Light Eye
01-12-2007, 11:44 AM
Dear Friends,
http://www.pureenergysystems.com/academy/papers/Y-Bias_and_Angularity/
Be Well, Be Love.
David
Y-Bias and Angularity: The Dynamics of Self-Organizing Criticality From the
Zero Point to Infinity by David G. Yurth and Donald Ayres
Holladay, Utah
Composed on August 20, 2005
Published for the first time here at PES Network Academy Nov. 11, 2007
Preface On Dec. 27, 2006, David G. Yurth, who is the Director of Science and
Technology for the Nova Institute of Technology wrote the following.
At Nova Institute of Technology we have produced a scientific monograph entitled
"Y-Bias and Angularity: Self-Organizing Criticality -- From the Zero Point to
Infinity". This monograph describes a newly developed model of scalar physics
that incorporates all the rules of self-organizing criticality [P. Bak et al]
into a simple, elegant framework.
Introduction
Who we are, how we live and how we think; how the Universe functions, and how
we relate to that universe: these are the great questions of our Time. Physics,
in the classical sense that has inflamed the passions of untold thinkers in
human history, is the quest -- for the answers. It is a quest that ultimately
drives how we feel about each other, and profoundly influences how we treat the
planet we live on. It frames our attitudes and values about life and living. To
the extent that our notions about the origins of the cosmos and how Nature works
are flawed, it naturally follows that our attitudes about our relationships with
the world we live in must also be crippled. Consider, for example, the archaic
Darwinian concept that the most evolved creatures are those most effective at
slaughtering other creatures. It is this type of scientific bias which appears
to have negatively affected our ?modern? mindset, leading to a passion for
consumption and conquest that is
unrivaled in any written accounts of our history.
Today, more than at any other time in the known history of our world, we find
ourselves faced with the daunting prospect of our own self-inflicted extinction.
While the particulars are growing in number at a startling rate, the causes have
remained starkly constant.
We have come to rely on the language of Science as the means for discussing how
Nature works. If, as the current thinking about such things goes, the universe
in its entirety was created in one mighty bang, it may be true that we are but
passive expressions of the evolution of that event, however it turns out. If we
are nothing more than inert byproducts of a giant, impersonal explosion, then
what difference does it make if we exploit the planet and each other? Were
Plato's notions about fate correct? On the other hand, if all the matter,
energy, field forces and phenomena comprising the cosmos are being actively
created and deconstructed everywhere, all the time, as part of an infinite,
eternal cycle of self-organization and annihilation, our role in this process
must be apprehended in a completely different context. If we are active
participants in the process of creation, is it not in our best interest to
produce a scientific model that defines our responsibility for the
consequences of our choices and actions?
---------------------------------
Alt i ÃÂà ƒÂ‚ƒÃƒÂ‚à ƒÂ‚©n. FÃÂà ƒÂƒÃ‚‚ƒÃƒÂ‚àƒÃ‚ƒÃ‚‚Â¥ Yahoo! Mail med adressekartotek, kalender og notisblokk.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
http://www.pureenergysystems.com/academy/papers/Y-Bias_and_Angularity/
Be Well, Be Love.
David
Y-Bias and Angularity: The Dynamics of Self-Organizing Criticality From the
Zero Point to Infinity by David G. Yurth and Donald Ayres
Holladay, Utah
Composed on August 20, 2005
Published for the first time here at PES Network Academy Nov. 11, 2007
Preface On Dec. 27, 2006, David G. Yurth, who is the Director of Science and
Technology for the Nova Institute of Technology wrote the following.
At Nova Institute of Technology we have produced a scientific monograph entitled
"Y-Bias and Angularity: Self-Organizing Criticality -- From the Zero Point to
Infinity". This monograph describes a newly developed model of scalar physics
that incorporates all the rules of self-organizing criticality [P. Bak et al]
into a simple, elegant framework.
Introduction
Who we are, how we live and how we think; how the Universe functions, and how
we relate to that universe: these are the great questions of our Time. Physics,
in the classical sense that has inflamed the passions of untold thinkers in
human history, is the quest -- for the answers. It is a quest that ultimately
drives how we feel about each other, and profoundly influences how we treat the
planet we live on. It frames our attitudes and values about life and living. To
the extent that our notions about the origins of the cosmos and how Nature works
are flawed, it naturally follows that our attitudes about our relationships with
the world we live in must also be crippled. Consider, for example, the archaic
Darwinian concept that the most evolved creatures are those most effective at
slaughtering other creatures. It is this type of scientific bias which appears
to have negatively affected our ?modern? mindset, leading to a passion for
consumption and conquest that is
unrivaled in any written accounts of our history.
Today, more than at any other time in the known history of our world, we find
ourselves faced with the daunting prospect of our own self-inflicted extinction.
While the particulars are growing in number at a startling rate, the causes have
remained starkly constant.
We have come to rely on the language of Science as the means for discussing how
Nature works. If, as the current thinking about such things goes, the universe
in its entirety was created in one mighty bang, it may be true that we are but
passive expressions of the evolution of that event, however it turns out. If we
are nothing more than inert byproducts of a giant, impersonal explosion, then
what difference does it make if we exploit the planet and each other? Were
Plato's notions about fate correct? On the other hand, if all the matter,
energy, field forces and phenomena comprising the cosmos are being actively
created and deconstructed everywhere, all the time, as part of an infinite,
eternal cycle of self-organization and annihilation, our role in this process
must be apprehended in a completely different context. If we are active
participants in the process of creation, is it not in our best interest to
produce a scientific model that defines our responsibility for the
consequences of our choices and actions?
---------------------------------
Alt i ÃÂà ƒÂ‚ƒÃƒÂ‚à ƒÂ‚©n. FÃÂà ƒÂƒÃ‚‚ƒÃƒÂ‚àƒÃ‚ƒÃ‚‚Â¥ Yahoo! Mail med adressekartotek, kalender og notisblokk.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]