PDA

View Full Version : the law of foreverness


alchemikey
03-30-2007, 02:47 PM
i know Ra never really spoke much about the law of foreverness for i am guessing words just do not do it justice but i am guessing it could be summed up as "all is forever"

after reading david's latest blog entry "the deeper secret:part II" which i really enjoyed, as he talked about the seventh density it seemed to me that in a physical sense the seventh density would be represented as "the point of no return" when you cross the event horizon of the black hole in the center of our galaxy

"Utimately this is where we're all going… and if you are an ET soul, who volunteered to be human though you didn't NEED such simple lessons, then you may be a lot closer to graduating into 7D and completing the process of "looking backward" than you may have ever realized."

i am guessing that most of us that strongly resonate with the law of one material are ET souls from Ra and so i guess my question is if coming back to earth in 3d would speed up the process of Ra being harvested into 7th density because according to Ra they still have quite some time before that happens?

"Questioner: Of what density level is Ra?

Ra: I am Ra. I am sixth density with a strong seeking towards seventh density. The harvest for us will be in only approximately two and one-half million of your years and it is our desire to be ready for harvest as it approaches in our space/time continuum."

peace,
mikey

David Wilcock
03-31-2007, 04:41 AM
You're about 90 percent correct... the biggest problem is that there IS NO black hole in the center of the galaxy. That is an assumption that is not grounded in observational evidence. What we instead expect to see is a 'central oscillator' - a very large star - that keeps the 'beat' of the galaxy, in very unscientific terms.

A very important aspect of Law of One physics is that you see the same structure emerging at all levels of scale. If there's no black hole in the center of the solar system (and there's a sun there) then there's no black hole in the center of the galaxy (they usually say it's "right behind that big star in the center".)

I'm not just spouting Law of One-isms either... this is also based on straightforward evidence. Even WITH the black hole model they now see there are so many problems that 'dark matter' also has to be invoked... simply because mainstream science so doesn't 'get it' yet.

As for the rest of your post, yes... Ra just has a few small remaining kinks to iron out, making sure everyone whose free will was affected by their decisions has been properly accounted for... and since there are some real stragglers, it could take about 1.5 million years of our time to account for that. Don't forget that this might also include a group having to be moved into the future for another third-density cycle... so by our time it might just be another 75,000 years.

There is circumstantial evidence to suggest that the next 3D planet could be Mars... that within that ensuing time period it will be terraformed. Possibly. These questions are too transient for me to try to get psychic data about one way or the other, but we'll know the deal soon enough...

- David

alchemikey
03-31-2007, 06:43 AM
alright i gotcha, i remember the central oscillator from the divine cosmos, i just used the term black hole because of the whole event horizon idea that is attached to it

when you say the same structure at all levels of scale you mean the torus structure right?

i guess 1.5 million years isn't that long in the grand scheme of things :)

peace,
mikey

inside-up
03-31-2007, 07:57 PM
There is circumstantial evidence to suggest that the next 3D planet could be Mars... that within that ensuing time period it will be terraformed. Possibly. These questions are too transient for me to try to get psychic data about one way or the other, but we'll know the deal soon enough...

- David
Mars being the next 3D planet intuitively makes sense to me. I've bought into the possiblity.

David Wilcock
04-01-2007, 09:22 PM
when you say the same structure at all levels of scale you mean the torus structure right?

The torus is what it looks like when it's rotated and the geometry is not visible... and it's more important to see it as a nested torus, with each sphere in the nest having a different corresponding frequency... but more or less, yeah.

- David

soup
05-06-2007, 11:23 PM
I find it fascinating that there is so many
very significant things in the universe that
are not visible. I look at the night sky and
would love to be able to point out where
the center of the galaxy is in a way which
would go beyond argument, but can't as
there doesn't seem to anything visibly
significant there. It seems by the means
of technology that we can see the unseen,
though importantly - there seems some
utility in the veil. That may be one of the
great messages of the galactic center,
that there seems some utility in the veil.
Part of this utility acts to filter information.
We are blessed by our ignorance in that
we don't live overwhelmed by just how
much information (unseen) is out there.
An intrinsic quality of being human is to
be ignorant of the unseen in some degree.

soup
06-29-2008, 12:10 PM
...Ra: I am Ra. I am sixth density with a strong seeking towards seventh density...

I wonder if such pull toward seventh density is
analogous to a strong sexual attraction or strong
sexual magnetism which comes as simply undeniable.

Then, when I ponder that I find myself withdrawing
inward more than outward - as if the important
component of the magnetism somehow happens
internally - as if my more efficient shortcut to that
which seems important, like a sublimation.

Some sexologists argue that for the best compatibility
people interpenetrate each others energetically somehow,
sans touching. I wonder if that's how it is with RA.


soup

soup
07-27-2008, 04:51 PM
If attraction is a mechanism of reuniting - and repulsion a mechanism of individuating, than it seems feasible that along a path of spiritual evolution there can seem a comfort zone which finds a balance between these states of being.

If 3D is to a greater degree individuated than 6D, than part of the reason why 6D interacts with 3D, may be in the balancing so (of love/light.)


soup