
If modern-day money were to be created by, say, We the People, it would be totally devoid of usury/interest, which is the key source of the "avarice" mentioned in the above Chinese proverb. When the American Republic was born, there were a LOT of strong debates on how to manage the nation's money with Alexander Hamilton arguing for a strong, central bank (i.e. a privately-owned bank operated by the Rothschilds) as opposed to Thomas Jefferson, who would rather have had money be real gold/silver specie to be used as "units of account". Twice there was a central, private bank established in America and twice the charter was canceled by the Congress back then, with the first one being canceled in 1811.
Guess what happened in 1812--a war, the "War of 1812" and the real reason was the European-banker-financed armies had tried to do the war to re-establish the private banking interests in America, as well as other reasons, like the destruction of the original public records that were essential in the founding of the Republic, as well as the stopping of the Original 13th Amendment (Google " Original 13th Amendment ") so that the private, European bankers (back then the Rothschilds were mere players and not yet dominant) could deploy their Esquire agents in key positions at key times to gradually undermine the American Republic that was blissfully unaware of this infiltration.
[end of part 1; to be continued in part 2]