Are you familiar with David Wilcock's work?

[Larry Seyer]

Are you familiar with David Wilcock's work?

[Ashutosh]

I was always in search of spiritual knowledge that will help me identify my "source" and where my journey will possibly end or should end. When I came across Divine Cosmos, my search ended. I am hooked up to Divine Cosmos. Everyday I review it hoping to read David's next article and am still hungry for more. David is doing a phenomenal work and I cann't comprehend how grateful I am for what he & his team-mates are doing for us & humanity at large. God bless & amen.
Ashutosh

[Ashenar]

Hi,

I was listening to coast to coast am the other day. I don't listen to it on a regular basis; because, I feel that many of the shows are fear provoking.

This show caught my eye.

I resonate strongly with most of what David talked about.

Love,
Ashenar

[dreamteller2005]

I've been listening to Coast to Coast interviews and listened to one with David. I was intrigued by what he had to say, so I started doing more research and found his website. :)

I'm still finding my way around though. I'm truly a novice at all of this, and there's so much information to digest.
I too, found David Wilcock's site after listening to Coast to Coast and have found his information to be very informative and thought-provoking. I also look forward to visiting here on a regular basis knowing that there are other "like minded" people out there like myself. Thanks!

[cricket]

I found David through the Montalk.net site. I resonate with a lot of David's material.

[jax]

I think the Reincarnation of Edgar Cayce Book came up when I was looking at a different title in Amazon.com Either that....or I may have Googled Edgar Cayce and it brought up the Reincarnation book. It's strange because I remember watching a biography program on the History Channel or Discovery Channel last Spring about Edgar Cayce which made me think about looking up info about him (and or Hugh Lynn Cayce) on WWW. I'm always searching for that 2x4 that will hit me between the eyes. Some of us awaken with difficulty...hehehehe. My two cents worth. Namaste jax :o

[Mario.Leme]

I have ran into David's work last year through a fantastic series of sinchronicity events that took place in the span of about three months, starting on Octber 12.

Since then I've read the first of the free books, which I still allow time to sink in before I proceed any further, and joined this group unde another name, having participated quite actively for a while.

A very particular event in my life - love for a wonderful woman, totally reciprocated -, which filled me up entirely, since last January, has somewhat led me "astray", although never have I forgotten it or let it down.

Now I'm back only to see that David has found some other different ways to make his work come across more promptly, so it can reach wider audiences, and I'm delighted by that!

[HeavyFlea]

I can't remember how I came upon David's website years ago... then it was called ascension2000. I read his Ra Material guide and that was my introduction to the Law of One and llresearch. I felt the material like remembering rather than learning. I was raised Catholic but never really felt it, the Law of One however felt like home. I've read the Ra books but never really got into the rest of David's work too much... perhaps it's time too check into it more.

[Spiral of Light]

I had been on a journey of spiritual growth, following a Dark Night of The Soul after struggling free from a fundamentalist religion/lifestyle. The Reincarnation of Edgar Casey book jumped out at me in a bookstore since I had been a reader of much of Casey's work years ago. From the book, I went to this web site and have been here ever since. As many others have said, this material resonates with my own innate knowledge. (It's as if I always knew it.) And every day I continue to grow more by taking in the knowledge available here. This forum continues to be a place where those of like minds can share and grow together. Thank you, David, and those of you here who share freely the Love and the Light. Nancy

[myconsumerclub]

Divine cosmos is awesome and after reading that along with some Drunvalo and Greg Braden I'm a little more hip to what's going on of course I've read a lot on holographic universe theory and ufo's as well as eastern metaphysics and conspiracy material so I feel I'm pretty well versed in a lot of the topics. I think its one of the top books that people should study if not the top book so that people can get a clue as to what is going to happen. Drunvalo's vol 1 an 2 in the Ancient secret of the flower of life is also in this category of must reads. Talbot's Holographic Universe and the galaxy clock theory by David Sereda is necessary scientific knowledge as well. It's been years since I've read this stuff. I was originally reading it off the old ascension 2000 website.
I would sure like to find some other books to read that are as good so if you have any suggestions be sure to let me know.

[TESLA]

hi everyone.

i just watched Project Camelot interviews David Wilcock - Part 1 and 2.

wow!

he has blown my mind away!

what he is saying resonates very _highly_ with me, and i am not a beginner in understanding the mysteries of life.


David seems like a very honest and loving human being, and yes his resemblance to Cayce is amazing.

[onething]

A friend sent me a link to a 4-part interview on Camelot, about Edgar Cayce and other things. I find David tremendously likeable, and I plan to rewatch the interview. Since that time I have been devouring this website, and I printed up - for greater comfort - two of his free books, which I'm reading both of. I've been very aware of 2012 and the increase in consciousness that is coming, for example from John Major Jenkins' Galactic Alignment.

I had a very powerful spiritual awakening several years ago, which gave me God, but took away my religion. So I have been seeking to figure things out ever since. The best part about the teachings at this website is the positive spin on the coming events. Up till now, I had been experiencing it schizophrenically - afraid of catastrophe and our increasingly fascist government, and also spiritually high from the waves of increasing consciousness that I can feel, and talk about with my son, who is also aware of it. I'm still a bit worried but I've got a much better handle on things.

Oh, the other thing that I really, really LOVE about David's take on things is the amalgamation of science with spirit. A few years ago, I wrote to my Dad before he died and said that one day science would prove the existence of God. And he wrote back that this would never happen. I've been arguing the same thing on the intelligent design vs Darwinian evolution forums, too. Once you see the logic of it, there's no going back.

[MarkM]

Oh, the other thing that I really, really LOVE about David's take on things is the amalgamation of science with spirit. A few years ago, I wrote to my Dad before he died and said that one day science would prove the existence of God. And he wrote back that this would never happen. I've been arguing the same thing on the intelligent design vs Darwinian evolution forums, too. Once you see the logic of it, there's no going back.

It seems that one function of the veil which separates the conscious mind from the unconscious is that proof of anything is a highly subjective thing. What operates as proof of an issue for one will be nonsense for others.

To quote Robin Williams, "Reality, what a concept!"

Reality is also a highly subjective thing; no two person's realities are the same.

An 'in your face' proof of an issue that is totally incontrovertable by everyone is impossible. You can make the argument that every living human needs to breathe, yet there are those who percieve otherwise, however insane this may seem to you or me.

Scientific proof of the existence of God...will not be seen by some, simply because this could not possibly be visible to some, in keeping with the law of free will. Some will need to undergo a great deal of catalyst and life experience, rightly, before they come to a stage in their lives where they are able to have such a perception, and if you found a way to force this proof upon them, you would be infringing upon their free will in ways deleterious to their rightful path of becoming.

Likewise, some are simply not ready yet to make the Choice of polarizing either STO or STS, this is a function of their personal stage of 3D evolution; and this is all well and good.

There are recorded cases wherein two individuals standing side by side look up - one clearly sees a UFO, while the other sees nothing. Both are seeing in accordance with the law of free will - one sees because his stage of becoming allows for this and may require this perception, whilst the other sees not because his accepted world view does not yet allow for this to be.

This reminds me of those who block out a traumatic event in order to prevent damage to the psyche, recapitulating the exprience gradually over time in accordance with their ability to safely assimilate the material.

Here beneath the veil, we truly percieve only that which we are capable of safely assimilating. There is much that you or I cannot perceive (or choose not to), at present.

-Mark

[onething]

Scientific proof of the existence of God...will not be seen by some, simply because this could not possibly be visible to some, in keeping with the law of free will. Some will need to undergo a great deal of catalyst and life experience, rightly, before they come to a stage in their lives where they are able to have such a perception, and if you found a way to force this proof upon them, you would be infringing upon their free will in ways deleterious to their rightful path of becoming.

Oh,dear! We had better warn David Wilcock, then, to cease and desist in this dangerous endeavor.

We can quit wasting money on scientific research, too. Although they seem to do pretty well and consistently what with landing planes safely and laser surgery and whatnot.

[onething]

Perhaps it would have been more accurate to say that science will prove the existence of spiritual reality.

[MarkM]

Hi, Onething, I appreciate your reply.

I would suspect that for those who have begun to polarize on the path of service and are beginning to search in earnest for the truth, the work of David Wilcock and many others offers an invaluable tool, in that a great and wonderful opportunity is made available to them as they attempt to prove spiritual reality, or God, to themselves.

I recall Don Elkins telling of how he spoke to a materialized ghost who slapped him and Carla Rueckert hard on the arms, and then promptly walked right through them both with no sense of solidity. In that they had many such encounters, for them the burden of proof was carried.

He also made the point that in a roomful of sceptics these phenomena would never be percieved to an extent that left no room for the interpretation of trickery simply because "believing is seeing", as he put it.

The point is, such proof can never be universally shown to the masses, because the vast majority of humans here now are protected from this by the law of free will; each must discover the proof of spiritual reality for themselves.

My father is one who has longed for and anxiously awaits such proof from without; and as such will never find it until he finds it within. For him, every 'paranormal' phenomenon will always include a built-in caveat of 'rational' explainability, without exception. Only when it is found within (or perhaps if one desperately needs a kickstart to an already begun process of becoming) is there any possibility of outer proof.

I hope this helps clarify my somewhat opaque attempt at elucidating a concept!:)

-Mark

[onething]

Hi Mark,

What you say is essentially true, especially right now and in this culture. But perhaps you worry too much that simply uncovering facts will involve an infringement upon free will. I would consider the badgering and fearmongering within religion to be an infringement of free will, and yet it goes on all the time.

Throughout most of history, probably the vast majority of people accepted a spiritual reality. There was societal consensus and a person would have to be a very independent thinker to decide otherwise. I can hardly imagine that we would find an American Indian atheist 500 years ago. I think atheism is a rather modern phenomenon, albeit they existed in western civilization a long time ago as well, as indicated by the Biblical phrase "The fool has said in his heart, there is no God."

I think spirituality for an Indian tribe was as much a part of life as nearly anything else. That a child was being indoctrinated outside of his will would never have occurred to them. Spirituality to the spiritually aware is fairly obvious. But it was done in an invitational way, not by making them sit on hard benches and listen to dogma.

Right now, science is the religion and has the priesthood, and they are defending a particular worldview, which is essentially atheistic. And because our science tools have been fairly crude, so far they are holding their own. but it was only one hundred years ago that the west abandoned the ether theory, and it is now coming back. Ervin Lazslo wrote a book called Science and the Akashic Field which I liked. So is it going to be a free will problem if our science clicks along discovering item after item that shows that there is an ether, that all things are connected, that there is no empty space, that consciousness is a real, physical field, that there is a life-love energy pervading the universe, that minds can communicate at a distance, and so on and so forth?

Just because people may live in a society in which that which we currently call 'spiritual' may be proven, does not mean they will not have options to be relatively unconscious. (I don't actually see a meaningful distinction between material and spiritual.)

Also, people have sometimes thought that leaving spirituality out of a child's upbringing is a way of not imposing on them, not infringing on their free will. But I have come to think of it as a form of neglect, because I take a great interest in how the human brain functions as a spiritual perceiving device. And, as you may know, brains are plastic, especially in the formative years. Lack of exposure to some form of experience or learning, may permanently impair the brain from developing those neural pathways. This is another area of inquiry that I think is going to prove important. The right temporal lobe and all that. Some religious people initially took offense at the idea that spiritual
experience might involve the right temporal lobe. Like that invalidated it. But if you think about it, your brain is engaged, certain areas are lighting up, no matter what you are doing, so there has to be areas involved in mystical experience.
So if you fail to expose your child to spiritually inspiring experiences, you might be narrowing their options.

But I do agree with you about free will.

[MarkM]

So is it going to be a free will problem if our science clicks along discovering item after item that shows that there is an ether, that all things are connected, that there is no empty space, that consciousness is a real, physical field, that there is a life-love energy pervading the universe, that minds can communicate at a distance, and so on and so forth?

Great convo, and a very interesting question!:)

I think one could say that these things have already been proven, per se - in fact, spiritual reality has been proven scientifically for as long as there has been science.

I think that David Wilcock and other modern researchers have been able to amply demonstrate these things, and I am personally very thankful for this work.

Well..demonstrated in the sense that it is proven for those who want the proof! In this world, many don't want the proof and will not/cannot see it.

Many who claim spiritual illumination will strap on a bomb and blow up innocent people for the glory of god. Is this true spirituality, or illusion? How do you prove to these people that they are blowing up other selves? That their victims are not abominations in the eyes of god?

Free will allows for such distortion, as free will allows for all of us, if we so choose, to embrace proof of the Law of One, and live a life of unconditional love of all others based upon an internal, first hand knowledge of these things.

Proof of those things you mention is available to those few who freely choose to, with much effort, internally realize them for themselves. It is not proof until they do this internally.

In short, the proof is available to all; or perhaps more accurately, becomes proof in the real sense only when it is brought inside ones self and proven in a way that transcends intellectual rigor, or when personal experience makes it known. True, this may be more easily accomplished within an aboriginal society which is relatively insulated from the hardened layers of materialist, life comes from matter-based thought into which our society brings it's children, but still each must prove these things for themselves.

I just wanted to discuss the concept of science 'one day' proving the existence of god or spiritual reality. Perhaps we have a paradox here, rooted in the shortcomings of human language, as one could say both that such proof has happened already, and that such proof will never happen. Perhaps better for me to say that despite the wonderful discoveries being made by science at this point in history, proof is totally in the eye of the beholder, and in this sense there is nothing but the accomodation of the free will of all!;)

-Mark

[onething]

Hi Mark,

In a general sense I tend to agree with what you say, yet not quite. You say that spirituality has always been proven to those who seek within for truth. That is so, but even then I think many harbor doubts, or are vulnerable at different times to doubting. Basically, most people are spiritually relatively weak, whether they are believers or not, they just don't have a lot to go on. What little spiritual inspiration they have is hard to maintain.

I think there is a difference between the level of proof we used to have, and what is available now, and even that is not yet mainstream and not so many people know about it. Things like showing that plants have awareness that is quite accurate - we have only been able to measure that for some decades. The ether is ancient knowledge, and only recently abandoned, but it is probably ancient knowledge because there were ancient civilizations with advanced science who understood how it worked.

See, I myself knew there was an ether because of my own spiritual awakening, although I didn't call it that. I called it the Holy Spirit, everywhere present and filling all things, later I decided there was a life-love force pervading the universe - same thing. I actually didn't know about the old ether theory, and got made fun of on a philosophy forum, and someone said, oh that sounds like the ether theory, which was disproven by the Michelson Morley experiment. I googled that, and read about it, but I immediately realized (I have almost no science education) that the Michelson Morley experiment, while clever and well intentioned, was way too crude to pick up on what I was intuiting. But since that time I have learned a lot more about ether theory. Now our science has advanced to the point where we have some proofs to back up my intuition.

(Heh, heh, my computer editor thinks googled isn't a word!)

You are quite right that many people are not going to accept what proof there is, at least not until more people do - but then they will. It's just a matter of believing the reigning paradigm.

There's no reason we can't have a paradigm shift, even though your points about people wanting or avoiding spiritual knowledge are still true.


Many who claim spiritual illumination will strap on a bomb and blow up innocent people for the glory of god. Is this true spirituality, or illusion? How do you prove to these people that they are blowing up other selves? That their victims are not abominations in the eyes of god?

I don't see a quote feature.

Of course it's illusion. It's religious belief, not true spirituality. This just goes to show that despite a reigning paradigm being belief in God, and no doubt the founder of the religion leaving ample good advice toward peace and love, that people will indeed do what they want with it and justify it. So their free will is not hindered. And it also goes to show, as you say, that the person will internalize the right lessons when they are ready and it's all about being ready.

But I still find it odd that you seem not to want to acknowledge that there is a difference between our current scientific knowledge of how the universe really works (and more is coming as the problems of big bang and quantum mechanics are requiring more and more epicycles to maintain them) and what we had in Newton's day.

[MarkM]

Yeah, I can see how you may have construed my words that way, although it wasn't my intent to leave you with that impression. Getting the jist of an idea across using words seems to always leave room for an interpretation not intended, especially if that idea is an abstract concept perhaps newly formed in one's own mind. There is never a duplication of concept, anyway, as the receiving party will colour the communication with their own biases based on their experience.

Yes, much more is known of the mechanics of the functioning of our universe now than at any time in our civilization's past. Remember how Newton proved the laws of gravity? It wasn't until Einstein that it was seen by science that with the addition of 'laws' of relativity that Newton's laws came to be seen as somewhat lacking in axiomatic status. But using Newton's laws we got to the moon, anyway.

Darwin was said in his time to have proven gradual natural selection as the motivating factor behind evolution, and although this is now seen by today's most progressive researchers into the nature of DNA to not be correct, Darwin left us with great insight into such things as mutative adaptation to environment.

In more recent times, we have had profound insight into the nature of matter and energy with the emergence of such things as atomic particle physics and the proof that matter is composed of atoms, which were said by mainstream science to be made up of energetic particles.

Now the particle model of the atom is beginning to give way to a new understanding of an atom being a function of 'etheric' or toroidal wave interference patterns, (pardon my limited grasp:D) but from our previous understanding we obtained nuclear energy, electron microscopes and MRI technology.

Gravity has long been proven to be an attractive force, whereas it seems now that rather it may be a function of etheric energy 'pushing', let's say for example, a body onto the surface of a planet as it rushes in to sustain the beingness of the planet.

One plus one equalling two on one level is provable, and is a functionally usable equation, although, as we are being taught, still an illusion, as there is in reality only One. In the context of our 3D experience of illusary separation, I feel, the advancement of science is indispensible to our civilization and our quality of life. One must deal in and move through the illusion to gain that which is closer to not being illusion.

The great work of those who endeavor to prove to us that there is only one contiguous field of consciousness, only one great 'I AM', is, I feel, the most important work done ever in human history, and could only be being done by standing on the shoulders of those great thinkers, ideas, concepts and working proofs that have gone before.

They haved moved through and worked within the great illusion and continue to do so, in the undying hope that the largest possible percentage of Mankind will realize the road that leads, ultimately, out of the illusion and back to the One reality.

I believe any such 'proof', while acting only as a direction-pointing signpost, has the potential to tip the scales towards a galvanizing of the bulk of humanity towards a true, love based unity of purpose and a mainstream awareness of our mutual oneness, creating a new ruling paradigm which, as you say, makes it easier for yet others to get on board. Perhaps this is the hope and vision of David Wilcock?:)

Another paradox, perhaps, is that that which could in 3D be only the illusion of proof is that which is necessary to awaken slumbering Humanity and set our foot more firmly on the road out of our illusary environment.

-And, please remember, these are only my thoughts, not meant to be construed as those which I believe anyone should take to be true.

-Mark

[Kranos]

When i was researching the Maya and the Sumerians, and also researching about extraterrestrials. I came across the Project Camelot and watched most of the interviews. When i went through David's interview i became hooked and wanted to learn and understand more.

Now i look at things way differently than what i have been ever since.
Can't thank David enough. :)

[sufi]

I too, found David Wilcock's site after listening to Coast to Coast and have found his information to be very informative and thought-provoking. I also look forward to visiting here on a regular basis knowing that there are other "like minded" people out there like myself. Thanks!

Yeah, I'm another Coast Fan who has found his way to David's site. Unfortunately, I can't listen to it live over here so have to get it through the net. usually provided by the Dude (duderinok) on You Tube.. Big shout out to him if he's on David's site...

[JCJ86]

I've seen the project camelot interviews and that's all I know.

[Gort]

I too am one who started out trying to find others like me, who had witnessed UFO's and was somehow guided to Project Camelot to view all of the interviews. When I watched David's I felt a connection. I could tell that he was just talking, and not really thinking about what he was saying. He talked about things as if they were commonplace to him. He understood what was going on and I know his sincerity is genuine. I knew I had to come here and be a part of what he and all of the rest of you reading this know.

[Debbie]

I too found David through Project Camelot's interview. And I am SO glad that I did. I have read through this entire site, and it has given me so much hope for a brighter future that I did not have before. Thank you so much David for all of the hard work you have put into this site! You are truly a life saver!

[transiten]

Hi1

I voted and was nr 111. 11, 44, 33 keep coming up all the time now. I think my contact with Davids work is a healingexperience for me. Synchronicities have been with me since 1982, now more frequent than ever before.

I'll be back with more

Liliane

[dazcox]

I've heard the C2C shows with David, seen the videos on the net and discovered this website but haven't read any of the books yet. I bought some of the mp3's last night and found them enjoyable.

[transiten]

Hi...

Perhaps I was voting too early...familiar...I haven't read everything yet but a great deal...suppose I don't exactly know the exact level of meaning in english...in swedish it means you know quite a lot but not necessary every inch of it...:confused:

Liliane

[1VibrationalEnergy]

Yeah, I can see how you may have construed my words that way, although it wasn't my intent to leave you with that impression. Getting the jist of an idea across using words seems to always leave room for an interpretation not intended, especially if that idea is an abstract concept perhaps newly formed in one's own mind. There is never a duplication of concept, anyway, as the receiving party will colour the communication with their own biases based on their experience.

Yes, much more is known of the mechanics of the functioning of our universe now than at any time in our civilization's past. Remember how Newton proved the laws of gravity? It wasn't until Einstein that it was seen by science that with the addition of 'laws' of relativity that Newton's laws came to be seen as somewhat lacking in axiomatic status. But using Newton's laws we got to the moon, anyway.

Darwin was said in his time to have proven gradual natural selection as the motivating factor behind evolution, and although this is now seen by today's most progressive researchers into the nature of DNA to not be correct, Darwin left us with great insight into such things as mutative adaptation to environment.

In more recent times, we have had profound insight into the nature of matter and energy with the emergence of such things as atomic particle physics and the proof that matter is composed of atoms, which were said by mainstream science to be made up of energetic particles.

Now the particle model of the atom is beginning to give way to a new understanding of an atom being a function of 'etheric' or toroidal wave interference patterns, (pardon my limited grasp:D) but from our previous understanding we obtained nuclear energy, electron microscopes and MRI technology.

Gravity has long been proven to be an attractive force, whereas it seems now that rather it may be a function of etheric energy 'pushing', let's say for example, a body onto the surface of a planet as it rushes in to sustain the beingness of the planet.

One plus one equalling two on one level is provable, and is a functionally usable equation, although, as we are being taught, still an illusion, as there is in reality only One. In the context of our 3D experience of illusary separation, I feel, the advancement of science is indispensible to our civilization and our quality of life. One must deal in and move through the illusion to gain that which is closer to not being illusion.

The great work of those who endeavor to prove to us that there is only one contiguous field of consciousness, only one great 'I AM', is, I feel, the most important work done ever in human history, and could only be being done by standing on the shoulders of those great thinkers, ideas, concepts and working proofs that have gone before.

They haved moved through and worked within the great illusion and continue to do so, in the undying hope that the largest possible percentage of Mankind will realize the road that leads, ultimately, out of the illusion and back to the One reality.

I believe any such 'proof', while acting only as a direction-pointing signpost, has the potential to tip the scales towards a galvanizing of the bulk of humanity towards a true, love based unity of purpose and a mainstream awareness of our mutual oneness, creating a new ruling paradigm which, as you say, makes it easier for yet others to get on board. Perhaps this is the hope and vision of David Wilcock?:)

Another paradox, perhaps, is that that which could in 3D be only the illusion of proof is that which is necessary to awaken slumbering Humanity and set our foot more firmly on the road out of our illusary environment.

-And, please remember, these are only my thoughts, not meant to be construed as those which I believe anyone should take to be true.

-Mark

…The whole world does not need to be awoken, there is no race to inform 6 billion people on the planet on this message, It is only important that you personally learn to conquer you innermost fears and learn to love. When you see your fear for what they are and master your emotions, then and only then you will truly be free…


~esoteric agenda
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NedsZNhAhiA

[This link to chapter 13 of 'Esoteric Agenda' will be approved, as that contained therein is in line with the teaching of the Law of One, and quite beautiful; however, the moderators do not vouch for the bulk of the rest of the presentation, as there is much that deeply explores the intrigue and issues of the negative elite. This of itself is neither frowned upon nor judged, but lies outside the scope of this discussion group, as the focus of this group is discussion relating to the more positive, non-reactive or non-fear based aspects of spirituality. -moderator]

[Earthforce]

David's primary work is his message of LOVE.

“LOVE is what makes the world go around.” It seems to be at the core composition of everything.

Surrender your mind to this realization and all the apparent mysteries of life and creation will become understandable and unveiled.

This website is a clearinghouse of information on modern and ancient science, including Top Secret technologies. It has been written in a language easy for most lay people to understand.

One could spend the every day trying to digest the information contained at http://www.DivineCosmos.com and still find fresh material daily.

To summarize, David is a complex person teaching real science with a simple core message; “Be LOVE, Be LIGHT, Be at PEACE.”

[noelnewell]

I want to thank you David, and your tireless colleagues and friends, for the awesome effort and articulation of your website. I am looking forward to your film Convergence (I am a videographer/editor myself, degree and all from MSU...I'm not looking for a job... but I can sincerely appreciate what it takes to make a film!)

I have also been researching and journeying along these lines all my life, and have actually found or read many similar things that you have and/or have directed folk to. Any way again, thank you so much for the your efforts and I hope Billy Blake is finding his feet on surer ground. Be well. Noël Newell

[terri2feathers]

In the late 90's I had already had a couple of decades walking my path of seeking. I had studied the Seth Material and pondered a lot of metaphysical material. After a significant 'experience' in 1999, I was intuitively searching the web in an effort to gain some insight on the experience when I found the Ra Material and David's Ascension 2000 site. I devoured the content and was a regular visitor for quite some time. Then, for some reason or another, I 'lost' the bookmark and got caught up in other studies, including re-inventing myself and expressing myself through my quilting. A few moths ago I again 'happened' upon the Divine Cosmos site and now check it regularly. I feel like I have been 'away' from the Circle for a long time, but yet never really left!

Terri

[mmariebored]

I'm new to David's information and I've yet to view/listen to all of what he has to say. So far I like what I'm hearing but I don't agree 100%. I don't believe anyone on earth has ever been given 100% accuracy and I believe "truth" comes in different packages for each individual while we're here on earth...for now. And even if you recieve information from an "entity" it can be a false light to mislead. Always keeping this in mind, I enjoy the many buffets of knowledge available and he's already an enjoyable one.
Thank you for having this discussion board.

[Belinda]

I am new to Davids particular information but very familiar with it also. It's
hard to find the words because I just don't dicuss it much with anyone because they think I'm crazy. I had a preminision about 22 yrs ago as to
why I came back here this time and after listening to David and reading
so much of his material I understand it completely. I happened to be in the
right place at the right time when coast to coast aired as I don't get much
radio out here in the boonies(mountains of ne washington) and there it was
loud and clear. Everything happens with intention. So I am so greatful to David. And the new wonderful people he has made me familiar with.
Thank you
Belinda

[CarolynP]

Hi everyone!

I'm new to this website, and old to the material David is talking about. I read the RA Material back in the 80's I think, and many of Edgar Cayce's books as well.

I've always been searching for more information and awareness through the years. I'm sure hoping that what I've discovered with David's material will assist in my spiritual growth...but I'm sure it's what I'm supposed to be looking at for now.

Thanks!
carolynp

[aaron straub]

The reason I like David's work so much is because it is more of a human explanation for these channelings he receives.I listen to alot of channels and sometimes have trouble understanding them.I also know that it is not really important to know this info but exciting.I try to not make it too important to receive this info but to except whatever comes.Much love to all.

[Jetamus]

I became familiar with his work when I found a thread about his 'reincarnation of edgar cacye?' on an internet forum.

I can see why he doesn't like talking about it though after reading some extremely insulting reponses about the book.

[rakers]

Hi Everyone,

I am not familiar with David's work at all, and this is my first time to Divine Cosmos. I am friends with David's friend, Larry Seyer, and I became familiar with David's name through Larry and the work they do together on "Wanderer Awakening." I heard a little of "Wanderer Awakening" and invited David and Larry to perform selections from it at a conference I help organize. That's Be the Love '09, a 3-day spiritual conference held in New Windsor, Maryland August 7 - 9, 2009. (www.bethelove.us)

Within a day or two of that, a new person showed up for one of my online teachings. That person knew David's work first. Through David, she came to know Larry, and Larry suggested she check out my work. It turns out she lives very close to me, and now she has joined A Course in Miracles group that I co-lead at our church, The Unity Center for Spiritual Living in Charlotte, NC. ~smile~

Within a week or two of that, another friend of mine became familiar with David's work. He is a comedian, radio DJ with a morning show in Albany, NY, and he is one of the Course in Miracles teachers that will present at Be the Love '09. He called me to ask if I could help put him in touch with David so he could invite David to be on his morning radio show.

~ha ha~

So in the last few weeks, it seems David's name keeps popping up. So here I am, looking to get to know a little about his work.

Love,
Regina Dawn Akers

[Stephen]

"Sort of."

I stumbled across The Reincarnation of Edgar Cayce? (http://www.amazon.com/Reincarnation-Edgar-Cayce-Interdimensional-Transformation/dp/1583940839/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1244648392&sr=8-1) white at Barnes & Noble last week and, since, have been enjoying reading from this website and watching videos of Wilcock on youtube. Fantastic information and very genuine guy - I'm impressed!

[Teresamh7]

I was researching Edgar Cayce online for some reason (I was a librarian at the time).....My grandparents used to speak of Cayce as a "healer" and I had been drawn to stories about him......Synchronicity???.....anyway, long story, I ran across David's site Ascension 2000 and felt like I was home.....ordered the book "The Reincarnation of Edgar Cayce?".... I became very interested in the Law of One and David's work and things just started unfolding! It has been a few years now....lol


Many members of my family still live in Hopkinsville and when I used to visit as a child it was comforting to see the signs "home of Edgar Cayce" etc. around the town for some reason! Odd, I had almost forgotten that! (It is important to note that I have been comforted and "healed" in many ways through this site).

Thank you!

[Matthew Clark]

Hi,

I am familiar with Davids work though now I am unfamiliar with his website!

The new website is so cool and contemporary. Well done to the designer.

To quote a famous fast food outlet - I'm lovin it. ;) - Just need to get used to where everything is.

[The Pauly Llama]

doesn't anyone know where the picture and dream interp is of Napoleon's nightmare in the pyramid?

[AwakeningFP]

I forget how I became aware of David's work, but it was only a little while ago. My trip probably began with the discovery of 2012 Enigma. However, I have been busy reading his blogs back to 2007. Now I am reading the Law of One; almost finished with Book 1.

His understanding of the Law of One and his interpretations of current scientific data definitely resonates with me!!! :D

[Sebastian]

This material is absolutely incredible!
It's a result of David's complete comittment to this task.
And I'm ever greatful for that. The bringing together of science and "seeing" is a true convergence.

Ive just read 16 chapters of vol 1 in a pretty fast pace and lyckily I have to work to because insight's keep popping in, and I dream a lot, and if I took in more I would have a heavy
headace knocking me out compleetly.

Thank's for evrything.
Sebastian

PS. I hope David takes a break now and then, so he doesn't end up like the guys in the Philadelphian experiment.
Take care.
DS

[noppy]

in a dream i saw him, in one of his interviews that from project camelot 2007. in dreams i'm telepatic so i just looked at him and sense the energy in the room. i new everything about him and what is gonna happen in this interview. i was bored and looked at the statue the whole time. when i woke up i only could remember a blond guy with a blue t-shirt and that statue. that was i think somewere begin march

later that year in may/june i saw that interview for the first time. i already forgot my dream. when i watch i thought ' he looks familiar....' its just now i know why he looks so familiar

i better write down my dreams for future deja vu moments :P

[Selenphina]

Hello! I am new here and looking forward to reading many of the discussions. I have for a very long time had a lot of interest in both science and spiritual topics, but it wasn't until about a year and a half or so that everything kicked into high gear for me. It seems I have been going through a sort of awakening and have been having more and more experiences as time goes on.

What has brought me here was that someone has shared two web videos: 2012 Enigma and the Sept. Project Camelot presentation. Very much of it made a lot of sense to me, and I have watched each video a couple of times now. The more I learn and as I continue on this sort of 'process' I seem to be going through, the pieces keep fitting together more and more all the time. I have felt pulled to come here and learn more, and so here I am. :)

[Oryad]

hi Larry,
I have seen some of project camelot & David Wilcock videos in the passing 2 weeks, the info is stunning... meaning slap you (me) hard in your face & guts..... I decided to take action, ,, I would like to ask for an advise....... first where or with what to begin? there is way too much info to be lectured in 2 hours.. I thought to talk with teen - agers that are about 17 -18 years old- almost finish high school, and where I live - in Israel the great majority go to the army just right after high school, and start a new life there - beginning to see hard stuff going on.......these kids, in my point of view, are going to shape the future on earth, I believe they should be told about the truth about what is going on,
My inner conflict comes in the spot - of my own mental & emotional respond - much of the material
is very hard to accept or deal- with, I am a mother of 2 teen agers my self, and I think - if I am about to Frick -out of this knowledge.... how would they react? do you have any experience with teen agers dealing with this material? how do they respond?
thanks
Orya

[Cynthia II]

I''ve just recently become familiar with David and his work - it's kinda hard not to become familiar with David when going over his work, as he seems to ... oh, I don't know .... I guess boldly go where no one has gone before :p His words, here on the site, in interviews, and in videos, have helped me so much in my process of spiritual unfoldment. Along with that, it is so enjoyable to see his personality come through in everything he does. I hope that won't ever stop - its not just the competent info that he presents, but the personality that presents it that makes his work so enjoyable! Such passionate curiosity!! Such a bright, bright star! Another thing -- the constant cry for more, more, more can really wear a person down. Lets not forget to not only take what David has to give, but give back, too. Fuel with love!

[lanceb30]

I''ve just recently become familiar with David and his work - it's kinda hard not to become familiar with David when going over his work, as he seems to ... oh, I don't know .... I guess boldly go where no one has gone before :p His words, here on the site, in interviews, and in videos, have helped me so much in my process of spiritual unfoldment......

I agree with you. David has been a very important part of my life. I owe a lot of spiritual growth and peace thanks to this amazing person.

Thank you David!!! We all love you very much! :D

[Jenkins]

I love David Wilcock's work and I enjoy listening to him when he speaks. I love how he mixes science with spirituality, everything he says makes sense and resonates with me. It's also nice to here from someone who has a positive outlook on the future rather then all the doom and gloom people out there who do nothing but spread negativity and fear.