Tony P.
12-18-2006, 01:24 AM
the following is mentioned: e = (c + 1 / cãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ã ƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâ ƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â½) cãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ã ƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâ ƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â²
speed of light is suppose to be viarable, correct?
c is the speed of light. it's distance over time.
suppose someone is 75 kilograms. that same person ends up living 70
years. we should be able to find out the net energy the person has
before dying by taking the mass over the distance traveled. the earth
has an orbital velocity and a rotational velocity. it should be
possible to find out the total distance traveled (even though we're
essentially going in circles) within that 70 years. (i don't know how
to figure this out right now.) we should be able to plug in those
numbers into "e = (c + 1 / cãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ã ƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâ ƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â½) cãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ã ƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâ ƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â²" since c is distance over time. the
spill over from playing with those numbers should be able to give us
a net energy amount for a human being, correct? then we proceed to do
this with our sun. any numerical discrepancies hopefully will allow
us to add a new variable, a variable for dimensions.
by the way, http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/18/9/3 i think is a
good read. i know it's over a year old, and i have no idea if it was
posted to this board in the past. i'm getting an error from yahoo!
saying that the search server is busy when i try searching for the
url.
speed of light is suppose to be viarable, correct?
c is the speed of light. it's distance over time.
suppose someone is 75 kilograms. that same person ends up living 70
years. we should be able to find out the net energy the person has
before dying by taking the mass over the distance traveled. the earth
has an orbital velocity and a rotational velocity. it should be
possible to find out the total distance traveled (even though we're
essentially going in circles) within that 70 years. (i don't know how
to figure this out right now.) we should be able to plug in those
numbers into "e = (c + 1 / cãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ã ƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâ ƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â½) cãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ã ƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚âƒãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâ ƒã‚âƒãƒâ‚ã‚â‚ãƒâƒã‚â‚ãƒâ‚ã‚â²" since c is distance over time. the
spill over from playing with those numbers should be able to give us
a net energy amount for a human being, correct? then we proceed to do
this with our sun. any numerical discrepancies hopefully will allow
us to add a new variable, a variable for dimensions.
by the way, http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/18/9/3 i think is a
good read. i know it's over a year old, and i have no idea if it was
posted to this board in the past. i'm getting an error from yahoo!
saying that the search server is busy when i try searching for the
url.