PDA

View Full Version : New 2012 Time Spiral discovered



Jan Wicherink
11-06-2006, 04:15 AM
a new and interesting version of the auric time scale theory by
professor sergey smelyakov has been released today. we think that we
have discovered a golden mean time spiral within the maya long count
calendar that may be likened to terrence mckenna's time wave zero
function.

in his march 2002 article titled `the ultimate secret of the mayan
calendar' david wilcock called smelyakov's theory the `smoking gun'
that 2012 would represent the long prophesised `ascension' of
mankind, a subject covered in his on-line books.

the modified ast theory was discovered after an e-mail conversion
between sergey smelyakov and me (jan wicherink,
www.soulsofdistortion.nl) mentioning the earlier inconsistencies in
the ats theory discovered by geoff stray (www.diagnosis2012.com) and
mentioned in his book 'beyond 2012'.

today together we present this new auric time scale theory and it's
on-line auric time scale calculator that allows us to calculate the
exact bifurcation dates. the previous bifurcation point corresponded
with the start of the war on iraq and the next bifurcation point
corresponds with the 22nd of november 2006. if the theory works
we're expecting major changes around this date.

www.soulsofdistortion.nl\ats.html

the full paper can be downloaded here:
http://www.soulsofdistortion.nl/download/auric%20time%20scale%
20spirals.pdf


here's geoff stray's announcement on his diagnosis 2012 website:

hot news:

russian maths professor sergey smelyakov, who
developed the auric time scale theory with its
resonance to the 13-baktun cycle, has just approved
the modified version suggested in beyond 2012!

for those who have not read beyond 2012, it was first
announced on diagnosis2012 here:
http://www.diagnosis2012.co.uk/new3.htm#auric

summary:

he applied the golden section, or phi, to the
13-baktun cycle, making 12 foreshortening epochs, the
bounaries of which corresponded to significant
historical events.

when i wrote beyond 2012, i told the story of how i
spotted a couple of points in smelyakov's theory that
needed addressing.

firstly he originally based it on a start-date of 3113
bc (taken from arguelles' the mayan factor)... (the
actual start-date was 3114 bc in the gregorian
astronomical dating system, that allows an extra "year
zero" for calculations across the bc-ad divide).
smelyakov had pushed the original end-date on to 2013
to compensate for the missing year zero.

secondly, the time-spiral created was open-ended and
didn't spiral into itself in a time-implosion, as
implied by david wilcock. i calculated that the spiral
would do that in 2037, using smelyakov's original
calculations.

sergey smelyakov re-published the theory over 2 years
later, incorporating a revised start date and
end-date, but without any modification to the spiral
so it reached a point of spiraling into itself - an
"implosion point" or "white hole in time" as implied
by the work of peter russell.

for beyond 2012, i re-calculated the bifurcation
points so that the time implosion happened on the
winter solstice 2012, coinciding with the end of the
13-baktun cycle. this produced a bifurcation point
only 2 days from the trinity test - the first nuclear
explosion on earth...this bifurcation point was closer
to the event than any of the original ones, and
brought the whole concept into resonance with
mckenna's timewave - fixed to history by the hiroshima
explosion - the first nuclear explosion over a
populated area!

i recently sent prof. smelyakov a copy of beyond 2012,
not knowing that jan wicherink (the dutch author of
the online book souls of distortion awakening, who i
have already linked to on the 2012 books page, 2012
who's who and 2012 links pages), had been in
correspondence with him, pointing out the adjustments
to the auric time scale mentioned in beyond 2012, and
discussing the finer points.

to cut a long story short, an email correspondence
between the three of us has resulted in a new version
of the auric time scale called infinite auric spiral
of time (iast) as opposed to the original finite form
(fast).

jan wicherink has suggested a fractal version, in
which the space between each pair of bifurcation
points also becomes a phi spiral, and each of the
second-level spaces also contains an even smaller
spiral, and so on. in this way, he has found
resonances to many events, such as 9/11. this also
brings the concept even closer to mckenna's timewave
- both are fractal time concepts convering on 2012,
and resonating with nuclear explosions in 1945.

jan has got a page that is a good introduction to
this, on which he has also provided a special iats
bifurcation point calculator, that came out of a
modified version of the diagnosis2012 calendar
converter. check out jan's page here:

http://www.soulsofdistortion.nl/ats.html

sergey smelyagkov has a page about this here:

http://www.astrotheos.narod.ru/page3.htm

where he links to a new version of the auric time
scale:

http://www.astrotheos.narod.ru/downloads/part3.zip

and the new paper on the iats:

the last multi-turns of the spiral of time before it
rolls up to appear in new reality
by geoff stray, sergey smelyakov, jan wicherink.
november 3, 2006

http://www.astrotheos.narod.ru/downloads/spiral.zip

the first thing to watch out for is the coming major
bifurcation point on 22 november 2006 - just 2 weeks
away....

David Wilcock
11-06-2006, 12:18 PM
-----original message-----
from: asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=ykoszp2yh6kxydho6r9jxnbgq2w3syefzdk0_q ei_sthdhtiy2_pcxzzxfrertzpuvwmtnqu5sptqw226awn) [mailto:asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=ykoszp2yh6kxydho6r9jxnbgq2w3syefzdk0_q ei_sthdhtiy2_pcxzzxfrertzpuvwmtnqu5sptqw226awn)] on behalf of jan
wicherink

>a new and interesting version of the auric time scale theory by professor
sergey smelyakov has been released today. we think that we have discovered a
golden mean time spiral within the maya long count calendar that may be
likened to terrence mckenna's time wave zero function.

in his march 2002 article titled `the ultimate secret of the mayan calendar'
david wilcock called smelyakov's theory the `smoking gun' that 2012 would
represent the long prophesised `ascension' of mankind, a subject covered in
his on-line books.

dw: i must say this is very exciting news - and perfectly fits with a raft
of new material that i've been getting ready to write up, first in an
article form. much of this groundbreaking material i put out for the first
time at joshua tree, which we will be releasing on dvd and in a youtube
version fairly soon. i have had a lot of celestial encouragement to do this
as soon as possible.

since i got back i have been through an amazing, life-altering healing
process (too intense to even write about until now) that is so profound that
i am not at all surprised to hear that we may well be heading into a
bifurcation point. it explains the dreams, the prophecies, the energy, the
singularly life-altering changes, so many things. it is also a relief in the
sense that the "pressure" will ease off as we head into next year and the
new energy level stabilizes itself.

obviously i'm going to need to dig in there, see what you've done and
independently draw my own conclusions, but i must say it is a real delight
to see teams forming, directly or indirectly a product of things i've
written, and pushing the 'cutting edge' ahead - so that i'm not the only one
making new discoveries of substance.

when you dig into this stuff deeply enough, you start finding ways to do
more than synthesize interesting data - which, no offense, is all i'd seen
on the souls of distortion website up until now... essentially a summary of
my material with other things i'd elected not to include, for whatever
editorial or scientific reason, thrown in as well.

(case in point, i was strongly, strongly guided to completely abandon any
and all terence mckenna studies going all the way back to when i first got
online in 1995-96. every time i tried to read about it on his website, the
computer literally shut down to a dead black screen and had to be turned on
again and run through scandisk, et cetera. after three of these i got the
point, and dreams filled in the rest. later reports revealed twz to be
deeply flawed, so i would recommend not mentioning it, as it forms an attack
vector. without going into any detail, calleman is another name you'll never
see in any of my writings. there are certainly other data points that are
worthwhile that i just didn't use.)

stray's website also seemed more of a synthesis of any and all 2012-related
data that was available - sort of like a 2012 bulletin board so that in case
something interesting came along, you would find it there.

i don't mean to sound arrogant in any way... i'm actually very proud that
you've stepped into data creation as opposed to just data synthesis. i
already know that when you really dig in and start sifting through the
pieces, trying to synthesize things, sometimes you end up with more than a
synthesis - you suddenly see and publish new discoveries that push the whole
field forward. i've certainly had many, many of these, documented in the
convergence series, and up until now i've never seen this happen elsewhere.

>the modified ast theory was discovered after an e-mail conversion between
sergey smelyakov and me (jan wicherink, www.soulsofdistortion.nl) mentioning
the earlier inconsistencies in the ats theory discovered by geoff stray
(www.diagnosis2012.com) and mentioned in his book 'beyond 2012'.

today together we present this new auric time scale theory and it's on-line
auric time scale calculator that allows us to calculate the exact
bifurcation dates. the previous bifurcation point corresponded with the
start of the war on iraq and the next bifurcation point corresponds with the
22nd of november 2006. if the theory works we're expecting major changes
around this date.

dw: i have thoughts on this, of course. bifurcation points do not seem to be
quite that exact, though you may get something on the precise day the energy
is the strongest - it is a massive ramp-up that happens around that
timeframe. this is precisely what is already happening, and i'd start citing
examples but i'll save it for the article.

it'll take some time to work through - and i would recommend mirroring all
the documentation off smelyakov's website since his server does not always
make benefit glorious nation of kazakhstan...

- david

Michael Bergman
11-06-2006, 02:43 PM
after reading the new time spiral pdf i decided to go for a walk to the
river to do some sun gazing and as i was watching the bright orange sun go
down i noticed this huge boat coming out of the canal and wouldnt you know
in big bold letters it said "infinity"

you sure that bifurcation point isnt right now? :)

peace,
mikey

__________________________________________________ _______________
stay in touch with old friends and meet new ones with windows live spaces
<a href="http://clk.atdmt.com/msn/go/msnnkwsp0070000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friends.aspx&mkt=en-us">http://clk.atdmt.com/msn/go/msnnkwsp0070000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://spaces.\
live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friends.aspx&mkt=en-us</a>

Jan Wicherink
11-06-2006, 03:42 PM
--- in asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=bmsoojz4pjah1zc6wbmdhqvikq5omqcdrcmc5z wmoxd6m7duovgxm2sfurbmsvuc-wqhx33tbdqmyq4), "david wilcock" <djw333@...> wrote:
> dw: i must say this is very exciting news - and perfectly fits with
a raft of new material that i've been getting ready to write up,
first in an article form.

dear david,

thanks for your honest reply i must say, you never beat around the
bush and i appreciate it! the first improvement on the auric time
scale has been that we have been able to calculate the exact length
of each of segments in between bifurcation dates with a high
accuracy.

also a new element was added to the original theory and that is to
make the auric time scale fractal. the result is that the ats now
provides for a resolution counting days that allows it to forecast
bifurcation dates in the future. now whether this part of the theory
proves to be right has just to be tested and discovered yet. the
first indications are that bp 13 resonates with the start of the war
on iraq and that bp 14 is pointing to two weeks from now so we will
find out real soon.

i've had a strong feeling that something is going to happen maybe
related to the midterm elections in the usa and bush's last struggle
to survive. this is my 5 cents. all, speculation sure, but not
unlikely.

i don't mind you criticising my website and book, i never made it a
secret that my book and website were inspired by your work completely
(including the name and title of the website). the first time i read
your books my mind just blew and my live has never been the same. the
book is a result of my further investigations and yes it's been a
data gathering. i think especially that the work of dan winter that i
added is of key importance in understanding sacred geometry and adds
new insights to your work especially into understanding what torsion
fields actually are. that's my humble opinion. there's no single
truth out there only perspectives of the universal truth and my book
is just another colour in the multi colour spectrum.

i'm a great admirer of your work and whish you all the best, looking
really forward to your convergence movie.

regards
jan

Valarie Vousden
11-06-2006, 04:51 PM
thank you so much for this! this is something with some real meat to it (sorry,
vegetarians!). can't wait to read david's new article on it...

could someone please explain to me what exactly happens at a bifurcation? i
understand the word but want a mental picture of what happens at one of these
forks. is it merely making a choice as humantiy or do we actually split into
other levels?

i'm anxious/excited to see what nov. 22nd birngs now!

thanks all,
shanti,
valarie




---------------------------------
sponsored link

talk more and pay less. vonage can save you up to $300 a year on your phone
bill. sign up now.

[non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Charmer007
11-06-2006, 10:07 PM
david,
can you take a few moments to elaborate why you do not agree with/support
calleman's work? i am about to delve into his books and would love your
perspective before i do. i am sure there are others here who have already
explored his work that would also benefit from your point of discernment on the
matter. in your opinion, do any of his insights shed truth to the 2012
discussion? thank you.
love and light,
~mike


dw: without going into any detail, calleman is another name you'll never
see in any of my writings.

bjorn_nitmou
11-07-2006, 06:46 AM
--- in asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=iogxnamdssamjwaesnuuft6dbv3ltekjpq9e4t 5zw3c0verh7exrjog91s_mdj0oczi8aez-dszu63ga1q), valarie vousden <vjvousden@...> wrote:
> i'm anxious/excited to see what nov. 22nd birngs now!
> thanks all,
> shanti,
> valarie
________________
i fear many millions of turkeys are being slaughtered to celebrate this
bifurification point.

David Wilcock
11-07-2006, 10:57 AM
from: asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=dzvhdlycgqj56to0zljijp1jofu0hqbbowazxa 1dbm3kovcuzadufbemp_afdheq-csgpa-warm6-vohtpke) [mailto:asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=dzvhdlycgqj56to0zljijp1jofu0hqbbowazxa 1dbm3kovcuzadufbemp_afdheq-csgpa-warm6-vohtpke)] on behalf of
charmer007

>dw: without going into any detail, calleman is another name you'll never
see in any of my writings.

>david,
can you take a few moments to elaborate why you do not agree with/support
calleman's work? i am about to delve into his books and would love your
perspective before i do. i am sure there are others here who have already
explored his work that would also benefit from your point of discernment on
the matter. in your opinion, do any of his insights shed truth to the 2012
discussion? thank you.
love and light,
~mike

dw: no, i can't and i won't - hence "without going into any detail". i also
don't want to encourage posts directly to me as it violates our guidelines
and makes it into an "ask david a question" forum, collapsing the spirit of
a group discussion. better to ask yourself, if reading something i flagged,
"what about this material might have caused david to have such a firm
stance?" such a discussion won't persist here, if it happens at all. we've
been down that road before and that's not the purpose of this forum - we are
here to discuss the greater philosophy of the law of one as seen through l/l
and my own perspective, not to argue about the truthfulness of an outside
source.

notice the phrasing of my sentence. this does not mean i am trying to tell
you what to read or not to read. i encourage skepticism on every level of
seeking, and only wish to present what i feel is a perspective that is true
and of high integrity. if i am not willing to personally stand by the
character, decisions and teachings of someone, and defend them as part of my
greater team, then you will never see them mentioned.

come to think of it, there is one minor example that is ok, as it ties in to
a worthy discussion topic. i remember reading an article a few years ago in
which it was stated that on a certain day (i believe it was late in the
year), all karma would be erased - the law of karma as we know it would
cease to exist in some form. of course, nothing happened, but on a more
philosophical level there is a fundamental flaw in seeing karma as an
undesirable law that would pass away as we head through the ascension
process. the initiation book makes a very solid case, expounding on law of
one philosophy a great deal, as to why karma is not only a blessing but
absolutely necessary.

peace be with you -

- david

Chuck
11-07-2006, 02:17 PM
>could someone please explain to me what exactly happens at a bifurcation? i
understand the word but want a mental picture of what happens at one of
these >forks. is it merely making a choice as humantiy or do we actually
split into other levels?


hi valarie - i'm still working on your other questions...

but here is something that may help this one.

hyperlink
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/bifurcation_theory"http://en.wikipedia.org/wik
i/bifurcation_theory

aloha

chuck








--
no virus found in this outgoing message.
checked by avg free edition.
version: 7.1.409 / virus database: 268.13.32/523 - release date: 11/7/2006



[non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Jenifer
11-07-2006, 02:37 PM
--- in asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=lkuauvywrp5rp6_dyu6fglyrifqsyyz_3fdvv_ emksostq4gz0lc3fxgovxcccnwxzeiau_ams5ahnrggsli), "david wilcock" <djw333@...> wrote:
>
> from: asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=lkuauvywrp5rp6_dyu6fglyrifqsyyz_3fdvv_ emksostq4gz0lc3fxgovxcccnwxzeiau_ams5ahnrggsli) [mailto:asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=lkuauvywrp5rp6_dyu6fglyrifqsyyz_3fdvv_ emksostq4gz0lc3fxgovxcccnwxzeiau_ams5ahnrggsli)] on behalf of
> charmer007
>
> >dw: without going into any detail, calleman is another name you'll never
> see in any of my writings.
>
> >david,
> can you take a few moments to elaborate why you do not agree with/support
> calleman's work? i am about to delve into his books and would love your
> perspective before i do. i am sure there are others here who have already
> explored his work that would also benefit from your point of discernment on
> the matter. in your opinion, do any of his insights shed truth to the 2012
> discussion? thank you.
> love and light,
> ~mike
>
> dw: no, i can't and i won't - hence "without going into any detail". i also
> don't want to encourage posts directly to me as it violates our guidelines
> and makes it into an "ask david a question" forum, collapsing the spirit of
> a group discussion.

hello david, i just reviewed the forum guidelines and could not
find anything about not addressing posts to you. if that is the case, i
guess i am violating that guideline here.

of course, posts addressed to you don't necessarily have to be questions,
and i'm not asking you any questions here, just commenting...


better to ask yourself, if reading something i flagged,
> "what about this material might have caused david to have such a firm
> stance?" such a discussion won't persist here, if it happens at all.

hmm, i don't see why not.

we've
> been down that road before and that's not the purpose of this forum - we are
> here to discuss the greater philosophy of the law of one as seen through l/l
> and my own perspective, not to argue about the truthfulness of an outside
> source.
>
> notice the phrasing of my sentence. this does not mean i am trying to tell
> you what to read or not to read. i encourage skepticism on every level of
> seeking, and only wish to present what i feel is a perspective that is true
> and of high integrity. if i am not willing to personally stand by the
> character, decisions and teachings of someone, and defend them as part of my
> greater team, then you will never see them mentioned.

but you did mention calleman, and it's reasonable that one who is currently
investigating his work would want to know your objections. i nyself
am interested in mckenna's timewave zero model, and would like it if
you could elaborate on why you think it is "flawed" (even though its conclusions
are in sync with yours, john major jenkins' et al). note, i said i would like
it.
i get the message that such questions are disallowed here.

but if you don't want certain subjects or persons to be discussed here (this is,
after all, a discussion forum), it might be best to avoid bringing them up in
the first place.


jen

Valarie Vousden
11-07-2006, 06:31 PM
hmmmm...thanks for that. but i'm afraid that was about as clear as mud. i
appreciate you at least trying to answer my questions, chuck!

blessings,
valarie

chuck <chuck@... (/group/asc2k/post?postid=tnq9u2iahi6hqoc0ul651-aos5yffxk0yqxznwhxxznd6nzs2xmiva-pc4jmocfcwdij-tx1avjvsvaytialvvzws4y96uc)> wrote:
>could someone please explain to me what exactly happens at a
bifurcation? i
understand the word but want a mental picture of what happens at one of
these >forks. is it merely making a choice as humantiy or do we actually
split into other levels?

hi valarie - i'm still working on your other questions...

but here is something that may help this one.

hyperlink
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/bifurcation_theory"<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/bifurcation_theory">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/bi\
furcation_theory</a>

aloha chuck

Chris Hamilton
11-07-2006, 07:26 PM
ha ha!! yes val, that explanation let something to be desired. i wouldn't
have had a chance (seeing that my spatial accuity is probably 30 out of
100:), but i did see the graphic, and that helped a little. as a woman, i
say that if there is a point, and and you are observing it, that the point
will change in shape (dimensions) as you move thru time (in our 3d view). go
forwards, or backwards, in front or behind, you will see a different point,
but they all originate from the same bifurcation point. this is a guess:).
move in other directions and the causal points from the point can change.
iow, you could change the future by moving in another direction from that
bifurcation (pivotal) point. this is really interesting....anyone with other
suggestions? chris


> hmmmm...thanks for that. but i'm afraid that was about as clear as mud. i
> appreciate you at least trying to answer my questions, chuck!
>
> blessings,
> valarie

Jan Wicherink
11-08-2006, 03:34 AM
--- in asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=bbfzcuumhww5rccnrbrgtsmw2exxqhcskjlscc 2fav9yqbmmeup514cppgeqppx5vnmmbwt0bqucuadus7a), valarie vousden <vjvousden@...> wrote:
>
> hmmmm...thanks for that. but i'm afraid that was about as clear as
mud. i appreciate you at least trying to answer my questions, chuck!

hi valerie,

i can image you didn't quit understand it. but the explanation is in
the first description of the bifurcation theory:

"in mathematics, specifically in the study of dynamical systems, a
bifurcation occurs when a small smooth change made to the parameter
values (the bifurcation parameters) of a system causes a
sudden 'qualitative' or topological change in the system's long-term
dynamical behaviour. bifurcations occur in both continuous systems
(described by odes, ddes or pdes), and discrete systems (described
by maps)."

what is being said here is that even small changes in a dynamic
system (let say the world at large) can have great effects in the
overall system (in our example the world).

take your midterm elections held yesterday, whether bush is going to
win or loose his marjority in the house of representatives and the
senate may make a huge difference in the future policy of the usa
and will have also have tremedeous consequences on the political and
military stability of the world at large. that's what a 'small'
change (outcome of the elections) could have. you might say the the
midterm elections is a signigicant bifurcation point.

if you want to visualize this, just think of a tree with branches.
yesterday the future of the usa could have branched off into two
possible directions caused by this pivital point determined by your
your midterm elections.

the ats theory is trying to catch those bifurcation points in
history that made a huge difference in the evolotion of mankind.

hope this explains it a bit more.
jan

Charmer007
11-08-2006, 04:19 PM
jan,
i found this to be a much clearer explanation. i am sure many on this
group thank you. i was trying to download the full file of the ats from the
links you gave us but was not able due to errors that seem to be on the end of
the uploader. i could, however, gain access to your 12 page .pdf file. is the
12 page file from your site the same as the full version? if not, is there
another way to get the full version?
love and light,
~mike



in a message dated 11/08/06 05:59:15 eastern standard time,
jan.wicherink@... (/group/asc2k/post?postid=z9w4mpx-nx3zdyvywknmoy5rsinv_lsyzcjk4vzkjbxrihxuefhe1kaibg 4ddsiarbdufubmzqs-8_lypoo6m5y) writes:

the ats theory is trying to catch those bifurcation points in
history that made a huge difference in the evolotion of mankind.

hope this explains it a bit more.
jan

Jan Wicherink
11-09-2006, 02:55 PM
--- in asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postid=j3gfm-q38x1dit4h8wptad8cy8dfjmffe1hrfgqhhydn1ullmjzkv65m 7xg9krhb_zsa1n3jy-q53utyhamoag), charmer007 <charmer007@...> wrote:
>
> jan,
> i found this to be a much clearer explanation. i am sure many
on this group thank you. i was trying to download the full file of the
ats from the links you gave us but was not able due to errors that seem
to be on the end of the uploader. i could, however, gain access to
your 12 page .pdf file. is the 12 page file from your site the same as
the full version? if not, is there another way to get the full version?
> love and light,
> ~mike

hi mike,

the 12 page pdf with the title 'the last multi-turns of the spiral of
time before it rolls up to appear in new reality' is the full paper.

you can download it here:
http://www.soulsofdistortion.nl/download/auric%20time%20scale%20spirals.pdf


my webpage about the ats is http://www.soulsofdistortion.nl/ats.html

you may have been trying dr.smelyakov's website, unfortenately his
website doesn't have a very good performance and you may have lost
connection with his site.
here's his url:

http://www.astrotheos.narod.ru/

his complete auric time scale theory is quit eleborate and comprises 9
parts, they can all be accessed from his main page. all that is
required is patience :-)


regards
jan