Light Eye
02-18-2007, 11:16 AM
dear friends,
http://blog.hasslberger.com/2007/02/tewari_hidden_laws_in_the_univ.html
be well, be love.
david
tewari: hidden laws in the universe
paramahamsa tewari is known in the 'free energy' community as one of the
pioneers of over-unity energy production. his space power generator is one of
the early examples of electromagnetic generators that are said to produce more
energy than they should - according to agreed-upon theoretical considerations.
tewari is also the originator of space vortex theory, which holds that space
is permeated by a non material substrate that, similar to a bose-einstein
condensate, has high density but no inherent resistance to flow, and that matter
is created by vortices in that substrate that break its continuity due to their
flow at the speed of light. his views are described in the paper titled "on the
space-vortex structure of the electron" (download as pdf).
in the following article, paramahamsa tewari discusses how this view of the
genesis of matter is applicable to cosmic structures as well:
the hidden laws in the universe
paramahamsa tewari
can we understand the universal reality in a scientific sense and describe it
through scientific methods? taking due note of the theories and experimental
findings during the last few centuries and paying attention to the fact that
some basic issues like genesis of mass, inertia, charge and light require a
fresh approach for their fuller understanding, universal reality can be
pinpointed. among the aforesaid basic properties of matter, genesis of mass is
the least understood phenomenon.
the present problems in physics arise mainly due to the unresolved controversy
whether, in addition to matter and field, the universe has also a basic
substratum of some real entity. for instance, to study the mode of transmission
of light in the substratum of either ether, or voidness, requires first to
determine the structural relationship between light and the substratum
transmitting it.
a: is light in its structure independent of space structure as it would be if
space were postulated as a void?
b: or is light structurally a condition of space (ether) as it would be if a
fluid ether were postulated?
but before that, if ether's existence as the universal substratum is
postulated, it has to function not only as a carrier of light but also - and
more primarily - as the entity to give structure to matter, say the electron.
this is because light is not as basic a phenomenon as matter which has more
basic properties including mass, inertia, charge etc.
- - -
starting first with the postulate of real existence of an ether substratum,
the question arises: since the electron has mass, can we postulate mass and
density properties for the ether as well? the answer is a clear 'no' - if the
origin of mass in electron structure is to be derived from first principles.
but, if ether is postulated to be a mass-less fluid substratum, it is branded as
a hypothetical entity because the modern trend is that anything without mass is
energy-less and hence a kind of nothingness. here is the impasse created for the
past century by the relativity and quantum theories. with an empty and also
non-empty concept of space (to suit convenience) they do not allow investigation
of the genesis of mass from the first principles. the challenge is to derive
mass and charge properties of the electron through the dynamics of a mass-less
ether using new basic equations, and to compare the theoretically obtained
results with the experimentally obtained values
of electron mass and charge, and thus to prove the real existence of a non
material ether substratum, unless of course any other contemporary theories
based on the postulate of a void-space can achieve the same. further, it is not
only to explain the origin of the basic properties of mass, inertia and charge
of the electron and of matter in general but also to explain, in qualitative and
quantitative terms, the creation of electrostatic, gravitational, magnetic and
electromagnetic fields from electron structure for a broader and clearer
understanding of the existence of fields and matter in the universe.
einstein argued around the middle of the 20th century that 'field' is the most
fundamental entity in the universe, but leaving the question of the process of
creation of fields open, his can be termed a hasty conclusion. also, he said
that since we can not do away with the concept of fields, why introduce a
hypothetical carrier - ether - for the transmission of fields. with this
suggestion, again he did not give due importance to the genesis of fields
because fields, if real, will require a real substratum.
---------------------------------
alt i ãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ムâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒ ã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â©n. fãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ã ƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâ ƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚⥠yahoo! mail med adressekartotek, kalender og notisblokk.
[non-text portions of this message have been removed]
http://blog.hasslberger.com/2007/02/tewari_hidden_laws_in_the_univ.html
be well, be love.
david
tewari: hidden laws in the universe
paramahamsa tewari is known in the 'free energy' community as one of the
pioneers of over-unity energy production. his space power generator is one of
the early examples of electromagnetic generators that are said to produce more
energy than they should - according to agreed-upon theoretical considerations.
tewari is also the originator of space vortex theory, which holds that space
is permeated by a non material substrate that, similar to a bose-einstein
condensate, has high density but no inherent resistance to flow, and that matter
is created by vortices in that substrate that break its continuity due to their
flow at the speed of light. his views are described in the paper titled "on the
space-vortex structure of the electron" (download as pdf).
in the following article, paramahamsa tewari discusses how this view of the
genesis of matter is applicable to cosmic structures as well:
the hidden laws in the universe
paramahamsa tewari
can we understand the universal reality in a scientific sense and describe it
through scientific methods? taking due note of the theories and experimental
findings during the last few centuries and paying attention to the fact that
some basic issues like genesis of mass, inertia, charge and light require a
fresh approach for their fuller understanding, universal reality can be
pinpointed. among the aforesaid basic properties of matter, genesis of mass is
the least understood phenomenon.
the present problems in physics arise mainly due to the unresolved controversy
whether, in addition to matter and field, the universe has also a basic
substratum of some real entity. for instance, to study the mode of transmission
of light in the substratum of either ether, or voidness, requires first to
determine the structural relationship between light and the substratum
transmitting it.
a: is light in its structure independent of space structure as it would be if
space were postulated as a void?
b: or is light structurally a condition of space (ether) as it would be if a
fluid ether were postulated?
but before that, if ether's existence as the universal substratum is
postulated, it has to function not only as a carrier of light but also - and
more primarily - as the entity to give structure to matter, say the electron.
this is because light is not as basic a phenomenon as matter which has more
basic properties including mass, inertia, charge etc.
- - -
starting first with the postulate of real existence of an ether substratum,
the question arises: since the electron has mass, can we postulate mass and
density properties for the ether as well? the answer is a clear 'no' - if the
origin of mass in electron structure is to be derived from first principles.
but, if ether is postulated to be a mass-less fluid substratum, it is branded as
a hypothetical entity because the modern trend is that anything without mass is
energy-less and hence a kind of nothingness. here is the impasse created for the
past century by the relativity and quantum theories. with an empty and also
non-empty concept of space (to suit convenience) they do not allow investigation
of the genesis of mass from the first principles. the challenge is to derive
mass and charge properties of the electron through the dynamics of a mass-less
ether using new basic equations, and to compare the theoretically obtained
results with the experimentally obtained values
of electron mass and charge, and thus to prove the real existence of a non
material ether substratum, unless of course any other contemporary theories
based on the postulate of a void-space can achieve the same. further, it is not
only to explain the origin of the basic properties of mass, inertia and charge
of the electron and of matter in general but also to explain, in qualitative and
quantitative terms, the creation of electrostatic, gravitational, magnetic and
electromagnetic fields from electron structure for a broader and clearer
understanding of the existence of fields and matter in the universe.
einstein argued around the middle of the 20th century that 'field' is the most
fundamental entity in the universe, but leaving the question of the process of
creation of fields open, his can be termed a hasty conclusion. also, he said
that since we can not do away with the concept of fields, why introduce a
hypothetical carrier - ether - for the transmission of fields. with this
suggestion, again he did not give due importance to the genesis of fields
because fields, if real, will require a real substratum.
---------------------------------
alt i ãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ムâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒ ã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â©n. fãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ã ƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâ ƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚⥠yahoo! mail med adressekartotek, kalender og notisblokk.
[non-text portions of this message have been removed]