PDA

View Full Version : History Of World In Molecules Of Life


Light Eye
09-15-2006, 11:54 AM
Dear Friends,

Long, but worth the read...

http://www.studycenter.com/downloads/Written_for_a_Generation_to_Come.pdf

Be Well, Be Love.

David


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Nelson Mac
09-16-2006, 05:20 AM
More evidence of changes by the mainstream media! This is in reegard to the
arctic Ice Cap.


http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/09/15/arctic.ice.reut/index.html

Love and light,
Nelson

Light Eye <universal_heartbeat2012@... (/group/asc2k/post?postID=sQY1bpmEr8lcPcF7F0SasRtq7QOTo5zhLAZnAM G_udNw-JHWsw4Xn97IxFmTSo0Hjz_Eh5krnhxOMP6vKrEmqUcECEJZ5g)> wrote:
Dear Friends,Long, but worth the read...

http://www.studycenter.com/downloads/Written_for_a_Generation_to_Come.pdf
Be Well, Be Love. David

antoinettecressy
09-16-2006, 11:13 AM
--- In asc2k@yahoogroups.com (/group/asc2k/post?postID=dkk6kaHGwQ-6hlghU68Q4hVileqEgsBrK5wlYsUIcO3jwaul3ku-2MhwrUQD2SD4FPw9Qi8WHww398PN), Light Eye <universal_heartbeat2012@...>
wrote:
>

>
Hi David,
I've followed the link...just started reading...thanks for the heads
up...as you say, well worth the read.
Take care
Anne

Ron Erickson
09-16-2006, 03:34 PM
David: Long, but worth the read...
http://www.studycenter.com/downloads/Written_for_a_Generation_to_Come.pdf

Ron: As you say, it is long and certainly contains interesting information, but
soon after presenting its "scientific" introduction, it quickly gets down to
what is apparently its "real agenda". Admittedly, I have not read the entire
document, but unless I've totally misinterpreted it, this is racist Christian
propaganda - disguised as science. Actually, Christ, himself, seemed to have a
clear and balanced view, and I don't believe that he would have endorsed the
dark implications presented in this document. A balanced perspective is
essential for all of us - and especially for those who study the LOO. All I
suggest is that if any members of the asc2k are not already doing so, consider a
broad range of philosophical, spiritual and religious materials (including the
Ra material and LOO) before deciding what "rings true". Defnitely check out
Michael Tsarion's work (for example, video lecture:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8545585184878490822). Tsarion may seem
like a spiritual rebel to some, perhaps even the anti-Christ to Christians who
misunderstand the nature of the soul (and it's role in the Trinity), but what he
has to say about free thought and the true nature of the soul (as opposed to the
ego) needs to understood by the world as we move into the forth-coming eras of
mankind and perhaps post-mankind.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Petrus
09-17-2006, 02:29 PM
> Ron: As you say, it is long and certainly contains interesting
> information, but soon after presenting its "scientific" introduction, it
> quickly gets down to what is >apparently its "real agenda". Admittedly, I
> have not read the entire document, but unless I've totally misinterpreted
> it, this is racist Christian propaganda -

I would agree, but the one thing I found of value is that I have never seen
a more eloquent description of the motivations of many atheists:-
'Fortunately, they have answered that question for us: Oxford zoologist
Richard Dawkins said, " Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually
fulfilled atheist," (unintentionally confirming Colossians 1:21's assertion
that intellectual position is dictated by spiritual condition.) (Johnson)
Aldous Huxley revealed ulterior motives as well, saying that the scientist
"is also concerned to prove that there is no valid reason why he personally
should not do as he wants to do. For myself, as no doubt for most of my
contemporaries, the philosophy of meaningless was essentially an instrument
of liberation. from a certain system of morality. We objected to the
morality because it interfered with our sexual freedom."'

I have seen very few examples of strong atheism which I did not feel were
primarily an act of rebellion against theism, rather than a genuine believe
on the part of the adherent in the lack of a creative principle. I
apologise for bringing this up if it is off topic, but it is an issue which
has caused me some emotional pain of late...Wikipedia has been taken over by
atheist fundamentalists, who are preventing anyone from submitting anything
unless it adheres to their particular brand of materialistic pedantry.

In order to try and bring this somewhat back on-topic...I'm trying to
remember...Does Ra say anything about atheism in particular?